Sen. Ted Cruz speaks during the Fox Business Network Republican presidential debate. (Photo: Chuck Burton/AP)The partisan crowd appeared to back him up, cheering the Texas senator and booing when the debate moderator and Trump dabbled in the country-of-birth issue.
"I'm not going to be taking legal advice from Donald Trump."Some pranksters have attempted to edit his Wikipedia page to point out his Canadian birth. A lawsuit has already been launched, and more are expected. Several constitutional scholars have emerged to call it a legitimate question because they say the Supreme Court has never ruled on the definition of what constitutes a "natural-born" U.S. citizen, which is a constitutional requirement to run for president. Tribe says he believes Cruz should qualify — only because Tribe personally favours a flexible approach to interpreting the Constitution, one that evolves over the centuries. But he noted an irony: Cruz himself sees the Constitution differently.
Cruz a constitutional 'originalist'He's a strict originalist who believes the Constitution should be interpreted exactly as written — which means, according to this view, that the 18th century right to bear arms for the purposes of a militia should extend to all 21st-century U.S. citizens and include new forms of high-powered weaponry. "To his kind of judge, Cruz ironically wouldn't be eligible," Tribe wrote in the Boston Globe. "Because the legal principles that prevailed in the 1780s and '90s required that someone actually be born on U.S. soil to be a 'natural born' citizen." Cruz pointed out that his former professor was a committed Democrat. Trump replied that several other scholars have voiced similar concerns. Cruz recently relinquished his Canadian citizenship, which he was granted at birth.
Also on HuffPost