VANCOUVER - British Columbia's highest court may have placed a muzzle on anti-salmon-farming activist Don Staniford, but that hasn't stopped the man described by one judge as a "zealot" from continuing his personal battle against the industry.

After losing a defamation case this past summer against one of the province's biggest salmon-farming companies, Mainstream Canada, Staniford moved shop to Scotland.

There, he leads an organization known as Protect Wild Scotland, co-ordinating actions against Norwegian-owned, salmon-farming companies in the United Kingdom and Ireland, and even back in B.C.

There, he is equally as vocal on the issue of salmon farming and appears unfazed by the gag order put in place in B.C.

"The question for my lawyer and the question for me in the future is how can this injunction, this judgment, this ruling be applicable to my work in Scotland and Ireland," said Staniford, during a recent interview.

"I've always been a global campaigner and visited New Zealand and Australia and Chile, so how can they enforce such a ludicrous judgment internationally, especially, when you've got Twitter and Facebook."

The B.C. Court of Appeal ordered Staniford this past July to pay $75,000 in damages for defaming Mainstream Canada during a 2011 campaign, in which he used graphics that looked like cigarette packages and boasted slogans like, "Salmon Farming Kills Like Smoking."

The three member panel found that a lower court judge erred when she upheld Staniford's defence of fair comment during the original defamation ruling, a ruling in which she called him a "zealot," challenged his credibility and noted his "closed-mindedness and deep prejudices make him an unreliable reporter of facts."

B.C. Court of Appeal Justice David Tysoe said the defamatory publications did not meet all four elements of a legal test because Staniford didn't reference the facts upon which he based his comments.

Tysoe then ordered Staniford to pay $25,000 and $50,000 in general and punitive damages, respectively, and granted a permanent injunction, requested by the Norwegian-owned company, restraining the activist from "publishing similar words and images in the future."

Staniford said he has done what's necessary in B.C. to comply with the court order, taking down his Global Alliance Against Industrial Aquaculture and Superheroes 4 Salmon websites and even stopping his blog.

Careful, too, is Staniford about what he says of Mainstream during interviews, while his Vancouver-based lawyer David Sutherland awaits a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on whether it will hear an appeal.

Stifled in B.C., Staniford said he "had no real choice but to set up shop somewhere else," and he is now working with a private Scottish land owner, taking action against the industry, specifically the Norwegian-owned companies.

"My boss has six salmon farms within 30 kilometres of her salmon river, so the challenge is to move those six farms by 2020 and fight the Scottish government's plans for a 50 per cent expansion of the industry by 2020."

Staniford said he presented Scotland's first minister, Alex Salmond, with a letter in early December, and it called on the government to "curb expansion by instituting an immediate moratorium."

In November, he co-ordinated protests against the industry at grocery stores in England, and he worked in September with a Green party member of the Scottish Parliament to introduce a question on the ownership of salmon-farming companies.

Staniford said he also filed a recent complaint against the BBC over a program it aired about the industry. Protect Wild Scotland alleges on its website that the BBC "caved into demands by the Norwegian-owned giant and the Scottish Salmon Producers’ Organisation," and decided not to interview the environmental organization for the program.

Few of those who have found themselves on the receiving end of Staniford's actions are willing to say much about the campaigner.

The Scottish Salmon Producers' Organisation wouldn't even use his full first name in recent email response to The Canadian Press.

"I can confirm that D. Staniford is protesting in the UK, however, we have no further comment to make," said Angela Kelly, a spokeswoman for the organization.

Similar, too, was the response from the BBC.

"We are happy that the piece was editorially balanced and showed no bias towards either side in the ongoing debate about the future of fish farming," said an unidentified spokesperson.

Grant Warkentin, a spokesman for Mainstream Canada, which changed its name to Cermaq in November, said the company doesn't have much to say about Staniford anymore because it doesn't have any operations in Scotland.

"We're not really following his activities in Scotland," he added, noting his company is continuing its work in B.C.

However, Iain Thom, a spokesman for Alison Johnstone, a member of the Scottish parliament, confirmed Staniford asked her to lodge a written parliamentary question on the ownership of Scottish salmon companies, and he called Staniford a well-known and committed campaigner.

"The question seemed a sensible one, so we were happy to do so," he said.

Staniford was back in Vancouver recently, where he visited family and friends and attended a flash mob against a proposed mining project, and on a following night, he planned on attending an event for indigenous rights.

Staniford said he has no plans of giving up his fight against the industry.

"I am a campaigner and I have been for 15 years against salmon farming," he said. "I've worked in Ireland, Scotland, Australia, New Zealand, Chile, the United States, Canada, all around the world against salmon farming, and I will continue to do so."

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Production

    With fish stocks rapidly depleting in the oceans, the industry of fish farming has continued to grow in response. In 2006, Americans ate an average of <a href="http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=16150" target="_hplink">16.5</a> pounds of fish per person, surpassed only by Japan and China. That same year, fish farming accounted for <a href="http://www.greenfacts.org/en/fisheries/l-2/01-fisheries-production.htm#5" target="_hplink">47%</a> of the world’s fish food supply.

  • Pollution

    Large-scale fish farm operations force fish to live in conditions much more <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_farming#Criticisms" target="_hplink">crowded</a> than they would in the wild, sometimes leaving each fish less room than an average bathtub. The excess of fish waste and unconsumed feed <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,391523-2,00.html" target="_hplink">pollutes</a> the surrounding waters. Additionally, living in such close proximity gives rise to increased disease and infection, which is usually responded to withc antibiotics, further polluting the surrounding environment.

  • Chemicals

    Many of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/world/americas/27salmon.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=chile+fishing&st=nyt" target="_hplink">chemicals</a> banned in the US are still used in international fish farms for disease and parasite control. Due to a lack of regulation, these chemicals make their way to our dinner table through the large amount of fish we import from other countries.

  • Escaped Fish

    Many fish farms operate with netpens in open waters. These systems are extremely susceptible to being ripped open from predators or storms. When the fish <a href="http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=16150" target="_hplink">escape</a>, they cause irreparable harm to the local ecosystems, corrupting gene pools, competing for food sources and breeding territories, and spreading disease.

  • Tilapia

    Tilapia are one of the most environmentally friendly fish to farm. They are herbivores, so they don’t <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/8-sustainable-sources-farmed-fish-seafood.php" target="_hplink">require</a> the mass amounts of fish byproduct that carnivores do. In addition, they can be farmed in large tanks rather than outdoor pools, making them much more accessible for aquaculture.

  • Shrimp Farming

    Shrimp farming is one of the most destructive types of aquaculture. Mangrove forests protect coastlines, provide food and shelter to countless wildlife, and <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/02/mangroves/warne-text" target="_hplink">supply</a> multiple resources to impoverished coastal people who rely on them for daily sustenance. Unfortunately, they also occupy many ideal locations for shrimp farming, and are uprooted and destroyed as a result. In addition, shrimp farmers are often <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/02/mangroves/warne-text/3" target="_hplink">quick</a> to abandon the locations and move to new ones for better production results, destroying more mangroves along the way. Shrimp farms also raise the <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,391523-2,00.html" target="_hplink">salinity</a> of surrounding water and soil, ruining the land for agriculture.

  • Carnivores

    Some carnivorous species, like salmon, can be very high maintenance to farm, requiring much more food than they produce. For every <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,391523-2,00.html" target="_hplink">1 lb.</a> of farmed salmon, 2 to 5 lbs. of smaller fish are needed to feed it.

  • Bivalves

    Bivalves, such as oysters and mussels, rank highest when it comes to environmentally friendly aquaculture. Because they are filter feeders, they actually make the water in their ecosystem <a href="http://www.rodale.com/benefits-eating-oysters" target="_hplink">cleaner</a>, and due to their lack of mobility, they are much easier to contain than fish.

  • Eco-Friendly Aquaculture

    Recirculating Aquaculture Systems are the <a href="http://www.aquaculturetalk.com/2009/01/closed-3/" target="_hplink">most</a> eco-friendly. The ultimate water use is minimal, and they have the least environmentally hazardous waste removal methods. Developing aquaculture farming systems in tandem with agriculture is becoming a more popular environmentally-friendly option, as well. When done right, the systems produce very little waste, as they benefit from each other’s byproducts. Fish waste fertilizes the plants, which can in turn filter the water and provide needed nutrients back to the fish. Rice farmers in Asia have long <a href="http://www.fao.org/focus/e/fisheries/sustaq.htm" target="_hplink">farmed</a> fish alongside their crops, using certain species of fish to fight pests that harm their rice paddies.