Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ben West

GET UPDATES FROM Ben West
 

Harper Tanker Safety Plan Changes Nothing in Pipeline Debate

Posted: 03/18/2013 3:41 pm

Soon after closing the Vancouver Coast Guard station and the Vancouver Marine Traffic Control centre, Stephen Harper has come out with a new plan for tanker safety. Of course we need the best safeguards available to deal with the increased tanker traffic we are already facing in the time since Kinder Morgan bought the Trans Mountain pipeline but this doesn't replace the Coast Guard stations.

When Kinder Morgan bought the Trans Mountain pipeline in 2005 there were approximately 20 tankers a year in the Vancouver harbour and most of them were carrying oil that would ultimately be consumed in B.C. after being refined in California. Since then annual tanker traffic has increased to approximately 80 tankers per year.

In early 2013, Harper's government closed the both the Kitsilano Coast Guard station and the Vancouver Marine Communication Terminal in the Vancouver harbour, shifting responsibilities to stations in Richmond, B.C. and on Vancouver Island.

This looks to me like Harper is trying to save face after closing the Kitsilano Coast Guard station. It's a shame that it takes the strong opposition to new pipeline proposals to get the Harper government to put in place the kind of safety measure we should have had already, given Kinder Morgan's quiet increases to tanker traffic in the Vancouver harbour. Frankly they should start by re-opening the Coast Guard stations and admitting they made a huge mistake closing them in the first place.

Kinder Morgan's new proposed pipeline would bring over 400 tankers a year to Burrard Inlet. Each one carries 600,000 barrels of tar sands oil, three times as much as was spilled by the Exxon Valdez.

The Enbridge pipeline proposal would bring 225 larger supertankers carrying up to two million barrels of tar sands oil. These vessels are much bigger than what can fit through the shallow narrows of Burrad Inlet in the Vancouver Harbour where the Kinder Morgan terminal is located.

I think our prime minister is missing the point. The people of B.C. are making it clear that we don't want the West Coast to be sacrificed to be a tar sands export zone. This is a question of more tar sands oil tankers or less tar sands oil tankers, more risk or less risk, new pipelines or no new pipelines. It's about trajectories.

Prime Minister Harper can make all the safety announcements he wants but it doesn't change the fact that the people of B.C. are moving in the opposite direction he is. We are saying less tar sands oil not more, thank you very much. The truth is the safest thing we can do is say no to the Enbridge and Kinder Morgan pipelines.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Syncrude Upgrader and Oil Sands

    The refining or upgrading of the tarry bitumen which lies under the oil sands consumes far more oil and energy than conventional oil and produces almost twice as much carbon. Each barrel of oil requires 3-5 barrels of fresh water from the neighboring Athabasca River. About 90% of this is returned as toxic tailings into the vast unlined tailings ponds that dot the landscape. Syncrude alone dumps 500,000 tons of toxic tailings into just one of their tailings ponds everyday.

  • Boreal Forest and Coast Mountains / Atlin Lake, British Columbia | 2001

    This area, located in the extreme northwest of British Columbia, marks the western boundary of the Boreal region. On the border of the Yukon and Southeast Alaska, the western flank of these mountains descends into Alaska's Tongass Rainforest and British Columbia's Great Bear Rainforest. Far from the oil sands, the greatest remaining coastal temperate and marine ecosystem is imminently threatened by the proposal to build a 750-mile pipeline to pump 550,000 barrels per day of oil sands crude to the coast. Once there, it would be shipped through some of the most treacherous waters, virtually assuring an ecological disaster at some point in the future.

  • Tailings Pond in Winter, Abstract #2 / Alberta Tar Sands | 2010

    Even in the extreme cold of the winter, the toxic tailings ponds do not freeze. On one particularly cold morning, the partially frozen tailings, sand, liquid tailings and oil residue, combined to produce abstractions that reminded me of a Jackson Pollock canvas.

  • Aspen and Spruce | Northern Alberta | 2001

    Photographed in late autumn in softly falling snow, a solitary spruce is set against a sea of aspen. The Boreal Forest of northern Canada is perhaps the best and largest example of a largely intact forest ecosystem. Canada's Boreal Forest alone stores an amount of carbon equal to ten times the total annual global emissions from all fossil fuel consumption.

  • Tar Sands at Night #1 | Alberta Oil Sands | 2010

    Twenty four hours a day the oil sands eats into the most carbon rich forest ecosystem on the planet. Storing almost twice as much carbon per hectare as tropical rainforests, the boreal forest is the planet's greatest terrestrial carbon storehouse. To the industry, these diverse and ecologically significant forests and wetlands are referred to as overburden, the forest to be stripped and the wetlands dredged and replaced by mines and tailings ponds so vast they can be seen from outer space.

  • Dry Tailings #2 | Alberta Tar Sands | 2010

    In an effort to deal with the problem of tailings ponds, Suncor is experimenting with dry tailings technology. This has the potential to limit, or eliminate, the need for vast tailings ponds in the future and lessen this aspect of the oil sands' impact.

  • Tailings Pond Abstract #2 | Alberta Tar Sands / 2010

    So large are the Alberta Tar Sands tailings ponds that they can be seen from space. It has been estimated by Natural Resources Canada that the industry to date has produced enough toxic waste to fill a canal 32 feet deep by 65 feet wide from Fort McMurray to Edmonton, and on to Ottawa, a distance of over 2,000 miles. In this image, the sky is reflected in the toxic and oily waste of a tailings pond.

  • Confluence of Carcajou River and Mackenzie River | Mackenzie Valley, NWT | 2005

    The Caracajou River winds back and forth creating this oxbow of wetlands as it joins the Mackenzie flowing north to the Beaufort Sea. This region, almost entirely pristine, and the third largest watershed basin in the world, will be directly impacted by the proposed Mackenzie Valley National Gas Pipeline to fuel the energy needs of the Alberta Oil Sands mega-project.

  • Black Cliff | Alberta Oil Sands | 2005

    Oil sands pit mining is done in benches or steps. These benches are each approximately 12-15 meters high. Giant shovels dig the oil sand and place it into heavy hauler trucks that range in size from 240 tons to the largest trucks, which have a 400-ton capacity.

  • Oil Sands Upgrader in Winter| Alberta Oil Sands | 2010

    The Alberta oil sands are Canada's single largest source of carbon. They produce about as much annually as the nation of Denmark. The refining of the tar-like bitumen requires more water and uses almost twice as much energy as the production of conventional oil. Particularly visible in winter, vast plumes of toxic pollution fill the skies. The oil sands are so large they create their own weather systems.

  • Boreal Forest and Wetland | Athabasca Delta Northern Alberta | 2010

    Located just 70 miles downstream from the Alberta oil sands, the Athabasca Delta is the world's largest freshwater delta. It lies at the convergence of North America's four major flyways and is a critical stopover for migrating waterfowl and considered one of the most globally significant wetlands. It is threatened both by the massive water consumption of the tar sands and its toxic tailings ponds.

  • Tar Pit #3

    This network of roads reminded me of a claw or tentacles. It represents for me the way in which the tentacles of the tar sands reach out and wreak havoc and destruction. Proposed pipelines to American Midwest, Mackenzie Valley, and through the Great Bear Rainforest will bring new threats to these regions while the pipelines fuel new markets and ensure the proposed five fold expansion of the oil sands.


 

Follow Ben West on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BenWest

FOLLOW GREEN
Soon after closing the Vancouver Coast Guard station and the Vancouver Marine Traffic Control centre, Stephen Harper has come out with a new plan for tanker safety. Of course we need the best safeguar...
Soon after closing the Vancouver Coast Guard station and the Vancouver Marine Traffic Control centre, Stephen Harper has come out with a new plan for tanker safety. Of course we need the best safeguar...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:05 PM on 03/24/2013
"The truth is the safest thing we can do is say no to the Enbridge and Kinder Morgan pipelines."
------

I'd say the "smartest" thing we can do is say no to .....
Safety is important, but would you do a dumb thing if it appeared "safe"?
11:37 PM on 03/22/2013
haper sends an olive (who is just back from telling the USA that oil from the tarsand is actually green, and telling people that a spill would be good for the economy... it would bring cleaning jobs to the region...) to BC to show us that everything is safe and under control.
the foto ops is missed by the lunatic when the emergency safety response ship to be show cased runs aground on one of the most notorious and well marked sandbar ... in the world, and takes 11hr to reach Vancouver.
the olive flies back to Ottawa...
The population says NO pipeline.
harper is saying we are building a safer pipeline
The population is saying you are NOT building a pipeline...
harper says, ok, we will not charge taxes on hockey equipment anymore

... they escaped...

http://www.youtube.com/watchv=-Vkr90OMhJI

a.
11:36 PM on 03/22/2013
Here is the thing,

harper wants more oil to be sold as crude (why?) at bargain price to other countries.
in doing so he wants to run pipelines through pristine BC areas.
The population says NO.
harper says ok we will create a commission to study the situation (but we reserve the rights to disregards the commissions finding if we want to).
The population says NO pipeline.
The commission say the people do not want the pipelines and tankers.
The population says NO pipeline.
harper says our pipeline and tankers will be the safest in the world.
The population says NO pipeline.
(apparently missing the point that there will be no pipeline allowed, if the population can help it)
harper reduces environmental protection from what it is to 'what is comparable to international standards' (where did the 'safest in the world' statement go?)
People say, we want NO pipeline.
harper says the pipeline we are building, we will make it even safer then.
People say, we want no pipeline.
(wait how can it be even safer when it was already supposed to be the safest???)
People say, no pipeline.
The FN people say we will not let a pipeline go through our land.
harper ignore them.
FN people make it very clear they will not accept it.
harper tells them to sign or they will not get the money they are owed, an illegal proposal he is in court for due to previous abuse.

harper turns around.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
01:17 AM on 03/21/2013
There is one other issue to consider and raise awareness on, which is "West Coast Air Pollution" caused by ocean tanker traffic.

Those tankers have massive bunker fuel diesel engines can never have them shut down and they burn the most pollution fuel on earth.

This article written in 2008 when those 55 oil tankers went dead in the water off England's coast, tells the story in its entirety; http://bit.ly/8Q0XET .

Everyone who lives on the west coast is subject to the natural ocean to land wind patterns.

Park those tankers off Vancouver/Kitimat, the westerly wind flow will put their pollution right in the breathing channel of he populations in those cities.

The shipping ports in San Diego suffer tremendously from poor air quality because of the high volume of ocean freighter traffic in and out of their port.

In an effort to reduce that pollution, they are swapping all material handling equipment over to "pollution and noise free" hydrogen fuel cell electric transport systems, including these freight hauling trucks: http://bit.ly/Y0kKYz .

Oilsands oil has 7.9% sulphur content -- the Gulf refinery knocks 3% off that sulphur content, cleans it up a bit and sell it as bunker fuel into the ocean shipping industry.

The U.N.'s "International Maritime Organization" permits ocean going vessels to burn bunker diesel fuel @ 4.5% sulphur content -- a fact that their IPCC panel fails to disclose.

So, just replace the oilsands with the Hydrogen Economy!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
09:45 PM on 03/20/2013
This is one part of the story -- the other part is "West Coast Air Pollution" caused by ocean tanker traffic.

Those tankers have massive bunker fuel diesel engines can never have them shut down and they burn the most pollution fuel on earth.

This article written in 2008 when those 55 oil tankers went dead in the water off England's coast, tells the story in its entirety; http://bit.ly/8Q0XET .

Everyone who lives on the west coast is subject to the natural ocean to land wind patterns.

Park those tankers off Vancouver/Kitimat, the westerly wind flow will put their pollution right in the breathing channel of he populations in those cities.

The shipping ports in San Diego suffer tremendously from poor air quality because of the high volume of ocean freighter traffic in and out of their port.

In an effort to reduce that pollution, they are swapping all material handling equipment over to "pollution and noise free" hydrogen fuel cell electric transport systems, including these freight hauling trucks: http://bit.ly/Y0kKYz .

Oilsands oil has 7.9% sulphur content -- the Gulf refinery knocks 3% off that sulphur content, cleans it up a bit and sell it as bunker fuel into the ocean shipping industry.

The U.N.'s "International Maritime Organization" permits ocean going vessels to burn bunker diesel fuel @ 4.5% sulphur content -- a fact that their IPCC panel fails to disclose.

So, dump the oilsands and convert to the Hydrogen Economy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Blanc
10:20 AM on 03/20/2013
The idea that Harper can control tankers is ludicrous. And trying to lay this nonsense on the public is close to criminal lying. And is Enbridge paying to send that worthless Tory minister (NOT) of environment out here? He might as well be on Enbridge's payroll because he is just spouting the Enbridge line. Enbridge won't own the tankers, and they will most likely be registered in such 'sterling' countries as Liberia and Sierra Leone, where no one checks out the engineering or safety of a ship before it gets its papers. In a previous column I mentioned that we out in BC want to protect 'our' coast, and someone wrote back that we gave up all claims to the beaches when we joined the federation. Federation doesn't mean you roll over and show your belly to the bullies in Ottawa. If the federal rules for shipping and coastal safety aren't tough enough, it's our duty to fight for better rights. In the US, states have a great deal of control over their coasts. And major cities have their own waterfront police and fire fighters. Sometimes it's worth looking at other countries and see what's working well that can be borrowed.
01:30 PM on 03/19/2013
its been said one picture paints a thousand words, what these pictures paint is beyond words or reasoning, are Canadians stupid or are the lies that convincing. cmon Canada your selling your wonderful heritage down the pan.
12:33 PM on 03/19/2013
You are correct....it does not change a thing. We will NOT build pipelines to get the Tar Sands "product" to market. As of May 15th, 2013, the BC Government will be giving the required 30 day notice to kill the 2010 Equivalency Agreement, signed by the Liberials in 20120, which effectively gave Ottawa decision making powers. By,exercising the right to opt out of the federal government’s review process and setting up a rigorous “made in B.C.” environmental assessment that ensures the voices of all British Columbians are heard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
11:07 AM on 03/19/2013
You are correct....it does not change a thing. We will build pipelines to get the product to market.
12:46 PM on 03/19/2013
Yes, but the Keystone and eastern pipelines are a safer means of export than going through BC. We need to get away from absolutes and acknowledge valid fears for the environment.