A Vancouver filmmaker and a B.C. anti-supertanker campaign are garnering major attention from a dazzling video showing locales on the route for Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway pipeline.

The video called "This is not an Enbridge animation" is in response to an erroneous animation by the energy giant showing a tanker traversing an open channel — which is actually populated by several islands. Enbridge has come under public scrutiny for omitting the islands.

In contrast to Enbridge's computer animation, the 'not Enbridge' video showcases stunning vistas of lakes, a waterfall and coastlines. At the end, it urges viewers to sign an online anti-tanker petition organized by the Dogwood Initiative.

Since the video was posted on Sunday, the B.C. non-profit group has collected almost 2,500 new signatures, said Emma Gilchrist, Dogwood's communications director.

"I think it really struck the right tone with people. It wasn't aggressive, it was just showing people what really is at risk in British Columbia and leaving them to make up their minds about it. Obviously a lot of them decided they were going to join the 'No Tanker' side," she told the Huffington Post B.C. on Tuesday.

FILMMAKER'S TREK

The video, which has reached 21,000 views in less than three days, has likewise been a boon for filmmaker Dave Shortt, who has a strong personal opposition to the Enbridge pipeline.

"I think a lot of people are pretty frustrated, they don't feel like they're having their voices heard," he told HuffPost B.C. "I felt this was an opportunity for me to use my skills and do something good."

Shortt initially planned to make a five-to-10 minute video documenting the various locations where the Northern Gateway pipeline would be located. He found an Enbridge-sponsored map of the pipeline's route and then set about scouting locations, having to bushwhack just to get to some sites that weren't accessible by road.

While on the trip he learned about Enbridge's island-less ad and immediately changed the focus of his film.

Shortt said he filmed for 10 "very intense, challenging days" that included hiking over cliffs and swamps just to get the right shots, carrying a dolly and a camera with him all the way along.

Once finished, he contacted the Dogwood Initiative and asked whether he could link to their petition, and the group agreed.

"I wanted there to be something people could do," Shortt said. "I thought their organization was the best for me to align myself with."

NEGATIVE ALBERTA RESPONSE

"This is not an Enbridge animation" has caught fire on social media, being retweeted on Twitter and shared on Facebook.

The response, he said, has been "mind-blowing." He's done several news interviews and and drawn lots of praise on social media, but he added not all the response has been positive: "[The video] appeared in Alberta as well, the Calgary Herald and the Edmonton Journal, and some of the comments on there, I prefer to ignore them," Shortt said.

"I think they're just critical of environmentalists in general. They call them 'bleating hearts.'

"It's people who maybe don't connect with images of nature."

Enbridge defended its pipeline route animation in a blog last week:

"Our pipeline route animations were never meant to provide you with information about our proposed marine operations, the Douglas Channel or the B.C. coast.

In the animated pipeline route flyover video we provided the following disclaimer: "The animation is for illustrative purposes only. It is meant to be broadly representational, not to scale."

The Dogwood petition claims that "some of the most powerful oil companies in the world" are looking to bring "supertankers" to B.C.'s coast. The petition claims that those tankers would "jeopardize the livelihoods of tens of thousands of British Columbians and the stability of the Great Bear Rainforest and southern Gulf Islands in the name of profit."

The petition has collected a total of 130,000 signatures so far.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Su

  • Ben Stacey

  • Lindz Marsh

  • Christellar

  • Linda Poitevin

  • Craig Windrim

  • Randy Miller

  • Laurel

  • Hans Goldberg

  • Mark N. Rybchuk

  • Patricia MacGregor

  • Ramona Montecillo



Loading Slideshow...
  • 10. Oil And Gas Accounts For 4.8 Per Cent Of GDP

    The oil and gas industries accounted for around $65 billion of economic activity in Canada annually in recent years, or slightly less than 5 per cent of GDP. Source: <a href="http://www.ceri.ca/docs/2010-10-05CERIOilandGasReport.pdf" target="_hplink">Canada Energy Research Institute</a>

  • 9. Oil Exports Have Grown Tenfold Since 1980

    Canada exported some 12,000 cubic metres of oil per day in 1980. By 2010, that number had grown to 112,000 cubic metres daily. Source: <a href="http://membernet.capp.ca/SHB/Sheet.asp?SectionID=9&SheetID=224" target="_hplink">Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers</a>

  • 8. Refining Didn't Grow At All As Exports Boomed

    Canada refined 300,000 cubic metres daily in 1980; in 2010, that number was slightly down, to 291,000, even though exports of oil had grown tenfold in that time. Source: <a href="http://membernet.capp.ca/SHB/Sheet.asp?SectionID=7&SheetID=104" target="_hplink">Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers</a>

  • 7. 97 Per Cent Of Oil Exports Go To The U.S.

    Despite talk by the federal government that it wants to open Asian markets to Canadian oil, the vast majority of exports still go to the United States -- 97 per cent as of 2009. Source: <a href="http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/statistics-facts/energy/895" target="_hplink">Natural Resources Canada</a>

  • 6. Canada Has World's 2nd-Largest Proven Oil Reserves

    Canada's proven reserves of 175 billion barrels of oil -- the vast majority of it trapped in the oil sands -- is the second-largest oil stash in the world, after Saudi Arabia's 267 billion. Source: <a href="http://www.ogj.com/index.html" target="_hplink">Oil & Gas Journal</a>

  • 5. Two-Thirds Of Oil Sands Bitumen Goes To U.S.

    One-third of Canada's oil sands bitumen stays in the country, and is refined into gasoline, heating oil and diesel. Source: <a href="http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/statistics-facts/energy/895" target="_hplink">Natural Resources Canada</a>

  • 4. Alberta Is Two-Thirds Of The Industry

    Despite its reputation as the undisputed centre of Canada's oil industry, Alberta accounts for only two-thirds of energy production. British Columbia and Saskatchewan are the second and third-largest producers. Source: <a href="http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/statistics-facts/energy/895" target="_hplink">Natural Resources Canada</a>

  • 3. Alberta Will Reap $1.2 Trillion From Oil Sands

    Alberta' government <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/03/27/alberta-oil-sands-royalties-ceri_n_1382640.html" target="_hplink">will reap $1.2 trillion in royalties from the oil sands over the next 35 years</a>, according to the Canadian Energy Research Institute.

  • 2. Canadian Oil Consumption Has Stayed Flat

    Thanks to improvements in energy efficiency, and a weakening of the country's manufacturing base, oil consumption in Canada has had virtually no net change in 30 years. Consumption went from 287,000 cubic metres daily in 1980 to 260,000 cubic metres daily in 2010. Source: Source: <a href="http://membernet.capp.ca/SHB/Sheet.asp?SectionID=6&SheetID=99" target="_hplink">Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers</a>

  • 1. 250,000 Jobs.. Plus Many More?

    The National Energy Board says oil and gas employs 257,000 people in Canada, not including gas station employees. And the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers says the oil sands alone <a href="http://www.capp.ca/aboutUs/mediaCentre/NewsReleases/Pages/OilsandsaCanadianjobcreator.aspx" target="_hplink">will grow from 75,000 jobs to 905,000 jobs by 2035</a> -- assuming, of course, the price of oil holds up.