POLITICS

Bill C-27: Watchdogs Veterans' Jobs Legislation Must Be Fixed

02/18/2015 01:21 EST | Updated 04/20/2015 05:59 EDT
OTTAWA - Military and veterans watchdogs are urging the Senate to fix a bill intended to give wounded ex-soldiers first crack at federal civil service jobs, but the Harper government appears ready to allow it to go through as written.

Gary Walbourne, the Canadian Forces ombudsman, and veterans ombudsman Guy Parent say National Defence should have the power to determine whether a soldier's medical release is a result of military service.

Bill C-27 gives Veterans Affairs that responsibility, something Walbourne says doesn't make sense, adds unnecessary red tape and could ultimately defeat the purpose of expedited job placement.

"To have a process to determine what is already been determined, for me, just defies logic," Walbourne told the Senate's veterans affairs sub-committee, populated on Wednesday by mostly Conservative members of the upper chamber.

The legislation gives wounded troops the top statutory priority for federal jobs, as long they are qualified, even putting them ahead of laid-off civil servants.

Walbourne argues that National Defence is best suited to justify why a soldier is being given a medical discharge, not the veterans department, which should only assess the impact of the release on an individual.

Allowing Veterans Affairs to decide whether an injury is the result of military service could take as long as six months, delaying not only job applications, but also the distribution of benefits, Walbourne said.

What may seem like a bureaucratic squabble between departments has long been a major sore spot for ex-soldiers, some of whom were let go from the military only to find veterans affairs does not see their medical condition in the same way.

The Senate still has two opportunities to amend the jobs bill before it becomes law.

Kayleigh Kanoza, a spokeswoman for Veterans Affairs Minister Erin O'Toole, said the government "would like to see this bill brought into force as soon as possible," but wouldn't say whether it is prepared to entertain changes at this stage.

"We are committed to continuous improvement in our treatment of veterans, and look forward to seeing the Senate's study," she said in an email.

The Conservatives came under fire in 2013 after troops who were considered medically unfit complained they were being summarily released. The government responded by introducing legislation to bump those wounded soldiers to the front of the line for civil service openings.

Mike Blais, of Canadian Veterans Advocacy, said he can't understand why the government would allow a flawed bill to become law when two of its watchdogs have already sounded the alarm.

"They just want to ram it through before the election, wrap themselves in the flag and say they've done something," said Blais.

Don Leonardo, of advocacy group Veterans Canada, agrees that the bill is flawed and said the Commons veterans committee has also complained that a soldier's medical release should not have to be reviewed twice.

Conservative Sen. Carolyn Stewart-Olsen said she's been told that the two departments are already working together to make the transition between military and civilian life seamless and that "the red tape will be eliminated."

Also on HuffPost

Current MPs With Military Experience