Hearings civil, but tense
An Enbridge Energy East shut-off valve is shown above pipeline 9B in Sainte-Justine-de-Newton, Que. (Photo: CP)
Irene Dupuis, 65, a retired elementary school teacher, co-founded her environmental group with her sister, Carole. "Under what circumstances is TransCanada not responsible for spills?" she asked the commission. "What if its IT system is hacked, what about vandalism, earthquakes?" Bergeron said a new federal law coming into effect this summer stipulates companies like his will be entirely responsible for up to $1 billion in cleanup costs associated with a spill, regardless of who is at fault. "What about if a spill costs $1.1 billion?" Dupuis pressed, ignoring the one-question rule.
"The science shows us global warming is real. So when will we stop?"
Irene Dupuis testifies at the Environment hearings on the Energy East pipeline, Wednesday, March 16, 2016 in Levis Que. (Photo: CP)
"The science shows us global warming is real," he said. "So when will we stop?" "The people who work in the industry, they want a salary, they want to pay for their car, they want to work. Environmentalists threaten their livelihoods." One of those threatened is Morin, who after calming down from his encounter with Villeneuve, lights a cigarette outside the hockey complex and discusses his frustrations. "I have no problem with environmentalists," says the truck driver. "But they should arrive here on foot or in electric cars if they are going to criticize oil and pipelines." "I am for the pipeline. It moves the economy. It gives us work." He says Quebecers want expensive services but refuse major projects that can pay for them. "We can't have it all," he argues. "Daycares at $7 a day paid for with money from other provinces. We want parental leave for men. Then we reject energy projects."
"[Environmentalists] should arrive here on foot or in electric cars if they are going to criticize oil and pipelines."
Final approval rests with TrudeauTransCanada wants to build a 4,600-kilometre pipeline from Alberta and Saskatchewan's oil deposits to a marine terminal in New Brunswick. In between, the pipeline is supposed to cross hundreds of kilometres of Quebec territory, connecting to refineries in Montreal and Quebec City.
Final approval rests with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's cabinet after a review by the federal National Energy Board. Quebec's environmental review board is scheduled to produce a report in November. While its recommendations are not legally binding, Trudeau will have a difficult time green-lighting the project if it's rejected in Quebec. Real Picard, 72, a former worker at Quebec's City's Valero oil refinery, said he's for the pipeline — "with conditions." He said he's worried about corrosion but that what concerns him most is the threat of another event like the one nearly three years ago that overshadows much of the discussion on energy projects in Quebec. A recent report says many residents of Lac-Megantic were still suffering nearly 30 months after an oil-train derailment killed 47 people in July 2013. "Lac-Megantic wouldn't have happened if that oil was being transported by pipeline," Picard said. "The pipelines will take some of the trains away."
"Lac-Megantic wouldn't have happened if that oil was being transported by pipeline."
Also on HuffPost