While it may seem absurd, it is possible based on the U.S. electoral college system and the constitution which requires a candidate to win the majority of electoral votes — in this case 270 — to become president.
But if neither candidate reaches that majority of electoral college votes, the 12th Amendment says that the state delegations of the U.S. House of Representatives decide among the candidates who becomes president. The Republicans, who have and are expected to retain a majority in the House, would choose Romney as president.
The Senate is then given the task to pick the vice-president. If after the election it is still controlled by the Democrats, Biden would become vice-president. (In fact, if the Senate is split, Biden, as vice-president and head of the Senate, would cast the deciding vote.) And there you would have a Romney-Biden administration.
But how would that come into play?
Electoral college tie
There are an even number of electoral college votes (538) that the candidates could evenly spilt. U.S President Barack Obama could win 269 votes and Romney could win 269 votes. And this would all depend on how those crucial swing-states go.
Larry Sabato, professor of politics and director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, highlighted on his "Crystal Ball" website just one of the scenarios in which the two candidates could receive the same number of electoral college votes.
If Obama took all the states John Kerry won in 2004, along with New Mexico and Ohio, Obama would get 269 votes. In this scenario, Romney would carry the swing-states of Florida, Nevada, Virginia, Colorado, Iowa and North Carolina while Obama would carry, along with Ohio, Wisconsin and New Hampshire.
It's also possible that neither candidate could reach the magic 270 number if their electors in the electoral college decide not to vote for whom they have pledged — also known as "faithless" electors, who could vote for anyone.
When Americans vote for the president, they vote for electors who about a month after the November election, gather in each of the state capitals and cast their ballots. The Republicans and Democrats field a slate of electors who are typically chosen through state conventions and due to their party loyalty.
"The expectation is because you are a good partisan, of course you're going to vote as expected," Robert Alexander, professor of political science at Ohio Northern University told CBC News.
But Alexander, while doing research for his book Presidential Electors and the Electoral College: An Examination o Lobbying, Wavering Electors, and Campaigns for Faithless Votes, said he found that in the 2000, 2004 and 2008 elections, many of the electors were lobbied to consider changing their vote.
"In virtually all of the cases those attempts failed. But I also found that there were a number of electors that at least considered voting contrary to expectations. That was surprising."
Alexander said that there have been nine cases of faithless electors in the past 16 elections, including in 2004, when an electoral college voter voted for John Edwards twice, once as president and once as vice-president.
He added that while about 30 states have laws that force electors to vote according to the popular will of the state, these laws may not necessarily be enforceable.
All this means that if Romney, for example, won 271 electoral votes on Nov. 6 but a couple for electors decided later to cast their ballot for someone else, Romney would lose the majority and the presidential and vice-presidential picks would go to the House and Senate.
"Maybe we want to see a Romney-Biden administration but I think most people don't want to see that," Alexander said. "So I think there may be a real attempt to make one of them blink in the electoral college to try and resolve it before it got to the House of Representatives and the Senate."
Also on HuffPost