TORONTO - A Canadian hospital has launched a court challenge with the ultimate goal of invalidating patents on human genes, saying such protection can adversely affect the health of patients and is boosting the country's health-care costs.
Lawyers for the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, or CHEO, filed the challenge Monday in Federal Court in Ottawa, arguing that genes and other segments of the human genome should not be subject to patents for commercial or any other purposes.
"The core position really is that no one should be able to patent human DNA," said Alex Munter, president and CEO of the Ottawa-based CHEO. "It would be like patenting water or air."
Companies or other institutions that hold patents on genes or snippets of DNA and own the rights to related diagnostic tests have a monopoly on what can be done with the information.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that naturally occurring human DNA cannot be patented, siding with advocates who argued that the multibillion-dollar biotechnology industry should not have exclusive control over genetic information found inside the human body.
But in Canada, there has been no similar court challenge to the country's Patent Act — and hence no ruling, said Richard Gold, a professor of law at McGill University in Montreal.
"There's considerable lack of clarity in Canada, especially after the U.S. decision about exactly what can be patented," said Gold, who is consulting pro bono on the case but is not involved in the actual court challenge.
"So we have companies not knowing whether their patents are valid. We have hospitals and governments not willing to take the risk because it would cost a lot to defend one of these actions," he said, referring to potential lawsuits based on patent infringement.
"To take the risk, they may be violating the patents."
CHEO's court challenge centres on the patent for genes related to what's known as long QT syndrome, a potentially deadly heart rhythm disorder that runs in families.
"It's quite an insidious condition because long QT syndrome can be difficult to diagnose with an ECG (electrocardiogram)," said Dr. Gail Graham, chief of the hospital's regional genetics program. "Typically it's the first-line test, but many people's look normal even with an inherited predisposition.
"So ECG isn't a perfect tool and it needs to be combined with genetic testing, which has a much higher sensitivity."
There are a number of genes related to long QT syndrome, and five of them have been patented, primarily by the University of Utah, the chief defendant in the court challenge. Patents cover the DNA sequence — either the whole gene or part of the gene — and related diagnostic tests, said Gold.
The University of Utah had no immediate comment on the Canadian court challenge.
Gold said patents involving long QT genes are being used as a test case, in the hope of setting precedent that would invalidate all patents on naturally occurring human DNA.
"The patents are on the books, they're ostensibly valid, but there are strong legal arguments to make that they're actually not valid or don't apply."
CHEO's physicians and scientists say the granting of proprietary patents on human DNA interferes with their ability to provide high-quality care by making full use of genomic technologies in the increasingly emerging era of personalized medicine.
The hospital had planned to become a major Ontario testing centre for long QT syndrome, but received a cease-and-desist order from a company that holds a Canadian patent on one of the gene mutations and the related test.
But Graham said CHEO and some other institutions have advanced genetic testing capabilities with the development of "whole-exome" sequencing technology, which can look at all the roughly 23,000 genes contained in human DNA and pinpoint those mutated genes known to be associated with disease.
The technology, which is currently being validated, could be used to determine whether a sick newborn in the NICU, for instance, has a genetic disorder, by analyzing DNA in a blood sample, said Graham.
"If by chance I happened to read through a long QT gene and found that that ill newborn would also have long QT syndrome, I would be prohibited from learning that, our laboratory would be prohibited from learning that and our patients would be prohibited from learning that," she said.
"So we would actually be in the morally reprehensible position of not being able to potentially save someone's life and the family members' lives because someone has claimed a patent on a sequence of DNA that occurs naturally."
Graham said long QT syndrome can cause fainting spells during exercise, seizures or, in some cases, sudden death. Genetic testing can identify family members at risk for the condition, allowing them to be treated with medications and sometimes an implanted defibrillator.
As it stands, hospitals must send a patient's blood sample to be tested for long QT gene mutations to one of the U.S. labs licensed by patent holders.
The U.S. labs charge between $4,500 and $4,800 for the genetic testing, more than double the $1,500 to $2,000 it would cost in Canada, said Graham. In Ontario alone, such tests cost the system about $200,000 a year.
"So there's a significant impact on the health-care system."
There are about 7,000 genetic diseases, and many of the mutated genes that underpin the disorders have not yet been identified. Should newly discovered genes be patented — along with diagnostic tests — the impact on Canada's health-care system would accumulate, she said.
"We'll be sending to the U.S. for more and more tests. If you consider the impact of new gene patents and the fact that we might be forced to send blood samples for a number of other conditions over the longer term, it could easily be millions of dollars.
"We need to be able to take advantage of the great potential that these new technologies have," Graham said of whole-exome analysis. "And gene patents have the ability to prevent us from doing that."
CHEO is being represented in Federal Court by Toronto law firm Gilbert's LLP, whose lawyers are providing their services pro bono. Gold's team is being funded by a number of institutions, including Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, Genome Quebec and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Follow @SherylUbelacker on Twitter.
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
In 2007, South Korean scientists altered a cat’s DNA to make it glow in the dark and then took that DNA and cloned other cats from it — creating a set of fluffy, fluorescent felines. Here’s how they did it: The researchers took skin cells from Turkish Angora female cats and used a virus to insert genetic instructions for making red fluorescent protein. Then they put the gene-altered nuclei into the eggs for cloning, and the cloned embryos were implanted back into the donor cats — making the cats the surrogate mothers for their own clones. What’s the point of creating a pet that doubles as a nightlight? Scientists say the ability to engineer animals with fluorescent proteins will enable them to artificially create animals with human genetic diseases.
The Enviropig, or “Frankenswine,” as critics call it, is a pig that’s been genetically altered to better digest and process phosphorus. Pig manure is high in phytate, a form of phosphorus, so when farmers use the manure as fertilizer, the chemical enters the watershed and causes algae blooms that deplete oxygen in the water and kill marine life. So scientists added an E. Coli bacteria and mouse DNA to a pig embryo. This modification decreases a pig’s phosphorous output by as much as 70 percent — making the pig more environmentally friendly.
Scientists at the University of Washington are engineering poplar trees that can clean up contamination sites by absorbing groundwater pollutants through their roots. The plants then break the pollutants down into harmless byproducts that are incorporated into their roots, stems and leaves or released into the air. In laboratory tests, the transgenic plants are able to remove as much as 91 percent of trichloroethylene — the most common groundwater contaminant at U.S. Superfund sites — out of a liquid solution. Regular poplar plants removed just 3 percent of the contaminant.
Scientists have recently taken the gene that programs poison in scorpion tails and combined it with cabbage. Why would they want to create venomous cabbage? To limit pesticide use while still preventing caterpillars from damaging cabbage crops. These genetically modified cabbages produce scorpion poison that kills caterpillars when they bite leaves — but the toxin is modified so it isn’t harmful to humans.
Strong, flexible spider silk is one of the most valuable materials in nature, and it could be used to make an array of products — from artificial ligaments to parachute cords — if we could just produce it on a commercial scale. In 2000, Nexia Biotechnologies announced it had the answer: a goat that produced spiders’ web protein in its milk. Researchers inserted a spiders’ dragline silk gene into the goats’ DNA in such a way that the goats would make the silk protein only in their milk. This “silk milk” could then be used to manufacture a web-like material called Biosteel.
AquaBounty’s genetically modified salmon grows twice as fast as the conventional variety — the photo shows two same-age salmon with the genetically altered one in the rear. The company says the fish has the same flavor, texture, color and odor as a regular salmon; however, the debate continues over whether the fish is safe to eat. Genetically engineered Atlantic salmon has an added growth hormone from a Chinook salmon that allows the fish to produce growth hormone year-round. Scientists were able to keep the hormone active by using a gene from an eel-like fish called an ocean pout, which acts as an “on switch” for the hormone. If the FDA approves the sale of the salmon, it will be the first time the government has allowed modified animals to be marketed for human consumption. According to federal guidelines, the fish would not have to be labeled as genetically modified.
The Flavr Savr tomato was the first commercially grown genetically engineered food to be granted a license for human consumption. By adding an antisense gene, the California-based company Calgene hoped to slow the ripening process of the tomato to prevent softening and rotting, while allowing the tomato to retain its natural flavor and color. The FDA approved the Flavr Savr in 1994; however, the tomatoes were so delicate that they were difficult to transport, and they were off the market by 1997. On top of production and shipping problems, the tomatoes were also reported to have a very bland taste: “The Flavr Savr tomatoes didn’t taste that good because of the variety from which they were developed. There was very little flavor to save,” said Christ Watkins, a horticulture professor at Cornell University.
CLICK HERE to continue on to Mother Nature Network to see the rest of these bizarre genetically engineered creations, including banana vaccines, less-flatulent cows, medicinal eggs and more!