OTTAWA - The family of a Canadian soldier who committed suicide spent just over $10,800 in court costs to correct mistakes made in the young soldier's death certificate and registration, errors for which they blamed National Defence.

But their lawyer, retired colonel Michel Drapeau, says a potential legal claim was dropped because Cpl. Stuart Langridge's parents feared it would create the perception they were out to profit from the 28-year-old's death.

Shaun and Sheila Fynes were also worried a lawsuit would impede an inquiry currently taking place before the Military Police Complaints Commission, he added.

"We had to drop it in order to strip the department of any claim to litigation privilege," Drapeau said.

Among other things, the death certificate listed the wrong next-of-kin and other "egregious errors," which the Fynes petitioned to have changed.

The parents were not asking for compensation for their son's death, but in warning of court action they were instead trying to recover the cost associated with correcting the legal, public record as it related to Langridge, who killed himself at his Edmonton barracks in March 2008.

"They would never ask for compensation — ever," Drapeau said.

National Defence claims it had no hand in the death registration, but the family pointed out members of their son's regiment were on hand when it was filled out along with Langridge's ex-girlfriend.

The Fynes' threat of a lawsuit and the issue of solicitor-client privilege are at the heart of Defence Minister Peter MacKay's claim that the government must withhold certain documents from the inquiry commission.

Records that have been disclosed are so blacked out, they can easily be taken out of context, and the government is in "damage control and they're pushing back and it's like pulling teeth" to get information out of them, Drapeau said.

The federal government is covering the family's cost of legal representation as well as travel and expenses to attend the inquiry, he added.

But critics say it was granted "grudgingly" at the last minute before the opening of hearings.

"They certainly didn't do it with an open heart," said New Democrat veterans critic Peter Stoffer, who called on the Harper government to reimburse the family for the death certificate fix.

"The government should, with absolutely no estimation, pay that money back outside of the legal process. This is money they shouldn't even have to be suing for because (National Defence) screwed up and that cost the Fynes family $10,000."

Liberal MP Sean Casey, also a veterans critic, said "the government seems incapable of admitting mistakes. They're hiding behind solicitor-client privilege in order to justify untenable positions."

Langridge's parents accused military police of botching the investigation into his death by not pursuing a criminal negligence or even a disciplinary probe into the actions of members of the Lord Strathcona's Horse Regiment.

They say the veteran of Bosnia and Afghanistan suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD and was pushed over the edge following a month of civilian hospital care by the military's humiliating treatment of him.

The military disputes the PTSD claim and has presented medical records that state Langridge suffered from drug and alcohol addiction.

Expert testimony before the inquiry Monday looked at the question of whether military lawyers could — or would — cover up negligent performance of colleagues.

Lt.-Col. Bruce MacGregor, a former Crown prosecutor and senior officer at the military's Judge Advocate General branch, testified that military police and investigators seek advice from uniformed lawyers before laying charges.

Much of his testimony was in the abstract and meant to lay the foundation for the appearance later this week of the military police officers who investigated the death.

MacGregor defended the sweeping use of solicitor-client privilege when it comes to investigation reports and advice that found its way up the chain of command to chief of defence staff's office — records the family maintains are crucial to understanding what happened.

"You have to have a free and frank ability to discuss certain things and sometimes an investigator might be going down a road that isn't the best legal path to take," he said.

"And you have to be able to sit there and you have to have an open and frank dialogue between the investigator and the prosecutor. If everything that is being said between and investigator and prosecutor is ultimately going to be disclosed, you're not going to get a freedom of thought."

Are you in crisis? Need help? In Canada, find links and numbers to 24-hour suicide crisis lines in your province here.

Related on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Start of War: Oct. 7, 2001

    <em>American soldiers hide behind a barricade during an explosion, prior to fighting with Taliban forces November 26, 2001 at the fortress near Mazar-e-Sharif, northern Afghanistan. (Photo by Oleg Nikishin/Getty Images)</em>

  • Number of U.S. Troops in Afghanistan: 88,000

    <em>US Marines with the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit deployed from the USS Bataan's Amphibious Ready Group arrive December 14, 2001 at an undisclosed location with field gear and weapons. (Photo by Johnny Bivera/Getty Images)</em>

  • Number of Troops at War's Peak

    <em>U.S. Marines begin to form up their convoy at a staging area near Kandahar, Afghanistan, as they await orders to begin their trek to Kandahar to take control of the airfield 13 December, 2001. (DAVE MARTIN/AFP/Getty Images)</em><br><br> Number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan at the war's peak: About 101,000 in 2010. Allies provided about 40,000.

  • Withdrawal Plans

    <em>U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a televised address from the East Room of the White House on June 22, 2011 in Washington, D.C. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais-Pool/Getty Images)</em><br><br> Withdrawal plans: 23,000 U.S. troops expected to come home by the end of the summer, leaving about 68,000 in Afghanistan. Most U.S. troops expected to be out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014, though the U.S. is expected to maintain a sizeable force of military trainers and a civilian diplomatic corps.

  • Number of U.S. Casualties

    <em>American flags, each one representing the 4,454 American soldiers killed in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, move in the breeze at The Christ Congregational United Church March 17, 2008 in Miami, Florida. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)</em><br><br> Number of U.S. casualties: At least 1,828 members of the U.S. military killed as of Tuesday, according to an Associated Press count. According to the Defense Department, 15,786 U.S. service members have been wounded in hostile action.

  • Afghan Civilian Casualties

    <em>Asan Bibi, 9, sits on a bench as burn cream is applied to her at Mirwais hospital October 13, 2009 Kandahar, Afghanistan. She, her sister and mother were badly burned when a helicopter fired into their tent in the middle of the night on October 3rd, according to their father. (Photo by Paula Bronstein/Getty Images)</em><br><br> Afghan civilian casualties: According to the United Nations, 11,864 civilians were killed in the conflict between 2007, when the U.N. began reporting statistics, and the end of 2011.

  • Cost of the War

    <em>An Iraqi man counts money behind a pile of American dollars in his currency exchange bureau in Baghdad on April 11, 2012. (ALI AL-SAADI/AFP/Getty Images)</em><br><br> Cost of the war: $443 billion from fiscal year 2001 through fiscal year 2011, according to the Congressional Research Service.

  • Number of Times Obama Has Visited Afghanistan

    <em>US President Barack Obama speaks to troops during a visit to Bagram Air Field on May 1, 2012 in Afghanistan. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images) </em><br><br> Number of times Obama has visited Afghanistan: 3 as president, including Tuesday, and 1 as a presidential candidate.