Abortion Debate: March For Life Rally Closes Ottawa Roads

CP  |  By Posted: 05/10/2012 2:32 pm Updated: 05/10/2012 11:23 pm

OTTAWA - Thousands of people marched through the streets of Ottawa on Thursday in an annual protest to end legalized abortions.

Throngs of teenagers, given the day off by their Roman Catholic schools to attend the event, sang "Life is Life, Na Na Na Na Na," as they drifted slowly away from Parliament Hill into the streets.

They were joined by religious leaders and people of all ages, including families with small children, in a march that lasted nearly two hours.

The protest came just two weeks after a Conservative MP tried to reopen the national abortion debate.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper rejected Stephen Woodworth's private member's motion in late April, but that didn't stop critics from accusing the Tories of using the proposal as a back-door way to rekindle debate over the sensitive topic.

While it was difficult to measure the size of the crowd on the Hill, police estimated that there were fewer people than the 15,000 that the Campaign Life Coalition claimed attended last year's event.

The protesters called on the government to legislate protection for all human beings from the time of conception to the moment of natural death.

Regardless of the prime minister's insistence that his government won't reopen the abortion debate, it's already on, said Bruce Clemenger, president of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.

"We cannot afford not to have the conversation," he told the crowd. "I say Parliament needs to catch up with what Canadians believe."

A few dozen pro-choice protesters were also on hand, some standing off to the side chanting "my body, my choice."

Woodworth's non-binding motion, which was debated for an hour last month, called for a special committee to study a criminal code provision that could redefine when human life begins.

It's expected to return to the House of Commons either next month or in September for another hour of debate and a vote.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story indicated the march took place on Monday. It took place on Thursday.

Related on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Which Cabinet Ministers Oppose Abortion?

    The <a href="http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Find_Your_MP" target="_hplink">Campaign Life Coalition provides a listing of MPs who support and oppose abortion rights</a>. The list is based on voting records, previous comments and questionnaire responses. Here is a list of Conservative cabinet ministers who, according to the Coalition, oppose abortion. (CP)

  • Rob Nicholson

    Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. (CP)

  • Vic Toews

    Minister of Public Safety. (CP)

  • Peter Van Loan

    Leader of the Government in the House of Commons. (CP)

  • Jason Kenney

    Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism. (CP)

  • Gerry Ritz

    Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board. (Handout)

  • Ed Fast

    Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway. (CP)

  • Lynne Yelich

    Minister of State for Western Economic Diversification. (Handout)

  • Gary Goodyear

    Minister of State for Science and Technology and for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario. (Handout)



Loading Slideshow...
  • Where The Parties Stand On Abortion

    Here's a look at the official position of Canada's federal parties, and how the controversial debate has reared its head in recent years. <em>With files from CBC</em>

  • Conservative Party

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper has repeatedly said that he has no interest in addressing the issue head-on.<br><br>"As long as I am prime minister we are not opening the abortion debate," Mr. Harper said in April 2011. "The government will not bring forward any such legislation, and any such legislation that is brought forward will be defeated as long as I am prime minister." (CP)

  • NDP

    NDP leader Tom Mulcair has stated that his caucus is unanimous in its opposition to the private member's motion calling on Parliament to look at whether a fetus is a human being, but he plans to force his MPs to vote along party lines.<br><br>"We're resolutely in favour of women's right to choose," Mulcair declared. (CP)

  • Liberal Party

    Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae has stressed that the abortion issue is matter of individual conscience. Rae expressed his personal opposition to reopening the debate, but said Liberal MPs will be allowed to vote "their conscience" rather than force them to toe the party line.<br><br>"Our position on reproductive choice, my position on reproductive choice is very, very clear. It has been for decades. The position is it's a person's right to choose." (CP)

  • Planned Parenthood Funding Controversy

    Saskatoon-Humboldt MP Brad Trost tells Saskatchewan's ProLife Association in April 2011 that the federal government has decided to cut funding to the International Planned Parenthood Federation, a decision he says was influenced by anti-abortion supporters.<br><br>"I cannot tell you specifically how we used it, but those petitions were very, very useful and they were part of what we used to defund Planned Parenthood because it has been an absolute disgrace that that organization and several others like it have been receiving one penny of Canadian taxpayers' dollars," Trost said.<br><br>Maurice Vellacott, a Conservative MP from Saskatoon-Wanuskewin, also calls for Planned Parenthood to be defunded.<br><br>Vellacott says the controversy over the funding "exposed the lies and destructiveness of IPPF's agenda."<br><br>"It exposes what this abortion giant is surreptitiously trying to achieve worldwide."<br><br>International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda approves funding. (CP)

  • 'Coerced' Abortion Law

    Conservative Winnipeg MP Rod Bruinooge proposes "Roxanne's Law" in 2010, a bill that would penalize anyone who "coerced" a woman into ending her pregnancy against her will.<br><br>"It's not just as simple as feeling pressured to get an abortion; there is a lot of discussion of sex-selection abortion these days, as well," Bruinooge told the Winnipeg Free Press. "It's part of the overall topic of intimidation that goes towards a pregnant woman."<br><br>Bruinooge insisted the bill wasn't meant to force Parliament to wade into the debate banned by Harper, stating that nothing in his bill made it illegal to abort a fetus.<br><br>But the Liberals and New Democrats saw it as a backdoor entry into the touchy topic.<br><br>"How is an abortion bill not an abortion bill?" said then-Liberal MP Anita Neville. "This certainly introduces discussion into the House of Commons and it is a rather sneaky way of doing it."<br><br>Then-NDP leader Jack Layton echoed her concerns. "You have got to wonder what is really going on here."<br><br>The bill was defeated in December of 2010, with 178 votes for and 97 against it. Harper and many Conservatives voted against it and 10 Liberals supported it. The NDP was unanimously against it. (Handout)

  • Maternal Health

    International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda discloses for the first time in April 2011 that Canada will not fund abortions in its G8 child and maternal health-care initiative for developing countries.<br><br>Keith Martin, then-Liberal MP who had defected from the Tories years earlier, expressed outrage. "People here are perplexed and wondering why Canada is rolling back the clock and depriving women in developing countries from having the same rights to basic health care and access to abortion as women in Canada," he said.<br><br>Then-NDP leader Jack Layton accused the Tories of putting Canada on side with former U.S. president George Bush, who reduced support for abortion-related aid.<br><br>"It's picking up the banner that George Bush used to carry, and I think that that's not something that would be supported by the majority of Canadians, that's for sure," Layton said.<br><br>On June 25, Canada pledged $1.1 billion to a global initiative on maternal and child health for developing countries - a disproportionately high amount compared to other G8 countries. Canada did not allow for its share to be used in the funding of abortions. (CP)

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Thousands of people marched through the streets of Ottawa on Thursday in an annual protest to end legalized abortions.Throngs of teenagers, given the day off by their Roman Catholic schools t...
OTTAWA - Thousands of people marched through the streets of Ottawa on Thursday in an annual protest to end legalized abortions.Throngs of teenagers, given the day off by their Roman Catholic schools t...
Filed by Brian Trinh  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 224
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
smduib
truth is not relative
01:49 AM on 05/16/2012
Wonderful to see people come out in support of life! In the US, these marches gather hundreds of thousands. For those who aim to protect our most innocent, the abortion debate is far from over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Mutter
07:28 PM on 05/13/2012
So,where were the riot squads,tear gas,rubber bullets etc.Oh they weren't unionized.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
09:57 PM on 05/12/2012
I have never heard of a full term fetus ready to be born being aborted and I'm sure it would be in the news. I don't believe any doctor would do this unless it is the mothers life or the babies and only a Catholic Dr. would choose to save the baby and let the mother die regardless of what the family wants. Even then it's never full term and it's very rare. If a women carries to full term she must want the baby. Most abortions are preformed in the first trimester.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
10:19 PM on 05/12/2012
Here is a link Canada Does Not Need an Abortion Law. www.arcc-cdac.ca/action/dont-need-abortion-law.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileen Warren
12:09 AM on 05/13/2012
Think I am going to be quoting from that somewhere in the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurel1us
They're eating her!Then they'll eat meeee
10:45 AM on 05/11/2012
I'm so embarrassed to be Canadian right now. Disgraceful, uneducated, and blind to the consequences. These people are pustulent boils on the underside of canadian politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileen Warren
12:07 AM on 05/13/2012
I think they came from south of the border.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurel1us
They're eating her!Then they'll eat meeee
12:26 AM on 05/13/2012
Hahah that would be an awesome name for a horror movie. I might steal the title. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileen Warren
12:50 AM on 05/13/2012
Hey would love to see it on a marquee. :))
photo
smduib
truth is not relative
01:58 AM on 05/16/2012
What do you think the economic and societal consequences will be of a birth rate below replacement value, as we have in Canada? One only needs to look to Greece...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurel1us
They're eating her!Then they'll eat meeee
07:38 AM on 05/16/2012
Pffffft, the world doesn't need more people. Below replacement value? Sounds great!
06:23 AM on 05/11/2012
I hope Harper's supporters will continue to pressure him for their voice to be heard. After all he got all their votes for his support over anti-abortion. Although I am not in their political opinion over this issue, I still feel that politicians cannot and should not use people like this to get elected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurel1us
They're eating her!Then they'll eat meeee
10:53 AM on 05/11/2012
Hahaha! Then you probably voted for the wrong party. The right-wing has a time honoured tradition of using bigots and the uneducated to gain power...followed by reneging on their promises to the foolhardy. They can pressure him all they want, but Harper isn't as uneducated as the people who vote for him. Canada isn't the bible belt, and he can't win next election on a platform that isn't supported by at least some logic.
04:37 AM on 05/11/2012
I wonder if they value life as much when it comes to the death penalty for criminals? It seems in the US that most people who are anti-choice are also pro-death penalty down there. Does the same apply up here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
06:30 AM on 05/11/2012
Yep...and most are wannabe Americans...of the coo-coo cluckin' clan segregation state variety
photo
smduib
truth is not relative
01:39 AM on 05/16/2012
Nope, I'm pro life and against the death penalty. I don't know why the two are always mentioned together. It's apples & oranges.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dale Chan
Hope is both panacea and poison.
03:35 AM on 05/11/2012
25000 people die every day from hunger
Over 100000 documented civilian deaths in Iraq

I'm not an all or nothing kind of guy. I try to steer away from either or fallacies. I need to ask though.

How many people need to starve to death before we do anything about that? How much collateral damage does there have to be before we stop warring? Exactly how do you measure the value of one life against another?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
02:00 AM on 05/11/2012
The Church advocating a political position and publicly opposing the Law of the Land? Time to rescind their tax-free status.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
To decimate is to reduce by one tenth.
10:35 AM on 05/11/2012
Catholic students given the day off to attend the event - time to rescind public funding of separate schools in Ontario.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
temenos
castigat ridendo mores
01:55 AM on 05/11/2012
Meanwhile back alley abortionists are rubbing their hands in the fervent hope of profitable days ahead.
01:55 AM on 05/11/2012
Harper, you promised not to open the issue on abortion, I know it is not easy to keep your promises but glad you do!!!
Go Harper Go
01:26 AM on 05/11/2012
NEVER should a government dictate what a person can do with their own bodies. It's not ethical, it's not constitutional. It's down right cruel and inhumaine.

Human Right: We have the right to live free and do as we see fit for ourselves in our country. It's a given right to any and all citizens of Canada. If we start stripping people (more importantly here, stripping genders) of rights, you might as well use the paper rights are printed on as toilet paper cause they will no longer hold any merit.

Religion: Keep it out of this debate (and every other debate on any topic throughout history and yet to be topics in the future) because for the activists out there saying "it's God's destiny for you" maybe you should preach that saying towards the Same Sex topics. It's all the activists in this world that has destroyed religion. The first rule, Only God Can Judge has been anhilated by every person who decides to try and speak on His behalf. Religion was meant to give people the safe haven to believe in a greater power to help them through trying times. It wasn't meant to be used as a weapon to control and manipulate people. "Love thy Neighbour" that's turned into a joke, thanks to everyone in this world who has used religion as a reason for why something much be banned.
01:53 AM on 05/11/2012
I tend to agree with you, although not 100% sure about suicide and assisted which are still illegal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
01:55 AM on 05/11/2012
So you think it is perfectly fine to stop a full-term baby part way down the birth canal, smash open the top of it's head, and use forceps to scramble the brains.

It is called a partial-birth abortion, and it is currently perfectly legal in Canada.

there is lots of room for debate.

unfortunately, extremists like you seem to have taken over the converrsation.
02:04 AM on 05/11/2012
I'm a liberal for a very good reason. Since every activist in this country wants to take someone's rights at some point.

I'm a lesbian, married lesbian, at one point they wanted (and still do want to take that away).

And I do know what that is. We get taught that during university. But do you know what it's sometimes needed? So that the mother can live. A mother who already has children? Ever thought about those women? Who have other children? So you are prepared to say that those children don't deserve to have their mother live? That they don't need their mother more than their sibling?

I'm liberal, because I have met an 11 yrs old who was raped. Her body nor mentality would have survived the ordeal. Those like you, aren't protecting the needs of those who do need it as an option. People like you, are willing to kill other human beings instead.
02:25 AM on 05/11/2012
my sister in law was diagnosed with tumor after she found out she was pregnant. It was either her or the child. She choose her life and if she didn't do so, 4 years later, she'd not have given birth to my niece and my nephew wouldn't have a sister nor a mother had she choosen to abort.

It's not as black and white as everyone thinks.
01:11 AM on 05/11/2012
Any country that can permit the slaughter of its innocent children through abortion is not a civilized nation. If anyone, after watching an actual abortion or seeing pictures of one, was still "pro-choice", they would be no better morally than Hitler or a serial murderer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
06:28 AM on 05/11/2012
Most of you pro-lifers that I've listened to are also pro-death penalty, and also are very cavalier when the innocent are executed.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
08:37 AM on 05/11/2012
let me guess.......you are pro- d e ath penalty and a Christian??....am I right or am I right?
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
01:08 AM on 05/11/2012
Harper is playing moderate on this one to score points as a moderate, but my guess he is actually hoping the time is right to climb out from under the rock he is hiding under on this issue and strike. Maybe he thinks the Charter of Rights needs to be destroyed (watered down) first and this is just a probe to gauge public opinion.
01:47 AM on 05/11/2012
Only bonus is that, if he overturns that law, Canada will be screaming for an election before 5 yrs is up and Harper would be out of office.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
07:46 PM on 05/11/2012
So will any MP that supports that and they should be warned of the consequences of being a brainless Harperdroid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileen Warren
01:51 AM on 05/12/2012
If Canada screamed for an election bbefore 5 years is up,he would prorogue parliament again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phatbiker
Dentalfloss tycoon
01:04 AM on 05/11/2012
4000 tuned up, pfffft. More people turn out for 420. I bet most of them had to leave early because they had homework and chores.
01:59 AM on 05/11/2012
Not many, they dont have the money behind them that organized labour does, and cant afford to hire paid activists.

I dont know why, but it is only the last few years that I have noticed these protesters in Canada, maybe I wasnt paying attention.

I have no problems with protesters, provided they do not
1. break the law
2. cause disruption to services that have no competition
3. Will cost me money if they get what they want

Therefore anti abortion protesters, do your thing!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
11:43 PM on 05/10/2012
What kind of people carry little plastic fetuses around with them? Do they think that will influence anyone who believes in the right to choose! Nobody has the right to tell women what they can or can not do with their own bodies! They are not pro life they are pro control right wing religious radicals!