Althia Raj
GET UPDATES FROM Althia:

Sex: A Tell-All Exhibition At Ottawa Museum Has Age Limit Raised After Minister Expresses Concerns

Posted: Updated: 05/18/2012 4:04 pm

Sex A Tell All Exhibition Ottawa
Canada’s Science and Technology Museum has abruptly raised the age limit for a Sex: A Tell-All Exhibition after Heritage Minister James Moore's office raised concerns and more than 50 individuals complained.

Canada’s Science and Technology Museum has abruptly raised the age limit for a controversial sex exhibit after Heritage Minister James Moore's office raised concerns and more than 50 individuals complained.

Moore’s office called museum president Denise Amyot to complain thatSex: A Tell-All Exhibition is completely inappropriate.

“The purpose of the Museum of Science and Technology is to foster scientific and technological literacy throughout Canada,” said Moore’s spokesperson James Maunder.

“It is clear this exhibit does not fit within that mandate. This content cannot be defended, and is insulting to taxpayers,” he said.

The sex exhibition was designed for children 12 and up by the Montreal Science Centre to complement sexual health curriculums. It is scheduled to open Friday, but already the Ottawa museum is facing a backlash, with one group asking the Heritage Minister to shut it down completely.

Because the museum operates at arm’s length, Moore’s office said there’s nothing he can do about it. But Moore's spokesperson urged Canadians to contact Amyot directly.

The museum’s vice president of public affairs, Yves St-Onge, said Wednesday that management had decided to raise the age limit for children unaccompanied by an adult from 12 to 16 after receiving more complaints than anticipated.

It also pulled an animated video informing children about masturbation.

“It was seen as particularly sensitive by many that have seen it,” St-Onge told The Huffington Post Canada.

He insisted the changes the Crown corporation made to the exhibit were not mandated by the minister.

“They called us and they asked questions about it but they did not ask us to do anything about it,” he said, adding that he didn’t have the authority to specify what concerns were raised.

The sex exhibit garnered few complaints when it was first shown in Montreal in 2010 or even in Regina last year, said Julie Mailhot, a press relations officer with the Montreal Science Centre.

“There was no controversy, absolutely no controversy,” she said.

The Montreal Science Centre developed the exhibit in close collaboration with a scientific committee that recommended the target age should be 12 and above, she said.

“Because around the age of 12 young girls start to develop their hormones and it’s the same for boys, so that’s why they said it was the right time,” Mailhot said.

The Institute for Marriage and Family Canada, which visited the show last week, believes the “erotic and titillating” exhibit doesn't belong in a museum.

In an open letter to the Heritage Minister, Dave Quist, the Institute’s executive director, said the exhibit approves and promotes anal sex, multiple partners and sex without emotional and marital commitment.

“Surely these topics are not a part of the mandate of the CMST [Canadian Museum of Science and Technology],” Quist wrote. “This exhibit includes what can only be described as soft pornography, expressly designed for youth in the context of a museum.”

After going through a long list of the exhibit’s features which the Institute found objectionable, including an area where visitors are encouraged to isolate erogenous zones on foam bodies and a section where the words “pussy, snatch, bush” and “prick, cock, dick” are mentioned, Quist asked for the whole thing to be shut down.

“Minister Moore, I would respectfully ask that this exhibition be cancelled,” he wrote.

St-Onge said the exhibit was designed to engage children at the very moment when sex is becoming an issue that is relevant to their lives.

“They need information, otherwise they will find it in the wrong place, or they may not find it at all and may not understand fully what is happening with their bodies and their lives and end up making right decisions or wrong decisions about sexuality that might have consequences in the future,” he said.

The exhibit, which touches on STIs and homosexuality, also includes graphic images, such as nude photos of real-life models and a video on how to use condoms that uses a drawing of an anatomically-correct penis. But the area is tucked away so that parents with small children won’t be shocked by nudity on their way to visit the museum's well-loved trains.

St-Onge acknowledged he was puzzled as to why the exhibit is causing such controversy since displays in Montreal and Regina went off without a hitch.

“I don’t understand … I would really like to understand why the market in Ottawa — why is it that we are in such a different situation than Montreal or Regina?”

Sex: A Tell-All Exhibition is expected to cost $60,000 — money that will come from museum admissions rather than its government-funded operating budget. The controversial exhibit is expected to run until the end of December.

Loading Slideshow...
  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)

  • (Althia Raj/HuffPost)


Loading Slideshow...
  • 25. Grande Prairie, Alberta

  • 24. Kitchener, Ontario

  • 23. Kingston, Ontario

  • 22. Moncton, New Brunswick

  • 21. Fredericton, New Brunswick

  • 20. Fort McMurray, Alberta

  • 19. Red Deer, Alberta

  • 18. Surrey, British Columbia

  • 17. Quebec City, Quebec

  • 16. St John's, Newfoundland

  • 15. Sudbury, Ontario

  • 14. Kelowna, British Columbia

  • 13. Hamilton, Ontario

  • 12. Regina, Saskatchewan

  • 11. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

  • 10. Halifax, Nova Scotia

  • 9. London, Ontario

  • 8. Victoria, British Columbia

  • 7. Winnipeg, Manitoba

  • 6. Ottawa, Ontario

  • 5. Vancouver, British Columbia

  • 4. Montreal, Quebec

  • 3. Calgary, Alberta

  • 2. Edmonton, Alberta

  • 1. Toronto, Ontario

Loading Slideshow...
  • 25. Grande Prairie, Alberta

  • 24. Kitchener, Ontario

  • 23. Kingston, Ontario

  • 22. Moncton, New Brunswick

  • 21. Fredericton, New Brunswick

  • 20. Fort McMurray, Alberta

  • 19. Red Deer, Alberta

  • 18. Surrey, British Columbia

  • 17. Quebec City, Quebec

  • 16. St John's, Newfoundland

  • 15. Sudbury, Ontario

  • 14. Kelowna, British Columbia

  • 13. Hamilton, Ontario

  • 12. Regina, Saskatchewan

  • 11. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

  • 10. Halifax, Nova Scotia

  • 9. London, Ontario

  • 8. Victoria, British Columbia

  • 7. Winnipeg, Manitoba

  • 6. Ottawa, Ontario

  • 5. Vancouver, British Columbia

  • 4. Montreal, Quebec

  • 3. Calgary, Alberta

  • 2. Edmonton, Alberta

  • 1. Toronto, Ontario

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:47 AM on 05/18/2012
This just in......Driver's Ed leads to increase in Automobile Accidents. Driver's Ed in our publicly funded schools is contributing to to the slaughter on our roads!!

Does Stephen Harper know?

What Would Dief Do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mr Lyons
views of an meat-eating socialist
10:31 AM on 05/18/2012
I'm a prude, not a religious prude, but a prude just the same. Saying that, even i can see the educational benefits of this.If the the religious right played their cards right, they would have said nothing and the exhibit would have come and gone without anyone knowing the difference, but , giving this all the publicity, the attendance is going threw the roof.Having Dean Del Mastro saying " if you want to see an exhibit like this go to your local adult video store" is not helping their cause.But hey, i always take my moral compass from a used car salesman( Del Mastro Motors,Peterborough ON)
i'm lucky my tv is tough and the couch pillows are fluffy or i'd be buying a new set today.
03:47 PM on 05/17/2012
Why does this sound like a good idea to anyone?
Our children lose their innocence soon enough without exposing them to crass vocabulary and images that only minimize the value of their own sexuality and influence their future sexual relations. Once an obscene image is viewed or a crass word is heard, it is forever etched into a young person's mind.
That is... just WRONG!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugi
09:50 PM on 05/23/2012
Oh sorry, yes let's tell them a stork dropped them off until they're 18. Do you honestly think these descriptions and depictions can hold a single candle to the stuff kids see at the movies/ on MTV/ in video games?? smh
12:08 PM on 05/17/2012
Is it really so bad that they raised the age requirement for an UNACCOMPANIED child? I mean really? A 12 year old being able to freely sift through exhibits including discussions of anal sex, adult euphemisms for genitalia, encouragement to keep secrets from parents...?

Parents should be the gatekeeper of these topics. Children should be taught about this stuff, but frankly, much of this seems to be topics of a more advanced level of sexuality.

So really, what is wrong with requiring a 12, 13, 14, 15 year old to be accompanied by an adult to such an exhibit?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugi
09:51 PM on 05/23/2012
No sane but hormonal 12-15 yr who NEEDS this information would ever ask their parent to go.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:22 AM on 05/17/2012
Shocked!!! I say I am truly shocked! Isn't Ottawa the city where politicians publicly "engage in intercourse" with Canadians?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Werd
pizza, chocolate, beer, go
09:19 AM on 05/17/2012
sexual health. eewww grody to the max
08:58 AM on 05/17/2012
The first girl to get pregnant from my grade school class parents' showed up at the school and had a discussion with the principal and the teacher about the sex ed class. They didn't want there daughter "Tarnished" (needed to ask my Mom what that was). She left the class when the sex ed topic was discussed.
In grade 10 she left school because she was pregnant and her parent kicked her out of the house. Her parents were "born again christian".
The funny part is when I as older I would see her father always sitting at perverts row at the hotel.
Teach your kids about sex and they will be better off.
12:26 PM on 05/17/2012
Yes. Teach your own children. Not letting others decide that perhaps porn is a good tool for this as some teachers have also tried to do. Teaching a child about basic biology and nature as well as mentioning (gasp!) love. No one on either extreme side of these issues mentions love anymore, but I see the word sex a billion times a day, everyday. How telling.
07:19 AM on 05/17/2012
For hot no holds barred sex, kids can watch their local satellite network movie channel late nights on weekends fer chriss's sake. Did you know that? I didn't. And it is not ppv, just the regular movie channel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
monstersfromtheid
micro-bio is empty - and staying that way
02:46 PM on 05/17/2012
easier than that. Two words

Inter.

net.
03:48 AM on 05/17/2012
I dunno ... I really wanted to agree with the museum, but after reading this I`m not so sure. I really dislike when slang words are used in educational information, some slang kids actually would have never heard before, I know I didn`t until I was much older. I`m on the fence, I want kids to be kids, but we shouldn`t be afraid to talk about the realities of life with them, especially at that age as they`re going through puberty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugi
09:55 PM on 05/23/2012
Trust me, these teens have heard that slang and much more. Stigmatizing talking about sex just shuts the door to communication and leads to unsafe sex and unhappy people. Body parts are not dirty and sex is not dirty. Treating the words that describe them as dirty only promotes the ugly stigma.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigLittle
02:22 AM on 05/17/2012
Summerworks festival had funding withdrawn. A cd cover offended him, same thing. Then the manufactured crisis over the film at the National Library, staged by a Conservative Party pilot fish. And more. This is just the latest witch hunt.

"The Ministry of Heritage" is Stalinist, and all of its business could be transferred to the Canada Council, where it could be administered at arms-length for a fraction of the cost of Ministerial business carried out by the hoards of political operatives who infest the civil service.
05:57 PM on 05/17/2012
I think the National Library fuss was because a group wanted the film cancelled. Moore insisted it be shown. I would not call this a witch hunt. This exhibit is treading on a sensitive area where people have different views on how it should be presented in the public sphere. Since it is funded by taxpayers, they have a right to speak out. The exhibit is not being shut down by the government. Moore is simply encouraging those who disagree with the exhibit to complain to the museum. What is your problem with that? And personally, I would not trust the Canada Council any more than I would trust the bureaucrats.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigLittle
01:23 AM on 05/18/2012
Fred Litwin, a long time CPC pilot fish, organized the right-wing film series at the National Library, and they manufactured the controversy to get some publicity, and John Baird ran with it for his own purposses.

Then, the Harper government used the trumped up "crisis" as an excuse to remove the use of the Library Theatre from the public, who have been using that theatre since Jimmy Moore was in diapers.

It was disgusting, but it just shows how low this gov't really is.

The Canada Council operates free from political interference, and the kind of childish, under-handed dirty tricks that went on at the National Library under this Ministers watch, by his friends. Disgusting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
01:52 AM on 05/17/2012
And along with their destructive Alberta Reform Party politics they also bring along their stilted prairie viewpoint on sex and art. Can't wait to see the end of this 'reign of error' in 2015.
photo
Charles Howarth
“I became insane, with long intervals of horribl
01:43 AM on 05/17/2012
I would be inclined to say that a high percentage of Ottawa tweens would likely consider this shocking stuff as 'Vanilla'...Goes to show how out of touch the Government really is...
11:41 PM on 05/16/2012
Unbelievable. Haven't the CONS heard that there's that there Interweb thingy where teens can get all kinds of information about sex? And that the Interweb machine might contain erroneous information that could mislead kids...Given that the exhibit uses factual information, I don't see what the problem is. But then, I'm not a prudish, bible-thumping, sex-obsessed fundamentalist. Get over it already.
photo
Charles Howarth
“I became insane, with long intervals of horribl
01:42 AM on 05/17/2012
Well said! Cheers
10:47 PM on 05/16/2012
if you check out the group raising the complaint, you see that Dave Quist, the Executive Director, prior to joining the Institute of Marriage and Family Canada, held the role of Executive Assistant to a Member of Parliament for six years, following which he was named Director of Operations to the Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper when he was Leader of the Official Opposition. as for he next person on the bios, Andrea Mrozek, Manager of Research and Communications, she was an intern at the Fraser Institute. This seems similar to Ethical Oil, a group set up by partisan conservatives to support conservative policies. with such seeming partisan aims, it is not surprising that their complaint to the minister is acted on quickly.
11:46 AM on 05/17/2012
Nice find!
10:09 PM on 05/16/2012
As someone from Saskatchewan, I can attest to the fact that there was no mass media exposure of this exhibit being in Regina. This is the first we are hearing about it. From the reaction in Saskatchewan right now, it wouldn't have gone off "without a hitch" if the papers had reported it then.