Potentially harmful expired baby formula has been found on some Vancouver-area supermarket shelves in violation of federal food safety guidelines, a CBC News investigation has found.
The sale of past-dated formula would carry hefty penalties in several U.S. states, but in Canada, federal and provincial regulations lack clout.
CBC News took hidden cameras into about a half dozen supermarkets and discount retailers across Metro Vancouver and found expired infant formula in two of them.
President's Choice Soy Infant Formula, a liquid, was found for sale more than two months past its expiry date at a Real Canadian Superstore in North Vancouver.
A PriceSmart store in East Vancouver was selling Isomil Infant Formula powder that was seven months out of date.
According to guidelines set out by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and Health Canada, these products should not have been offered for sale to the public.
Differs from 'best before'
Unlike best-before dates, expiry dates apply to food that can't be compromised. Infant formula is often the sole source of nutrition for babies. The CFIA says once that date is passed, the food should be discarded, not sold.
"Best before" means a product may be safely eaten after the specified date, although nutrition may be compromised.
The supermarket chains where the expired baby formula was found say they are taking the matter very seriously and reinforcing procedures now in place so this doesn't happen again.
Still, Vancouver mother Amanda Lee wants to know why expired baby food products were left on store shelves.
Lee’s four-month-old son, Nathaniel, recently became dehydrated following an infection and now needs to have infant formula.
“If you have somebody stocking it, first of all, it’s right in front of their faces and they're putting it onto the shelves. Why can't they take two seconds out of their lives to actually just peer at it,” Lee said. “Tell your managers or something. Honestly, there's no excuse for it, and yes it does anger me.”
Woodstock, Ont., mother Melodie White claims her son became seriously ill in 2011 after eating baby food nine months out of date. She settled out of court with Zellers, where she bought the food.
"He was vomiting, he had chills, he had fever, he had diarrhea,” White said. “We're talking full-blown food-borne illness here.”
Pediatrician-turned-politician Dr. Richard Pan is behind a new California law making it illegal for retailers to sell expired baby foods and formulas.
"This should not be 'buyer beware.' This should be something people should be able to count on," said Pan, a member of the California State Assembly. The law he authored came into effect Jan. 1.
The state of New Jersey fined K-Mart $300,000 for selling expired infant formula and baby food, while similar legal actions in Pennsylvania and New York also resulted in fines against retailers ranging from $250,000 to $2 million.
In Canada, federal guidelines contain no listed penalties. Checks of supermarkets in B.C. are often left to local health inspectors, who can be far busier examining restaurants and meat counters than store shelves.
Claudia Kurzac, manager of health protection with the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, told CBC News that all her inspectors can do is tell stores to remove expired products if they are found.
“We don't have any provincial legislation that governs expiry dates,” Kurzac said.
Lee said that’s not good enough.
“Our government should be stepping up ... and banning everything. And if [the stores] do sell it, they should be definitely getting fined for it,” Lee said.
- CBC News Investigates: Send us your tips
Also on HuffPost:
Their Baby Cuteness Doesn't Predict Adult Attractiveness
A study published in the journal <em>Infant Behavior & Development</em> revealed that the standard "<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCQQtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch?v%3DXTV8bOv3Jhs&ei=0uLBToKrMuPu0gHkmNH0BA&usg=AFQjCNFtutJJhlTFZJ2fm-cmsDo46XMpzw" target="_hplink">You Must Have Been a Beautiful Baby</a>" has little to do with reality. When 253 college students were asked to rank photos of the same individuals as infants and young adults (without being told who was who), there was <a href="http://bodyodd.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/08/31/7542626-must-have-been-a-beautiful-baby-maybe-not" target="_hplink">no relationship between how cute the students found the babies and how attractive they found the grown-ups</a>.
They're Good At Sharing
No, really, it's true. It doesn't matter how many times you've heard the shout "Mine!" -- research shows babies can sense fairness at 15 months. During one study at the <a href="http://www.washington.edu/news/articles/babies-show-sense-of-fairness-altruism-as-early-as-15-months-1" target="_hplink">University of Washington</a>, 47 babies observed videos of an experimenter distributing milk and crackers to two people. When one recipient received more food than the other, the babies paid more attention. That means they had expected a fair distribution. The researchers also found that babies who did notice unfairness were more likely to share their own toys.
They Read Minds
OK, so they're not exactly psychic. But a <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/111101130204.htm" target="_hplink">recent study</a> from the University of Missouri found that babies just 10 months old are starting to follow the thought processes of others. Yuyan Luo, an associate professor of developmental psychology who conducted the study, tells The Huffington Post, "Babies, like adults, when they see something for the first time -- when something is surprising -- they look for a long time. It shows [they recognize] something is inconsistent." It's called the "violation of expectation," she explained. When babies are surprised by something or notice something unexpected has happened, they tend to gaze at that thing longer. In Luo's research, babies watched actors consistently choose object A (such as a block or a cylinder) over object B. When an actor then switched to object B, the babies stared for about five to six seconds longer, meaning they recognized the change in preference.
They're A Little Bit Racist
Don't judge a book by its cover. Treat all people the same. We're all equals. These are sentiments parents strive to teach their kids from a very young age. And they should. Starting, like, immediately. Researchers at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom found that babies at three months <a href="http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/060212_racefrm2.htm" target="_hplink">begin showing a preference for the faces of people of their own race</a>. But not all hope for equality is lost. The same study showed that babies who are exposed to people of all different races are less likely to develop bias at such an early age.
The Rhythm Is Gonna Get Them
Researchers from Brigham Young University found that five-month-old babies can <a href=" http://news.byu.edu/archive08-oct-babymusic.aspx" target="_hplink">identify an upbeat song as being different from a series of sad, slow songs</a>. In other words, they are happy. They know it. They will clap their hands. Or stare longer, as the case may be. The experimenters showed babies an emotionless face while music played. When they played a new sad song, the babies looked away. When the music pepped up, the babies stared for three to four seconds longer.
They Can Tell The Good Guy From The Bad Guy
Babies have a sense of morality at six months old, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1275574/Babies-know-difference-good-evil-months-study-reveals.html" target="_hplink">say Yale researchers</a>. During the Yale study, babies watched a puppet show in which a wooden shape with eyes tried to climb a hill over and over again. Sometimes a second puppet helped him up the hill, and other times a third puppet pushed him down. After watching the act several times, the babies were presented with both puppets. They showed a clear preference for the good characters over the bad ones by reaching to play with the good puppet.
They Can Read Lips ... Kind Of
Dr. Janet Werker of the University of British Columbia, who studies how babies perceive language, found that if a mother spoke two languages while pregnant, her infant could <a href="http://www.livescience.com/13016-bilingual-babies-brain-language-learning.html" target="_hplink">recognize the difference</a> between the two. And they don't even have to be spoken out loud. Werker's research found that infants four to six months old can <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/11/health/views/11klass.html" target="_hplink">visually discriminate two languages</a> when watching muted videos of someone speaking both.