<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title>VICE </title>
  <link href="http://huffingtonpost.ca/author/index.php?author=vice-com"/>
  <updated>2013-06-18T21:41:19-04:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>VICE </name>
  </author>
  <id xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/author/index.php?author=vice-com</id>
  <rights>Copyright 2008, HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.</rights>
  <subtitle>HuffingtonPost Blogger Feed for VICE </subtitle>
  <generator>Good old fashioned elbow grease.</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Yet Another Teen Rape Case in Nova Scotia Needs Your Attention</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/rehtaeh-parsons-rape_b_3437501.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.3437501</id>
    <published>2013-06-14T08:08:05-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-06-14T08:09:17-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[After going to a party a 15-year-old girl from Nova Scotia was "dragged outside" by several boys and performed oral sex on one of them, while another filmed it all happening. Since April, the federal and provincial government have been taking steps to make amendments to the law so these situations don't happen again. But are they being enacted quickly enough?]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[We've heard it before: teenagers are drinking at a party, a girl is taken advantage of, someone records the whole thing, then posts it online to extend the humiliation exponentially. It's the structure of the tragic Rehtaeh Parsons story, and unfortunately, another case that fits this template has surfaced in Halifax barely two months after Rehtaeh's death in April.<br />
<br />
According to the mother of a 15-year-old-girl living in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, her daughter went to an <a href="http://www.trurodaily.com/News/Local/2013-05-30/article-3264817/Police-charge-teen-with-making-child-porn-after-sex-video-surfaces/1" target="_hplink">"all you can drink party" where she got so drunk she could "barely walk."</a> The girl says she was "dragged outside" by several boys and performed oral sex on one of them, while another filmed it all happening. The mother of the girl is saying it's sexual assault, but the only kid getting charged is the boy who filmed and posted the video, who is facing a count of making and distributing child porn. He turned himself in.<br />
<br />
The mother has also said that her daughter, who is facing harassment from her peers after becoming "<a href="http://www.trurodaily.com/News/Local/2013-06-04/article-3268984/Facebook-famous-Dartmouth-teen-being-bullied-over-online-video-of-sex-act/1" target="_hplink">Facebook Famous</a>" for the video of her at the party has stopped going to school and stays out late, shoplifting, her mom says. Clearly she is trying to cause a bunch of noise about this issue now to try and prevent any further damage from occurring to her daughter's life.<br />
<br />
Since April, the federal and provincial government have been taking steps to make amendments to the law so these situations don't happen again. But are they being enacted quickly enough?<br />
<br />
This recent case shows us that no, they're not. Democracy is a slow process. In April, the federal government asked that <a href="http://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/news-nouv/nr-cp/2013/doc_32880.html" target="_hplink">priority be taken on the review</a> of cyberbullying laws, and that it be prepared by sometime in June. It shouldn't take a legal mastermind to conclude that it should be illegal to take an illicit photograph of someone without his or her consent, and hopefully that's what the federal review of the Criminal Code will conclude.<br />
<br />
The Nova Scotia government has moved much quicker than their federal counterparts. In May, the Justice Department pushed the <a href="http://nslegislature.ca/legc/bills/61st_5th/1st_read/b061.htm" target="_hplink">Cyber Safety Act</a> (CSA) through legislation, although its date of proclamation has yet to be determined. The Act is the first of its kind in the province, and it aims to create an investigative unit whom people can call for immediate action against online bullying. Whenever it actually exists, it will supposedly be able to stop an accused party from online communication or confiscate their computers and phones. This also means a victim can go to civil court with charges.<br />
<br />
It's too bad this law wasn't enacted already. Wayne MacKay, a Dalhousie University law professor, says the 14-year-old in this recent case would likely be charged under the CSA if it was already in place. But it's not, and instead a child is being charged for making child pornography; which is a little odd. His alleged actions are still reprehensible, but the language of his charge doesn't seem to adequately describe the crime -- <a href="http://stephenkimber.com/2013/06/charging-a-child-as-a-child-pornographer" target="_hplink">the child pornography act was meant to protect minors from adults.</a><br />
<br />
When he goes to court later this month, he could get off without any charges depending on his defense. "There's a couple of possibilities," MacKay explained to me over the phone. "He's not really in any way a threat to other people in the way that maybe child pornographers would be seen as a threat." But, Mackay admits it's a tough argument to make. Instead, he could argue that it wasn't child pornography, "which would lead to defining what is child pornography mostly because, pretty clearly by his age, he was a child.<br />
<br />
However, this recent case, like many before it, isn't just about the consent to being photographed during sexual acts; they're also about consenting to the sex act in the first place. That, for whatever reason, is something that is being underplayed in this latest story. A Halifax Police spokesperson said the sexual act that was recorded was consensual -- something they determined after interviewing people involved.<br />
<br />
OK, but that raises another question: when so much alcohol is involved that a girl can barely walk, how can she consent? The young girl's mother says when she picked her daughter up from the party she was barely able to walk. The question raised in a case, if this investigation was reopened, would be to measure her intoxication. "Was the person so intoxicated as to not properly understand or be able to inform a consent with the knowledge of what that would entail?" asked MacKay. Consent is an iffy subject legally because it can be hard to prove, but in the case of this young girl who was allegedly too drunk to walk, the situation does not seem too fuzzy. And yet, the problem of determining consent is the reason why the boys who are suspected to have sexually assaulted Rehtaeh Parsons have not been charged. Halifax Police say they are still investigating that case, but the media relation's officer had nothing to add to about the investigation when called.<br />
<br />
MacKay says the girl could alternatively file a human rights complaint saying the posting of the video, based on her gender and sex, was discriminatory and harassment. "In Australia that's a fairly major response to cyberbullying: to deal with it through a human rights complaint process."<br />
<br />
So where do we go from here? If laws are too slow to come into effect, what options are there while we sit in limbo? The federal government announced this week that monetary support would be given to the Red Cross to develop a youth-led anti-bullying program across the country. The Nova Scotia government gave a Halifax sexual assault centre $100,000 in May when the centre said they've had double the requests for counseling and 50 per cent increase in phone calls after the Rehtaeh's story came to light.<br />
<br />
More support in these services is certainly a good sign. In the meantime, however, the media is vital in making sure the case of this most recent Halifax case doesn't get thrown to the side, and that the justice system doesn't fail this girl like they failed Rehtaeh Parsons.<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Want to talk about it? Tweet Ken Wallingford: <a href="https://twitter.com/kjrwall" target="_hplink">@kjrwall</a><br />
<br />
More on Rehtaeh Parsons and the system failed her:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/why-doesnt-the-justice-system-take-rape-cases-seriously" target="_hplink">Why Doesn't the Justice System Take Rape Cases Seriously?</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/why-is-christie-blatchford-blaming-rehtaeh-parsons" target="_hplink">Why Is Christie Blatchford Blaming Rehtaeh Parsons?</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/will-the-rehtaeh-parsons-case-end-up-unresolved" target="_hplink">Will the Rehtaeh Parsons Case End Up Unresolved?</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/inside-anonymouss-operation-to-out-rehtaeh-parsonss-rapists" target="_hplink">Inside Anonymous's Operation to Out Rehtaeh Parsons's Rapists</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/the-rcmp-is-failing-to-protect-teenage-girls" target="_hplink">The RCMP Is Failing to Protect Teenage Girls</a></em><br />
<br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--291539--HH><br><br />
<br />
<br />
<em><a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/nova-scotia-is-dealing-with-yet-another-teen-rape-case" target="_hplink">This story originally ran on VICE.com</a></em>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1094524/thumbs/s-REHTAEH-PARSONS-POSTERS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Anonymous Member Who Broke the Steubenville Rape Case</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/anonymous-steubenville-rape-case_b_3404981.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.3404981</id>
    <published>2013-06-07T17:22:12-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-06-07T17:22:23-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Yesterday, news broke that the FBI raided the home of Deric Lostutter in April. Deric is most famously known as KYAnonymous, the Anonymous operative who leaked a video where the young men who were later convicted of raping an unconscious teenager girl in Steubenville, Ohio were bragging about what they did in a disgustingly proud manner.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[Yesterday, news broke that the <a href="http://gawker.com/the-fbi-raided-steubenville-anonymous-guys-house-here-511634071" target="_hplink">FBI raided the home of Deric Lostutter</a> in April. Deric is most famously known as KYAnonymous, the Anonymous operative who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/verify_controversy?next_url=/watch%3Fv%3DW1oahqCzwcY" target="_hplink">leaked a video</a> where the young men who were later convicted of raping an unconscious teenager girl in Steubenville, Ohio were bragging about what they did in a disgustingly proud manner. The raid of Deric's home was said to be in connection to the hacking of a site called Rollredroll, a fan site for the Steubenville football team. It was defaced by Anonymous during the heat of the story.<br />
<br />
Even though another hacker, who goes by BatCat, has taken credit for that hack, the FBI is obviously of the mind that Deric is responsible or can at least provide more information on how it all went down. Given the nature of Anoymous's actions in the case of Steubenville, Deric's Facebook and Twitter profiles are full of posts and retweets in support of what he did to help bring these rapists to justice. While he has not been officially indicted, he is expecting that to happen any day now. He could face up to a <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/anonymous-hacker-deric-lostutter-raided-by-fbi-2013-6" target="_hplink">decade of prison time</a>. The rapists were only sentenced to one and two years respectively. To figure out more, I called Deric earlier this afternoon to chat with him about his current situation.<br />
<br />
<strong>VICE:</strong> How did you end up with the YouTube video that helped convict the Steubenville rapists?<br />
<br />
<strong>Deric:</strong> Basically, an account was created by a resident of Steubenville who was like, "I have something for you but I don't want anything to come out about my identity," and I was like, "Okay, what is it?" He was like, "It's a video of the players," and I was like, "Oh shit, give it to me," and he said, "Alright, I don't want anything coming back to me," and I was like, "I don't even want to know your name, I'm just glad you didn't give it to somebody else," and he was like, "Yeah, I was afraid the cops would delete it, and it would disappear forever if I gave it to them," and I was like, "Well, I'll make sure that won't happen." <br />
<br />
<strong>Were you receiving a lot of tips at the time?</strong><br />
I was receiving a whole lot of tips - some valid, some not valid.<br />
<br />
<strong>What was the feedback like when you finally got that video out?</strong> <br />
It was almost instantaneous. It went viral immediately. A lot of people were disgusted, including myself, with the video's content.<br />
<br />
<strong>Right. How did the op proceed after that? </strong><br />
Rallies were the main focus. Raising enough media attention so that the FBI and the Department of Justice would get involved, and they ended up doing that. That was the ultimate goal. <br />
<br />
<strong>Were you contacted by law enforcement at any point through the Steubenville operation?</strong><br />
No.<br />
<br />
<strong>In between the raid on your home and the arrests of the rapists, what have you been up to?</strong><br />
I'm a hip hop artist, so I make music and music videos, and I've been working on my next album. Hanging out on my farm, fishing, hunting, drinking beer...<br />
<br />
<strong>Can you walk me through the allegations you're facing now? </strong><br />
They are accusing me of being involved in the hack of Rollredroll.com. They haven't officially indicted me. They haven't officially tried to press charges. They are sending a target letter, meaning they are going to try to indict me in front of a grand jury. <br />
<br />
<strong>At what point did your identity become revealed as one of the Anons involved in Steubenville?</strong> <br />
It was leaked online about three months prior to the raid. <br />
<br />
<strong>You don't think the Steubenville operation has anything to do with the raid?</strong><br />
The search warrant they gave me said: "the hack of rollredroll.com, all communications relating to Batcat", which is the guy who admitted sole responsibility for the hack in the article, which again brings up the question of why the hell was I raided if this guy is publicly online taking all credit for the hacks and he's the only one who committed crimes. I put the screenshot on my Twitter earlier today and on my Facebook.<br />
<br />
<strong>Why do you think you were raided if you had nothing to do with this?</strong><br />
When people think Steubenville, they think KY, they don't think Batcat. And that's my downfall because they want to make an example out of who the public recognizes. They want to say, "Don't question our law enforcement, don't question our government." Just turn a blind eye. And that's not what this country was founded on -- this country was founded on questioning our government and keeping it transparent. <br />
<br />
<em><strong>Want the rest of the interview? <a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/speaking-with-an-anonymous-member-involved-in-steubenville-who-got-raided-by-the-fbi" target="_hplink">READ MORE ON VICE.COM</a></strong></em><br />
<br />
Follow Patrick on Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/patrickmcguire" target="_hplink">@patrickmcguire</a><br />
<br />
Previously:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/inside-anonymouss-operation-to-out-rehtaeh-parsonss-rapists" target="_hplink">Inside Anonymous's Operation to Out Rehtaeh Parsons's Rapists</a>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/996226/thumbs/s-ANONYMOUS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Death to the LCBO</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/lcbo-strike-2013_b_3288402.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.3288402</id>
    <published>2013-05-17T07:53:07-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T07:53:16-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Canadian-style liquor store setups are exceedingly rare. There are almost no countries that require you to purchase spirits in the manner that we are accustomed to.  In Communist China, it's a free-for-all. Almost nobody does it like we do, Canada. We're an outlier. We're a weirdo.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[We were feeling celebratory. We were on vacation, and we liked the place. Unfortunately, it was nearly midnight -- on a Sunday. And we wanted Champagne.<br />
<br />
For a Canadian, this usually means: game over. We were tiring of the bars, and the clubs were cheesy and vaguely threatening. We just wanted to grab a bottle and retire to our balcony.<br />
<br />
We were also in one the largest metropolises in the Muslim world.<br />
<br />
Montreal or Toronto we would have been totally fucked. But not in Istanbul. In Istanbul, where the conservative Erdogan government has been cracking down on all things alcohol-related for a decade (sample statement from the Prime Minister himself: "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/08/alcohol-apartheid-the-new-turkish-laws-that-segregate-drinkers/261290/" target="_hplink">they want all of our youth to become alcoholics!</a>"), there were, on a short stretch of Siraselviler Cadessi in Cihangir, three late-night stores of the surly-man-behind-a-grate variety available to take my lira in exchange for a bit of bubbly. And this wasn't strange or anomalous.<br />
<br />
Canadian-style liquor store setups are exceedingly rare. There are almost no countries that require you to purchase spirits in the manner that we are accustomed to. In legalistic, rule-heavy Switzerland, I have -- personally -- rolled up to a Geneva late-nighter with an all-too-fat wad of francs (damn Swiss) and emerged with a little something-something.<br />
<br />
In sleepy Basel, union-run Paris, staid Vienna, and still-kind-of-Catholic Dublin, things proceed with a similar (from a Canadian perspective) abandon. In Communist China, it's a free-for-all. Meanwhile, in Ontario, employees of the vaguely Yugoslav (except every ex-Yugoslav country is cooler about this) LCBO are <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/story/2013/05/15/ottawa-lcbo-strike-friday.html" target="_hplink">preparing for their first-ever strike</a>, which will see Canada's largest city reduced to the status of that place Kevin Bacon's mom moved to in Footloose.<br />
<br />
Did we lose a war?<br />
<br />
Last week, British Columbia Conservative leader John Cummins promised voters that, if his party is elected, beer and wine (sorry, mixologists) <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/05/07/bc-cummins-liquor-sales.html" target="_hplink">will be available in corner and grocery stores</a> from Victoria to Fernie. Yesterday, the Saskatchewan government released a long list of slightly relaxed regulations that will -- <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/story/2013/05/15/sk-liquor-regulations-changes-130515.html" target="_hplink">among a great many other things</a> -- "allow customers on tour buses and boats to self-serve alcohol," thus increasing the appeal of a double-decker bus tour of Regina by approximately infinity per cent. Even in Toronto the Good, as VICE Canada's LCBO-hating Managing Editor <a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/hudak-wants-ontarios-corner-stores-to-sell-booze" target="_hplink">Patrick McGuire outlined back in December</a>, Conservative Party leader Tim Hudak has made noises indicating that the reign of the sex-shop-in-Victorian-England-like "Beer Stores" might, if his party is elected, come to a merciful end.<br />
<br />
So it's not like there isn't anybody fighting the good fight.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/the-ugly-canadian-mindset" target="_hplink">as I have previously outlined</a>, Canadians can be a prickly, defensive people. Even though we are, in my experience, a boisterous, party-loving bunch, arguments for liberalizing our liquor laws must overcome one very significant hurdle: they require us to admit that we were wrong.<br />
<br />
This is not an easy thing for Canadians. In exploring this topic in various booze-friendly roundtables across our kind-of-great nation, I have encountered a few significant counter-arguments, all of which are intended to make the would-be revolutionary feel somewhat less-than-festive; provincial, even. Out of the loop.<br />
<br />
Of these counter-arguments, the most interesting is the epicurean one. According to this line of thought, whose hedonistic veil hides a savagely puritanical visage, Canadians need the LCBO system (as well as its non-Ontario analogues) because Canadians enjoy quality spirits. Canadians, according to this argument, are not the type of disorderly, depressing lowlifes who nip out to sketchy late-nighters for an overpriced bottle of Jim Beam. Instead, we are connoisseurs--a people whose sophisticated requirements can only be met by the immense buying power (and vast selection) that a grandly-scaled Provincial liquor monopoly can provide.<br />
<br />
"I don't know," such people hesitantly utter while looking away from you, "I guess I've never been in that situation. I just sort of try to keep the place well-stocked, and besides--I'm not sure if a corner store would really sell the sort of 900-year-old, monk-distilled, dungeon-aged whisky that I like to drink."<br />
<br />
In Montreal, where slightly looser legislation allows for beer and wine to be sold in corner stores, this argument has a trashier (because: Montreal) analogue. In this formulation, your booze-after-11pm-on-Sunday-night requirements do not represent a failure of tastes or morals, but rather one of knowledge: Montrealers always know a guy.<br />
<br />
"Oh yeah, dude -- I know it sucks. But do you seriously not know D&eacute;panneur Super Plus Bronzage? It's, like, this tiny place under a sidewalk grate and behind an abandoned sugar factory in Griffintown. Ask for J-F (pronounced "gee-eff") -- he'll totally hook you up. Anything you want. I can't believe you've never heard of this!".<br />
<br />
Clearly, we are kidding ourselves.<br />
<br />
In my experience, insecurity -- whether personal or cultural -- is a difficult hurdle to overcome, but it can be done. You just have to make an appeal to ambition. For Canada's great cities, whose residents are totally-sure-but-still-kind-of-not-sure that they live in the sort of fantastic, cosmopolitan, beacon-to-the-world type of places that people from all nations flock to, I present a traveller's dilemma:<br />
<br />
It's late evening, and it's been a long day. Starting in Zurich or London or Buenos Aires or Bangkok or even Cairo, you've been put the wringer of endless ticket lines, implacable baggage regulations and babies developing ear disorders at 35,000 feet. But it's over. You've landed. And as you walk through downtown Montreal or Toronto or Vancouver (or Ottawa or Calgary or Halifax etc.), all you can think is that it might be time for a little nip. Just a small one. Back at the hotel. For the nerves.<br />
<br />
You walk around in a daze, looking for the sort of minor convenience that is common where you are from, but find, in its place, a mystifying profusion of Red Bull and Snapple. No relief. You try to ask a local for help -- Canadians are friendly, right? But all you receive are confusing directions to distant locations that "might be open." You pass darkened displays of wines from all over the world, and tug on locked doors. Literally dispirited, you give up, heading back to your room while thinking:<br />
<br />
"What is wrong with these people?"<br />
<br />
Almost nobody does it like we do, Canada. We're an outlier. We're a weirdo.<br />
<br />
Isn't it time we loosened up?<br />
<br />
<em>By Michael Mckenna</em>	<br />
<br />
<em>Previously:</em><br />
<br />
<em><strong><a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/hudak-wants-ontarios-corner-stores-to-sell-booze" target="_hplink">Tim Hudak Wants Ontario's Corner Stores to Sell Booze</a></strong></em><br />
<br />
<em><a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/death-to-the-lcbo" target="_hplink">This post originally appeared on VICE.</a></em><br />
<br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--297750--HH>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1079519/thumbs/s-LCBO-STRIKE-ONTARIO-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Montreal's Food Truck Plan Is a Symbolic &quot;Screw You&quot; to Poor People and Immigrants</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/montreal-food-trucks_b_3209469.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.3209469</id>
    <published>2013-05-03T12:32:13-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-05-03T12:52:57-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Montreal's recently self-identified foodies will finally get to enjoy the opportunity to stand in line for twenty minutes to pay $9 for a pork belly sandwich, thus catching up with the rest of Western civilization in realizing the ineffable and irreplaceable gastronomic qualities of "something that was in truck at some point."]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[By Jonah Campbell<br />
<br />
As those who are attentive to gastronomic rumblings in Canada are doubtless already aware, a few weeks ago it was announced that Montreal is finally lifting its 60-odd year ban on street food, although it is so doing in as perversely over-regulated and ass-backward a fashion as la Belle Province can muster (Quebec, I mean, not the <a href="https://www.google.ca/search?q=la+belle+province&amp;aq=0&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;hl=en&amp;tbm=isch&amp;source=og&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi&amp;authuser=0&amp;ei=r0qBUbKiH6fp0AGrwoCAAw&amp;biw=1792&amp;bih=932&amp;sei=uEqBUeGIL8TH0gGznoCwBQ" target="_hplink">fast food chain</a>). The city will be granting a small number of permits, exclusively to pre-existing restaurants and caterers, and apparently only to those that will provide food of a quality "highly respected and renowned" that showcases the gastronomic excellence of Quebec. Vendors will be restricted to food trucks per se (no carts, wagons, etc.), and the majority of the food preparation will have to occur off-location, ie: not in the truck itself.<br />
<br />
What all this amounts to is that Montreal's recently self-identified foodies will finally get to enjoy the opportunity to stand in line for twenty minutes to pay $9 for a pork belly sandwich, thus catching up with the rest of Western civilization in realizing the ineffable and irreplaceable gastronomic qualities of "something that was in truck at some point." Don't get me wrong, I myself have doubtless at some point or other uttered the meaningless statement "I LOVE STREET FOOD," unconsciously attempting to meet the social expectations to be agreeable without bothering to take a minute and a half to figure out what I was actually saying. For there is an important distinction between "liking Street Food," as code for the current obsession with tacos and banh mi, and actually being interested in supporting the culinary space that is opened up by the permission of public, mobile, food-vending.<br />
<br />
And this is the point that is completely missed by Montreal's approach to food trucks. Arguably, what is important about street food is the opportunity it provides for people who don't have the resources to open up a full-scale restaurant to make some kind of a living through food (important in the "big picture" sense; it is also important because of how vastly it improves the quality of life of wasted people, obvs.). What is interesting about street food is that, partly due to the lower overhead, a greater flexibility is allowed -- street carts can afford to cater to the specific and sometimes obscure culinary inclinations of particular neighbourhoods, communities, or cultures, and the material and logistical constraints of how to prepare and serve food on the fly can produce mutations and innovations in local culinary practices, even if it's as simple as "Screw it, let's put it on a stick." In this way street food comes to constitute a lively and often idiosyncratic part of the foodscape of a city.<br />
<br />
Montreal's food truck plan explicitly precludes the former, which if one is even remotely sensitive to questions about cultural appropriation, constitutes a pretty undeniable symbolic "screw you" to the poor people and immigrants upon whom street food has depended, basically forever. And even if you're completely indifferent to that side of things, the idea that the vendors are going to be selected on the basis of some city wonks' idea of what the culinary identity of Montreal is supposed to be should give anyone pause. The city is supposedly proceeding with due caution in light of the <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/04/20/vendor-calls-torontos-street-food-program-a-scam-threatens-to-sue/" target="_hplink">colossal failure of Toronto's similar A La Cart pilot program</a>, but what is truly creepy is the consonance of this with the project of asserting a particular Qu&eacute;becois identity that must be carefully tailored and maintained, protected from threats both internal and external by an elaborate scaffolding of regulation and legislation.<br />
<br />
Toronto's shitting of the bed notwithstanding, they at least still have street meat, and similar projects started in Calgary and Vancouver have met with some success in recent years, in spite of the attendant profusion of puns and extreme spelling (Perogy Boyz, Feastro Urban Bistro, Fasttrac Fusion, etc.). While both cities have a pretty restrictive licensing and regulatory apparatus, the number of vendors and the locations in which they are permitted to operate continues to expand, with Vancouver's food carts growing to nearly one hundred since the pilot was initiated in 2010. Of course, it is still to Portland and Williamsburg that these look for inspiration/administration, rather than Bangkok, Mexico City, or Kerala, the grand dames of eating on the street.<br />
<br />
So it's hard to predict exactly where this Montreal thing is going to go, but it already has the earmarks of a bad tourism venture, with a bunch of administrative yahoos trying to manufacture a cultural identity and say "this is Montreal" instead of opening things up and actually finding out what the place is all about. I mean, big ups to the <a href="http://grumman78.blogspot.ca/" target="_hplink">Grumman '78</a> folks for fighting the fight to at least get the bylaws changed, but it's got to go farther than this, which as it stands threatens to be but a precious and privileged promotional exercise, and a nullification of what makes street food a vital and relevant force in the culinary life of a city.<br />
<br />
Glut on.<br />
<br />
<em>Read the original article on <a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/montreals-food-truck-plan-is-a-symbolic-fuck-you-to-poor-people-and-immigrants" target="_hplink">VICE</a>.</em><br />
<br />
Hungry? Watch Munchies:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/munchies/bar-isabel" target="_hplink">Bar Isabel</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/munchies/munchies-joe-beef" target="_hplink">Joe Beef</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/munchies/guu" target="_hplink">Guu Izakaya</a>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1119380/thumbs/s-MONTREAL-FOOD-TRUCKS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why Rehtaeh Parsons' Story Could Have Been My Own</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/rehtaeh-parsons_b_3094864.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.3094864</id>
    <published>2013-04-17T07:13:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-06-17T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Sunday, April 14th marked ten years since the night I was raped. I'd been dreading that bizarre anniversary like the plague. I didn't really understand what I was supposed to do or how I was supposed to feel. So what did I end up doing on my "anniversary"?  My boyfriend made bacon pancakes, we went to the mall, watched TV...  So really it was like any other Sunday, although this time I was hyperaware of my gratefulness for every moment of it.  I mourn for Rehtaeh Parsons, Audrie Pott, and all the other girls who did not have that same luxury.  We need to realize that rape is a crime and stop making excuses for criminals.  If we don't we are going to continue to disappoint countless young women to death.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[By Andria Mahon<br />
<br />
Sunday, April 14th marked ten years since the night I was raped. I'd been dreading that bizarre anniversary like the plague. I didn't really understand what I was supposed to do or how I was supposed to feel.<br />
<br />
I have never really acknowledged the day any other year, but ten years feels like a lifetime. A lifetime which girls like Rehtaeh Parsons, Audrie Pott, or countless other girls that we don't even know about, will never experience. That, more than anything, weighed on my mind.<br />
<br />
I am the first to admit that the story of my rape is atypical as it was a "stranger rape" (which account for under 20 per cent of sexual assaults) in a foreign country. I had just moved to Tokyo three weeks prior and the time change was still seriously messing with me. I fell asleep fully-clothed to the sounds of merriment in a bedroom at party a friend was hosting at her place.  I woke up hours later in the dark with a man I uttered exactly two words to at said party on top of me. I woke up when he was pulling my pants off and before I could scream, it was happening. All I could do was focus on the sound of my heart beating as I felt my body fill with blackness.<br />
<br />
As I walked home afterwards, through the silent streets of suburban Tokyo, I felt like an oil pipeline had burst inside me. Every inch of my internal anatomy felt covered in thick black muck. I felt like I was going to suffocate.<br />
<br />
I didn't go to the police because I thought it was bad enough that buying cigarettes involved me resorting to playing charades. I couldn't imagine attempting to do the same to explain what had just happened to me.<br />
<br />
All my friends and family were several thousands of kilometers away and when I told a co-worker it was shrugged off. So I kept my mouth shut. I began to relish silence and being alone. I would walk for hours at night through the streets of Tokyo, alone and silent. As the days passed I knew that this was going to be my secret. I could not imagine trying to handle what other people might have to say about the violent moments that killed my soul.<br />
<br />
If I were confronted by the torment that Rehtaeh Parsons, Audrie Pott, and countless other nameless girls have endured at the hands of their unrelenting, Internet savvy peers I would have thrown myself in front of a train. I say that without a hint of hyperbole. There were days when the blackness that coated my insides and the barrage of bullshit within my own head (You are broken. You are disgusting. How could you be so stupid to assume you would be safe?!) was enough to make me stand in front of an abandoned store near the Keisei line and will myself to duck under the barrier to stand on the tracks. Obviously I never I did, but I'm starting to think that's because the only voice I had against me was my own.<br />
<br />
When I think about what these girls endured -- the constant barrage of hate and criticism, actual pictures of their rapes being passed around their schools like some sociopathic version of Pokemon cards -- it makes me want to vomit. I've been struggling to find a comparative moment in a person's life that would be as painful to have shared, in order to better explain how horrific this would be. Alas, I genuinely cannot. I struggle to think of a universal human experience that reaches that level of violation. Which is really part of the problem as to why this insane slut shaming and bullying of rape victims occurs.<br />
<br />
I never in a million years ever thought I would be raped. I took self defense in high school, I always had my guard up amongst strangers, I was too overweight to rock "inappropriate" clothing (the notion that fat girls aren't raped because they aren't conventionally attractive is a truly troublesome myth). I had bought into the bizarre notion that our culture propagates about rape only happening to "certain types of girls" who put themselves in "certain types of situations." But then I learnt the biggest secret regarding rape -- anyone (males included), at any time, at any place on the planet can be raped.<br />
<br />
There is no such thing as "certain types of people" or "certain types of situations." Rape is about power.  Not about clothing. Not about intoxication. What happened to me, what happened to Rehtaeh Parsons, what happened to Audrie Pott, could happen to anyone reading this right now. That is what not only pisses me off but scares me the most about this current "trend" of bullying rape victims to death.<br />
<br />
I encourage you to read a summation of the hate that has surrounded the Steubenville victim because I have a feeling that it is exactly the same as what Rehtaeh Parsons, Audrie Pott, and countless other girls that we don't even know about have had to endure. Except Rehtaeh and Audrie woke up every day to find it posted on their Facebook walls, sitting in their text messages, DM'ed to them on Twitter. Once they left their homes for the day they had to deal with people saying it to their faces. They could not escape the horror within their own heads and they could not get away from the externalization of their internal monologues spilling out of the mouths and keyboards of their peers. And we're shocked that they killed themselves?<br />
<br />
Here are some cold hard facts for those that bully rape victims:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>1 out of every 6 American women will personally experience sexual violence in their lifetime.</li></ul><br />
<ul><li>1 out of every 33 American men will personally experience sexual violence in their lifetime.</li></ul><br />
<ul><li>44% of victims are under the age of 18 and 80% of victims are under the age of 30.</li></ul><br />
<ul><li>80% of sexual assaults are committed by someone the victim already knows.</li></ul><br />
<ul><li>54% of sexual assaults are never reported.</li></ul><br />
<ul><li>97% of rapists will never spend a day in jail.</li></ul><br />
*although these statistics reflect the U.S., Canadian statistics are very similar.<br />
<br />
It seems like a lot of the abusive comments (and law enforcement inaction) hinge on the notion that victims are making it up. False reports of rape (while difficult to quantify) sit at 8-10% which are vastly outnumbered by the 54% of assaults that are never reported.<br />
<br />
It is time for society to accept that the suicides of these young women are entirely our fault. As Rehtaeh Parsons' father said in an emotional open letter on his blog: "My daughter wasn't bullied to death, she was disappointed to death. Disappointed in people she thought she could trust, her school, and the police." In a society where 97% of rapists never spend a day in jail and there are no real consequences (legal or otherwise) for bullying people, we are collectively responsible for disappointing rape victims to death.<br />
<br />
If you're a parent -- be a parent. Do your best to figure out what the hell your kids are saying and doing online. Do not assume that your child would never be a bully or that your child could never be a rapist.  Talk to your kids about sex and about consent. Your child is not a special snowflake, they have the capacity to be an asshole just like every other being on the planet.  Do not allow them to be.<br />
<br />
If you work in law enforcement -- do your job. When a group of computer geeks can do in a couple of days what you have failed to do in almost two years, you officially earn a badge of incompetency.<br />
<br />
If you are a rape victim -- know you are not alone. There are millions of us walking the planet. It was not your fault.  Know that one day the horror of what happened to you will only be a part of your story, not your whole story. You are a good person and you are loved. Never believe anyone who tries to tell you otherwise.<br />
<br />
So what did I end up doing on my "anniversary"?  My boyfriend made bacon pancakes, we went to the mall, watched TV...  So really it was like any other Sunday, although this time I was hyperaware of my gratefulness for every moment of it.  I felt grateful to be alive but most of all I felt grateful that I have had the luxury of not having the most horrific and dehumanizing moments of my life define my entire life. <br />
<br />
I mourn for Rehtaeh Parsons, Audrie Pott, and all the other girls who did not have that same luxury.  We need to realize that rape is a crime and stop making excuses for criminals.  If we don't we are going to continue to disappoint countless young women to death.<br />
<br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--290920--HH>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1085143/thumbs/s-REHTAEH-PARSONS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Q&amp;A: Inside Anonymous' Operation to Out Rehtaeh Parsons' Alleged Rapists</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/anonymous-rehtaeh-parsons_b_3071098.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.3071098</id>
    <published>2013-04-12T14:39:40-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-06-12T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[In the days following the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons -- the teenage girl from Halifax who committed suicide after being gang raped, photographed, and harassed -- the hacktivist group Anonymous is playing a game of chicken with the authorities in Nova Scotia.I spoke with a member of Anonymous who is directly involved with the operation to bring Rehtaeh's rapists to justice, in order to get a better handle on their motivations.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[In the days following the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons -- the teenage girl from Halifax who committed suicide after being gang raped, photographed, and harassed -- <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/04/12/anonymous-rehtaeh-parsons-rape-confession_n_3069945.html?utm_hp_ref=canada" target="_hplink">the hacktivist group Anonymous</a> is playing a game of chicken with the authorities in Nova Scotia. Anonymous says they have the names of four suspects, and are threatening to release that information if justice is not delivered. Those names have in fact been circulating in small online circles, but the information has been withheld from publication on Anonymous's largest social media channels. All of this has caused a storm of negative feedback from those who view Anonymous's actions as destructive "vigilantism" while Anonymous maintains they are only involved because "several crimes have been committed in Nova Scotia. A 17-year-old girl killed herself because the police failed to do their jobs."<br />
<br />
I spoke with a member of Anonymous who is directly involved with the operation to bring Rehtaeh's rapists to justice, in order to get a better handle on their motivations.<br />
<br />
<strong>VICE: How do you go about sourcing the information that has led to naming the four suspects?</strong><br />
The information we have gathered comes from a combination of internet research and informants. It's a lot more like being a journalist than it is being a detective. We use advanced search techniques to comb the internet for statements, photos, videos, whatever we need. We can locate statements by suspects made years ago on accounts they may not even know still exist. We've also developed a level of trust with our online community and they feel comfortable speaking with us because they know we'll protect their identities. We validate their information in the same way the police might, by cross referencing stories and doing background checks on the individuals who are providing the information. There's also a psychological factor. It's important to recognize the motives behind the person who is providing you the information. Some people just want to be involved so they'll embellish their accounts or perhaps they want revenge. You can't always count on a person's memory either so it's important to test them to discover if the story they are telling you has been compromised by time or their emotional state.<br />
<br />
<strong>VICE: In this case, did your sources approach you?</strong><br />
Most of the sources approached us, but we tracked down quite a few of them by examining the online interactions of the victim and the suspects.<br />
<br />
<strong>VICE: What have you learned about this case so far that you want people to know?</strong><br />
Only half of this case is about those four teenage boys and the alleged rape. The real guilty parties here are the adults that violated Rehtaeh. I would like to see those boys punished for what they did because I think it sets a terrible example for the other young men in Nova Scotia, but almost even more I would like to see the police and the school system pay for what they did to that girl. They had a responsibility to be there for her, to protect her and to relieve her torment. They failed at every turn to help her. Now they're all too busy blaming one another. The school claims they didn't know. The police say they couldn't find any evidence. They're both guilty of incompetence.<br />
<br />
<strong>VICE: What happens if you have the wrong person?</strong><br />
I became specifically involved in this operation to prevent that. I didn't get involved in Steubenville. I didn't like the way it was handled. People were called out and in some cases forced to prove their innocence before being let off the hook. It seemed a lot like guilty until proven innocent. I have experience tracking people down online. We would never go public on this unless we were 100 per cent sure. Fortunately, this isn't really an issue. The boys who committed the assault were very public about what they had done. The photo taken of the rape was circulated throughout the school, possibly to hundreds of kids -- this of course goes to back my previous statements about how incompetent the school administration was.<br />
<br />
People are using this idea of us possibly implicating the wrong individuals to detract away from the real issues. We all know who the police and school officials are that are guilty in this case. I think it's also important to note that justice systems often find innocent people guilty and sentence them to prison, or even in the U.S. for instance, death. So it's nonsense to compare the justice system to Anonymous, but I doubt I'd be embarrassed if our track records were viewed side by side.<br />
<br />
<strong>VICE: How would you respond to columns like Chris Selley's in the National Post that say your efforts are not needed?</strong><br />
Wow, you picked a real winner there. Well, no offense to Chris Selley or the National Post, but he seems to insinuate that if the police screw up and a few rapists get off the proper response is "tough shit," move on to the next case. For that, I think he's a moron. Let's slow down for one second and assume that I did release the names of those rapists... what law am I breaking? I suppose they could sue me for slandering them. Of course, to do that they'd have to prove I was lying.<br />
<br />
This gets worse: he says we should ignore the photo being spread around the school because it probably happens all time. We can't expect the legal system to punish everyone that's passing around photos of women being raped, now can we? It's "fairly routine adolescent behaviour." Chris Selley article epitomizes the rape culture. Selley is equating a traumatic rape with a picture of a girl's breast she took in a mirror and sent to her boyfriend.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/inside-anonymouss-operation-to-out-rehtaeh-parsonss-rapists" target="_hplink">Read more...</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/the-rcmp-is-failing-to-protect-teenage-girls" target="_hplink">The RCMP Is Failing to Protect Teenage Girls</a><br />
<br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--290920--HH>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1084047/thumbs/s-REHTAEH-PARSONS-CONFESSION-ANONYMOUS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How the RCMP failed Rehtaeh Parsons</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/rateah-parsons-rcmp_b_3061060.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.3061060</id>
    <published>2013-04-11T12:05:50-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-06-11T05:12:02-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[We're still left with the question of why the RCMP failed Rehtaeh Parsons, the 17-year-old who recently commit suicide after being allegedly raped and bullied. Something seems seriously amiss when photographic evidence of a rape is considered not useful, especially when the investigating officers tell the victim and their family they believe the rape happened. We can discuss cyber-bullying all we want, but perhaps it would have lessened, or even stopped, had the boys who raped, and ultimately were the cause of her social torture, were arrested. We don't have systems in place to stop cyber-bullying yet, but we do have institutions to bring justice to those who commit crimes. Especially when it comes to a rape that happens in real life]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[Rehtaeh Parsons, a teenage girl from Nova Scotia, was taken off life support on Sunday after a failed suicide attempt. Her mother believes Rehtaeh tried to take her life because of severe depression, brought on by months of bullying both in person and online. <br />
<br />
It all started one night -- at a friend's house -- when four boys raped Rehtaeh. One of them took a photo and distributed it online. It quickly went viral within Rehtaeh's school and community and for whatever reason, the RCMP took a year to investigate the rape after which no charges were placed. They say there are "no grounds to charge four boys over allegations they sexually assaulted Rehtaeh" and worse still, Nova Scotia's justice minister has "no plans to order a review of the RCMP handling of the case." Does this sound familiar?<br />
<br />
Reteah's death comes on the heels of Steubenville, Ohio and months after British Columbia's tragic Amanda Todd case -- the Canadian teenager who tragically took her own life last October. This repetitive tale is exhaustingly familiar: young guys do something terrible to a teenage girl, in person and cyber-bullying ensues, then the guys get away with it unscathed (unless Anonymous and/or the Ohio courts get involved).<br />
<br />
Unfortunately Amanda Todd and Rehtaeh Parsons share a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/04/10/rehtaeh-parsons-school-rape_n_3052364.html" target="_hplink">seeming failure on the part of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police</a> to properly serve and protect them. Amanda Todd's case has gone completely cold, despite the RCMP's chest-beating declaration early on that "<a href="http://o.canada.com/2012/10/13/investigation-into-b-c-teens-suicide-nets-400-tips-from-around-the-globe/" target="_hplink">20-25 full-time investigators</a>" were working on her case. Now, with Rehtaeh, there isn't even any fanfare coming from Canada's federal police force. So both the Parsons and the Todd families are left without any justice.<br />
<br />
Amanda Todd's death resulted in an online uproar. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/04/10/rehtaeh-parsons-suicide-anonymous_n_3052495.html" target="_hplink">A branch Anonymous</a> stepped in and named Kody Maxson, an individual who through a VICE Canada investigation was connected to a ring of online extortonists. The RCMP said he was a person of "no interest." For Rehtaeh, the public -- both on Rehtaeh's Facebook memorial page and on various other outlets -- are upset as well. How could there be no further investigation when a photograph of Rehtaeh's rape exists? One would think that when a young woman claims she is raped and has photographic evidence, it would be an open-and-shut case. But since the RCMP couldn't identify who took the picture, it wasn't considered good enough evidence.<br />
<br />
Then there's the fact Rehtaeh's bullying is considered a "community issue" by Nova Scotia's justice minister. <a href="http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/1122402-landry-revisits-review-of-rehtaeh-parsons-case" target="_hplink">According to him</a>: "As a community, we need to have more dialogue with our young people about respect and about support to educate our young boys and our young girls about what's appropriate behaviour, what's not appropriate behaviour."<br />
<br />
This begs a second question, since when is young boys taking a picture of a rape of a 15-year-old girl and then distributing it considered an issue for the community to handle? Once again, like we saw with the misnomer of Amanda Todd's online sexual extortion being described as cyberbullying, we are seeing the wrong word used to describe an insidious act. At the very least, the photograph of Rehtaeh should be classified as child pornography -- and investigated as such.<br />
<br />
The British Columbia RCMP handled a creepily similar case in 2010-2011. Multiple teenage boys raped a young girl at a rave in Pitt Meadows, and photos were taken and distributed. The only difference here was that charges were pressed both for child pornography and for sexual assault, all within a time frame of a few months. What did Rehtaeh's rapists do differently that not only foiled police in terms of finding out who specifically took the photo, but absolved them of even the slightest chance of being found guilty? As Rehtaeh's mother told the <em>Chronicle Herald</em>: "They didn't even interview the boys until much, much later. To me, I'd think you'd get the boys right away, separate them."<br />
<br />
While we know the officers who were investigating Rehtaeh's case had a photo with supposedly no author, nor a single person that could be identified as to distributing it, they took a full year to reach this conclusion. Since this photo was being shared via social media, there was a digital history that could have hopefully been sourced back to its original poster. Someone should have been able to pick up on the trail before Rehtaeh took her life.<br />
<br />
The success the B.C. RCMP had with laying charges in the Pitt Meadows rape case indicates the RCMP is capable of getting to the bottom of this type of atrocity. Unfortunately this is the same sect of the RCMP that was unable to conclude Amanda Todd was blackmailed by sexual extortionists, as well as bullied --and as a result of their failure, they let that case die out.<br />
<br />
A lot of us in Canada like to think we're spared from events like Steubenville, but we're not, and it appears we're even worse than the Americans at prosecuting teenage rapists. There has still not been a single arrest in the Amanda Todd case, and the administration at Rehtaeh Parson's high school said they had no knowledge of a photo circulating, let alone any bullying, despite the fact they were notified that a rape investigation was underway. The administration justified their inaction because they didn't want to interfere with the RCMP's investigation, but as we now know, there was no real investigation to interfere with. Young girls are supposed to rely on our institutions to protect them, but in less than a year our authorities have failed two Canadian teenage girls that are no longer with us.<br />
<br />
We're still left with the question of why the RCMP failed Rehtaeh Parsons. Something seems seriously amiss when photographic evidence of a rape is considered not useful, especially when the investigating officers tell the victim and their family they believe the rape happened. We can discuss cyber-bullying all we want, but perhaps it would have lessened, or even stopped, had the boys who raped, and ultimately were the cause of her social torture, were arrested. We don't have systems in place to stop cyber-bullying yet, but we do have institutions to bring justice to those who commit crimes. Especially when it comes to a rape that happens in real life. Something is seriously wrong inside the RCMP, and it's looking like these problems aren't just limited to one misguided division.<br />
<br />
Read more on VICE:<br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/the-gay-sex-club-next-to-the-vatican-is-the-saddest-place-on-earth" target="_hplink">The Gay Sex Club Next to the Vatican Is the Saddest Place on Earth</a><br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/no-man-left-behind-000284-v20n4" target="_hplink">No Man Left Behind</a><br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/noisey-vbs/botox-the-face-of-another-avec-anna-jean" target="_hplink">Bot'Ox Featuring Anna Jean - "The Face of Another"</a><br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--290920--HH><br><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"> var src_url="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?playList=517740285%2C517740039%2C517717382%2C517538711%2C517533018%2C517509516%2C517509143%2C517505803&amp;height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"; src_url += "&amp;onVideoDataLoaded=HPTrack.Vid.DL&amp;onTimeUpdate=HPTrack.Vid.TC"; if (typeof(commercial_video) == "object") { src_url += "&amp;siteSection="+commercial_video.site_and_category; if (commercial_video.package) { src_url += "&amp;sponsorship="+commercial_video.package;  } } document.write('<scr' + 'ipt type="text/javascript" src="'+src_url+'"></scr' + 'ipt>');</script>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1079938/thumbs/s-REHTAEH-PARSONS-SCHOOL-RAPE-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Ugly Canadian Mindset</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/canadian-identity_b_2775749.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.2775749</id>
    <published>2013-02-27T17:53:28-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-04-29T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[I don't understand why we can't just let ourselves be what we are: a weird little country with issues. Like Belgium or Switzerland or something. That's a great thing to be! It makes people curious. It would fit us so much better. Just a funny, comfortable nation that happens to have national debates about things like cereal box fonts. Why do we need to be the sort of place whose flag is featured on beer shirts? I don't know if the world really loves Canadians. I'm not about to get wasted and tell it that. But we haven't pissed it off that much -- not yet. We're kind of under the radar, you know, arguing about street signs and putting gravy on things.


It could be worse.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[Like a lot of terrible cultural trends, I think this one began in the late '90s. It was the Smash Mouth era, the Puff Daddy era. Everything was determined to be the worst possible version of itself, and Canada was no exception. It was a poisonous time.<br />
<br />
Enter, then, onto that defaced public stage: a strange, defensive little advertisement for that beer that your loser uncle drinks. I remember it clearly, because it gave me that familiar feeling: "please don't let anyone from any other country in the whole entire world be watching this channel right now."<br />
<br />
The ad featured an aggrieved, nervous man reciting a list of minor linguistic and governmental distinctions between Canada and the United States (we say "zed!"), and attempting to correct various misconceptions of the "skis on the roof in July" type. He grew more animated as he worked his way through the litany, but he never really lost the nervousness. It ended with a declaration: "I AM CANADIAN!" I put my palms over my eyes and stared into them for thirteen minutes.<br />
<br />
Is this who we are? Because people liked this ad! People wore T-shirts with parts of the script written on them! "I have a Prime Minister -- not a President!" "I don't live in an igloo!" These are apparently things that we need to announce in sartorial form, to scream at people before even meeting them. These are our tepid little war-cries. And it has only gotten worse from there.<br />
<br />
I moved from Montreal to Pristina, Kosovo, last year, and I exist in a weird little bubble of international people who are isolated by their lack of Albanian language skills and double-headed eagle belt buckles. There are some Americans, Dutch, Italians, Koreans, Chinese, Australians -- the world, really. And then there are some Canadians.<br />
<br />
You almost feel bad. The need is so palpable. "We're so nice!" "We're a little more sophisticated" "As soon as they found out I was Canadian, everything got a lot less Midnight Express!" You don't know where to look, but it just keeps coming. "I think it's because we're just that little bit more socially-conscious, is all it is."<br />
<br />
We say these things aloud, at parties, and in groups of people from everywhere. You see guys from Amsterdam kind of eyeing the exits, girls from Tokyo wondering when the conversation is going to get fun again, couples from New York awaiting the inevitable polite exception: "well, New York isn't really America..." You see girls who had joined the group to escape poorly-crafted Albanian come-ons ("Is for now... not for marry...") filter back to their would-be suitors. Everything kind of dies.<br />
<br />
And when the lights go on, and they're handing out coats, there's still some guy from Calgary talking about how we're the third-largest supplier of potassium in the world.<br />
<br />
SIDE NOTE: I once witnessed a guy from Brampton, Ontario, in a New York City hotel bar, actually go and get his laptop from the room in order to show a bunch of dudes from Texas that not only do we have Taco Bell in Canada, but that we actually have a shitload of them. You know, using Google Maps. So there.<br />
<br />
I guess it comes from the fact that, as worldly as we perceive ourselves to be (and tell uncomprehending Bulgarian girls that we are), we tend to use the United States as our measure for everything. Never mind that it is a country ten times our size, and with a dramatically different history. We're always better at guns than America, better at hospitals than America, better at potassium (or whatever) than America. We never boast about being better at any of these social metrics than, say, Denmark. Or the Netherlands. Because usually we're not.<br />
<br />
It's this same reliance on the American model that causes our patriotism to fail so embarrassingly. American patriotism, annoying as it can be, is usually based on a cocksure and unquestioning confidence in the country's overall number one-ness. Which might be irritating given certain conspicuous failures, but they've got the numbers. Largest economy, largest military, most influential cultural exports. It gives them a sense of centrality; makes them feel like they matter. And you can't pull off that sort of blas&eacute; nationalism when your particular foam hand reads "number eleven." Even if you're really, really nice. Even if you (sort of) speak French.<br />
<br />
I don't understand why we can't just let ourselves be what we are: a weird little country with issues. Like Belgium or Switzerland or something. That's a great thing to be! It makes people curious. It would fit us so much better. Just a funny, comfortable nation that happens to have national debates about things like cereal box fonts. Why do we need to be the sort of place whose flag is featured on beer shirts? Which, in turn, are featured on belligerent, red-faced party-ruiners? We wear it so poorly. It's not us. I feel like we're lying to ourselves.<br />
<br />
I don't know if the world really loves Canadians. I'm not about to get wasted and tell it that. But we haven't pissed it off that much -- not yet. We're kind of under the radar, you know, arguing about street signs and putting gravy on things.<br />
<br />
Cold. Comedically-inclined. North America's ever-so-slightly raised eyebrow.<br />
<br />
It could be worse.<br />
<br />
I mean, we're not America. But that's not as great a thing as a lot of us like to pretend it is. We didn't invent jazz, blues or the skyscraper. We didn't invent rock 'n' roll. Tailfins, flappers, Kool Herc, the Chrysler Building -- not us.<br />
<br />
So, yeah, we didn't invade Iraq and we didn't nuke Japan and we didn't put missile bases in like a hundred countries even when they asked us not to. But -- and I am totally quoting the Tragically Hip here, because I'm still from you-know-where -- "no one's interested in something you didn't do."<br />
<br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--231839--HH>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1013268/thumbs/s-CANADA-FLAG-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How Does Big Shiny Tunes 2 Hold Up in 2013?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/big-shiny-tunes-2_b_2768270.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.2768270</id>
    <published>2013-02-27T00:35:33-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T22:25:14-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Believe it or not, Big Shiny Tunes 2 is the third best selling album in Canadian history, and this December it will be celebrating its Super Sweet 16th Birthday. After remembering the greatness of this musical milestone, I decided to dust off my copy of the album and see how each track holds up to the incredibly high standards of music in 2013. And so, it begins.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[Believe it or not, Big Shiny Tunes 2 is the third best-selling album in Canadian history, and this December it will be celebrating its Super Sweet 16th Birthday. If you're not familiar with this spectacular album, it was the second (no kidding) installment in a musical compilation series by the Canadian music television giant MuchMusic. When it was released in 1997, Napster didn't exist and people hadn't even heard of MiniDisc players. It was an era where a compilation of songs on a CD from a variety of artists was actually an exciting prospect, and consumers would make a day out of traveling to the mall to spend $20 on an album that only contained one song that they liked. I remember playing all of Big Shiny Tunes 2 on loop early on in grade school, while hunting down my wiener friends with a RCP90 on Goldeneye 64.<br />
<br />
Between this album and the Godzilla soundtrack (shout outs to Jamiroquai, surely you're holding it down out there with your silly hat and your dancing, wherever you are) there has never been a compilation in the history of music that has ever come close to Big Shiny Tunes 2. After remembering the greatness of this musical milestone, I decided to dust off my copy of the album and see how each track holds up to the incredibly high standards of music in 2013. And so, it begins.<br />
<br />
<strong>Blog continues below slideshow...</strong><br />
 <HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--283450--HH><br />
<br />
<strong>The Prodigy - Breathe</strong><br />
This song reminds me of a kid I knew in grade five named Josh. Josh was the awkward kid who just moved to our town, and had high hopes of performing at the Grammy's with the Spice Girls that very year, which he reminded us of constantly. When he tried to make new friends his icebreaker was always: "Have you heard 'Breathe' by The Prodigy?" which no one really had at the time. Josh was a trendsetter.<br />
<br />
To entertain us, he would then sing the entire song at recess, acapella, and throw his Philadelphia Flyers baseball hat around the field. I've had a soft spot for this song ever since. I miss you Josh.<br />
<br />
<strong>Blur - Song 2</strong><br />
OH SHIT! It's called "Song 2" and it's the second song on this compilation? GOD DAMN that can't be a coincidence. Some brilliant son of a bitch at MuchMusic Headquarters knew exactly what they were doing. Hopefully that person is billionaire now.<br />
<br />
This song is still played all the time. Last weekend, I spent a night at the Mod Club in Toronto and they played this track like it was hot off of the presses. Every dude in the place wearing a club-ready sparkly dragon shirt and a matching sports jacket lost their shit and really got into it. That night ruined this song for me.<br />
<br />
<strong>Third Eye Blind - Semi Charmed Life</strong><br />
This song is about crystal meth. A lot of people don't know that but look it up. So, this ironically bubbly pop song is really just about some guy's dark descent into a crystal meth addiction. After knowing that, I'm down with this track. Imagine a montage set to this song, of some addict lighting up some crystal meth in a crack den, then cut to his afternoon of thievery where he's having the time of his life breaking glass windows and stealing crack pipes and blankets. All the while this song is stuck in his head. That makes me smile.<br />
<br />
<strong>Sugar Ray - Fly (ft. Supercat)</strong><br />
Did anyone else see Mark McGrath on Celebrity Apprentice? The guy is actually awesome. MeatLoaf would be having one of his regular meltdowns, and Mark would just come in and be like "Meat, it's going to be okay bro. Just ignore Gary Busey." That's quality television right there. But at the same time, I picture longboarders editing one of their underwhelming video parts to this song so, much like "Song 2," it's ruined for me now. <br />
<br />
<strong>Bran Van 3000 - Drinking in LA</strong><br />
This is one of the few songs on Big Shiny Tunes 2 that people still admit to loving unironically. I went to L.A. for the first time recently, and was warned about how girls aren't that attractive there. It's California, why wouldn't there be attractive women? I thought maybe my friends telling me that just had a picky taste in women and weren't into botoxed Barbies, which is fair. But they were right, LA actually doesn't have that many good-looking women. Maybe that's what inspired this song. Also as a sidenote, my friend saw one of the guys from Bran Van 3000 do a cannonball into a pool last year during Toronto's NXNE festival, and in the process he kicked a woman's open purse into the water, nearly destroying her iPhone. Apparently she was pissed, but at least we know that the Bran Van posse still knows how to throw down.<br />
<br />
Read more on <a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/does-big-shiny-tunes-2-hold-up-in-2013" target="_hplink">VICE.com </a>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1012442/thumbs/s-BIG-SHINY-TUNES-LOGO-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How Nicole Doucet Got Away with Hiring a Canadian Hitman</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/nicole-doucet-hired-a-hitman_b_2575599.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.2575599</id>
    <published>2013-01-30T08:37:14-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-04-01T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Earlier this month, Nicole Doucet was brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada after she tried to have her allegedly abusive ex-husband, Michael Ryan, killed. She hired a hitman to do the job for $25,000, but unfortunately for Nicole and fortunately for Michael, the assassin turned out to be an undercover RCMP officer. Despite that, Nicole was ultimately absolved by the Supreme Court of Canada.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[<img src="http://assets.vice.com/content-images/article/nicole-doucet-got-away-with-hiring-a-canadian-hitman/07d92022b748e4c6c3d32256b05a97ed_vice_670.jpg"><br />
<center><em>Nicole Doucet, speaking with the CBC.</em></center><br />
<p><br />
	Earlier this month, Nicole Doucet was brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada after she tried to have her allegedly abusive and estranged ex-husband, Michael Ryan, killed. She hired a hitman to do the job for $25,000, but unfortunately for Nicole and fortunately for Michael, the assassin turned out to be an undercover RCMP officer. While a lot of Canada has rallied behind Nicole, what most people don&amp;rsquo;t know is that Nicole told the hitman that Michael was never physically abusive during their initial transaction, and also said that she was OK with the possibility of Michael&amp;rsquo;s girlfriend getting killed as collateral damage. <br />
<br />
Despite that, Nicole was ultimately absolved by the Supreme Court of Canada in what they described as an &amp;ldquo;<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2013/01/21/scoc-calls-it-an-exceptional-situation-nicole-doucets-story/" target="_blank">an exceptional situation</a>,&amp;rdquo; where Michael Ryan&amp;rsquo;s testimony &amp;ldquo;<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2013/01/24/ns-hitman-nicole-ryan-doucet.html?cmp=rss" target="_blank">wasn&amp;rsquo;t needed</a>.&amp;rdquo; The case only reached the SCOC because the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, who had originally acquitted Nicole entirely, made a &amp;ldquo;<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/no-new-trial-for-woman-who-hired-hit-man-against-abusive-husband-supreme-court/article7509651/" target="_blank">serious legal error</a>.&amp;rdquo; As a result of her allegations of abuse, Nicole was found to be &amp;ldquo;under duress.&amp;rdquo; Her proceedings were stayed, meaning that she was not found guilty or innocent, and she was just permitted to have her case forgotten about and swept under the proverbial rug of law, without any opportunity for Michael to testify.</p><br />
<br />
Since the hearing, Nicole has <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2013/01/21/scoc-calls-it-an-exceptional-situation-nicole-doucets-story/" target="_blank">appeared on CBC Radio&amp;rsquo;s <em>The Current</em></a> to describe, at length, the amount of abuse she allegedly had to endure. She says that Michael had pointed a gun to her head, mocked stabbing her with a real knife, and threatened to bury her and their daughter Aim&amp;eacute;e in their backyard. Recently Michael, who never had a chance to tell his side of the story in court, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq2WWsY8Rmc" target="_blank">put up a YouTube video</a> claiming that none of that ever happened. His video has received over 120,000 views in little over a week.<br />
<br />
I spoke to Michael over the phone, and he did admit to me that he has a history of anger management issues: &amp;ldquo;In my younger years, I came from a tough background, not different from anyone else -- I had a few anger management issues when I was a young soldier around the military base. I joined the military when I was 17 years old, basically a young kid around a bunch of burly men and you know anybody in the military or lives around the military base. You go down to the local bars, you know, and you&amp;rsquo;re bound to get mixed up in to something and you know I had a few scuffles and you know I had a bit of an anger management control issue and I didn&amp;rsquo;t like the way I reacted and as a result of that I got help for it. I went and took some anger management counselling in the late eighties, early nineties -- before I even met Nicole&amp;hellip; I was never aggressive towards women.&amp;rdquo;<br />
<br />
He claims that as a result of Nicole&amp;rsquo;s controlling family, he was left without any other choice but to divorce her. He told me that this divorce, along with the pressure of her manipulative family, sent her into a spiral of depression that caused her to lose custody of Aim&amp;eacute;e. Michael believes that full custody of Aim&amp;eacute;e and the insurance settlement for Michael&amp;#39;s life is the reason that Nicole wanted him dead, and this would have been his defence, were he to have taken the stand.<br />
<br />
	<center><img alt="" src="http://assets.vice.com/content-images/contentimage/no-slug/8e008d1c2ff41378dfe675a86c711a87.jpg" style="width: 642px; height: 429px;" /></center><br />
<br />
<br />
It seems irrational and unfair that, just because a woman has accused a man of abuse, that he will not be able to testify and defend himself. Clearly Michael has a history of anger and violence, but there was no evidence of any physically abusive behaviour that led the courts to decide in Nicole&amp;rsquo;s favour. The allegations of psychological abuse that Nicole makes certainly are very serious as well, but they are nearly impossible to prove without first-hand witnesses. The only person who could effectively rebut these allegations would have been Michael, but again, he never had the chance.<br />
<br />
Michael is, of course, more shocked than anyone. He told me about the first time he heard Nicole had hired a hitman to kill him. The RCMP called him and, according to Michael&amp;rsquo;s retelling of their conversation, assured Michael by saying their &amp;ldquo;audio and video coverage of this arrest is in perfect quality&amp;rdquo; and let him know that the evidence they had was &amp;ldquo;very strong.&amp;rdquo; He also says that they let him know he is worth &amp;ldquo;over a million dollars dead.&amp;rdquo;<br />
<br />
	<b><a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/nicole-doucet-got-away-with-hiring-a-canadian-hitman">Finish the story at VICE.com</a></b>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/964992/thumbs/s-TARGET-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Rob Ford: Still King of Toronto, and That's OK</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/rob-ford-wins-appeal_b_2551374.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.2551374</id>
    <published>2013-01-25T12:05:19-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-03-27T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Despite the grand conspiracy pushed forth by Toronto's anti-high school football illuminati, Rob Ford the World's Greatest Mayor is keeping his job. Sure, Rob Ford may be an angry drunken high school football coach who also just happens to be the mayor, but he's our angry drunken football coach. If you're not one for performance comedy, we can kind of understand why you might be upset about Big Dawg Rob's return, but here at VICE, we would like to to welcome the gravy man back with open arms.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[<p><br />
	Despite the grand conspiracy pushed forth by Toronto&amp;rsquo;s anti-high school football illuminati, Rob Ford the World&amp;rsquo;s Greatest Mayor is keeping his job.</p><br />
<p><br />
	Just in case you haven&amp;rsquo;t been keeping up with the Andy Kaufman-esque King of Toronto over the past few months, a whistleblower named Paul started whining about ol&amp;rsquo; Robbie&amp;rsquo;s campaign to get donations for his beloved pigskin posse on city letterhead. It resulted in just over $3,000 in contributions, not a ton of money, because evidently Rob is not a master of charitable sales pitches. Anyway, while Paul and others certainly found this to be a conflict of interest, and even though <a href="http://www.vice.com/read/toronto-fired-the-greatest-mayor-of-all-time">Rob Ford was temporarily fired</a>, all of this jibber jabber about whether or not it&amp;rsquo;s alright for mayors to seek donations to fund high school kids&amp;rsquo; love of touchdowns and tackles was for nothing. This is the political equivalent of being pronounced dead on the operating table, then suddenly jolting back to life with a newfound respect for conflict of interest appeals.</p><br />
<p><br />
	At this point, it&amp;rsquo;s unsure how Rob Ford is going to celebrate. Over here at VICE Toronto HQ, we are speculating whether or not he will throw an <a href="http://torontoist.com/2011/09/partying-in-rob-fords-moms-backyard/">awesome rager at his mom&amp;rsquo;s house</a>, go visit the <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/cityhallpolitics/article/1259499--winnipeg-mayor-offers-rob-ford-a-geography-lesson">Winnipeg and Detroit border</a>, or <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2012/04/18/rob-ford-pride-parade358.html">avoid a gay pride celebration</a>. Only time can answer this important question.</p><br />
<p><br />
	What we do know is that Rob Ford will continue to be the King of Toronto until October 27, 2014. This means way more <a href="http://i.imgur.com/h0s0F.gif">GIFs of Rob Ford falling down</a>, more racially questionable comments about &amp;ldquo;<a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/310319--ford-refuses-to-apologize-for-asian-comments">orientals</a>&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;<a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1076796--mammoliti-says-ford-called-him-a-gino-boy">gino-boys</a>,&amp;rdquo; and a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;v=nySs1cEq5rs">total lack of remorse</a> for any cyclists in Toronto who end up getting hit by cars. Sure, we <em>could</em> build bike lines, but why the fuck would we do that? We&amp;rsquo;ve got gravy to cut back on.</p><br />
<p><br />
	Yes, the grand irony of a man who looks like he is made up of 70 per cent real gravy, looking to cut back on the city&amp;rsquo;s figurative gravy, is not lost on most people. That said, we already know that challenging the grand poobah is not going to end well in anybody&amp;rsquo;s favour but Robbie&amp;rsquo;s. Not only is he adept at catching and subsequently beating the charge, he&amp;rsquo;s also great at sticking it to media personalities. One of Big Dawg Rob&amp;rsquo;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;v=mHJGR4i7fhw">most infamous radio interviews</a> on the CBC was a mix of Rob speaking in the third person about how he was going to get rid of taxes and gravy, while yelling at his football team to go get changed. It is likely being studied in college-level comedy programs across the country as we speak.</p><br />
<p><br />
<strong>BLOG CONTINUES AFTER SLIDESHOW</strong><br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--276872--HH><br />
<br />
<br />
	Not only are his accusers and the media in the direct path of Rob&amp;rsquo;s wrath, civilians have also felt the sting of Rob Ford&amp;rsquo;s infamous verbal lashing skills. If you sit near Rob at a hockey game you might get burned, just like how if you bike in the city you are, (in Big Dawg Rob&amp;rsquo;s parlance) &amp;ldquo;swimming with the sharks.&amp;rdquo; In 2006, Rob flipped the fuck out and <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2006/05/03/tor-ford060503.html">caused a &amp;ldquo;drunken ruckus&amp;rdquo;</a> at a Maple Leafs game, told everyone he didn&amp;rsquo;t cause a drunken ruckus at a Maple Leafs game, then finally admitted, yes, he made a drunken ruckus at a Maple Leafs game.</p><br />
<br />
	So sure, Rob Ford may be an angry drunken high school football coach who also just happens to be the mayor, but he&amp;rsquo;s <em>our</em> angry drunken football coach. If you&amp;rsquo;re not one for performance comedy, we can kind of understand why you might be upset about Big Dawg Rob&amp;rsquo;s return, but here at VICE, we would like to to welcome the gravy man back with open arms. Hopefully he trips over something, or yells at a member of society that he perceives as a weak target, really really soon.<br />
<br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--233867--HH><br />
<br />
	<strong><em>Follow Patrick on Twitter: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/patrickmcguire">@patrickmcguire</a></em></strong>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/955551/thumbs/s-ROB-FORD-APPEAL-VERDICT-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The War in the Gaza Strip Goes Cyber</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/israel-palestine-cyber-war_b_2160945.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.2160945</id>
    <published>2012-11-19T16:48:49-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-01-19T05:12:01-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[As military strikes between Israel and Gaza continued with the deaths of 11 Palestinian civilians on Sunday, a complicated Internet battlefront has appeared. There is an unprecedentedly transparent wave of social media propaganda by both sides.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[<p><br />
	As military strikes between Israel and Gaza continued with the deaths of <strong><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/19/us-palestinians-israel-hamas-idUSBRE8AD0WP20121119" target="_blank">11 Palestinian civilians on Sunday</a></strong>, a complicated Internet battlefront has appeared. A virtual info-war is just beginning, and it exists on multiple fronts. There is an unprecedentedly transparent wave of social media propaganda by both sides, a fairly predictable backlash of Israeli website defacement from Anonymous, and an effort to bring open Internet access for civilians affected by the strikes from a group called Telecomix.</p><br />
<p><br />
	On Wednesday, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;v=nTEDVC5ZqPA" target="_blank"><strong>the IDF released an infographic-filled video</strong></a> describing the methods the IDF uses (phone calls and precision strikes) to minimize civilian casualties. The IDF is also live-tweeting the strikes on Gaza using their shiny new Twitter account, <a href="https://twitter.com/idfspokesperson" target="_blank"><strong>@IDFSpokesperson</strong></a>. The Twitter feed for Al Qassam, the military branch of Hamas, <a href="https://twitter.com/AlqassamBrigade" target="_blank"><strong>has responded by tweeting numerous photos of dead children</strong></a> killed by Israeli strikes. These photos are a very effective and graphic response to the monochromatic circles Israel is using in their videos to say they&amp;rsquo;re not killing anyone who doesn&amp;rsquo;t deserve it. Though, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/busted-hamas-caught-posting-months-old-picture-from-rebel-attack-in-syria-2012-11" target="_blank"><strong>as Business Insider reported</strong></a>, one of the Hamas tweets was a picture from the conflict in Syria.</p><br />
<p><br />
	Besides this public social media conflict between governments&amp;mdash;which is shockingly savvy and direct&amp;mdash;the hacker group Anonymous is also taking action through a campaign they&amp;rsquo;re calling #OpIsrael. According to Anonymous<a>, </a><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57551494-83/anonymous-targets-israeli-web-sites-in-protest-over-gaza/" target="_blank"><strong>Israel threatened to cut out electricity and the Internet in Gaza</strong></a>, <a href="#_msocom_1" id="_anchor_1" name="_msoanchor_1"></a>though that has <strong><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/11/19/anonymous-hackers-ramp-up-israeli-web-attacks-and-data-breaches-as-gaza-conflict-rages-2/" target="_blank">not been confirmed by any news source</a></strong>. Anonymous responded to this supposed threat, and to the bombings in Gaza, with one of their <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKrVYRu0oMY&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank"><strong>trademark public service announcements on YouTube</strong></a>. The resulting offensive from Anonymous led to the temporary shutdowns and defacements of hundreds of Israeli websites, including the Bank of Jerusalem.<br /></p><br />
<p><br />
<strong>BLOG CONTINUES AFTER SLIDESHOW</strong><br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--264034--HH><br />
<br><br />
<br />
While most sources are claiming the number of Israeli websites taken down is between <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57551494-83/anonymous-targets-israeli-web-sites-in-protest-over-gaza/" target="_blank"><strong>663</strong></a> and <a href="http://rt.com/news/anonymous-israel-officials-leaked-002/" target="_blank"><strong>700</strong></a>, Israel&amp;rsquo;s Finance Minister has said that the government <a>has </a><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-11-19/millions-of-hacking-attacks-on-israeli-govt-websites/4379222" target="_blank"><strong>&amp;ldquo;deflected 44 million cyber attacks on government websites&amp;rdquo; and called this wave of attacks a &amp;ldquo;second front&amp;rdquo;</strong></a><a href="#_msocom_2" id="_anchor_2" name="_msoanchor_2"> </a>in this conflict. Besides website defacements and takedowns, Anonymous leaked a document containing thousands of email addresses and passwords supposedly belonging to IDF operatives and Israeli government officials. Attached to the leaked document, the Anonymous leaker added: <a href="http://rt.com/news/anonymous-israel-officials-leaked-002/" target="_blank"><strong>&amp;ldquo;this is/will turn into a cyber war.&amp;rdquo;</strong></a><br />
	<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/?hpnne29xvx1ceuv" target="_blank">Anonymous has also been distributing a &amp;ldquo;care package&amp;rdquo;</a></strong> to the citizens of Gaza. The package, named &amp;ldquo;OpIsrael.Care.Package.v2.0&amp;rdquo; contains a press release, first aid instructions in English and Arabic, a technical guide with information on how to circumvent authoritarian Internet shut-downs (<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/8288163/How-Egypt-shut-down-the-internet.html" target="_blank"><strong>like the one in Egypt during their Arab Spring</strong></a>), a proxy that can be used to hide the IP address and location of your computer, as well as a small image file of the Anonymous crest.</p><br />
<br />
	After running the documents through Google Translate, it&amp;rsquo;s clear that the information inside of the care package is designed to help civilians get online and spread information in the event of an Internet shutdown. The documents describe how to activate Twitter via text messaging in case the Internet is inactive, advises people to use fax machines, make their own WiFi antennas out of spare aluminum, and to print out their email contacts in case they lose access to their virtual address book. It also encourages people to use the Telecomix dial-up network.<br />
<p><br />
<b><a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/the-gaza-strip-cyber-war">Read the rest at VICE.com</a></b></p><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"> var src_url="http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?playList=517543070&amp;height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;continuous=true"; src_url += "&amp;onVideoDataLoaded=HPTrack.Vid.DL&amp;onTimeUpdate=HPTrack.Vid.TC"; if (typeof(commercial_video) == "object") { src_url += "&amp;siteSection="+commercial_video.site_and_category; if (commercial_video.package) { src_url += "&amp;sponsorship="+commercial_video.package;  } } document.write('<scr' + 'ipt type="text/javascript" src="'+src_url+'"></scr' + 'ipt>');</script><br />
<br><br />
<a name="liveblog"><HH--LIVEBLOG--1213--HH></a>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/869418/thumbs/s-GAZA-ATTACKS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Harassing Women in Egypt? Prepare to Get Sprayed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/harassing-women-egypt-spray-paint_b_2139625.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.2139625</id>
    <published>2012-11-15T17:01:50-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-01-15T05:12:01-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Despite worldwide publicity and campaigning, the approach to actually solving the sexual harassment epidemic in Egypt has sadly been a pretty apathetic one, with police giving less than a gram of shit about the situation, leaving street perverts to grope away until their hands are content.

It's perhaps no surprise that anti-harassment groups in Cairo have gone vigilante, taking what's left of the law into their own hands and patrolling the streets to fight the harassment epidemic themselves. I spoke to Muhammad Taimoor, leader and founder of the campaign, about their controversial tactics during the festival.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[Despite worldwide publicity and campaigning, the approach to actually solving the sexual harassment epidemic in Egypt has sadly been a pretty apathetic one, with police giving less than a gram of shit about the situation, leaving street perverts to grope away until their hands are content. So it's perhaps no surprise that anti-harassment groups in Cairo have gone vigilante, <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/388987/vigilantes-in-cairo-cracking-down-on-abusers-of-women/" target="_hplink">taking what's left of the law into their own hands and patrolling the streets</a> to fight the harassment epidemic themselves. <br />
<br />
The members of one of the more radical anti-harassment campaigns -- "Be A Man" -- patrolled during the recent Eid al-Adha festival celebrations, armed with cans of black and white spray paint, attacking, pinning down and scarlet-lettering the shit out of grabbers and gropers with the words "I Am a Harasser." Mostly men themselves, the activists wore matching fluoro jackets with "Harassment Prevention" scrawled across their backs in Arabic. I spoke to Muhammad Taimoor, leader and founder of the campaign, about their controversial tactics during the festival.<br />
<br />
<strong>VICE: Hey Muhammad. Can you tell me a little bit about what's been going on in the past few weeks?</strong><br />
<strong>Muhammad Taimoor:</strong> Yeah, we've been working against harassment with our campaign, "Be a Man." A big problem here is that women-only carriages on the subway are being invaded by men who are then harassing the women onboard, so we've been working against that. It was Eid a couple of weeks ago and we were expecting that would be a particularly bad time for harassment. In the three days of Eid that I participated in, we caught about 300 cases of harassment -- that's 100 every day.   <br />
<br />
<strong>Wow, good job. How do you "catch" these cases?</strong><br />
Our tactics this time were pretty violent -- a lot of people were offended because they didn't like what we were doing. Basically, we attacked the harassers and spray-painted "I Am a Harasser" on anyone we caught in the act. The police weren't at all supportive of what we were trying to do and they clearly weren't ready to keep Egyptian women safe during Eid, so we did all the work on our own. <br />
<br />
<strong>Why did you choose tagging with spray-paint as a tactic?</strong><br />
Because, in our society, a girl blames herself when she gets harassed. When she speaks out to her family about it, they blame her. Sometimes they prevent her from going to school or going outside because they think that sexual harassment is the girl's problem, not the harasser's problem. So, when our group attacks the harasser, the girl feels confident in herself. She feels like she was right, she feels like the street is supporting her. She'll have the confidence to walk in the street without fear and she won't be afraid to speak out if it happens again.<br />
<br />
<strong>How did you get people together for the campaign over Eid?</strong><br />
We collected people on Facebook and got about 30 to 50 people over the three days to join us. I think we did a great job. Just between us, we caught 300 harassers. If everyone in Egypt does what we're doing and protects the ladies in their hometowns, it would improve the situation so much, because the police don't bother at all. A little justice is better than no justice. <br />
<br />
<strong>What do the police have to say about what you're doing?</strong><br />
They think we're not doing a good job, that we should be cooperating with them and that we shouldn't be attacking people in the street. They don't like it, basically. I was arrested, along with some other people who attacked harassers. But, seeing as they're doing an awful job of keeping women safe from harassment, someone has to step in. <br />
<br />
<strong>Have the police or the government not done anything at all to combat harassment?</strong><br />
The government aren't treating it with the attention it needs; they're underestimating it. The first research into harassment was only seven years ago and the researchers were accused of being disloyal and treasonous. So the publicity and examination of the subject is new to Egypt -- even the police hold the Egyptian idea of blaming the girl -- so I think it'll take a long time to move forward properly.<br />
<br />
<strong>What's it like being involved in this campaign as a man?</strong><br />
It's an honour. I think the first step towards fighting this phenomenon in our society is not to be afraid -- as men -- to acknowledge its existence. I'm not afraid to say that my society is growing more masculine -- giving far more rights to men that it does to women -- and one of the biggest problems is how people seem to deny that's happening.<br />
<br />
<strong>Do you ever come up against problems with the public themselves?</strong><br />
No, not really. I've been working with the group for around a year and, although we've had quite a few problems with the police, we don't have that many direct problems with general members of society. Plenty of people are giving us credit for what we're doing -- they respect what we do. Anyway, I think protecting the girls is more important than respecting the law, so it wouldn't really change anything. <br />
<br />
<strong>Is there any tension between you and the less violent campaigners?</strong><br />
Yeah, the non-violent campaigners criticised what we did. They want to work to prevent harassment before it happens, but I don't know how they would go about doing that. They'd also rather take harassers to the police, but I don't think that would work because it's difficult to convince the girl to go to the police to confirm what happened. <br />
<br />
The Egyptian media have tried to paint us a violent group, but we're not. What we did during Eid was an exception -- desperate times called for desperate measures. So yeah, a lot of people aren't happy about the way we go about what we do, but it's simply the best way of doing it. Arresting the harasser and releasing him after two days isn't going to do anything for anyone. <br />
<br />
<strong>Thanks, Muhammad. Keep on spraying.</strong>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/839988/thumbs/s-EGYPT-SEXUAL-HARASSMENT-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Quebec's Mafia Corruption Is All Out In the Open</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/quebec-mafia-corruption-_b_2093164.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.2093164</id>
    <published>2012-11-08T19:40:22-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-01-08T05:12:01-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[On Monday, Montreal's hapless, shaky, angry, and white-haired mayor, Gérald Tremblay, resigned in disgrace. It's no big surprise, really. Gérald had been fighting corruption allegations for years, always claiming that he knew nothing about any corruption seeping into Montreal's municipal politics. Even the most casual city observer would call utter bullshit on that.

The mayor's position really became untenable last week when a former top aide, Martin Dumont, dished the goods in front of the Charbonneau Commission, which has been overturning dirty rocks to uncover the filthy world of Montreal's construction contracts.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[<center><img src="http://assets.vice.com/content-images/article/quebecs-mafia-corruption-is-all-out-in-the-open/4382b78a1c6487de3ffcd69a73fa2796_vice_670.jpg" style="width: 625px"></center><br />
	<center><em>Montreal's former mayor, G&eacute;rald Tremblay, looking all bummed out.</em></center><br />
<br />
<p>On Monday, Montreal's hapless, shaky, angry, and white-haired mayor, G&eacute;rald Tremblay, <strong><a href="http://montreal.ctvnews.ca/end-of-an-era-as-mayor-gerald-tremblay-resigns-1.1025287" target="_blank">resigned in disgrace</a></strong> with his good name in tatters, his honour besmirched, and his legacy in the gutter. Across the river, suburban Laval's mayor Gilles Vaillancourt is at home feeling a bit blue because <strong><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/11/06/montreal-laval-raids-nov.html?cmp=rss" target="_blank">cops keep raiding</a></strong> his home, while city hall, credit unions and engineering firms look for evidence of gross misconduct and corruption over city contracts. Why? Because it turns out--surprise!--the Mafia is balls deep in just about everything that gets built--and re-built, and then falls apart, and then gets re-built again--in Quebec's heaviest population centre. In the span of a couple of weeks, a quarter of Quebec's population is now mayor-free.</p><br />
<p>It's no big surprise, really. G&eacute;rald had been fighting corruption allegations for years, always claiming that he knew nothing about any corruption seeping into Montreal's municipal politics. Even the most casual city observer would call utter bullshit on that.</p><br />
<p><br />
	The mayor's position really became untenable last week when a former top aide, Martin Dumont, dished the goods in front of the Charbonneau Commission, which has been overturning dirty rocks to uncover the filthy world of Montreal's construction contracts. Martin Dumont's testimony has been so good <strong><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/10/30/quebec-corruption-martin-dumont_n_2042907.html?ir=Canada+Politics" target="_blank">it's almost unbelievable</a></strong>. He told the commission tales about a safe stuffed with so much cash it couldn't close, and bureaucrats telling him not to mind inflated bids on city contracts. He also went on to discuss one of G&eacute;rald's fundraisers Bernard Trepanier, also known as "Mr. Three Percent." Bernard's nickname comes from his take of the kickbacks, from public work deals, that went directly into the mayor's party's coffers.</p><br />
<p><br />
	Most explosive of all, was Matin's revelation that the Montreal mayor was aware of illegal campaign financing and did nothing about it. That effectively blew a great big gaping hole in the mayor's oft-repeated--as recently as last Monday, when he resigned--excuse that he had no idea how widespread the corruption was. Listening to G&eacute;rald, who was generally seen as a nice enough guy and probably not personally dirty, insist that he was in the dark time after time, one can only reach two conclusions: the mayor was dirty, or he was clueless. Neither of which are good qualities for a guy who boasted that he was the province's most effective extinguisher of corruption.</p><br />
<p><br />
	<center><img alt="" src="http://assets.vice.com/content-images/contentimage/no-slug/c15418479d3564a2eae76f995c432e3b.jpg" style="width: 625px" /></center><br /><br />
	<center><em>Martin Dumont spilling the beans.</em></center></p><br />
<p><br />
	G&eacute;rald's real headaches began back in 2008, when news investigations revealed that his number two guy from 2002 to 2008, Frank Zampino, had been cavorting aboard construction magnate Tony Accurso's yacht, the <em>Touch</em>. Accurso is what you'd call colourful: he's alleged to have ties to Montreal mob boss Vito Rizzuto, and he's one of the top construction bosses in the province. Tony is fantastically rich. He would have got even richer if a $355-million water metre deal, destined for one of Tony's companies, <strong><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2009/09/22/montreal-water-meter-auditor-report.html" target="_blank">hadn't been cancelled</a></strong> due to bidding irregularities in 2009. In 2008, Frank left city politics to go work for one of Tony's companies. He resigned the following year.</p><br />
<p><br />
	Frank is also in trouble over the 2007 sale of primo city property worth $31 million, for the absurdly small sum of $4.4 million. The buyer in this case was Paolo Catania, who's also been linked to the Rizzuto family, and is said to have a serious mean streak. He allegedly had <strong><a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/10/30/frank-zampino-paid-300k-for-sweetheart-deal/" target="_blank">the shit beaten out of</a></strong> a fellow loan shark, and supposedly close friend, who owed him money. Despite the low sale price, Frank came out of the land deal in decent shape. According to testimony at the Charbonneau Commission, he got a $300,000 cash gift and a quarter-mil worth of renovations done to his kitchen.</p><br />
<p><br />
	Frank, Bernard, Tony, Paolo and others were arrested last May, and each of them faces a slew of tax and fraud-related charges. All of them are proclaiming their innocence, and you can give Frank Zampino points for balls: he wants the city to <strong><a href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Frank+Zampino+suing+city+Montreal+legal+fees/7482395/story.html" target="_blank">pay his legal fees</a></strong>.</p><br />
<p><br />
	There's more. Take the allegations of spying on the city's auditor-general or the lavish, boozy parties that were billed to the city. Then there's the sleazy campaign financing and dirty contracts to fix up city hall. To say nothing about the possibility of cronyism over any number of comparatively nickel-and-dime contracts that we never hear about.</p><br />
<p><br />
	Montreal's mayor has been blubbering about "not knowing" for years. And you know what? It's possible he didn't, because he didn't need to. While that may not make him an outright crook, it makes him something almost as despicable: a cynical, dishonest, small-time political huckster.</p><br />
<p><br />
<i>Want more Canadian mafia coverage from VICE? Try this:</i></p><br />
<a href="http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/toronto-is-infested-with-mobsters"><b><i>Toronto is Infested with Mobsters</i></b></a><br />
<br />
<HH--236SLIDEEXPAND--251475--HH>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/842127/thumbs/s-GERALD-TREMBLAY-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>You Can Protest, But Don't Wear a Mask</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/vice-com/mask-ban-canada_b_2067236.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.2067236</id>
    <published>2012-11-02T16:51:59-04:00</published>
    <updated>2013-01-02T05:12:01-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[In a move that comes with an unsettling brand of legislative style, tongue-in-cheek humor, the Canadian government passed a bill on Halloween that aims to outlaw masked protestors during riots or "unlawful assemblies." In a way, it's not surprising. Canada has had a tricky few years for riots and protest related carnage. 

Evidently, this catch-all legislation that sets out to ban masks from any protest that the government or the police designate as illegal, is an imprecise knee-jerk reaction to the growing problem of violent protests in Canada.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>VICE </name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vice-com/"><![CDATA[<center><img alt="2012-11-02-vice1real.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2012-11-02-vice1real.jpg" width="500" height="337" /></center><br />
<em>Anarchopanda, a crowd favorite at protests in Quebec this year, could be criminally charged under a new law that bans masks at unlawful protests.</em><br />
<br />
In a move that comes with an unsettling brand of legislative style, tongue-in-cheek humor, the Canadian government passed a bill on Halloween that aims to outlaw masked protestors during riots or "unlawful assemblies." In a way, it's not surprising. Canada has had a tricky few years for riots and protest related carnage. As you may have seen in our documentary, the streets of Montreal were torn up this year by students, anarchists, and anarchist students who were protesting tuition hikes. <br />
<br />
When the G20 summit came to Toronto in 2010, cop cars were burned, the Black Bloc smashed up retail windows, uninvolved civilians were held by police blockades in the rain, and many protestors were detained in a make-shift detention center on the east end of the city. People in Vancouver also got super upset when the Canucks blew it in the Stanley Cup finals. However, the move to ban masks entirely appears to be an unrealistic measure that will do more to prevent the freedom of protestors, than limit the amount of violence and anarchy on Canadian streets during trying political times.<br />
<br />
The politicians and law enforcement representatives in Canada have mixed feelings about all this. Bob Rae, the interim leader of the Liberal party, is pro-mask. As the CBC reports, Bob asks: "Are we going to ban people from appearing in a protest because they are wearing a burka? Are we going to say that on a cold day that people can't wear a mask?" On the other side, a guy named Tom Stamatakis who is the president of Canada's Police Association, thinks he knows better: "In my experience when someone shows up at protest with mask, their intentions are violent... There is no good legitimate reason for someone to protest peacefully and show up wearing a mask."<br />
<br />
The definition of what is and what is not an unlawful protest is also troubling. During a fairly uneventful version of Occupy (compared to its New York counterpart, anyway) that reached Toronto streets in November of last year, protestors took over a park in the downtown core of the city and had their protest camp declared as illegal by a Toronto judge. The <em>Globe and Mail</em> is reporting that this new law against masked protestors "provides a penalty of up to 10 years in prison." So, that seems to indicate that someone who is demonstrating at a peaceful yet illegal protest, during a very cold time of year while wearing a balaclava, could be criminally charged and imprisoned for a decade.<br />
<br />
<img alt="2012-11-02-vice2real.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2012-11-02-vice2real.jpg" width="600" height="450" /><br />
<em>Anarchopanda, a crowd favorite at protests in Quebec this year, could be criminally charged under a new law that bans masks at unlawful protests.</em><br />
<br />
I spoke to a Quebec lawyer named Julius H. Grey this morning who is against this outright ban on masked protestors. Julius does not think this law is fair, or set-up to be an effective measure against violent protests. He also believes it violates our basic freedom of expression: "Freedom of expression is not only verbal expression or written expression. If you can't point or gesticulate, or do whatever it is you need to do physically to express something, then that is a violation of freedom of expression."<br />
<br />
Canada has certainly seen destruction on its streets at the hands of masked protestors, which Julius addressed: "There is no question that there is a pressing objective to have have peaceful demonstrations, and to be able to identify people, in order to prevent people from committing vandalism during a demonstration."<br />
<br />
"The criminal code provides police with the power, at all times, to be able to read the riot act and say: 'This demonstration is out of hand, please disperse.' You can have that. During a demonstration that is getting out of hand, you could ask people to remove masks. That may pass. But to pass, in advance, a law that says I cannot put on a mask...  I think that's a violation of freedom of expression."<br />
<br />
There are a myriad of fair reasons why a person may want to hide their identity during a protest. It is not simply a way for vandals or violent protestors to disguise their identity in an attempt to escape criminal prosecution: "People may want to wear masks of a particular political leader. They may want to disguise themselves with a Stephen Harper mask or a Romney mask in order to demonstrate their displeasure with those gentlemen."<br />
<br />
"You can imagine that a young student may be afraid of his parents, may be afraid of his priest or his rabbi, may be afraid of his University's authorities. Somebody working for a very strongly Zionist employer who is taking part in a pro Palestinian demonstration, or vice versa, could lose their job if they were identified. There are all sorts of legitimate reasons why a person might want to be at a protest, in solidarity, without being identified."<br />
<br />
Evidently, this catch-all legislation that sets out to ban masks from any protest that the government or the police designate as illegal, is an imprecise knee-jerk reaction to the growing problem of violent protests in Canada. While we have certainly seen unnecessary destruction on the streets of Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal at the hands of protestors, both masked and unmasked, limiting our freedom of expression that truly is the basis of why we're allowed to have protests and demonstrations in the first place, is doing the civilians of this country a great disservice.]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/841641/thumbs/s-MASK-BAN-CANADA-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>
</feed>