Assisted Death Legislation: Feds Mull Including 'Mature Minors' In Motion

Posted: Updated:
Print

TORONTO — A special parliamentary committee has recommended that legislation governing doctor-assisted death for competent adults be expanded within three years to include "mature minors" under the age of 18.

The notion of a young person seeking help to terminate their lives raises a number of thorny questions, not the least of which is how does one define a mature minor?

The Canadian Paediatric Society opposes mature minors being included in legislation, which the federal government must draft and pass before June 6, when assisted suicide becomes legal in Canada.

However, Dr. Dawn Davies, chairwoman of CPS's bioethics committee, said the organization will not have a full position statement on the issue until it completes a survey of its members.

"Children and teenagers do die and they suffer just as much as adults who are dying."

"What we suspect is that most pediatricians and pediatric health practitioners would not think that mature minors should be included, at least in the first iteration of the legislation, just because of the weight of the decision being made," Davies said Thursday from Edmonton.

As to how to define when a minor is considered mature enough to make a decision about ending his or her life, Davies said there is no specific age "and that's where it becomes very related to the individual child."

"Really, we're just looking at can they comprehend the information that's being presented to them? Do they understand all the options and the outcomes of those options? And is there a durability about their wish."

Dr. Derryck Smith, who made a submission to the committee during its hearings, said qualifying for assisted death should not be dependent on age, but on whether a person is competent to agree to a medical treatment, including aid in dying. 

"Children and teenagers do die and they suffer just as much as adults who are dying," Smith, the former head of child psychiatry at B.C. Children's Hospital, said from Vancouver.

"The basic principle is why do we want people of any age to suffer unnecessarily if ultimately they are going to die?"

">"Is a seven-year-old likely to be competent? Probably not."

There are standard measurements for determining competency, which are blind to the age of the individual. So it's up to the practitioners assessing a patient to decide, based on those standards, if a young person is capable of understanding and consenting to the terminal nature of their request, he said.    

"Is a seven-year-old likely to be competent? Probably not. But that's not because they happen to be seven, it's because they wouldn't understand the issues" needed to determine if they have capacity, he said.

Even so, Smith agrees with the committee's recommendation that Parliament should wait three years before extending the right to die to mature minors.

"I think we need to proceed cautiously with this because it's controversial."

To date, Belgium and the Netherlands are the only two jurisdictions that allow minors access to physician-assisted death.

Also on HuffPost:

Close
Right-To-Die Laws Around The World
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Doctor-Assisted Death 'Not Permitted' At Vancouver's Providence Health Care ...

Updated: BC's Health minister responds to report on doctor-assisted death

Doctor Assisted Death Recommendations a Good Start: Fletcher

Will doctor-assisted death become religion's cross to bear?

When doctors help you die: Key questions ahead of this week's assisted death ...

Notion of 'mature minors' in assisted death legislation raises thorny questions

Senator who lost husband says assisted death shouldn't be option for mentally ill