Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Arya M. Sharma, MD

GET UPDATES FROM Arya M. Sharma, MD
 

Fat Chance Rob Ford, Diets Don't Work

Posted: 01/30/2012 10:31 am

Few issues have received as much media coverage as the recent public announcement by Toronto mayor Rob Ford (and his brother Toronto councilman Doug Ford) to lose 50 pounds in the next six months. This has prompted a wide range of responses, including from media celebrities like Dr. Oz, who chipped in with rather whimsical tips like recommending Ford eat more green tea ice cream and devour 30 grams of protein within 30 minutes of waking.

By making this announcement and inviting citizens to join them, the Fords have made their personal struggles with obesity a matter of public interest. But is this appeal truly in the public's interest? Are the Fords' efforts a motivation to others battling excess weight? Will they use their considerable reach as a platform to educate Canadians about evidence-based obesity management? Or, will their weight loss antics simply perpetuate obesity myths and stereotypes?

Although I am not privy to the exact treatment plan the Fords are pursuing, from what I can glean, it largely amounts to diet and exercise -- an approach that is notorious for its failure for the seriously obese. As documented in hundreds of studies (and real-life experiences), individuals who do lose 50 or more pounds and keep them off with diet and exercise alone are rare and far between.

Those who do succeed require a lifelong obsession with keeping the weight off -- hours of daily exercise and ongoing severe restriction of caloric intake. The risk for regaining the weight remains as high 10 years after losing it as it does in the first months of the diet. We may have treatments for obesity -- we certainly have yet to find a cure.

Indeed, losing weight is never the problem -- all diets work. The real challenge in obesity treatment is keeping the weight off -- this is where most diets fail. This is not unexpected. The complex biology of energy regulation and the unrelenting tendency of our bodies to defend and regain every gram of fat lost leaves no option but to embrace a lifelong commitment to the given diet if the weight is to stay off. When treatment stops, the weight comes back -- always -- there are few (if any) known exceptions to this rule of nature.

Thus, while restricting caloric intake to 1400 calories (or less) together with 60 minutes of daily exercise will let anyone lose weight -- keeping the weight off requires exactly that -- eating less than 1400 calories and committing to 60 minutes of daily exercise forever!

Increase caloric intake to just 1500 calories or cut back to just 50 mins of exercise, even for a few days, and the weight comes back. The metabolism of a 300-pound individual, who has dieted himself down to 200 pounds will never be that of someone who has always been 200 pounds. While the former will forever struggle to survive on 1400 calories to keep the weight off, the latter can happily continue eating his daily 2400 calories while effortlessly maintaining his 200 pounds forever -- who said life is fair?

But it is not just our biology that virtually guarantees the long-term failure of all diets. Most people fail to keep their weight off simply because cutting back calories and increasing activity addresses the symptoms of obesity -- not its causes. While most of us often mistakenly assume that the seemingly obvious cause of weight gain is simply eating more calories than required, the true cause, namely the underlying drivers of that excess consumption, have to be the actual target of treatment.

Unfortunately, the root drivers of overeating are anything but simple. They can range from genetic predisposition (as in "born with a large appetite") to stress, emotional eating, lack of sleep, lack of time, social pressures ("food pushers"), meal skipping, mindless eating, medications, and countless other factors. Treatment approaches that do not consider this wide range of root causes are bound to fail.

If stress (as admitted to by Doug Ford) is the root cause of overeating -- target the stress -- eating will improve. If skipping breakfast leads to night time hunger binges, learning to have breakfast and eating regularly throughout the day will likely solve the problem.

If you are self-medicating your depression with chocolate cake, treating your mood disorder may be the solution. If the medications you take make you hungry, ask your doctor for medications that don't.

If overeating is a due to mindless eating and lack of impulse control, perhaps it is time to screen for attention deficit disorder. None of these underlying root causes can be addressed by simply cutting back on portion size or spending a few extra minutes on your treadmill. In fact, in many cases, restricting calories or exercising can make the underlying problem worse -- which is part of why many end up heavier after their diets than before.

If you are a stress eater, then it is only natural that adding the stress of having to now restrict calories and find the time to squeeze in those extra minutes of exercise into your already overly packed schedule can only add stress -- the exact opposite of what it would take to better manage your weight.

So while I wish the Ford brothers well and do hope that they eventually find competent health professionals who can help treat their obesity (including discussing with them the option of bariatric surgery), I would be disappointed if we pass up this opportunity to educate Canadians on the real issues that drive the obesity epidemic and why this complex and multi-factorial chronic disease requires the same treatment approach and resources as every other chronic condition.

 

Follow Arya M. Sharma, MD on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DrSharma

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:01 PM on 01/30/2012
I have lost 100 lbs and kept it off for well over 2 years so far. This takes renewed commitment every day. The "secret" was move more eat less.

While I am not a fan of the Fords, I do wish them the best in their weight loss journeys.
12:11 AM on 01/31/2012
Actually the secret is "renewed commitment every day" - Congratulations!
08:45 AM on 01/31/2012
Thanks! People have asked me when I will stop "dieting" and I try to tell them it is not a diet just a change in what I eat, but people keep searching for a secret or a magic potion that will make it all easy.
04:11 PM on 01/30/2012
Dr Sharma, a leading Canadian expert on obesity, neglects to mention one of the simplest and most effective diet regimens that delivers results which can be maintained for a life-time - carbohydrate restriction. He is not alone. The nutritional science establishment dismisses carb restriction as just another fad diet and, in a neat self-fulfilling prophesy, tell all and sundry that it is impossible to maintain and that it is also harmful (although there is zero evidence to support this). Meanwhile, countless people have shed excess weight and normalized their metabolic problems by simply removing carbs from their diets. In the countries of northern Europe this has become a widely accepted way of eating to the extent that they have been experiencing severe butter shortages because so many people have switched over (for more on this see the blog of Dr Andreas Eenfeldt at dietdoctor dot com). It is also a crowning irony that bariatric surgery is offered as the only lasting solution. We will happily provide an entire team of highly paid experts to prep, operate and follow-up on this disfiguring procedure with its lifelong risk of complication but will not consider offering even a fraction of that investment in support of a carbohydrate restricted diet which can deliver the same results with no risk. Go figure!
12:13 AM on 01/31/2012
Unfortunately, this idea is not supported by the scientific evidence, which does not show that carb restriction in the long-term is much better than any other approach. There is no doubt that some people do better with carb restriction but certainly not everyone (I have patients who gain weight after cutting down on carbs). If this works for you, great - it sure doesn't for everyone.
08:44 AM on 01/31/2012
For me restricting my carbs was helpful because of what I was eating before I changed my life style...I was living off pasta, rice, potatoes and bread! These foods are cheap, easy, yummy and filling. I now restrict myself so that I take in more protein, less carbs, and when possible my carbs are whole grain. Again this means every day, resisting that the urge to take the easy way out and dive into the carbs.
09:23 AM on 01/31/2012
I assume you referr to the 24 month trials by Sacks and Foster, both of which botched the low-carb arm but, nevertheless, found that low-carb delivered similar weight and better metabolic outcomes than low-cal. There are no large trials that extend beyond 24 months and few of any duration where the diet was properly applied. Sacks' subjects increased their carb intake after 6 months and were eating almost as much as the low-cal arm at the end. Ditto Foster. In both cases, both arms were asked to restrict salt and drink water, the researchers unaware that carb restriction causes natriuresis which would be exacerbated by that advice. These poorly conducted studies are cited as proof that low-carb has no merit when they actually show that low-carb done poorly still delivers superior results. There is one small long-term study among diabetics in the literature that showed significant benefits enduring beyond four years. There are plenty of case studies, some of which I am personally familiar with, that demonstrate sustained weight loss and metabolic benefits over many years duration when the diet is properly applied. Since we worship at the altar of the RCT, we will need many long-term trials before the naysayers will be convinced. And this is not going to happen since the defenders of the status quo control the research agenda and funding sources. BTW - how many RCTs did Banting and Best conduct before insulin became widely accepted?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wendy82551
Rockin' the cranky.
03:40 PM on 01/30/2012
A great article, as always. Everything you've said is true, in my experience. I had gastric bypass surgery about 5 years ago and lost about 120 pounds. I was fast on my way to gaining it all back, but two things stopped me. The main thing was that my surgery was so "successful" that my stomach never stretched, and eating significant (and sometimes insignificant) amounts of sugar or fat resulted in the "dumping" syndrome, which made me so sick (nausea, chills, vomiting, pain) that it served as negative reinforcement. You can only throw up so many pieces of chocolate cake before it starts looking bad to you. The other help was my personal realization that I had permanently altered my body, and I had to choose between fighting it or working with it. That meant dealing with all of the emotional issues that caused me to eat, for one thing. It meant accepting the facts that my "Highland Scots" genes would probably fight me all the way when it came to letting go of fat. It meant accepting that it was not going to happen overnight, that diets don't work, that the only thing that WOULD work was to alter the way I think about food. I have been able to re-lose the weight I had re-gained (the definition of yo-yo, right?), and I'm hoping to lose some more, but only but eating sanely and exercising moderately.
12:16 AM on 01/31/2012
Yup, even surgery is not a guarantee and certainly not the 'easy way out'. Patients who are successful with surgery in the long-term also have to work at this everyday (no exceptions) - it is just that with the altered physiology this is now a lot easier than before - but definitely not a simple walk in the park.