03/12/2018 21:30 EDT | Updated 03/14/2018 10:14 EDT

National Geographic Says It Wants To Move Past Its 'Racist' Coverage

The magazine said its work perpetuated racist stereotypes for decades.

The cover of National Geographic's race issue, which goes on sale March 27.

WASHINGTON — National Geographic acknowledged on Monday that it covered the world through a racist lens for generations, with its magazine portrayals of bare-breasted women and naive brown-skinned tribesmen as savage, unsophisticated and unintelligent.

"We had to own our story to move beyond it,'' editor-in-chief Susan Goldberg told The Associated Press in an interview about the yellow-bordered magazine's April issue, which is devoted to race.

National Geographic first published its magazine in 1888. An investigation conducted last fall by University of Virginia photography historian John Edwin Mason showed that until the 1970s, it virtually ignored people of colour in the United States who were not domestics or labourers, and it reinforced repeatedly the idea that people of colour from foreign lands were "exotics, famously and frequently unclothed, happy hunters, noble savages — every type of cliche.''

For example, in a 1916 article about Australia, the caption on a photo of two Aboriginal people read: "South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings.''

Editor-in-chief of National Geographic Susan Goldberg says the magazine wants to move past the racist coverage it published in the past.

In addition, National Geographic perpetuated the cliche of native people fascinated by technology and overloaded the magazine with pictures of beautiful Pacific island women.

"I think National Geographic was a product of its time,'' Goldberg said. "It started at the height of colonialism and that is the lens through which it covered the world.''

This examination comes as other media organizations are also casting a critical eye on their past. The New York Times recently admitted that most of its obituaries chronicled the lives of white men, and began publishing obituaries of famous women in its "Overlooked'' section.

I knew when we looked back there would be some storytelling that we obviously would never do today, that we don't do and we're not proud of.Susan Goldberg

In National Geographic's April issue, Goldberg, who identified herself as National Geographic's first woman and first Jewish editor, wrote a letter titled "For Decades, Our Coverage Was Racist. To Rise Above Our Past, We Must Acknowledge It.''

"I knew when we looked back there would be some storytelling that we obviously would never do today, that we don't do and we're not proud of,'' she told AP. "But it seemed to me if we want to credibly talk about race, we better look and see how we talked about race.''

30 million readers worldwide

National Geographic, which now reaches 30 million people around the world, was the way that many Americans first learned about the rest of the world, said professor Samir Husni, who heads the Magazine Innovation Center at the University of Mississippi's journalism school.

Making sure that kind of coverage never happens again should be paramount, Husni said. "Trying to integrate the magazine media with more hiring of diverse writers and minorities in the magazine field is how we apologize for the past,'' Husni said.

Goldberg said she is doing just that, adding that in the past, the magazine has done a better job at gender diversity than racial and ethnic diversity.

"The coverage wasn't right before because it was told from an elite, white American point of view, and I think it speaks to exactly why we needed a diversity of storytellers,'' Goldberg said. "So we need photographers who are African-American and Native American because they are going to capture a different truth and maybe a more accurate story.''

Also On HuffPost: