OTTAWA — It appears the federal Liberals and Canada's highest courts have averted a legal showdown over an information-technology decision by the previous Conservative government that irked the country's top judges.
That decision forced the courts to use the government's central IT department, Shared Services Canada, for all IT purchases, such as servers, routers and software, as of Sept. 1, rather than letting them make the procurements on their own.
Documents obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act showed the Supreme Court, the Federal Court, Federal Court of Appeal, Court Martial Appeal Court and Tax Court were all threatening legal action over the move.
Beverly McLachlin, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, delivers a speech in Ottawa. (Photo: Fred Chartrand/CP)
They were arguing that the decision infringed on their judicial independence, even though Shared Services Canada wasn't going to house any of the court records in any of their data centres.
The chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, Beverley McLachlin, now says court representatives have met with government officials and the high court is "expecting a satisfactory resolution of the issue shortly."
A spokeswoman for Public Services Minister Judy Foote, who oversees Shared Services Canada, declined to comment.
A spokeswoman for the Privy Council Office, the bureaucracy that supports the prime minister and cabinet, says the government will seek a solution that ensures any shared IT services provided to the courts "do not in any way compromise the principle of judicial independence."
Akim Isabelle Thibouthot didn't say whether that solution would involve a complete reversal of the original Conservative decision last spring.
The move, approved by the Conservative cabinet in May 2015, was supposed to save money and improve security, since Shared Services Canada buys in bulk for the federal government from safe suppliers.
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
The court rules that the Harper government cannot use Parliament alone to impose Senate term limits, allow consultative elections for senatorial candidates or abolish the upper chamber. The justices hold that the first two changes would need the consent of seven provinces representing half the provinces. Abolition would require provincial unanimity.
The government's Truth in Sentencing Act sought to stop judges from routinely giving inmates extra credit for time spent in jail before custody. The court ruled judges have the discretion to allow up to 1.5 days credit.
The court rules 6-1 that Justice Marc Nadon, named to the Supreme Court by Harper last year, is ineligible to sit. They found he did not meet the special criteria laid out for candidates from Quebec.
The court struck down the country's laws prohibiting brothels, streetwalking and living off the avails of prostitution. The Harper government had strongly argued in favour of the laws. The 9-0 decision gave the government a year to enact a new statute.
The court rules that Vancouver's controversial Insite safe-injection facility can stay open. The Harper government tried to close it by denying it a renewed exemption under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. The court found that denial contravened the principles of fundamental justice and ordered the exemption renewed immediately.