But our panic about invasive species might be a major mistake, according to veteran ecologist Ken Thompson.
Professor Thompson, a senior research fellow in the Department of Animal and Plant Sciences at the University of Sheffield in England, thinks there is good evidence to suggest that the plants and animals we often vilify as invasive species only rarely threaten ecosystems.
He adds that our expensive fights against them often do more damage than the invader might have caused in the first place.
In an interview on CBC Radio’s Quirks & Quarks, he discusses the controversial idea that he explored in his new book, Where Do Camels Belong - Why Invasive Species Aren't All Bad.
Professor Thompson begins with the story of the camel. “Camels are a really neat way of illustrating the problem of where species actually belong,” he says.
Camels evolved in North America, where they lived until 8,000 years ago. They only spread – or “invaded” – the rest of the world fairly recently.
Nature, he says, has moved species around throughout history, and while we’re doing it faster and more frequently than in the past, nature tends to be up to the challenge.
Invasive species are often assumed to be driving native species to extinction when they spread into places that don’t have the predators and diseases that normally control their populations. But Professor Thompson suggests that the evidence to support this idea is often not very strong.
He points out that these ecosystems are often already damaged by human activity. Pollution, over-exploitation of native species, and pressure from development have compromised natural systems.
As a result, he says that often the invaders aren't actually displacing indigenous plants or animals. “Most of the time, alien species are simply responding to opportunities that human changes to the environment have created.”- Listen to the interview with Professor Ken Thompson on Quirks & Quarks on Saturday, Dec. 6 at noon on CBC Radio.
Research is also suggesting that many invaders may not be as damaging as we have assumed. One example is Purple Loosestrife, an Old World plant that was introduced to North American and has quickly spread through wetlands here. It built a reputation for crowding out native plants and completely taking up their space with tall and colourful stalks and flowers.
But Professor Thompson says that the plant's conspicuous nature fooled us. Scientific study of Purple Loosestrife has shown that it actually has very little impact on the biodiversity of the wetlands into which it spreads, and may even provide some benefit by supplying more food for native pollinators.
Professor Thompson is careful to acknowledge that there are some real bad actors out there - truly damaging invaders.The Brown Tree Snake, for example, annihilated the indigenous birds of Guam after it was introduced to the Island after World War II. But he says it is often difficult to identify the truly damaging invasive species in advance, because their impact can vary with time as ecosystems evolve and respond to them.
Given the complexity and dynamic nature of the relationships in any ecosystem, predicting how each case will turn out is very difficult.
He also cautions that our efforts to control or eliminate invasive species can be tremendously expensive, are rarely successful, and often have damaging unintended consequences. For example, the herbicides used to try to eliminate invasive plants often have devastating impact on vulnerable native species.
The cure, in some of these cases, is worse than the disease, he says.
Professor Thompson says the invasive species we might worry about most is actually us. Humans have spread to every corner of the globe, and altered a huge amount of the planet.
“We’ve chopped down forests, built dams and turned the whole world into a giant cattle pasture, and then we’re surprised that some species quite like what we’ve done. We shouldn’t be surprised.”Suggest a correction