Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page:  « First  ‹ Previous  1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
11:44 AM on 08/17/2012
Sorry I'm confused. I thought freedom of speech was unlimited except in cases of direct threats of violence or the classic yelling fire in a theater. Yet this keeps mentioning 'human rights' as if it is the opposite of the freedom of speech. So is the freedom of speech anti-human rights? That's the logic I'm getting here.

Sorry, I just won't buy that posting cartoons or stating blacks commit crimes at higher rates than whites/east Asians is the equivalent of yelling fire in a crowed theater. Sorry... try that on somebody else.

So if I could find 10,000 racist Stormfronters who supported abortion because statistically it has been proven that minorities are over represented in the amount of aborted fetuses, would you suddenly stop your support of the woman's right to choose?

No, of course you wouldn't. You would probably claim disparate impact and enforce racial abortion quotas and call it freedom.

The stuff that I see on main stream sites from the right and left has me convinced that we're doomed.
12:55 PM on 08/18/2012
Orwellian "1984" style doublespeak. I wish we had the Ministry of Truth to clear things up for confused people [rolleyes]. The confusion goes away once you come to the realization that different people have different opinions as to what should be legal and what should be illegal, much like they'll have different opinions on what toppings make the perfect pizza. Given what you wrote, I think you understand the inconsistency. I now suspect that left-wing and right-wing minded people are the result, at least partly, of genetics. Kind of like we have left-handed and right-handed people. Consider that the federal vote in Canada is closely split between (loosely put left-wing) Liberal, NDP, Bloc and (loosely put right-wing) Conservatives. Similarly in the US, there is a close split between Democrats and Republicans. I think we could avoid a lot of conflicts if the left-wingers and right-wingers were freely allowed to live under their preferred government. Then neither could complain about the other steering their country in the wrong direction. The problem is, from what I observed, that both 'left' and 'right' want total control, and so the chaos continues. I'm trying to warm people up to the idea of segregation. It doesn't have to be a bloody war. You get bloody wars when one group forcefully imposes tyranny on another and gives them no choice but to fight.

Would you care to point to some of those 'main stream sites from the right'.
01:41 PM on 01/15/2013
Stay ignorant...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bohemiangrooves
12:05 PM on 01/18/2013
oh left and rights are genetically programmed. so when the right solidifies power they can exterminate the left or at least preclude them from taking part in democracy because of their obvious faulty wiring. I know I'm painting an extreme, but extreme actions often are a result of a belief that ideas, or a race's failure to be as prosperous as you is a result of their genetic difference. It's also a belief that was widely debunked over the last hundred years and lies in the dustbin of junk science.
11:46 PM on 01/14/2013
Oooooh, check out the tinfoil hat on this Faux News/Sun News lemming.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doogs62
To see by faith is to shut the eye of reason
03:32 PM on 08/12/2012
Trying to post on this article is precisely why I am in favour of this repeal. Merely including a few select words is an automatic censorship of a comment regardless of context. Simply stating you hate something is apparently hate speech. Denying an individual the right to voice an opinion regardless of how misguided or ignorant that opinion may be is censorship. It is not the governments job to decide what is and isn't hate speech, it is the public forum that should decide. Nobody is forced to go to an offensive website or article and nobody is forced to agree with anothers philosophy. There are already more than sufficient laws to protect an individual or group of individuals against hateful acts.
All too often these laws are ignored by certain "minority groups" simply because they could claim discrimination if prosecuted. How often do you see religious groups spreading their hatred without nary a peep from the agencies responsible for enforcement. What makes one group untouchable and the next a target. Also we act if national borders actually make a difference on what an individual(s) can and cannot read on the internet, simply ridiculous. Any hate group can host their site wherever they want and it would still be available to everybody. In my opinion this is just another useless regulation that ended up where it deserves to be ... in the trashcan.

After all that typing I hope this comment doesn't end up in the trashcan.
12:08 AM on 08/16/2012
Is murder a form of hatred? Have laws against murder protected people from being murdered?

You don't think radical enough yet to worry about your posts being trashed... but I think you're getting close. I see you're using their terms "hate speech" and "hate group". Tell me something. Do you think only Whites are capable of hatred? If not, do you think Whites are more inclined towards hatred than others?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doogs62
To see by faith is to shut the eye of reason
11:48 PM on 08/17/2012
Wow! That was disjointed and borderline incoherent. I still didn't grasp the intent behind your post. I'll answer the two questions you asked and disregard your ramblings.

Homicides occur irregardless of laws. Laws merely define a legitimacy for prosecution.

Define the term "White". Hatred does not have defined boundaries. Racial prejudice on the other hand does. Any individual is capable of "hate", however you cannot label a specific group as "hateful".

A radical is a person who holds a differing opinion from a group or groups as seen by those groups. It does not necessarily define a person who is outside the mainstream beliefs of society. Nor does it define someone who is deserving of ostracism.
06:46 AM on 08/18/2012
I see you used "irregardless" in a highly intellectual manner. Did you major in English? English is a second language for me, so if you're an English major, feel free to give me instruction on grammar and syntax to correct my disjointedness and incoherence. Thanks.

Don't feel pressured in any way to answer me. Most of the questions I post here to the mostly leftist posters are merely rhetorical, but in a way challenge them to defend their way of thinking. I'm not really demanding any answers from anybody, people can answer at their will.

Why did you ask me to define "White"? Is it not obvious that when I write "White" (as opposed to "white" to indicate a white piece of paper for example) I'm referring to White Europeans or alternatively Caucasians. Would you ask me to define "Black" if I was talking about Africans?

If racial prejudice has defined boundaries, what are they? What if someone had an opinion on another race but later changed it to be different or even opposite of the one he/she held before, would that be racial postjudice? Note that "postjudice" is not defined in dictionaries, however, I think we need that word because we could use a precise antonym to prejudice.

Being in favour of the repeal of S13 makes posters like you and me to be the ones who hold a differing opinion (from the majority of leftists posting here). In your words we're "radical".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LGC1953
Be careful what you ask for, you might get it
09:43 AM on 09/16/2012
Bullshit!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TRMS
Gotta send me a plastic Jesus
06:37 PM on 08/10/2012
Just the fact that neo-Nazis are supportive of the repeal should be enough to tell you that it was a bad idea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Goncharenko
Insert a witty quote...
05:32 PM on 10/08/2012
This is one of the biggest logical fallacies in existence. You know Hitler supported building highways. Does this mean we should tear down 401?
11:34 PM on 01/14/2013
Yes, because Hitler built highways for ideological reasons. Oh, wait, no he didn't. Whereas our current government is quite certainly doing this for ideological reasons, those being the erosion of tolerance and human rights in Canada.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shahanshah
Liberalism is destroying western civilization
10:02 PM on 01/15/2013
the Nazi party of America endorsed the occupy wall street protests.

is it safe to assume you think OWS is a bad idea?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TRMS
Gotta send me a plastic Jesus
06:29 PM on 08/10/2012
I'm not surprised because the Conservative party is made up almost exclusively of racists. But this is a sad day for Canada.
08:06 PM on 08/10/2012
You are factually wrong. Can you give me names of even 10 Conservative party members who have publicly made a statement that could be construed as racist/racialist? Anything in the past year or two? Oh yes, and they should have also stuck to their word instead of groveling and apologizing when caught. Can you give me even 5 names or even 1?

The sooner the leftists in Canada who usually vote Liberal or NDP and the more right-wing leaning people who usually vote for Conservatives realize that we can have peaceful segregation and live under separate autonomous states, the better for all of us.

Did Ezra Levant make you sad? I hear Ezra Levant makes a lot of sad people extra super duper sad [wink wink].
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TRMS
Gotta send me a plastic Jesus
09:19 PM on 08/10/2012
I don't have to point out public statements. Everybody knows most Conservatives are racists. It's a well known fact. It's not like they run aroud making racist statements in the media, bu you can judge them by their actions, like if they were to repeal hate speech legislation. Not all racists are Conservatives. But chances are, if you're a racist, you're probably a Conservative. I will name one racist for you though, you. You're clearly a racist, so why would you deny that your political party are racists? Thomas Winnicki is the name of a white "supremist". Ezra Levant is sad.
This comment has been removed.
04:23 AM on 08/09/2012
Dictators hate human rights laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taureau
09:02 PM on 01/17/2013
They also frown upon free speech, as well.
12:10 AM on 07/23/2012
When can I have the freedom to use medicinal marijuana without fear of persecution? Oh, sorry, I forgot. Freedom is "selective" with the Con party. Whomever pays the most can have "freedom". Maybe those Nazis write big checks.

I do defend their write to speak their opinion without being censored however as long as they are not harming anybody. What is offensive is the Cons claiming to be champions of freedom.

The Jets, Jails, and Jesus party is all about pandering to corporations while sucking in the religious and the lunatic fringe support. Worst government in Canadian history.
07:49 PM on 08/10/2012
Sounds like you'd like the life in a White Nationalist state that I and other White Nationalists envision.

Don't confuse the nazis of WWII with today's conservatives or conservatives with today's White Nationalists. Our ideologies differ significantly. Even those who call themselves White Nationalists do not agree on everything.

Don't forget that it is corporations that give employment to majority of the population. It's corporations that produce neat things like the Lamborghini Aventador and Bugatti Veyron.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dredesch
11:56 AM on 10/15/2012
And how many people can drive those cars? You talk about it as if it was some major contribution to civilization...

As for "white nationalists", a racist rose by any other name...
09:02 PM on 01/14/2013
Ur Polish you pinhead. You aren't "White". lol. What's awesome is the amount of "Polish" jokes that I hear other Europeans / White ppl tell shows me that even if you ever got your "White Nationalist State", you'd still be bottom of the barrel. How does that make you feel? Loser.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
12:06 AM on 06/20/2012
Why is the left so scared of WORDS????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TRMS
Gotta send me a plastic Jesus
06:31 PM on 08/10/2012
They're not. They just don't want violent racists trying to incite violence and genocide.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EQ8Rhomes
09:29 PM on 08/11/2012
It's more than violence and ultimate genocide. Ironically, the worst part is trying to live under a constant cloud of fear and deprivation while a dominant group (not necessarily numerical majority) keeps abusing and suppressing people they see as threats. The bigotry is : Affirmative action for "us" but at cost of the "other's" deprivation, emotionally, physically, economically and in terms of security.
Learn from the Radical Islamic terrorist-caused insecurity and huge costs.
10:23 PM on 08/12/2012
Multiculturalism which promotes race-mixing is a form of promotion of genocide. When an African and a European mix or when an African and an Asian mix, the offspring is no longer African or European or Asian. I have heard from mixed people that they often feel rejected by both groups. Race-mixing destroys true diversity and only leads to greater conflicts.

The supposed violence caused by supposed racists pales in comparison to violence caused by multiculturalism. Examine for yourself for example the daily crime reports compiled by Toronto police.
photo
Taterhead McGobstopper
Paddle faster, I hear banjos ...
12:29 PM on 06/19/2012
Has the whole &^%$)#*g world gone insane? Seriously ... Our global theme song should be, "We're Gonna Party Like It's 1699!" Wooo Hooo!
09:58 PM on 06/19/2012
I think I've seen the image you're using for your avatar Taterhead McGobstopper. I think it helps to prove the case for the fact that people are NOT born equal. Yes, some government might give unequal people equal 'legal' rights and obligations, but that's artificial. In nature though, people are very different, even people who belong to the same ethnic group.
photo
Taterhead McGobstopper
Paddle faster, I hear banjos ...
10:14 PM on 06/19/2012
Yes! I am awesome, so have many imitators! No, people aren't born the same. That's very true. But those differences are rarely based on the amount of melanin in their epidermis. And let me tell you something, if you take away the right of one human being, even one you believe is "less" than you on a scale that matter, YOUR rights can and will also be taken away. In this dream scenario supremacists are never the ones with their rights taken away, they're taking them away from others. Why do you think your rights won't be taken away as well? Because they will be. When you take away the rights of another, you guarantee that at some point your rights will be similarly removed.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
01:44 AM on 06/19/2012
Do we need any more proof that conservatives are racists?
09:52 PM on 06/19/2012
Yes, in my opinion we do. If our supposedly conservative government cut all foreign aid to Israel and other countries, including but not limited to financial aid, as well as limited immigration to only White European descent people then you could factually call them racist, but until then they're just what I call 'kosher conservatives'. Although I do praise them for getting rid of a bad law (reducing the number of laws is a good thing) to give ALL Canadians more freedom of speech.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LuckyTron
02:57 PM on 08/10/2012
@Tomasz Winnicki

It seems you have a lot, A LOT, to say. So Dear Yoda, why don't you teach us all why getting rid of this particular law is Good for us? Why taking away the ability to ban and dismantle sites that spew Hate Crimes and carry the potential to destabilize the community and even the economy a good thing?

What is the real make of White Supremacists? Welfare junkies who just don't want to do any work, but still want to hate the immigrants, who apparently took away their jobs (lol, this really gets me -- they came to our country and took our jobs away. They slaved at minimum wages, worked long hours, didn't waste their money on booze and whoring, saved every red cent and got education, build nice big homes with their OWN money, became business owners, have loving families, donate to charities, uphold the laws, are friendly and generous, and are prospering every year and at the same time uplifting the economy and more over generating BILLIONS of dollars in Taxes which goes into the Welfare programs)

Btw aren't all White Supremacists descendants of either white immigrants or the whites who slaved and butchered the natives??? If I am not mistaken Winnicki (if that is your real last name) is not a Native Indian name is it???
09:19 PM on 08/10/2012
Regarding your first paragraph. I addressed your questions in my previous posts. Read for example what I wrote regarding a hypothetical country where promotion of multiculturalism would be deemed to be hatred and illegal, punishable by fines and jail.

Regarding your second and third paragraphs. They're based on false premises so I won't even bother addressing them. But I think prehistoric microbes are the true heirs of this land... all earth for that matter, so governments ought to issue a formal apology, cough up trillions of dollars in restitution and give them voting rights [wink].
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
12:01 AM on 06/20/2012
Do we need any more proof that the left lives is scared of WORDS?

What cowards. The answer to speech you do not like is more speech.
09:10 AM on 06/24/2012
We're talking hate speech here. I lived with it as an immigrant so don't call me a coward. If you think it's just "words" you aren't thinking hard. Words often turn into actions because "hate" comes from an emotional place. "Put on the tea kettle" isn't the same as "Damn I.......s!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LuckyTron
03:00 PM on 08/10/2012
How did that work our for the Jews of Germany???
08:22 PM on 06/18/2012
Leftists seem to have a hard time conceptualizing abstract ideas. Try to put yourself in a racist's shoes. Let me put it this way. Suppose a leftist who truly believes in multiculturalism and thinks has verifiable evidence proving that it's beneficial to the society, lives in country X where by law any promotion of multiculturalism was deemed to be hatred and punishable by fines and jail. Neither truth of his/her statements nor his/her intent in communicating multiculturalism could be used for defence. Someone not even harmed in any way by the communicated statements of multiculturalism could lay a complaint and all the legal work would have been done for them while the leftists would have to pay for everything out of his/her own pocket. Do you leftists understand yet? S13 to us is like laws punishing expressions of multiculturalism would be to you in country X. What someone considers hateful is subjective. There should be no laws protecting people's feelings. Personally I would do away with libel laws. Some right-wing people think I'm too extreme.
photo
Taterhead McGobstopper
Paddle faster, I hear banjos ...
12:30 PM on 06/19/2012
Naw, we conceptualize ideas just fine. We just don't like racists and bullies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
12:02 AM on 06/20/2012
I do not either.

Nor am I terrified of WORDS.
10:20 PM on 06/19/2012
OK, prove your ability to conceptualize. Do you agree with me that government of country X would be unethical to prosecute someone who promotes multiculturalism, in which he or she truly believes, just as our government was unethical in prosecuting White Nationalists in Canada before S13 law was struck down? Do you also agree that church officials during the dark ages who persecuted those who didn't believe in their god or that earth was flat or that it was the center of the universe where also unethical? Or are you just one of those typical leftists who thinks people should have the right to express themselves as long as it agrees with your own subjective opinion?
09:20 AM on 06/24/2012
Oh my gosh. Whether you are left or right has nothing to do with it. History has revealed that hate has led to atrocities beyond our imagination. Explain to me how this is fine.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dredesch
12:11 PM on 10/15/2012
How do you equate preaching tolerance of other's differences with hate speech? And of course, church officials in the Middle Ages who persecuted those who didn't believe in their God WERE unethical, just like the Christian and Muslim fundamentalists are today.
09:10 AM on 06/18/2012
Hooray! White Supremacists and Neo-Nazis for the Conservatives! I'd love to see them show up at his rallies or with their local MPs. Wouldn't that make for some great photo ops?

C'mon White Pride, hug a Con today and get his picture in the paper!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
07:31 PM on 06/15/2012
I'd like to see ONE example of a person being imprisoned for "hate speech" ---

All you "anti-white" people down there?! Can I please see a case where a coloured person actually successfully won a "hate speech" case against a white person?!?

If no such case exists, I can rightly come to the conclusion that all these people saying that "anti-white" laws exist are truly just insane!!

Multiculturalism has done great things for Canada. In fact, Canada is multiculturalism. Right from the first 3 nations of French, English and First Nations existed on this Continent. All the hate is so unnecessary, but I guess some people just enjoy hatred. To each his own.
10:39 PM on 06/15/2012
Obviously you don't know much about how freedom of speech has been trampled in Canada by the leftist enemies of freedom. Just off the top of my head here are some names (google them if you want confirmation): John Ross Taylor, Ernst Zundel, Brad Love, yours truly. I could name more if I did some digging. Jail is probably not the worst punishment for 'hate (even if it can be proven true) speech'. Ruined reputation and legal costs in my opinion are worse.

If you studied those cases you'd know that Richard Warman was the one who laid a fair chunk of those 'hate speech' complaints, some eventually leading to jail time. This is strange because Warman is supposedly White. You'd think that some offended minorities would have launched most of the cases but no, it was Warman who did a fair bit of the 'work' to 'weed the internet' as he termed it. Warman received awards from Jews. But I've heard of one case in Quebec where a Black woman launched a complaint against a candy maker and/or the distributor because she considered the candy wrapper to be, here we go, racist! Google " Laurraine Leblanc Couche Tard". I presume here that the candy company owner is White. Vast majority of the 'hate speech' complaints/charges were laid against right-wing White European descent Canadians. It doesn't matter who laid the 'hate speech' charge/complaint, it's more important to observe the pattern as to which people received them.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
01:50 AM on 06/19/2012
It sounds like Warman is on the side of the angels no matter what his skin color. And your complaints about him amount to calling him a "race traitor".
10:31 PM on 06/19/2012
Try to dispute any of my assertions instead of going into hyperbole.

It's not interesting to me anymore that leftists keep bringing up skin colour as if skin colour indicated someone's race. If racial background is only skin colour then how do you explain Africans' protruding jaws, or broad noses or thick lips. Everybody ought to know that these days it's possible to determine someone's racial background by examining the DNA of a few cells.
10:40 PM on 06/15/2012
White Europeans built Canada into a great country. The multi-racial multi-cult produced Regent Park, Jane & Finch, etc. Google some statistics on aboriginal population in jail. The supreme court ruled recently that First Nations people can be treated with more leniency when they get criminal charges. Now why is that? I was told we were all equal [roll eyes].
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith E
Earth Warrior
08:57 AM on 06/18/2012
Keep fighting to be a bigot,. it only shows your ignorance.
07:46 PM on 06/18/2012
You'll have to do better than that leftie. If awareness is the opposite of ignorance then why don't you make yourself aware as to which racial minority group is committing the vast majority of shootings, stabbings, robberies and swarmings in the GTA. Here's a link to the Toronto Police site http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/majors.php Study the information they provide for a few weeks and then report back with what you have learned... you know... when you're more educated, more aware and less ignorant.

I am partial to my group (White Europeans) and our racial politics but at the same time I'm tolerant of those who disagree with us and I wouldn't take away their right of free speech to criticize us as much as they please using whatever language they please. So I suspect you Keith and leftists like you fit the definition of "bigot" much better.
11:00 AM on 06/14/2012
Finally - if you wish to end all 'racism', the solution is very simple: just split the country into two unequal size parts, and allow all the 'racist' whites to live in one part, and all the other whites who actually WANT to live with millions of non-whites, to live in the other part. Problem solved. The non-whites would never ever experience 'racism' again, because the whites living with them would have CHOSEN to live with them. No more will black men be stopped by 'racist' white police, nor will a non-white have to wonder if they didn't get a job because the white interviewer was a 'racist' - because by definition, ALL the 'racists' (unless they were absolute masochists) would have LEFT to go and live in the all white partition.
Anybody care to rebut anything I've said above? The problem was very simple, and the solution is very simple.

They aren't immigrants. They are INVADERS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
11:50 AM on 06/14/2012
I have a better idea! Put all the whites over 18 who don't want to share this planet with other races in a rocket ship and send them to the moon!
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
02:02 AM on 06/19/2012
I like your idea. My other option was to put them all on a barge in the Pacific Ocean and tell them "good luck".
09:25 PM on 06/14/2012
I'm still puzzled as to why leftists don't want to separate to live in a leftists-only multicultural state under leftists laws. They seem to enjoy imposing their leftist ideology such as: multiculturalism, race-mixing, gay rights, 'hurtful speech' laws, open borders immigration... exactly on people who don't want them. After listening and reading to dozens of leftists I came to the conclusion (postjudice not prejudice) that they have tyrannical mindsets.

You're so witty Marg. I'd like to expand on your suggestion. If some racist White genius ever discovered technology allowing for interstellar space travel and we found a habitable planet, populated it only with racially aware White people, in a few years it would be turned into a paradise, while old Earth would revert to mud huts... except Japan and South Korea. More realistically speaking, when a once nice and mostly White neighbourhood goes bad, for reasons obvious even to leftists, White people who can afford it, even the liberal types (and they'll swear to god they're not racists), pack up and move to somewhere safer, somewhere more prosperous, somewhere more White.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
07:23 PM on 06/15/2012
lol. the trolls are out for this one!

In the end we're all immigrants... Where's the Red man? Oh yea, they were slaughtered by an insane gang of colonialists
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
02:06 AM on 06/19/2012
If you don't like the laws of Canada then MOVE. Canada has ALWAYS been a multicultural place, even before that was considered "cool". If you want to deny your Canadian heritage, fine. Your ancestors were probably from the wave of American conservative refugees (the Tories) who preferred to remain under the thumb of some king, who fled to Canada rather than participate in the American revolution. THAT is your heritage. I would invite you to return to America but the fact is we haven't had a king here in over 200 years and we regularly reject racism here just like they do in Canada. You are doomed to always be a minority racist in a majority-tolerant country. I'd say I feel sorry for you but that would be a lie. I don't generally feel sorry for ignorant racists.
11:00 AM on 06/14/2012
Most whites don't want to live around non-whites. This is proved unequivocally by the existence of concentrations of non-whites in certain areas in previously all white nations. Non-white immigrants move into an area - and whites move out. It's called 'white flight'. It is mathematically impossible for any area to gain a concentration of non-whites, if MOST white house buyers WANT to live around non-whites, because for every house that comes up for sale, there are going to be ten times as many potential white buyers as non-white - yet somehow non-whites end up buying houses in areas where there are already many other non-whites, and most whites DON'T buy those houses when they come up for sale.
That, in a nutshell, proves beyond any doubt that the MAJORITY of whites prefer living among their own kind. (And what a crime that is, apparently). Since we live in a 'democracy', it is also obvious then, that non-whites are not wanted here, by the majority, and therefore should not be here.
Yet unelected, undemocratic dictators in all white countries have opened our borders, and insisted that WE put up with the constant invasion of our lands, against OUR wishes.
This is clearly tyranny.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
02:12 AM on 06/19/2012
Most of the countries you describe as "white" have elected, democratic non-dictators. South Africa stopped apartheid twenty-thirty years ago. They were the last of the unelected, undemocratic dictators in a country run by whites. So even if you disagree with the policies of open borders that elected governments have agreed to does NOT mean that the decision was made by some unelected dictator. How long have Canadians been allowed to vote for their parliament? Since day one? Well then you can't call the policies that come from your elected government as being dictatorial. These are policies that were duly debated and voted on. Maybe if you racists weren't so ignorant you wouldn't go on your racist rants that expose you for being a poor student of history and political science (and an ignorant racist to boot).
11:48 PM on 06/19/2012
If you're White like you claimed elsewhere, you should go live for a while in South Africa under Black rule, or better yet, go live in Zimbabwe for a few years, see what it's like. You'll get a valuable lesson in political/racial science that the leftist brain-drain institutions you attended to couldn't possibly provide for you.

I would love it if Canada had a nationwide referendum on immigration. Personally I think immigration should be relegated from the federal level down to local level.

Leftists are ignorant. For example leftists are ignorant of the undeniable link between culture/civilization and genetics.
04:51 PM on 06/21/2012
You don't speak for "most" whites, so don't even start.