At a news conference on Tuesday morning, Mark Wiles-Simpson, 19, said officers choked and punched him because they suspected him of stealing merchandise from a nearby liquor store.
Wiles-Simpson said he was approached by police on his way to work near Côte-Vertu metro station in Montreal’s Saint-Laurent borough.
He said he was talking to his cousin when a police car drove towards them. An officer told Wiles-Simpson’s cousin to “go away.”
Wiles-Simpson alleges one police officer held his arms while another one held him in a chokehold. A third officer reportedly punched his ribs.
He said the officers still had him in a chokehold when he was taken down to the ground.
A video taken by one of Wiles-Simpson's friends shows four officers holding him down before putting him in a police car.
“All I heard is to be still and stop resisting,” said Wiles-Simpson. “But all I did was yell in pain and in shock since I had no clue of what was going on.”
Authorities later admitted Wiles-Simpson was not the man they were looking for, but he was charged with resisting the arrest.
Wiles-Simpson said he may file human rights and police ethics complaints with the help of the Centre for Research Action on Race Relations.
“This incident shows that there is something evil in the culture of Montreal police, some kind of deep-rooted hatred and contempt for young black men like me,” said Wiles-Simpson.
His mother, Dionne Wiles, is demanding that Montreal police apologize for the events.
“It traumatized him, you know?” she said. “I raised my son to respect the law, to do the right thing. I never really [thought] that he’d get in this position.”
“I would feel a big relief if they admit that they did the wrong thing — apologize to him and clear our name. That’s what I would really like,” she added.
In 2010, the Quebec Human Rights Commission said dozens of cases involving accusations of racial profiling by Montreal police were being stalled by the city.
According to the commission, the city filed an application in Quebec Superior Court challenging the commission’s right to call officers to testify at its hearings.Suggest a correction