VANCOUVER - "Yertle the Turtle" is no longer under ban.

"Yertle the Turtle" can gather more fans — in school districts around British Columbia.

A freedom of expression grievance has been settled between the BC Teachers' Federation and the B.C. Public School Employers' Association based on the Dr. Seuss children's book about a turtle trying to assert its rights.

The complaint was one of several made by the union when some school districts were banning classroom displays of union posters, buttons and T-shirts in the middle of a teachers' contract dispute.

In one case, an administrator vetoed a quote for classroom display in Prince Rupert from the book "Yertle the Turtle," saying it was too political.

Dave Stigant, with the Prince Rupert district, was given about 20 quotes from the book to determine if they would be appropriate to expose to students during an ongoing labour dispute.

He didn't like this quote: "I know up on top you are seeing great sights, but down here on the bottom, we too should have rights.''

BCTF President Jim Iker said the quote was just a small example of several instances where the union felt it had a claim of unfair labour practices in the province.

"But definitely the 'Yertle the Turtle' one out of Prince Rupert highlighted the whole issue of freedom of expression and our constitutional rights."

Iker said several such claims went to arbitration over the last four or five years before the issue was ironed out.

The complaints were settled based on a previous court case, a key arbitration ruling and an agreement with the employer on freedom of expression rights.

Teachers are now allowed to display or wear union posters, buttons and T-shirts.

"I'm hoping it clears it up. I think it actually gives both sides certainty and we know where the limits are in terms of materials and what we're able to display or not display, and I think the employer knows what the expectations are," Iker said.

He said teachers also know that they can't discuss any kind of political or union messaging with students during instruction time.

Like this article? Follow our Facebook page

Or follow us on Twitter

Related on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • The Great Gatsby

    Banned for language and sexuality, this novel was<a href="" target="_hplink"> first challenged at a Baptist College in Charleston, South Carolina</a> in 1987.

  • To Kill A Mockingbird

    In 2009, "To Kill A Mockingbird" was pulled from a Brampton, Ont. grade 10 course after parents complained about the <a href="" target="_hplink">"use of racial epithet in the book,"</a> according to

  • The Catcher in the Rye

    "The Catcher in the Rye" was banned in several schools and libraries <a href="" target="_hplink">because of sexual content and offensive language</a>, according to Yahoo News.

  • The Grapes Of Wrath

    This novel was temporarily banned in the United States for its portrayal of California residents.

  • The Color Purple

    "The Colour Purple" was removed from library shelves in a Virginia school in 1986 because of "profanity and sexual references." It was, however, made available to students over 18 with parental consent.

  • Ulysses

    This 900 page long-read was <a href="" target="_hplink">banned in the United States and the United Kingdom for its explicit sexual content.</a>

  • Beloved

    After 10 years of being published, "Beloved" was banned English classes in a <a href="" target="_hplink">Kentucky high school because of references to bestiality, racism and sex. </a>

  • The Lord of the Flies

    This novel has been challenged and banned several times because of its <a href="" target="_hplink">"excessive violence and bad language,"</a> according to

  • 1984

    Between 1965 and 1982, this novel was <a href="" target="_hplink">ranked fifth of the most challenged books</a> because of its "immoral and pro-Communist" content.

  • Lolita

    In 1958, <a href=" BC/1950.html" target="_hplink">Lolita was placed on Canada Custom's list of banned books</a>. The ban however, was later lifted.