Family and friends attend the departure of HMCS Fredericton, in Halifax, on Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2016. (Photo: Andrew Vaughan/CP)
"Given the age profile of our fleet and corresponding potential safety issues for our brave men and women, there is no time for delay."The association said that before the shipbuilding strategy was finalized in 2010, it tried unsuccessfully to persuade the Conservative government to adopt a looser model, rather than designating just two yards to build both the combat and non-combat fleets. "It provided a logical and common-sense approach as to how Canada could obtain the ships it needs at a competitive cost, within the time frames required by the Royal Canadian Navy and Canadian Coast Guard," said a report, released Wednesday.
Strategy hasn't produced a single shipThe Conservatives opted for Irving Shipbuilding in Halifax and Vancouver's Seaspan yard as its go-to companies. Although initially praised, the strategy has yet to produce a single ship — and the association says those delays are driving up costs to the point where entire programs are on the line. "Only competition will drive value-for-money for Canadian taxpayers," the association said. The group's position puts the Trudeau government in a bit of a bind: the shipbuilding strategy was one of the few Conservative-era policies the Liberals chose to endorse. Nonetheless, a select cabinet committee is said to be reviewing the program in light of the soaring costs. The association says the Conservative strategy is "non-binding" and should be jettisoned "before the program becomes an embarrassment to Canada and its shipbuilding industry."
Also on HuffPost