No Benefit To Developing Arctic Shipping: U.S. Report

Posted: Updated:
ARCTIC
A new report issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office suggests there's no benefit to developing shipping infrastructure in the Arctic. | David Forman via Getty Images
Print

A new report issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office suggests there's no benefit to developing shipping infrastructure in the Arctic.  

The organization serves as a watchdog for federal spending, and says deep-water ports, mapping and other infrastructure improvements will only go so far in attracting more ships.

For the container-ship companies, the report says one problem is Arctic routes would be seasonal, while that industry needs steady, year-round schedules. 

The report also says mainstream cruise lines aren't drawn to the Arctic because the 10-day journey, typically in Alaska, is too long, the scenery unvarying and interesting ports too scarce.

Some U.S. policy makers like Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski disagree with the report.

She says Arctic maritime activity is on the rise due to the shrinking sea ice, and says now is the time to start building infrastructure.

Related on HuffPost:

Close
Arctic Facts
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

GAO offers sobering look at shipping prospects in US Arctic

Quantifying Arctic Shipping Risk Through Case Studies

Shipping firm first to use drones to navigate Arctic ice

Study: Shippers and seabirds clash over Arctic territory