MONTREAL - A court judgment has personally singled out Prime Minister Stephen Harper and accused his government of violating the legal fundamentals of Canadian federalism in how it has gone about destroying the long-gun registry.
The Quebec court said the Harper government has no right to destroy the registry data in that province against the will of its provincial government, and Monday's 42-page verdict cited the prime minister's own words as evidence of improper behaviour.
In a victory for the Quebec government, which is trying to keep its portion of the registry alive, the verdict gave the federal government 30 days to hand over the registry data for that province. The decision only applies to Quebec data.
However, it's likely just one more round in a broader legal battle. The issue is expected to wind up before the Supreme Court of Canada. Within moments of Monday's verdict, the federal government all but announced plans to appeal.
The ruling came after the province obtained a series of temporary injunctions safeguarding the Quebec data, which has resulted in long guns continuing to be registered here unlike everywhere else in the country.
Justice Marc-Andre Blanchard of the Quebec Superior Court ruled Monday that the federal government didn't create the registry alone, and can't destroy the registry alone.
He wrote that the registry was created in the 1990s by a partnership that included multiple agreements over how the information would be gathered and accumulated.
"There is a complex web between the federal, provincial and municipal authorities that wove the firearms registry which means that it could not have existed without the close and constant co-operation of everyone," Blanchard wrote in his conclusion.
"The implementation of the firearms registry — although under the federal power to legislate criminal law — creates a partnership with Quebec, particularly with regard to the data contained in the registry."
The bill to end the federal registry received royal assent on April 5, fulfilling a long-standing promise by the Harper government to decriminalize non-registration of long guns.
In Quebec, where there is a strong current of support for gun control, the provincial government has fought back. The outgoing Charest Liberal government began a battle that the next Parti Quebecois government will certainly continue, and perhaps even amplify.
Quebec argued that it has a right to the information because its taxpayers helped build and pay for the registry. It is the centrepiece to a new provincial registry that has not yet been designed.
The Harper government is steadfastly opposed to relinquishing any data, which it is determined to destroy. It says Quebec can start from scratch if it wants to build its own registry.
Monday's verdict quotes Harper saying that he won't help another level of government keep the registry alive.
After citing that example, the judge declares that Canadian constitutional law implores politicians to practice flexible and co-operative federalism and not "undermine" that spirit.
"This lack of respect for the jurisdiction of Quebec obviates the principle of cooperative federalism that aims to satisfy the needs of both the country and its components," Blanchard wrote.
Opponents of the registry called it wasteful and irrelevant in stopping crime. Its supporters, however, including some police organizations, described the registry as a valuable tool in law-enforcement's arsenal.
Blanchard said the Quebec government made some pro-registry arguments that went undisputed.
Ninety per cent of registered weapons in Quebec are long guns and, since the registry was put in place, there has been drop in gun-related crimes as well as homicides and suicides committed with a weapon, he said, citing testimony from the case.
Gun-control advocates applauded the ruling.
"The decision of the court reaffirms the fact that the data on guns is useful, that the province which contributed to collecting it is entitled to keep it and that it is in the interest of public safety to maintain it," the Coalition For Gun Control said in a statement.
The organization was founded in the wake of the Montreal massacre in 1989, which helped prompt a renewed federal push for gun control that led to the creation of the registry.
Gun-control advocate Heidi Rathjen, who was at Montreal's Ecole polytechnique in 1989, said the ruling meant Quebec was one step closer to having a registry of its own.
"(I'm) very relieved, very happy, it's a good day for gun control," said Rathjen, who heads Polysesouvient, a group remembering the victims of the massacre.
"The judge underlined that the federal government has been acting in bad faith and the only reason they (want) to destroy the data is to prevent Quebec from doing what it wants to do."
The federal government reacted swiftly and critically to Monday's verdict.
"I am disappointed with today's ruling and will thoroughly review the decision," Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said in a statement.
"The will of Parliament and Canadians has been clear. We do not want any form of a wasteful and ineffective long-gun registry...
"Our Conservative government will continue to fight against any measures that needlessly target law-abiding hunters, farmers and sport shooters."
Quebec's outgoing Liberal government said it was pleased with its latest court victory.
Justice Minister Jean-Marc Fournier said the legal challenge has widespread support from a majority of Quebecers as well as all parties in the provincial legislature, the province's police forces and families who have been victimized by gun violence.
The premier-designate, Pauline Marois of the Parti Quebecois, was at the funeral for a long-gun victim Monday. She avoided commenting on the political issue while speaking to reporters outside the funeral for Denis Blanchette, who was shot and killed outside the PQ's victory party last week.
Related on HuffPost:
Gun ownership is strictly prohibited unless there are "genuine reasons" such as licensed sport, animal control or employment requirements.
Brazilians over the age of 25 are allowed to own guns as long as they are registered and kept indoors. The country has the second-highest gun-related death rate after the U.S.
Canada's gun laws are significantly stricter than the neighboring U.S. To acquire a license, applicants must take a safety course, pass a criminal records check and be certified by a firearms officer.
Chinese civilians are not allowed to own guns, except for hunting and protection from wildlife. Citizens can face the death penalty if caught illegally selling arms.
Czech guns laws are considerably more liberal than the rest of Europe. Applicants must pass a questionnaire on firearms, have no criminal record and show ID proving they are over 21 years old.
Germany's Federal Weapons Act, enacted in 1972, restricts everything apart from replica guns to adults at least 18 years old, who must pass checks for "trustworthiness, knowledge and adequacy." A firearms ownership license, or <em>Waffenbesitzkarte</em>, must be obtained before a weapon can be purchased.
Italians can have up to three "common" handguns in their home, but if they want to hunt or carry a concealed weapon they must apply for a license.
Japanese licensing requirements are considered a formality -- there is little enforcement of the strict laws. Despite this, gun deaths are among the lowest in the world.
Strict laws, including criminal record checks, apply for Mexican ownership. However, there are growing concerns that smuggling from the US is undermining these regulations.
Self defense is not a viable excuse for carrying firearms outside the home in Russia. Hand guns and fully automatics are prohibited, but adults with no criminal record can apply for a license for shotguns and air rifles.
Brits convicted of a criminal offense cannot handle, possess or shoot a gun. A license is needed for any firearm except low-powered air rifles/pistols. Self-defense is not a valid reason for ownership.