Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Annching Wang

GET UPDATES FROM Annching Wang
 

Is a 127-Year-Old Wedding Dress a Wearable Heirloom or a Disaster?

Posted: 08/ 8/2011 12:07 pm

Bride Allison Rinaldi, 23, recently took her trip down the aisle wearing her mother's wedding gown. Traditionalist? Yes. But wait till you hear the rest of it: That high-necked, long-sleeved, ecru-coloured, chrysanthemum-patterned wedding gown is 127 years old and was also worn by her aunt, grandmother, and great-great-grandmother.

Fashion, though seasonal and ever-changing, is well known to operate in cycles, with the cycles appearing at shorter time intervals in the last 50 years than ever before. But, there is and has always been money made in "traditionalist" styles. "Classic" is a word thrown around almost as often as "new." And every few seasons, we hear that tradition and heritage is back in fashion. Generally, this traditionalism manifests in styles and styling (Kate Middleton might have helped push this trend with her stunning Sarah Burton long-sleeved creation, an anomaly in a sea of strapless mermaid gowns), and sometimes it is just a marketing tactic (Can something inspired by the '70s be considered heritage? Well, maybe to today's tweens). In the case of the 127-year-old wedding gown, it is, as they say, the real deal.

But where do we draw the line between tradition and latching onto emotional sentiment through material possessions? The dress doesn't look half bad, and the bride does look beautiful, but it seems to fit awkwardly (not because it hasn't been altered properly, but as if female ideals have changed between now and then, and are reflected in the cut of the gown). I know that for too many brides today, it is the last thing they picture themselves wearing on their wedding day.

While I was working as a bridal consultant to put myself through fashion school, we always had brides coming in who were looking for classic, elegant, or timeless. From experience, it is interesting to note that for every bride, these words mean different things, but none of them ever asked for a high-necked style, or long sleeves, or brocade-like patterns. And one thing I noticed about brides is that they are almost always at odds with their mothers. Sometimes it will show up disguised through obedience: "I'll try it, sure. What's the harm?" they say with a doubtful cast. And then they would turn to me and whisper knowingly, "no." Other times, it is more blatant: "Mom, no. No. No. No!" Anyone who has ever watched the TLC show, Say Yes to the Dress, knows this.

Sidenote: When I was a teen, I proclaimed my interest in vintage clothes to a friend, who asked, "Aren't you scared of wearing clothes from dead people?" Okay, ick. But here I am, a decade later, reading about this girl, no older than I, who knew since she was a child that she "always wanted to wear the dress." Guess she didn't have a friend like mine.

I am all for tradition, sustainability, and timelessness, but there is something almost impractical about this whole thing. It reminds me of the practice in combining last names in marriage. When a Smith marries a Jones, their children become Smith-Joneses. If their children were to adopt this practice, it starts to become awkward. In trying to establish ideals through identity, they lose practicality. What happens when Rinaldi's daughter is grown up, and turns out to be bigger, or smaller, or shorter, or taller, or worse, what happens if she simply has different tastes? Is she turning her back on a family tradition? It's a lot of pressure to live up to, for the bride, and future seamstresses of the heirloom wedding gown.

Of course, sentiment is the reigning premise in this story. The truth is, we attach meaning to what we wear, and this is just one example. Truthfully, when I first read about it on the front page of a sustainable fashion news blog, I took it as a sign of sustainability because the dress is used over and over again, therefore saving on fabric and environmental costs in production. But, the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it was not about sustaining the earth at all, but about sustaining a value.

Latching onto emotional sentiment through material possessions is plainly, tradition.

Fashion, through the ages, has always been about evoking feeling, sentiment and ideal. Ideas of tradition, classic and timelessness change aesthetically from person to person, time to time, but the sentiments behind them remain the same. When a bride asks for those things, she is thinking of a certain reaction and feeling she wants on her wedding day. She is thinking with her heart.

Some brides just know how to take this to the next level.

 

Follow Annching Wang on Twitter: www.twitter.com/averybywang

Bride Allison Rinaldi, 23, recently took her trip down the aisle wearing her mother's wedding gown. Traditionalist? Yes. But wait till you hear the rest of it: That high-necked, long-sleeved, ecru-col...
Bride Allison Rinaldi, 23, recently took her trip down the aisle wearing her mother's wedding gown. Traditionalist? Yes. But wait till you hear the rest of it: That high-necked, long-sleeved, ecru-col...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:04 PM on 08/10/2011
I wore my mother's 30 year old wedding dress and it was the best decision I ever made. People loved the concept, and it meant a lot to my mother. I referred to it as "our dress." I did have the entire thing changed, and the cost was around $1,000. It was fun to create the new style and watch it evolve over the various fittings.
See the before and after pictures here ("Dress B")
http://thedressmaker.org/dressrestoration.aspx
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bootzey Jones
3/4th covered with water, 93 million miles from th
10:32 AM on 08/09/2011
I wish I had such a gown to wear on my wedding day.

Marriage is as much about family as it is about the individuals getting married. The dress is as much the star as is the bride. By wearing a dress that other family members wore before you, can show that you truly care about family and tradition. And that you want to save $2000+ dollars.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Annching Wang
06:30 PM on 08/09/2011
Yes the wedding day is, as many people forget now, about what you value, which should come from the heart. But I do wonder how much it cost to alter a dress like this. It could come out to be quite a bit, probably more than it would cost to alter most wedding gowns today. And I'm sure money wasn't the issue, since there are several options out there to get a cheap wedding gown for less (renting, one example). In any case, I'm sure many women would relish an opportunity like this, to wear a wedding gown with such history in it. But, the practicality issue arises again. (I definitely don't fit into my mother's wedding gown from the 1970s.) Thanks for the comment!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Annching Wang
06:35 PM on 08/09/2011
P.S. The bride mentioned that she had to diet like mad to fit into the dress, so I guess that brought down the alterations. Not everyone is as lucky though!
wetcoastm
Free Speech As Dictated By Our Sponsors
01:49 AM on 08/09/2011
I don't exactly get the point of this article however thanks for the link to the 127 year old dress, which is beautiful. I think many women would feel very lucky to have a family tradition like this to hand down.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Annching Wang
06:24 PM on 08/09/2011
Thanks for the comment, and interesting that you mention you don't "get it". Well here it is: The point is up to the reader to decide. Relating back to the title: "Is a 127-year-old wedding dress a wearable heirloom or a disaster?" I present my thoughts on this, based on my experiences in the fashion and wedding industry. :)