Taylor Energy's Gulf Oil Spill Could Last Another Century, U.S. Fears

Posted: Updated:
In this March 31, 2015 photo, the wake of a supply vessel heading towards a working platform crosses over an oil sheen drifting from the site of the former Taylor Energy oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, off the coast of Louisiana. Down to just one full-time employee, Taylor Energy Company exists for only one reason: to fight a Gulf of Mexico oil leak that has gone largely unnoticed, despite creating miles-long slicks for more than a decade. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert) | ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — A decade-old oil leak where an offshore platform toppled during a hurricane could continue spilling crude into the Gulf of Mexico for a century or more if left unchecked, according to U.S. government estimates obtained by The Associated Press that provide new details about the scope of the problem.

Taylor Energy Company, which owned the platform and a cluster of oil wells, has played down the extent and environmental impact of the leak. The company also maintains that nothing can be done to completely eliminate the chronic oil slicks that often stretch for miles off the coast of the state of Louisiana.

Taylor has tried to broker a deal with the government to resolve its financial obligations for the leak, but authorities have rebuffed those overtures and have ordered additional work by the company, according to Justice Department officials. Those officials were not authorized to comment publicly by name and spoke only on condition of anonymity.

"There is still more that can be done by Taylor to control and contain the oil that is discharging'' from the site, says an Interior Department fact sheet obtained by AP.

Federal regulators suspect oil is still leaking from at least one of 25 wells that remain buried under mounds of sediment from an underwater mudslide triggered by waves whipped up by Hurricane Ivan in 2004.

A Taylor contractor drilled new wells to intercept and plug nine wells deemed capable of leaking oil. But a company official has asserted that experts agree the "best course of action ... is to not take any affirmative action'' due to the risks of additional drilling.

An AP investigation last month revealed evidence that the leak is far worse than Taylor, or the government, has publicly reported during a secretive response to the slow-motion spill.

The AP's review of more than 2,300 Coast Guard pollution reports since 2008 showed a dramatic spike in sheen sizes and oil volumes since Sept. 1, 2014. That reported increase came just after federal regulators held a workshop last August to improve the accuracy of Taylor's slick estimates and started sending government observers on a Taylor contractor's daily flights over the site.

Presented with AP's findings, the Coast Guard provided a new leak estimate that is about 20 times greater than one recently touted by the company. In a February 2015 court filing, Taylor cited a year-old estimate that oil was leaking at a rate of less than 4 gallons (15 litres) per day.

A Coast Guard fact sheet says sheens as large as 1.5 miles (2 kilometres) wide and 14 miles (22 kilometres) long have been spotted by Taylor since the workshop. Since last September, the estimated daily volume of oil discharged from the site has ranged from roughly 42 gallons (160 litres) to 2,329 gallons (8,815 litres), with a daily average of more than 84 gallons. (320 litres).

Some experts have given far greater estimates of the leak's extent. Based on satellite imagery and pollution reports, the watchdog group SkyTruth estimates between 300,000 gallons (1.1 million litres) and 1.4 million gallons (5.3 million litres) have spilled from the site since 2004, with an annual average daily leak rate between 37 (140 litres) and 900 gallons. (3.4 million litres)

A spokesman for the company declined to comment Friday.

Only the broad outlines of the company's response work are known. The government has agreed to keep many details under wraps in the name of protecting the company's trade secrets.

In response to AP's investigation, U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson last month called on federal officials to disclose technical data and other information about the leak. A spokesman for the Democrat said Nelson confirmed with the Interior Department that Taylor ``was formally asking to be excused from any further cleanup costs.''

Kunzelman reported from Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Associated Press writer Alicia A. Caldwell in Washington contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

Gulf Oil Spill-- Looking Back
Share this
Current Slide

Earlier on HuffPost:

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Ecuador's president urges Brad Pitt to scrap Amazon oil spill movie

Metro Vancouver beaches safe for swimming following oil spill

Up to 90 per cent of Burrard Inlet oil spill would reach shoreline in hours ...

Enbridge to pay $75M settlement in 'win' for environment

Letting Shell drill in Arctic could lead to catastrophic oil spill, experts warn