Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Celine Hervieux-Payette
 

Tories' Orwellian Stranglehold on the Press

Posted: 05/05/2012 11:53 am

For this year's World Press Freedom Day, I spoke in the chamber to assure the Canadian public that the fundamental principles of journalism are being respected.

Allow me to refer to the code of conduct of the Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec to outline the fundamental values of journalism in Canada.

We know that journalists' work must be based on the critical thinking that pushes them to question everything, the impartiality that pushes them to do their research, and report on the various aspects of a situation, the independence that keeps them at arm's length from power and lobby groups, the honesty that makes them stick to the facts, and a number of other principles.

In the collective agreement between CBC/Radio-Canada and the Syndicat des communications de Radio-Canada, which expires on September 30, 2012, it is agreed that in order to fulfill the mandate given to the corporation by Parliament through the Broadcasting Act, CBC/Radio-Canada staff members will report factually, and without intent to deceive the public. The parties recognize that the primary professional obligations of the corporation, and of its employees are toward the public, which is entitled to news, and information that is impartial, complete, factual, and balanced -- that is from section 47.2 of the agreement.

On December 21, 2011, the Conservative government imposed a type of "pledge of allegiance" on all federal institutions through a so-called values and ethics code. The code describes the values and behaviours expected of public officials in all activities related to the performance of their professional duties. This so-called code was established by the Treasury Board, in accordance with section 5 of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act.

In this regard, it must be stated that under the Broadcasting Act, CBC/Radio-Canada staff are not subject to the so-called values and ethics code. Although the corporation is a federal institution, section 44(3) of the Broadcasting Act states that staff members are not officers, or servants of Her Majesty.

In fact, under section 46(5), the corporation shall, in pursuit of its objects, enjoy freedom of expression, and journalistic, creative, and programming independence. Therefore, CBC staff enjoy an exception and are not subject to the values and ethics code.

Finally, CBC/Radio-Canada adopted a new code of ethics on April 2, 2012, to introduce guidelines for standards of integrity, and professional conduct for its staff. This new code is a serious threat to the independence of the public broadcaster and its workers. Section 1.2 of the code states that CBC/Radio-Canada staff must loyally carry out the decisions of their leaders, and support ministers in their accountability to Parliament and Canadians. And there is obviously no exception for the opposition.

The Conservative government, and the new CBC/Radio-Canada code of ethics violate the principles of independence, and impartiality that are so closely associated with the profession of journalism, and are a serious threat to the preservation of Canadian democracy, where freedom of the press is a fundamental value enshrined in our Constitution.

 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
For this year's World Press Freedom Day, I spoke in the chamber to assure the Canadian public that the fundamental principles of journalism are being respected. Allow me to refer to the code of condu...
For this year's World Press Freedom Day, I spoke in the chamber to assure the Canadian public that the fundamental principles of journalism are being respected. Allow me to refer to the code of condu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:08 PM on 05/08/2012
The Harper Government should be thought as only one thing, an illegal Government. Between election funding fraud and voter suppression which goes "right" to the core of our Democracy, they have shown contempt for the ideals of Canadian Democracy and have spit in the face of every Canadian veteran who have sacrificed theirbodies, their sanity and even their lives. All Canadians should be rising up and create our own Canadian Spring, a full across Canada general strike until these sinners leave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
04:26 PM on 05/08/2012
Harper has destroyed Canada's reputation abroad and now he's going to destroy all that we've cherished domestically, including our Free Press.

Facts/Science & Conservatism don't mesh well, so the ideal of journalistic integrity will be chipped away at by these bunch of Cons
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nadine Lumley
unseatHarper circle ca
10:12 AM on 05/08/2012
Who Killed Canada
Media Ownership and the Radical Right in Canada

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8D67YiLcOM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiurWhmOIgk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRnZ43wxGvY&NR=1
Part 1, 2 & 3. Note: each video about 10 minutes long

No time for video? Read review instead:
http://pushedleft.blogspot.com/2009/11/under-stephen-harper-we-are-no-longer.html

Mr. Hurtig begins by discussing the Canadian media and how we now have the greatest concentration of media in the western world. In fact, he states that this would simply not be allowed in any other western democracy.

And since these same media outlets control newspaper, television and radio news; we are essentially only being given one voice. There are few or no alternative views. As stated in the video, a healthy democracy should foster a healthy and independent news media.

http://pushedleft.blogspot.com/2009/11/under-stephen-harper-we-are-no-longer.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nadine Lumley
unseatHarper circle ca
10:12 AM on 05/08/2012
The new game began in Canada on Aug. 27, 1980. “Black Wednesday”, as it became known, was the day newspaper corporations across the country colluded to swap properties and kill competition. The Ottawa Journal and the Winnipeg Tribune folded, and Vancouver Province's owner, Southam, bought the Vancouver Sun. The two had been in bed together since 1950s via a press-and-profit-sharing agreement at Pacific Press that killed the third paper and defended against upstarts.

Suddenly competition for readers was no longer necessary; these publicly traded corporations now focused on advertiser-pleasing copy as the technique for pulling more ads.

At least Postmedia has an understandable reason for changing standards: they're legally obligated to maximize profits. But the fact that the commercial-free public broadcaster also ignores the public good suggests that there is a new definition of journalism.

http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2010/12/28/NewNewJournalism/
12:27 PM on 05/07/2012
Have they no shame!? Oh, sorry, what was I thinking...
07:56 AM on 05/07/2012
'Bad news'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canuckistaneh
Science!
12:14 PM on 05/06/2012
The CBC used to be neutral, but lately more and more the right wing agenda seems to be creeping in.
09:21 PM on 05/06/2012
Don't worry, the CBC-SRC will go back to socialism when the NDP takes power. Sucking up to power is what state televisions do all around the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nadine Lumley
unseatHarper circle ca
10:13 AM on 05/08/2012
Repost from Mark Whitbread - Stephen Harper appointed the entire board of directors and the President of the CBC. I'm just wondering why Canada's top Conservative would appoint left-biased / right-wing CEOs and Directors to run the CBC.

The board, including president Hubert Lacroix, were all appointed by the Conservative government. Among the directors are figures with ties to the party or conservative politics — notably Montreal lawyer Brian Mitchell, who once ran for the party presidency and sat on its national council.

Pierre Gingras, appointed earlier this year, is a former member of Quebec's ADQ party. Director George Cooper is a former Progressive Conservative MP for Halifax.

Montreal lawyer Remi Racine, appointed to the board in 2007, was once national secretary of the Progressive Conservative party. He told a Montreal newspaper in 2008 that he was still a card-carrying party member and was close with John Baird, now foreign affairs minister, and former minister Jim Prentice.

http://www.friends.ca/news-item/10398
11:49 AM on 05/06/2012
The Right never fails. They say that the government should not have power in say, having media outlets, because they'll use it to broadcast propaganda. Then when they take power they announce that yes, they'll use it to broadcast propaganda. Just like when they say that the government should not run medical insurance because they'll use it to micromanage people's lives, then when they take power they propose such, or use unemployment benefits and welfare to micromanage people's lives, and so forth.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
11:19 AM on 05/06/2012
The press, CBC much appreciated but included as well, must stop self muzzling and take the risks necessary to regain the trust of the population. Some of you will get fired, some readers/viewers will be outraged, some progress from the sad state of affairs we currently lament, will be made.
09:15 PM on 05/06/2012
I totally agree. No one believes this "journalistic neutrality" bull anymore. We want media that openly display their bias so that we know what we are getting. I learned from Wikipedia that the closest thing to neutrality is the juxtaposition of biases.

Which is why I like the HuffPost.
06:47 AM on 05/06/2012
Unfortunately the Cebe has to suck up to Harper to retain their funding.
08:54 PM on 05/06/2012
That's what state televisions do all around the world.
09:31 PM on 05/05/2012
Note that this post was written by a senator named in 1995 by Jean Chretien. The same Chretien who, between1995 and 1998, cut the CBC-SRC budget by $400M because he was angered by the pro-separatist bias of RDI (nicknamed RDoui) during the 1995 referendum campaign. The same Chretien who in 2002, via his good friend Izzy Asper, got a journalist, Lawrence “Laurie” Martin, and the editor of the Ottawa Citizen, Russell Mills, fired two weeks after they published the Shawinigate story.

Senator, who is truly "Orwellian"?
11:26 AM on 05/06/2012
umm... Doesn't this mean we should support the CBC more?
01:42 PM on 05/06/2012
No, it means we should have as many media voices as possible, all as independent as possible from politicians. The CBC is far too dependent on Federal money to afford insulting its masters.
09:01 PM on 05/05/2012
Senator Hervieux-Payette and other CBC friends, if journalistic integrity is so important to you, why then do you tolerate that 70% of the CBC-SRC staff salaries be paid by taxpayers?

Go private or shut up, it's your choice.
11:25 AM on 05/06/2012
Privatizing the CBC is no solution. Corporate ownership is the worst thing possible. Your advise is based on ignorance and propaganda. It follows along the line of private money in politics. In always leads to corruption and lies. The CBC is under attack BECAUSE it attacks those in power, Cretien or Harper, and therefore needs the protection of citizens and the right to free speech.
01:45 PM on 05/06/2012
Finn, free speech comes with freedom. As long as the CBC-SRC gets 70% of its income from the government in place, it cannot demand the freedom to offend that government. He who pays decides.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nadine Lumley
unseatHarper circle ca
10:14 AM on 05/08/2012
Repost from John Carroll - Here are a couple of interesting facts about the CBC

1. The CBC costs each Canadian roughly 33 dollars a year to fund.Thats less than a case of beer, and you never get a hangover from the CBC!
2. CBC broadcasts to almost every area of Canada
3. The CBC has broadcasts in both official languages as well as 8 aboriginal languages
4. It only costs each of us 33 dollars a year! Thats less than it would cost for 3 people to go see Fred Litwin's new film, and the information CBC presents is factually substantiated!
5.The CBC has a page on their website which provides wide access to information about its activities and the way it manages public resources
http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/docs/disclosure/
6. Did I mention that it only costs 33 bucks a year? Thats way cheaper 65 F-35 fighter jets( roughly 469$ per person)!
7. The CBC is among the lowest funded public broadcasters in the world..only the US funds less..

http://www.friends.ca/ILoveCBC/
09:43 PM on 05/09/2012
Nadine,
1. CBC-SRC costs us (family of five) $15 per month that I am forced to pay under threat of imprisonment. Given the choice, I would use this money to upgrade my cable TV package, but I have no such choice.
2. CTV, Shaw (Global) and Quebecor also broadcast to almost every area of Canada, their information is also factually substantiated and they also publish annual financial reports and the vast majority of Canadians find them more interesting than the CBC. They cost me (and you) nothing. $0.00.
3. Your comparison with the F35 fighter jets is grossly misleading. From the article below (from the CBC), the total cost of 65 jets over 30 years is $29.3 billions. At the current rate of CBC state funding of $1.1 billions per year, that's $33 billlions for the CBC, more than the jets! Is that what you mean by "factually substantiated"?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/04/12/f-f35-cost-estimates.html

Nadine, as many comments alluded in this thread, the CBC used to be biased towards Liberals, now they seem to serve their Conservative masters. This is a recipe for bad television. Without public money, the CBC will not perish, it will improve!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:16 PM on 05/05/2012
"The parties recognize that the primary professional obligations of the corporation, and of its employees are toward the public, which is entitled to news, and information that is impartial, complete, factual, and balanced -- that is from section 47.2 of the agreement."

The human condition is a product of many temperaments fraught with occasional displays of altruism, selfishness, prejudice, irrationality, cruelty, creativity, compassion, brilliance, stupidity, individualism, community, ad nauseam - yet we need to be impartial, factual and balanced, perhaps god-like.

And would that be the same impartial and balance way the feds are attempting to criminalize environmental groups?

I just feel a little Orwellian perspective is required here.
05:18 AM on 05/05/2012
I'd like to hear how this was received by the employees. Whose bright idea was it to come up with this new code? What does supporting a minister mean in actuality? Are there going to be resignations or firings? How will programs like The Current and Power and Politics be affected? More info would be good to have before I pull my hair out over what seems like another Orwellian insult to Canadians by the cons.
09:06 PM on 05/06/2012
Don't blame the employees, they just want to keep their job. They still remember the last time a PM got angry at the CBC and cut their budget by $400 millions, causing the firing of countless veterans. It was Jean Chretien, following the 1995 Quebec referendum. Chretien was a Conservative, right?
01:49 AM on 05/05/2012
The bias is already showing on CBC radio, with Conservative pundits or ministers allowed to carry on at length, and anyone with a contrary opinion being hustled in at the end of the time slot, given only a short amount of time to make their case. Or sometimes the 'liberal' position holder will be given a few sentences at the start of the segment, and the Conservative who follows be allowed to blab talking points repeatedly, restating the same thing six ways to Sunday.

And, of course, there is less and less news analysis, and more of the he-said-she-said brand of non-journalism infecting the CBC of late. Recently if was shown in black and white that the Conservatives had planned to cut back the medical staff involved at the Department of Defense programs for suicide prevention and monitoring of post-traumatic stress disorders, and reduce front line medical staff in a other programs for the military. MacKay said in the House of Commons, which was broadcast without comment by the CBC, "The Canadian Forces have increased the number of mental health services". Huh? Perhaps he meant that the Conservatives had created more names for categories of health services? Or some such semantic lie? But a lie it most certainly was, and presented in the news cast without comment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:08 PM on 05/05/2012
What conservative pundits would those be? Rex Murphy gets a few minutes a week. Coyne (a centrist conservative at most) sits on the "At Issue" panel, and who else?
05:27 PM on 05/05/2012
Watch Power and Politics and you'll see. The conservative MP is generally given the last word to rebut everything said before. I've only really been watching P&P regularly the past couple of years so can't speak as to how long it's been this way.