Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Adam Scott

GET UPDATES FROM Adam Scott
 

Wind Power: A Quiet Solution to Climate Change

Posted: 06/26/11 10:42 AM ET

We asked a tough question today: Is the fear and anxiety being spread about the sound of wind power justified?

In an age when people fit subwoofers into their Honda civics, buy pickup trucks with 'tuned exhaust' noise and watch movies with ear crushing seven-speaker surround sound, one has to admit that our society isn't exactly aiming for quiet.

Wind energy is now the fastest growing source of electricity worldwide. However, in some places where new windmills are being proposed, people are worried that they might be bothered by the sounds they make. In Ontario especially, folks are increasingly uneasy about how loud new windmills might be.

For better or for worse, we have adapted to a life of auditory extremes. Whether you live in the country or in the city, chances are you have adapted to some kind of noise every day. Tires on a road, two-stroke whines from snowmobiles, motorcycles and jet-skis, diesel trucks, barking dogs, neighbours, airplanes, trains, music, construction, air conditioners, refrigerators, dishwashers, power tools -- the list of human created sounds is endless.

It's a bit confusing then that one of quieter things we build -- windmills -- are said to be the subject of great handwringing and upset.

When you step back and think about it, renewable energy is actually one of the more benign things in our society. It doesn't pollute our air, it doesn't poison our water, and compared to pretty much everything else, let's be honest -- it's not very loud either.

New designs of windmill blades are getting quieter all the time, and will continue to improve. Plus, there are minimum setbacks in place which set the distance that windmills must be built from the nearest home or workplace to ensure that noise isn't an issue.

In the difficult task of protecting the environment and our health for current and future generations, windmills are an important tool. Sited appropriately while ensuring real involvement for local communities, they will help protect both.

Put in perspective, windmills aren't one of our problems, but are in fact an important solution. And, as you'll see in this video we made, life is loud... windmills, not so much.


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
02:17 PM on 06/27/2011
All those Europeans using them for 30 years and building them right in villages must be stupid.
Please voters of Ontario, do not believe Tim Hudak is going to cut taxes, reduce your hydro bills, stop paying stranded debt and not cut cut cut, and the eyes on the prize might be the privitzation of Ontario Hydro, finishing the job Harris had to bail on leaving a colossus mess that has been a nightmare to clean up.
http://thinkingaboot.blogspot.com/2011/05/idiot-wind.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
03:29 PM on 06/27/2011
Those turbines "right in villages" are a fraction of the size of today's erections. Denmark hasn't added onshore wind capacity since 2002, because the people know better. See recent article "Low-frequency noise from large wind turbines": http://asadl.org/jasa/resource/1/jasman/v129/i6/p3727_s1?isAuthorized=no
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
12:00 PM on 06/27/2011
This is now what "Environmental Defence" means: fighting for industrial development in rural and wild areas?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
09:46 AM on 06/27/2011
Once Oil hits $200+ then and only then will we move towards alternative energy. Sad but true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
03:25 PM on 06/27/2011
Oil is already used only rarely to generate electricity.
09:39 AM on 06/27/2011
Missing paragraph from previous posts which you probably won't post anyway due to length. Too bad I thought I presented my facts well. Goes between second and last paragraph
Continued....Why is the turbine so close to my home? First of all, according to the wind industry, 500 feet would be an acceptable distance given their claim that the turbines make "no more noise than a refrigerator.' This would be an extremely old and noisy refrigerator indeed. In my case, and in the case of communities across the US, when residents have become concerned about the proximity of turbines to their homes, the wind companies resort to emotional blackmail. They tell the town board, who are very eager for the money the wind company is offering, that it would be a great hardship if the turbines were to be moved further away from homes and that the company could not possibly make money as there would have to be fewer turbines. Then the wind company tells the town board that if they do not keep the proposed turbine locations, they will pull out of the deal. Immediately!.....Continued
09:31 AM on 06/27/2011
First of all, I have been green since before there was a green, c. 1965. Secondly, I live approximately 1700 ft from a 425 ft tall industrial wind turbine. Lastly, I have been researching and investigating the American wind industry for over six years.
Industrial wind turbines are noisy. Very noisy. Yes, it is often possible to stand right under a turbine and hear not much more than a hum. The wind industry capitalizes on this fact by ferrying busloads of eager town officials, prospective leaseholders and supposedly un-biased reporters to turbines so they can proclaim "No noise!' The noise, as the wind industry well knows, occurs the further away one is from the turbine and is also influenced by atmospheric conditions.
The turbine near me is to the northeast. As prevailing winds are from the northwest, in theory I should not hear much turbine noise. In fact I hear non-stop, ear-splitting, unrelenting, sleep-disrupting noise. Unlike the noise of an airport or expressway, which is intermittent, this racket only stops when the wind does. Continued…..
09:30 AM on 06/27/2011
Continued…If you live in NYC, you have an expectation of the possibility a skyscraper being built next to you, as well as well as expectation of noise. When you live in a rural situation, you do not. We are used to quiet sound here. Farming equipment, in season, creates noise that ebbs and flows as it moves away and back towards you. At the end of the day the noise stops.
The noise I am talking about often sounds like a large jet airplane taking off. The problem is that it sounds like the plane is ALWAYS taking off - continuously. There is no ebb and flow. It does not stop. There are no quiet evenings on the deck, no early mornings in the garden. There are no quiet night's sleep. The noise is unrelenting.
The wind industry is quite aware of this (I guarantee you there are no industrial turbines in the backyards of wind industry executives), and they do their best to obfuscate the facts. And I will say here that there is not much difference from the tactics of Big Wind from those of the tobacco industry of two or three decades ago. Nor is there much difference between Big Wind, Big Oil and King Coal.... Continued
09:30 AM on 06/27/2011
.
Continued....Careful research by Mr. Scott would find ample evidence of the "carrot-dangling" practice of Big Wind. It happened where I live (Cohocton, NY), and I have read repeatedly of the same thing happening in community after community. Big Wind has a play book.
In fact, one of their tactics from the playbook is to refer to giant industrial turbines as windmills therefor rendering turbines as quaint, pastoral and harmless machines. A tactic Mr. Scott has also adopted.
I won't get into the politics here. Won't go into detail about this all being a grab for our tax dollars, nor about how turbines, as they exist today, are a grossly inefficient form of energy production. Nor about the colossal subsidies Big Wind receives (inappropriately larger than all other energy subsides, save solar, combined).
I won't get into the perplexing question of why our government is not asking citizens, and requiring businesses, to turn off the lights and to stop wasting energy.
I will just address the question at hand. Yes, turbines make noise. A lot of noise. And it isn't right.
10:20 PM on 06/26/2011
What about the birds that get hit by the blades? What about the poor birds?
08:17 PM on 06/27/2011
How 'bout all those people dying from dirty air?

Every kilowatt produced by wind or solar is one less kilowatt produced by coal/oil/or other "dirty" means.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
03:12 PM on 06/28/2011
But it doesn't reduce the equivalent amount of coal etc., because of making those plants run less efficiently. Because wind is highly variable, and electricity supply always has to equal demand, it's like switching the coal etc. plants from highway to city driving.

Furthermore, where there's hydro, that's what's mostly likely to be used in response to wind. That is, windpower displaces hydropower.
06:56 PM on 06/26/2011
Regardless of how much noise they make, manufacture of the neodymium magnets required in their generators contributes to huge amounts of toxic heavy-metal pollution. As wind turbines become more popular, production of these magnets has increased, and as a result, has polluted whole farming communities with toxic waste:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

Keep in mind that there are currently talks of starting up some of this type of neodymium mining and production in Wyoming, US, as China increases the prices. Is that what you want? If not, then you should stop advocating wind turbines and talk to your politicians about putting a halt to this destructive manufacturing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seer Clearly
Only truth remains when fear is denied
03:01 PM on 06/26/2011
Arguments about noise and lack of predictability have been used to prevent wind power from being developed. This article points out that the noise argument is pretty much ridiculous, or at least easily dealt with. Similarly, the lack of predictability can be overcome by storing the energy for times when it isn't being generated. There are many options available for storing energy, all of which use proven technology: hydropower storage, compressed-air storage, batteries, and converting the power to hydrogen for future combustion all work well, and there are even more exotic options on the horizon.

If *all* the power was generated by wind, storage might be a problem, but we can easily add a lot of wind power generating capacity before we get to that point. When you combine it with hydropower, fossil fuels, solar, and the new safe Thorium nuclear options, it becomes a valuable addition to the power portfolio.
07:50 PM on 06/26/2011
"When you combine it with hydropower­, fossil fuels, solar, and the new safe Thorium nuclear options, it becomes a valuable addition to the power portfolio. "

WOW!!!

You really believe that BIG OIL will allow your "dream" to happen?

Obama, Bush, Clinton and everyone on the House and Senate are "in" with BIG OIL.

Keep dreaming though.
12:15 PM on 06/26/2011
There is absolutely no question that there are individuals whose nervous systems are so sensitive that they ARE greatly disturbed by the low level sounds coming from wind turbines. There have also been some VERY poorly sited wind farms.
HOWEVER, the band-wagon has been jumped upon by affluent NIMBYs who realized long ago that their complaints of "it interferes with my beautiful view" wasn't going over too well with those who are more concerned with the cleanliness of the air they breathe.
The money being spent to manipulate the uninformed and fearful ("farmland can't be used for farming", "wind was supposed to be cheaper than what we already have", etc, etc) is disgraceful. Cattle can graze and crops can be grown within meters of a turbine. NO one has EVER suggested that wind power could be cheaper than the overly-subsidized power we've all been getting in North America! And don't get me started on those who live by the water and don't want a thumbnail-sized turbine on THEIR horizon! Funny, how they all insist upon having electricity, though.
Turbines CAN'T be put in the far north for the luxury of us "southerners" because the new grid required would be prohibitively expensive! ...and... electricity should be produced where it is required, if possible... it's called "Distributed Generation". It can't be shipped like a box of cookies, it's used at the first power station.

We adolescent, entitled, North Americans have a lot of growing up to do.
07:52 PM on 06/26/2011
BIG OIL will never cease to exist. Are they going to give up TRILLONS of dollars in up-and-down speculation to go to a Windmill?

Never going to happen until the oil runs dry.
08:03 PM on 06/26/2011
"We adolescent­, entitled, North Americans have a lot of growing up to do."

100 percent correct.
We need to throw out every politician in the US government. Start over. Can you imagine a country with no lobbyists and no special interests running the show. Can you imagine what us the people can do if we are free of all the corruption?
12:03 PM on 06/26/2011
We have one problem.

What happens when the windmills don't spin?

30% of the time they don't move?

Why you do then?

What say you Mr Scott?