The party has accepted the Munk Debates' offer of a debate on foreign policy — the fourth, and likely final English-language, debate slot, with the likely prospect of one more in French.
In a statement released Thursday morning, Conservative Party spokesman Kory Teneycke suggested the Munk debate would offer an in-depth discussion in an area he says has been treated as an afterthought during previous debates. He said it would highlight the "stark differences" between Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his opponents on topics ranging from "Russian aggression in Eastern Europe" to how best to confront ISIS.
That brings the number of debate invitations accepted by the governing Conservatives to four: an English debate hosted by Maclean's and Rogers and a French-language debate hosted TVA, both of which were announced last week, as well as a proposal for an English debate on the economy hosted by the Globe and Mail and Google.
Tories want 5 debates: Teneycke
Teneycke has said the party would consider up to five debates, which leaves just one spot remaining, which will almost certainly go to to a French-language outlet.
In a release announcing their successful bid, Munk Institute chair Rudyard Griffiths said that both Harper and New Democrat Leader Tom Mulcair have accepted the invitation.
And while they are still waiting for a response from Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, he confirmed Green Party Leader Elizabeth May has not been asked to take part, as her party does not meet the requirement of 10 MPs to be an officially recognized party in the House of Commons.
"It was our determination that inviting all the leaders of the federally registered parties recognized by Elections Canada, parties who also have MPs in Parliament, numbering six in total, to our standalone event would unduly limit our ability to hold a substantive debate," Griffiths explained. That means the Quebec federal parties Bloc Quebecois and Forces et Democratie, both of which have two MPs like the Greens, were not invited either.
The move came as members of the embattled broadcast consortium — which includes CBC, Radio Canada, CTV and Shaw/Global — were meeting behind closed doors with representatives of political parties who were, at least this morning, still willing to discuss the possibility of traditional cross-network, cross-country televised debates that have been a campaign fixture in the past.
Notably absent from that group is, of course, the Conservative Party. Teneycke, the party's lead negotiator, made it clear last week he would not take part in further discussions with the broadcasters.
On Wednesday, Teneycke urged Canada's major broadcasters — most of whom are also charter members of the consortium — to cover the privately-hosted debates "in a manner that ensures all Canadians can watch."
Liberals back national broadcasts
Meanwhile, the Liberal Party, which has thus far maintained a non-committal stance by refusing to accept or reject any invitations — issued a statement Thursday laying out its "overarching principle" on the issue — namely, that debates "need to reach the largest number of Canadians," an ability they say "only the broadcast group" possesses.
"We believe that a debate hosted by the country's four, national networks is the best way to have as many Canadians as possible engage in the debate process," the statement notes.
They also want to see an "equal number" of debates in both official languages, with the French debates available "for Francophones across the country." The party said it would also like at least one debate in a "town-hall style format, where the bulk of the interactions are audience-based."
Other criteria listed in the Liberal statement:- Establish clear rules around the ownership and uses of debate footage.
- Invite all party leaders represented in the House of Commons.
- Touch on a variety of themes relevant to the national discourse.
- Include a live studio audience and audience participation.
The Liberals are also the first party to explicitly raise the issue of whether "pre-writ debates" — which would include at least one, and possibly more, of the debate proposals accepted by the Conservatives — would include a blackout on party advertising from the date of debate to the "official start of the election."
According to the Liberals, such a rule would ensure fairness in the face of the Conservatives' overwhelming financial advantage. The party invited the other parties to respond.Suggest a correction