Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andreas Souvaliotis

GET UPDATES FROM Andreas Souvaliotis
 

Climate Change: What's the Big Deal?

Posted: 08/19/11 01:50 PM ET

It's been more than half a decade since Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth got us thinking and talking about climate change. And while the scientific consensus continued to solidify and our atmosphere continued to fill with more greenhouse gasses (we're now only a couple of years from crossing the psychologically painful threshold of 400 ppm), we actually changed very little in terms of our lifestyles and our national policies.

Some blame our collective inertia on bigger and more urgent concerns, like public finances and health care -- but that thinking would be based on an assumption that there's really nothing big or urgent about climate change. Could that be true? Or could it be that, while we understand all the theory about a changing climate, we may not actually know how it really affects our lives today and tomorrow?

Think about it: Al Gore's movie talked about melting glaciers and (slowly) rising sea levels; scientists have been talking about a few degrees of global warming and about a very changed world by the end of this century (how many of us plan to be around for the year 2100?); politicians are setting emission reduction targets for the year 2050. It's all too abstract and distant -- and none of it could possibly feel like a big deal, the way a mortgage default or a national bankruptcy would hurt today. And yet, if you break down this big fuzzy issue and you start to look at how it's affecting our economy already, how it will mess up our lives in the not too distant future and what will happen to the moral legacy of our generation, it suddenly starts to feel like a really big and scary deal. Consider this:

Short-term economic impact. The innovators, the visionaries and the nimble ones are already responding to the carbon crunch, even though it's still barely noticeable to the naked eye. China is already becoming the world's leading builder of smart grids, fast trains, solar arrays and everything else that a post-carbon world will need. Australia just became the first country to impose a nationwide carbon tax, forcing a great new dose of energy-related innovation into its economy. Some American states are seriously considering banning the sale of high-carbon oil from the Canadian oil sands. So you and I are already being impacted by climate change -- because we're either going to have to join this economic revolution (which might be a bit of an uncomfortable adjustment) or we can choose to resist it at our economic peril. This is not future-talk; it's happening all around us, right now. Elections are being lost and won on this issue; investment fund flows are changing; and tomorrow's leaders are launching their careers with entirely new perspectives and passions. Climate change has already changed the way our world works.

Long-term lifestyle impact. This is the scarier stuff, but most of us have been tuning it out because it's almost unbelievable -- and because it's always easier to focus on more immediate plans. Two or three degrees of warming may not sound like much, especially when it happens over decades, but it's the kind of shock the planet hasn't experienced since the extinction of the dinosaurs. It takes an incredible amount of order and balance to keep seven billion of us living on this small planet in relative peace. None of us can imagine what will happen if that balance is suddenly thrown off; if tens or hundreds of millions of hungry and thirsty people need to find a new homeland; if regional wars break out over access to water; if a resource-rich nation suddenly goes bankrupt. The domino economic effects and the security threats will touch every one of us, no matter where we live and no matter how safe and wealthy we may feel today.

The legacy of our generation.
We didn't create this mess -- we simply continued contributing to it. Climate change is the product of lifestyles from the past nearly ten generations (ever since the start of the industrial revolution) -- but nobody before us knew as much as we do about these consequences, so that makes us truly the first and only generation that is knowingly wrecking this world for our kids. If we don't at least try to change our ways, then those who follow us will naturally point the finger only at us. We will be known as the most selfish generation; the ones that knew what needed to be done but were too self-absorbed, too greedy or too lazy to do anything about it. Legacy is a big deal -- particularly when we get old and start packing our bags for the final exit -- so let's not underestimate how we, the first climate-change-aware generation, will be feeling near the end.

Climate change is the biggest, most complex, multi-faceted and perhaps incomprehensible challenge humanity has ever faced. If we choose to stick our heads in the sand, we might be able to convince ourselves for a little while longer that the party will last forever and the world doesn't need to change. But the world around us is already changing. If we want to protect our prosperous lifestyles, raise our kids in a safe and stable society and be remembered fondly by our grandkids, then our only option is to become the generation of innovators for humankind.

 
It's been more than half a decade since Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth got us thinking and talking about climate change. And while the scientific consensus continued to solidify and our atmosphere c...
It's been more than half a decade since Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth got us thinking and talking about climate change. And while the scientific consensus continued to solidify and our atmosphere c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
12:57 PM on 08/22/2011
If you have not yet read them, get Naomi Oreskes book Merchants of Doubt, and Jim Hoggan's book Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming. Both pull back the curtain on the largest, most well-coordinated PR disinformation campaign in history.

http://climateprogress.org/2010/03/07/naomi-oreskes-book-talk-merchants-of-doubt-how-a-handful-of-scientists-obscure-the-truth-about-climate-change/

There is a line between public relations and propaganda - or there should be. And there is a difference between using your skills, in good faith, to help rescue a battered reputation and using them to twist the truth - to sow confusion and doubt on an issue that is critical to human survival.
http://www.desmogblog.com/slamming-the-climate-skeptic-scam
12:46 AM on 08/30/2011
You have to answer the question, why would they do that? I know why people are "pro-global warming", it's money! See Al Gore...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
12:53 PM on 08/22/2011
Then just four years after the infamous TASSC Memo leaked, the American Petroleum Institute came out with the same strategy, authored by many of the same PR hacks like Steven Milloy, to attack the Kyoto Protocol with pseudoscience and Astro Turf.

1994 TASSC Memo: we encourage a TASSC group in Europe to focus on a few key messages, such as: (i) science should never be corrupted to achieve political ends; (ii) economic growth cannot afford to be held hostage to paternalistic, overregulation; and (iii) improving indoor air quality is a laudable goal that will never be accomplished as long as tobacco smoke is the sole focus of regulators.

1998 API Memo: National Media Relations Program: Develop and implement a national media relations program to inform the media about uncertainties in climate science; to generate national, regional and local media coverage on the scientific uncertainties, and thereby educate and inform the public, stimulating them to raise questions with policy makers.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Climate_Science_Communications_Plan_%281998%29

http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/pseudoscience-and-astroturfing-three-leaked-memos/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
12:48 PM on 08/22/2011
I don't think we'll be the "selfish generation;" we'll be known as the "suckered generation." But only if we continue to listen to shills and sock puppets of the fossil fuel lobby's disinformation campaign.

The evidence is clear: fossil fuel emissions are changing the climate. But rather than adapt the fossil fuel lobby decided to buy a PR disinformation campaign.

Big Tobacco's PR firm APCO Worldwide put their science denial model, TASSC, up for sale to other industries in '94...

As a starting point, we can identify key issues requiring sound scientific research and scientists that may have an interest in them. Some issues our European colleagues suggest include:

Global warming
Nuclear waste disposal
Diseases and pests in agricultural products for transborder trade
Biotechnology
Eco-labeling for EC products
Food processing and packaging

...Establish a Global Climate Science Data Center. The GCSDC will be established in Washington as a non-profit educational foundation with an advisory board of respected climate scientists. It will be staffed initially with professionals on loan from various companies and associations with a major interest in the climate issue...

Any industry harming the environment or public health just called TASSC, who wold then trot out their bullpen of shills with sciencey credentials to confuse and smear legitimate science. Instant fake scientific controversy, just add Astro Turf.

1994 TASSC Memo:
http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2078848225-8226.html
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=The_Advancement_of_Sound_Science_Coalition
(more...)
06:47 PM on 08/21/2011
The first steps are just getting more people to believe there IS a problem and we need to start doing something about it (and that we CAN do something about it). When the biggest corporations figure out how to make money during the right thing, it'll be amazing how much media will surround this issue and how fast things will change for the better.
marcdostl
Diogenesian & Classical Liberal
02:11 AM on 08/20/2011
Air Miles for Social Change? How does one exercise Social Change while accruing mileage flying planes? Is there some connoctation I am missing?
01:14 AM on 08/20/2011
Ya China is building “smart grids” because they get to do it form scratch. We will have to pay trillions. But China is doing something – they are the #1 producer of CO2 with output growing faster than we could ever reduce

Climate change is not “our fault” – in fact the theory is far from proved that doubling CO2 will have any real impact on temperature.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:29 PM on 08/19/2011
Humans emit more than 100 times the CO2 of all the volcanoes in the world combined.

Ya think that might change the climate?

Duh.
05:38 PM on 08/19/2011
I hate to break up your hate fest for all things powered by coal, oil and gas but sea level has DECREASED over the last year and a half! That's according to http://sealevel.colorado.edu/ which equals this smoothed out http://i56.tinypic.com/wsn19v.jpg (by Bob Tisdale).

LOOK AT THE DATA! Since 2005 the rise was only 10mm which is only a rate of one half foot per century. From 1999 to 2005 the amount of rise was more then DOUBLE that. If the ocean is hiding a lot of heat as Trenberth asserts then it's doing a very good job hiding the expansion from it.

A new paper just out confirms ZERO connection between global warming or CO2 and hurricanes.

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2011/2011GL047711.shtml "Tropical cyclone accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) has exhibited strikingly large global interannual variability during the past 40-years. In the pentad since 2006, Northern Hemisphere and global tropical cyclone ACE has decreased dramatically to the lowest levels since the late 1970s."

Here's the latest global temperature chart - show me the 'catastrophic' warming that was predicted to happen over a decade ago? - AIN'T HAPPENEN! http://tinyurl.com/6espvwp The trend established in the 80's and 90's effectively stopped for over a decade. For some climate shills - "it is a travesty" - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/04/AR2009120403073.html
photo
mbkeefer
Elder Amateur Scientist
07:22 PM on 08/19/2011
Two things came together to give us break on rising Global in the last decade.
The sun went into an extremely long solar minimum. The Earth actually received
slightly less solar energy than would normally be expected.
The Chinese put a lot of coal fired power plants on line burning low quality (high
sulfur) coal with no effort to clean up the emmisions. This resulted is a lot of
Sulfur oxide turning into tiny drops of acid in the high atmosphere. This acts
like a partial shade reducing the solar engery reaching the surface. China has
cleaned up the exhaust of their coal fired power plants.
Those two features are no longer working for up. We can expect the next decade
to do a lot of catch up in regards to Global warming. The US set over 8,000
temperature related records in July. Next year may be a repeat.
08:17 AM on 08/20/2011
"The sun went into an extremely long solar minimum." All I ever heard from climate shills in the past regarding the idea that the sun's variation of heat output had anything to do with earth's temperature was complete and utter DENIAL. They even denied that Mars and other planets were warming.

The excuse that sulfur aerosols from China are reducing forcing has already been DEBUNKED. The NH (northern hemisphere) has continued to warm while the SH is where all the cooling is occurring. If China was in the SH (or say Brazil was building more than one new coal fired power plant per week to produce cheap energy to bury global manufacturing competition), then the attribution of cooling to aerosols might be worth considering because aerosols are short lived and there is not a lot of mixing between the NH and SH.
03:59 PM on 08/19/2011
Not really sure what response "our generation" is supposed to provide. Seeing as we're already the 1st generation in history that's being told to expect less from our lives than those before us. Now we're being told that not only do we have to pay an exorbitant amount of taxes to fund the retirement packages of the boomers, we're also supposed to pay to fix the planet they've ruined. Must be a nice life; exploit one of the greatest economic expansions in History, live off Government largesse, then pass on the fallout to your kids and act appalled at the selfishness of those kids. Keep your guilt, we're not interested.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steve-in-abq
02:42 PM on 08/19/2011
We do have some selfishness running amuck. Selfishness that has and is continuing to pollute the planet. Did anyone consider the environmental impact of having an economic summit in Jackson Hole? News flash: it's very difficult to get to. How many extra gallons of fuel were used to meet there instead of a large metro area?

Does anyone question the 'soccer mom' that runs the children all over town in her SUV?

Do we really need all these electronic devices? And the video games? They're all polluters. All the medical equipment that will be used on these fat video game playing children also pollute.

If we are to conserve as a group, we cannot turn off the environmental consideration portions of our brains to make exceptions. "the financial gurus are saving the world, the 'soccer mom' is always exempt from criticism, and the child 'had' to have the game." Really?
bouvdoggie
hopeful pessimist
02:21 PM on 08/19/2011
Thank you. I worry about my great grandchildren who may not be able live a comfortable life if things don't change. People see those record winter cold temperatures and laugh about "those nuts who thought we were warming" nd forget to look at the other half of the globe with records of heat. Then in spring or fall everything switches and we get record heat while the other side [north pole/south pole] of the planet freezes.
05:46 PM on 08/19/2011
Some of 'nuts' actually watch the global temperature itself:

- since 1997 http://tinyurl.com/6espvwp no significant warming for over a decade and counting...

- since 1900 http://tinyurl.com/3ghx7c7