BUSINESS

Controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership Closer To Reality With 'Fast Track' Deal

04/16/2015 02:43 EDT | Updated 06/16/2015 05:59 EDT
Gabriella Demczuk via Getty Images
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 16: Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-OR), left, and Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT), right, speak during the Senate Finance Committee hearing on Congress and U.S. Tariff Policy in the Senate Dirksen Office building on April 16, 2015 in Washington, D.C. Congressional leaders in the tax writing committees reached a deal that would allow President Obama 'fast track' authority on negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Trade Agreement. (Photo by Gabriella Demczuk/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON - Top lawmakers struck a bipartisan agreement Thursday to allow President Barack Obama to negotiate trade deals subject to a yes-or-no vote from Congress without the possibility of changes.

The "fast track" legislation comes as Obama seeks a sweeping trade deal with 11 Pacific nations. The Trans-Pacific Partnership proposes a trade agreement involving the United States, Japan, Vietnam, Canada, Mexico and seven other Pacific rim nations.

The debate scrambles traditional partisan alliances, sharpening differences between the Democratic Party's liberal and pro-business wings. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee; the panel's top Democrat, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, announced the deal.

House Speaker John Boehner said the agreement would create and safeguard U.S. jobs. But Boehner added that Obama still has work before him.

"He must secure the support from his own party that's needed to ensure strong, bipartisan passage," Boehner said in a statement that was echoed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Labour unions and others say the Pacific pact would hurt U.S. job growth and encourage other countries to abuse workers and the environment. The Obama administration rejects those claims, and says U.S. goods and services must have greater access to foreign buyers.

One Democrat, Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, said the agreement marked only a start and could be derailed by amendments that might be added when lawmakers consider the bill in committees or on the floor of the House.

Brown and other Democrats who are aligned with organized labour are often highly suspicious of, or even hostile to, trade legislation. They argue such measures facilitate agreements that wind up destroying jobs in the U.S. and creating jobs in nations that lack the environmental and worker safety protections that exist in the United States.

"Negotiating objectives without enforcement mechanisms don't get you very far," Brown told reporters.

Hatch said he expects the committee to consider the legislation next week.

Traditionally, trade legislation has also been accompanied by a parallel bill that provides funding under the Trade Adjustment Assistance program for American workers who are adversely affected by international accords. It was not immediately clear what agreements had been reached on the subject.

At the same time, though, Wyden introduced separate legislation to renew an expired health care tax break for workers eligible for trade adjustment assistance. The bill would provide a tax credit equal to 72.5 per cent of the cost of health insurance.

The past several presidents have had so-called trade promotion authority, under which Congress may vote yes or no on proposed international deals, but not amend them.

Authority has lapsed, and Obama is seeking its reinstatement at the same time the administration is pursuing global deals.

Given the opposition trade bills draw from Democrats, approval of the legislation will be challenging. That's in part because Republicans deeply oppose Obama's policies and say they are reluctant to increase his authority in any area.

The trade agreement closest to completion, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, would cover a number of Asian and North American countries with Pacific Ocean coastlines, including Japan, Canada and the United States.

A statement from the footwear industry, the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America, hailed the legislation moments after it was announced. In a statement, the group said a Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement had the potential to "save the footwear industry and American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars a year in costs."

Labour unions have traditionally opposed trade legislation.

Also on HuffPost:

11 Things About TPP Harper Doesn't Want You To Know