Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Aimee Savard

GET UPDATES FROM Aimee Savard
 

Laureen Harper: Red, White and Wrong All Over

Posted: 07/04/11 11:46 AM ET

A proud Canadian family -- with a passion for fashion to boot -- my aunt and I celebrated this Canada Day up north in our annual cottage tradition.

We were excited to watch the Ottawa festivities from afar, to cheer on our prime minister, and of course to find out what that stunning Kate Middleton would wear.

We hadn't given much thought to our "First Lady" Laureen Harper, unfortunately. We were concerned she'd miss the the proverbial fashion boat, or should we say canoe -- a shame for such an elegant woman. Led by that sophisticated fleet of mounties, who clearly weren't policing her fashion, although they themselves looked smart and patriotic, Mrs. Harper committed some serious fashion faux pas.

While Princess Kate could have been on a catwalk July 1, Mrs. Harper was hardly fit for the sidewalk of Parliament Hill. We felt strongly that Mrs. Harper, or more precisely her stylist, could have represented our country in a far more avant-garde way. The walk-about was a perfect opportunity to display the many talented Canadian designers whom we so proudly adore: D Squared, Lucian Matis, Marie Saint Pierre, Lida Baday, etc. Instead Mrs. Harper donned a circa 1960s outfit reminiscent of an Air Canada stewardess or an Eatons' catalogue summer special.

The rule of thumb is to wear the colours of the maple leaf, our national flag, though the combination of red and white is a tricky one, particularly for the wife of a Conservative prime minister.
Mrs. Harper's attire conjured up images of candy stripers/Mrs. Claus/Valentine's Day cards etc, and don't forget those shoes, eh? Ron White's red heels pale in comparison to Louboutin's famous footwear.

In fact, upon first glance at our "First Lady's" outfit, my dear aunt and I exchanged our mutual disappointment for her secretary-like suit. I even turned to my aunt and huffed "Why wouldn't she wear a white dress and a red hat, something with a little sophistication!"

To my utter delight, this is precisely what our dear Kate did. Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, got it all right. A stunning white dress accented by an extraordinary red fascinator adorned with a stylized maple leaf. She incorporated the mandatory red and white theme in a most elegant and sophisticated manner. And oh those shoes! No matchy-matchy faux pas here. Instead she wore a subtle nude patent platform, the perfect accessory to her already fabulous outfit.

We get it Canada; our "First Lady" needs to find a balance to ensure her image isn't one of lavish luxury, contrary to that of a princess. But does that mean she needs to tell the world Canadians are mundane or boring? Just because you support the Conservative party, it doesn't mean you can't be a little more "liberal" in your sense of style, non? Montreal's known for its fashionistas, do we need to give Quebec even more reason to separate?

In conclusion, kudos to Catherine's stylist, for his/her fine taste in what to wear to our nation's birthday party and we ask Mrs. Harper to either fire hers (if she has one) or hire one if she doesn't.

Written by Catherine Haber and Aimee Savard.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
wetcoastm
Free Speech As Dictated By Our Sponsors
07:59 PM on 07/11/2011
I am no fan of Steven Harper, actually I can't stand him, however his wife does not deserve this article. PM's wives in Canada have never been in the spotlight like the American first ladies, forced to watch every outfit and be a walking symbol of their spouse. It is a good thing that our political spouses are allowed to be boring private citizens.

Too much time is devoted to cooing over women who have never actually held real jobs, wearing clothes that are too expensive for most women to wear.

Mrs. Harper is an educated women who is a mother and has her own career, she should wear something respectable and not buy into the fake worship of the fashion industry.

She does serve as a contrast to the new princess, she went to university then forged ahead and made her own name rather than going to one of the best universities in the world and then waiting around for her man to give her a name.
03:27 PM on 07/08/2011
Wow! I read this article with total confusion!!
Laureen Harper, wife of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, wore a pale blue hat and dress or suit. [I was rather surprised at her wearing blue to tell the truth].
Sharon Johnson, wife of Governor General David Johnson who, is Queen Elizabeth's representative in Canada, was the woman who wore a white outfit with a red hat.
Kate Middleton was indeed in a lovely white dress [the same one she wore for official engagement pictures], an adorable red fascinator with stylized Maple Leaf, but she wore simple, elegant red pumps and carried a red and tan-coloured straw fan-shaped clutch. She was not wearing nude platforms!
Which Canada Day program were you watching?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Newland
12:31 PM on 07/05/2011
I am continually amazed that comments seem to indicate that people don't get that when fashion designers are mentioned, their sales go up, meaning more fabric is purchased, more seamstresses are hired, more retailers place orders..etc,etc,etc. Why is it so hard to understand that jobs are created and stimulated when this happens. Hey, high end designers have jobs too you know and who better to showcase their talents than public/famous people. For the record Michelle Obama is very good at mixing high end designs with J Crew so I think maybe she is being overly criticized. It's all commerce folks.
cdnman
Still a free spirit...
09:29 AM on 07/06/2011
I'm with you Mary Newland f and f
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Newland
12:24 PM on 07/05/2011
I agree with Catherine and Aimee. Mrs. Harper looked like her outfits came from the Sears catalog circa 60's. It was so embarrassing! The only thing you got wrong was that Kate in fact had on red heels with her creamy white dress, red maple leaf hat and oriental fan styled clutch. I don't think it is a matchy,matchy faux pas to have the shoes match in this case. The tan shoes were worn with the navy dresses. Still you are spot on with your view of our representatives. Why couldn't it be Pierre and Maggie to receive this young couple. At least they would have had some hip style.
02:37 PM on 07/06/2011
Maggie was busy showing her vagina if you remember those photos from Rolling Stones - just like Britney Spears. Poor woman. She has been on drugs as her husband ran around with Leona Boyd, etc. Not a great role model. Laureen is in her 40s and looks great.
11:43 PM on 07/04/2011
You are wrong about one thing - Kate did wear "matchy matchy" shoes! Red ones.
I thought Mrs. Harper looked fine.
cdnman
Still a free spirit...
05:19 PM on 07/04/2011
I thought Ms. Harper looked like she got dressed at the last minute, in borrowed clothes almost one size too big.
Bianca S
You can't go trick-or-treating. Ever. For a week
03:12 PM on 07/04/2011
Well that's exactly it-it isn't a catwalk.
I'm glad Mrs. Harper wasn't donning a $900 pair of Louboutins(really author, in this economy?) and that her outfits don't eclipse the policies her party represents.
Just look at the U.S. I think it's sad how obsessed people have become with what Michelle Obama is wearing and it's overshadowing her policies. One one hand, it's commendable she wants to highlights American designers, but on the other, it's not like people can afford to wear them, let alone put food on the table. Perhaps if people paid more attention to the State of the Union adresses than the state of the dress someone was wearing, their country wouldn't be in a such a dire position.
Obviously Canada is a different country, but I think we are starting to become more media and fahion obsessed whewn it comes to Politics and I'm not sure that's a good thing.
03:00 PM on 07/04/2011
Hey, they don't dress fashionably in church.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Newland
01:02 PM on 07/05/2011
...and why not? Didn't God create fashion designers too? My mom always looked like a million bucks in church..including a stylish hat!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
12:14 PM on 07/04/2011
Technically, our First Lady would be the female spouse of the Governor General. We've had first gentlemen, before but they were not referred to in this fashion. Laureen Harper has her designation, the prime minister's wife. She looks pretty good in pale blue.