Ontario's world class renewable energy policy -- Feed-in Tariff (FIT) -- just got a whole lot stronger.
First, let's remember why this is important: We need to transition away from polluting energy sources like coal to clean, renewable ones like solar, wind, and geothermal in order to stave off dangerous levels of global warming and protect our health and our children's health.
In the first two years of the program, Ontario stepped out as one of the world leaders on renewable energy, but like all new things, there were a few bumps to smooth out. If the FIT program was going to prosper in the long run, it needed some careful adjustments to get it right. The Ontario government just finished its long awaited two-year review and it looks like they have listened to many of the public's recommendations.
With a host of new changes announced last week, the FIT program is now on much firmer ground, allowing Ontario to continue leading the continent in building clean, safe, renewable electricity. Hopefully these changes will cool some of the overheated rhetoric, so we can all get on with fighting global warming and building a new green economy.
Here's what was announced:
Cheaper renewable energy
The FIT program helps level the playing field between dirty sources of electricity like coal and clean sources like solar. The cost of doing this has so far had a tiny impact on electricity rates (0.4cent/kw/hr according to the Environmental Commissioner), but it's important to keep prices as low as possible in the future too.
Because of the big advances in solar and wind technologies as well as growing supply triggered by the FIT program, the cost to build these renewable energy projects has come down. This price decrease is one of the stated goals of the FIT so it only makes sense then that prices paid under the FIT would come down accordingly also. Across the board, FIT rates have now been reduced by 15-25 per cent. More cost competitive and affordable clean renewable energy is good for everyone.
Encourage community & Aboriginal ownership
Renewable energy projects owned at least in part by Aboriginal or community groups will be given priority in connecting to the grid. This is an important signal that projects that provide the most benefits to local Ontario residents will be a priority.
Work with municipalities
Municipalities have at times voiced concern they felt left out of the FIT program. The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) asked that this be addressed: "Changes to Ontario's FIT program should strengthen the municipal consultation process for green energy projects," said AMO President Gary McNamara. "The changes announced today should have the effect of gravitating green energy projects toward communities that support them." The goal is that new renewable energy projects will be more connected to local communities, providing greater financial benefits and control.
More ambitious renewable energy targets
Manufacturers like the ones who make solar panels were increasingly worried that low targets for renewable energy overall would mean demand for their products would dry up just as they were getting established. The targets were moved up to provide more certainty to hire more employees and grow the industry. It's clear renewable can generate more of our electricity, so let's hope that renewable energy targets are expanded in the near future
Let's hope these and other changes will lead to far more wind, solar, bio-energy, and small hydro projects being built across the province at a faster rate. With a greater emphasis on community and Aboriginal ownership, the future looks bright indeed. Getting this right means less asthma-causing smog, creating new green jobs, and doing our part to tackle climate change to give our children the future they deserve.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/mar/26/wind-energy-denmark
http://bravenewclimate.com/2009/10/22/denmark-wind-experiment-awry/
http://morecoldair.blogspot.ca/2012/03/at-any-price-wind-beats-reliable-supply.html
Transportation, heating, and electrical power generation are the major uses of fossil fuels. Wind and solar can only address the later two and using electrical energy for heating is a stupid idea where natural gas is available.
Transportation needs high energy-density fuels like diesel, kerosene, gasoline, propane, or alcohols. Electrical energy from wind and solar could be used to power trains, but is impractical or useless for other forms of transportation. Bio-fuels divert agricultural production from food.
The solution unfortunately involves nuclear energy, and lots of it. The (potentially) safest form of nuclear energy is the Liquid Fluoride salt Thorium Reactor (LFTR). Canada would need about 475 1GW reactors to meet our 2008 power use. But the this does not address the need for transportation fuels. For this we need to use a significant fraction of the reactors to power the synthesis of liquid fuels for transportation. With sufficient nuclear energy we could obtain the necessary carbon by condensing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and converting it to carbon monoxide to feed Fischer-Tropsch fuel synthesis.
If we start this right away we might be able to complete the transition in sixty years or so. Unfortunately, oil is going to get very expensive before then.
on this ignorance to push their program. It is absolutely astonishing that Mc Guinty is roaring ahead with his dream that will eventually severely damage or destroy a multi-million dollar industry that has employed thousands of people. TOURISM. His plan is to have 6,000 Industrial Wind Turbines running along the shoreline from Sarnia to Tobermorey.
If this were ANY other product that we were talking about that was costly, inefficient, unreliable, harmful to people and wildlife, damaging to the environment and not achieving the goals for which it was first touted (reducing CO2 levels), it would be labelled as the complete and utter failure that it is and thrown out.
But because governments and people who are financially tied to these thing kees spouting the rhetoric and propaganda and because people are too lazy to do some research of their own to find out just how UNgreen wind turbines are, these useless industrial monstrosities continue to get a pass.
Rather than continuing to waste money on something that DOESN'T work and is destroying our countryside, why can't we put those billions of dollars towards a true green energy source and scrap wind turbines altogether?