VANCOUVER - British Columbia has one of the country's toughest drunk driving laws, but if drivers choose to challenge a roadside ban and the penalties and fines that come with it, they have at least a one-in-five chance of getting it tossed out.

Last year, the government amended the impaired driving legislation that was introduced in 2010. The changes were aimed at bringing the law into compliance with a court ruling that concluded those accused of drunk driving had their rights violated due to their inability to challenge roadside screening tests, and to the lack of a proper appeal mechanism.

The Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles says in the year since the amendments, about 22 per cent of the 2,708 drivers who challenged an immediate roadside prohibition got it overturned. A total of 18,888 driving bans were issued in that time period.

While some defence lawyers applaud the successes, they say the appeal process remains unfair because it takes place outside of the court system.

"We're happy for our clients when we succeed, and it's certainly nicer to be able to call people to tell them they'd won," said Vancouver lawyer Paul Doroshenko.

"But the tribunal system does not allow you to really get to the bottom of it, and there are lots of innocent people who end up stuck with (the roadside bans)."

Having all appeals take place within the courts would likely lead to immense backlogs, as 6,027 out of 49,000 roadside prohibitions have been challenged since the law came into effect in 2010.

"It's new legislation, it's innovative legislation, of course people are going to take pokes at it," Justice Minister Suzanne Anton said Wednesday. "But fundamentally, the legislation is very good, it's been extremely effective in keeping people who are drinking out from behind the wheels of their cars."

The amended law requires police to tell drivers they can have a second test on a different breathalyzer if they fail the first one. In the past, the second reading would prevail, but now the lower of the two readings will.

Officers must also now provide sworn reports to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for every roadside prohibition issued, as well as certificates that confirm the calibration accuracy of the breathalyzers they use.

Drivers who fail both screening tests will have their vehicle towed and their license taken away immediately. They have seven days to apply for an appeal, and an oral review, done over the phone, usually happens within three weeks.

After the 30-minute review, an adjudicator makes a decision based on any statements or evidence that the driver presents, as well as any documents or information provided by the police officer who issued the ban.

Some lawyers say seemingly innocent people frequently have their evidence rejected, while others who may be guilty get let off on a technicality.

Earlier this week, a B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled that a roadside ban upheld by a government adjudicator in March should be quashed. A government report on approved screening devices used by the adjudicator to make her decision was inadmissible because it wasn't entered as evidence — the adjudicator simply referred to it of her own accord, said the ruling.

Sam MacLeod, B.C.'s superintendent of motor vehicles, has said his office is looking into the court's decision, but will need time to decide how to move forward.

Criminal defence lawyer Jennifer Currie says the process for sorting out the innocent from the guilty is flawed because there is no opportunity to cross-examine the police officer who issued the ban, or witnesses.

"Somebody can say, 'I saw this person do this,' and in court, we can go up, and we can ask questions about how far away they were, how good of a look they really got, how long they saw it, could they have mistaken them for somebody else?" she said. "You can't do any of that for one of these."

But MacLeod stressed that a roadside prohibition review is an administrative process, and not a criminal proceeding. During the review, defence lawyers do get a chance to examine the evidence that the police officer provided, he said.

"The driver who's asked for the review gets to see everything the police have put forward to us," he said. "So when they are in a discussion with the adjudicator, they can comment on exactly what the police have put forward."

However, drivers cannot obtain more evidence from a police officer — such as video recordings from a police cruiser, or records of the screening devices used — beyond what he or she has given to the adjudicator unless the driver files a freedom of information request, said Doroshenko.

"You don't know, for example, that the device was manufactured and came back with a flaw...and you don't know that the police officer may have been disciplined for lying in reports before," he said. "In criminal court, they'll take as long as necessary to get to the bottom of it, but in these hearings, you've basically got 29 minutes to make your pitch."

Critics of the roadside screening devices have also long argued they are too finicky for such tough, immediate penalties.

Currie has had clients — some more credible than others, she admitted — who swear they had a drink hours before they were pulled over, yet they still failed the tests.

"In those situations it's almost impossible to win," she said. "At the end of the day, the adjudicator is going to decide, 'You blew a fail in a properly serviced, properly calibrated screening device, and I don't find your submission that you consumed these drinks five hours earlier credible.'"

Yet it is possible that the device, which must be recalibrated every 28 days, was inaccurate, despite what its certificate says, Currie said.

"The calibration can go off halfway through the cycle, and then you're using an improperly calibrated device and you can easily be getting these false readings," she said.

The devices also do not distinguish between mouth alcohol or blood alcohol, she said.

But MacLeod stands behind the breathalyzers, which were initially meant to be a screening test to determine whether a driver should be taken to a police station to take a more thorough test on a more advanced machine.

"They've been used for many, many years, they are federally mandated and federally approved," he said. "All told, it's a scientifically-approved instrument."

The costs associated with failing two roadside tests can add up to thousands of dollars for a driver who chooses not to challenge a roadside ban — which, MacLeod pointed out, has resulted in a 51 per cent-reduction in drunk driving fatalities since the law was introduced in 2010.

An oral review costs $200, and while the towing and storage fees will be waived or refunded if the driving ban gets overturned, the driver has already suffered consequences, said Doroshenko.

"Even if you're innocent, you've already been punished," he said. "Even the people who manage to get their (prohibitions) overturned have already had three weeks, usually, of no license, no car, and potentially a job loss and whatever else flows from it."

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Samantha Lynn Goudie

    Samantha Goudie -- who also went by her Twitter alias, <a href="">"Vodka Samm"</a> -- was arrested at a University of Iowa football game in August 2013, after she allegedly tried to run onto the field. "Vodka Samm" blew a .341 BAC in jail, and later tweeted about it. Her outrageous tweets made her a viral sensation, but once she sobered up, she deleted her account.

  • Mary Maloney

    When this middle school math teacher was arrested on a DUI charge, she allegedly offered the arresting officer oral sex and the opportunity to fondle her breasts. <a href="">Read the whole story here.</a>

  • Timothy Carr

    His last name might sound like "car," but he was allegedly driving a motorized shopping car while drunk in a Florida Walmart. <a href="">Read the whole story here.</a>

  • Thomasine Harjo

    <a href="" target="_hplink">Harjo allegedly told cops</a> in December, 2012 that she couldn't be arrested for alleged DUI because she had a court date the following day for a previous DUI.

  • Bryan Wendler

    Bryan Wendler was arrested for his sixth DUI while wearing a shirt that read "Been Drinking? Free Breathalyzer Test: Blow Here." He blew a .19 on the police breathalyzer, more than twice the legal limit.

  • Jesse James Thomas

    Jesse James Thomas, arrested March 28 for public drunkenness, Thomas was wearing a sombrero when he jumped on an officer's parked patrol car screaming his name, according to an account in the <em>Sacramento Bee</em>. <a href="" target="_hplink">Read more. </a>

  • Jana Lawrence

    Jana Lawrence, 46, of Dacula, Ga., is accused of wreaking havoc at two restaurants Saturday, by groping, licking and flashing fellow patrons before being arrested.

  • Vanessa Robinson

    Vanessa Robinson was charged with aggravated assult after she allegedly cut up her boyfriend after he tried leaving her apartment with the last beer -- a Colt 45 to be specific.

  • Niles Gammons

    Ohio man <a href="" target="_hplink">Niles Gammons</a> found himself in a bit of double trouble when -- thanks to daylight savings -- authorities busted him twice in one day, at the exact same time.

  • Justina Laniewski

    Laniewski, 41, was arrested for allegedly endangering her child, among other charges, when she ran in to a raging creek to "save" ducks during Hurricane Sandy's onslaught on Oct. 30, 2012. Police say that Laniewski left her 4-year-old unattended while she plunged into neck-high waters in Glen Rock, Pa. It took 8 firefighters to rescue the woman, who allegedly had a blood alcohol level more than twice the legal limit for driving.

  • Patricia Libby

    Police say that Patricia Libby was under the influence when repeatedly crashed her car into another vehicle in the parking lot of a Marco Island, Fla. elementary school where her children are enrolled.

  • William Liddell

    William Liddell is accused of <a href="" target="_hplink">getting into a tussle</a> with cops after they tried to arrest him for a hit and run. During the altercation, a police report said Liddell defecated in his pants.

  • Ty Alsop

    Ty Alsop was allegedly found passed out in a car with pants soaked in urine. He was taken to an Evansville, Ind. hospital to detoxify. Instead of staying put, he sneaked out past the staff. Witnesses saw him in the parking lot wearing a hospital gown that exposed his backside. Alsop asked police for a second chance, claiming "I'm not really a bad guy. I've just been a drunken a-----e tonight," according to the police report.

  • Alison Whelan

    This 51-year-old Brit hijacked a ferry in September 2011, reportedly yelling to police officers that she was Jack Sparrow. <a href="" target="_hplink">Read the whole story here.</a>

  • Eugene Carl Kotelman

    Largo (Fla.) Police pulled over Kotelman allegedly for speeding and driving drunk on May 3. Cops checked the trunk and say they found a small monkey tucked inside. <a href="" target="_hplink">Read more.</a>

  • Coley Mitchell

    Coley Mitchell, a lab tech at Georgia Health Sciences University, was arrested for public drunkenness after being found in a locker room intoxicated with his pants down halfway his legs surrounded by two lab monkeys that had been let out of their cages.

  • Olivia Ornelas

    Police in Illinois say that Olivia Ornelas blamed her DUI and crashed vehicle on her boyfriend's failure to take her, as he promised, to the new "Twilight" movie. <a href="" target="_hplink">Read more.</a>

  • Man Charged with DWI for Driving Motorized Cooler

    An Australian man caught driving a motorized cooler box through a beachside resort town appeared in court charged with drunk driving, The Courier Mail reported Monday. Christopher Ian Petrie, 23, faces charges of driving under the influence and driving without a license after police caught him on the makeshift vehicle, which was powered by a 50cc engine.

  • Randon Reid

    Police in Phoenix, Ariz., have accused Randon Reid of the crime of flight -- and a crime against flight. Investigators say the 26-year-old suspect opened fire on an airplane parked at Deer Valley Airport, then fled from authorities who tried to pull him over. He has reportedly been charged with felony flight and driving under the influence.

  • Debra Oberlin

    It's always best to practice what you preach. Police in Florida say they arrested the former president of a local chapter of Mother's Against Drunk Driving for driving under the influence. Debra Oberlin has been charged with drunk driving for the Feb. 18 incident.

  • Andrei Bibbs

    Andrei Bibbs, 54, of the 3000 block of Coopers Grove Court, was arrested Jan. 7 Illinois State Police and charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol. He <a href="" target="_hplink">was clearly shocked by the change. </a>

  • Bradley Pope

    Pope was arrested for DUI. He allegedly told police that he was a "covert agent" and that he had drank 100 beers.

  • David Caruso

    In early August 2012, David Caruso was busted for allegedly deciding to grab a beer while driving through a sobriety checkpoint in Connecticut. <a href="" target="_hplink"> Read more.</a>

  • Samuel Phipps

    Phipps was arrested and charged with driving under the influence after he got into a car accident that he allegedly <a href="" target="_hplink">blamed on an elephant.</a>

  • Sherri Wilkins

    Sherri Wilkins, a drug and alcohol counselor, was arrested after allegedly fatally hitting pedestrian Philip Moreno with her car while driving under the influence. Police say Wilkins then drove over two miles with Moreno partially through her windshield. <a href="" target="_hplink">Read the whole story here.</a>