Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Conrad Black

GET UPDATES FROM Conrad Black
 

Would a Serious GOP Candidate Please Cut in?

Posted: 09/29/11 04:45 PM ET

This imperishable talk about a Grand Bargain between Democrats and Republicans is vintage, shovel-ready, Tom Friedman bunk. No possible such arrangement will even remotely address the full proportions of the problem of indefinitely continuing trillion dollar budget deficits and roughly $800 billion current account deficits. What economic school ever imagined that such open arteries could be left untreated for over a decade without the patient dying?

Glib columnists speak of the Grand Bargain as if it were merely a matter of agreeing to the top five items on each side's wish list, as if the agreed steps would not be mutually destructive. The administration will not accept the disposal of its mad health care reform and the Republicans will not accept an assault on the so-called millionaires and billionaires who make $250,000 per year (and, if they have three children in private schools, don't have $5,000 at the end of the year).

The president could ignore or tame his in-house left if he wanted to, but there is no Republican leader to kick the more wild and woolly members of the Tea Party into line. It is reassuring that the Perry phenomenon is melting, as the thought of a Republican candidate for president who jogs with a firearm and had his father-in-law perform a vasectomy on him, is disconcerting. The fate of Romney's tormented dog Seamus, rendered so incontinent by being transported on the roof of the family car from Boston to Montreal, that they had to stop for a car wash en route, may be less of a deterrent to the voters, but if Seamus still survives, he would probably run ahead of his owner in a fair poll.

One thing even someone like Tom Friedman, who can rarely take his mind off the global warming that must be the result of a tight yachting cap, since it isn't happening to the rest of us; or from the need to equip all new-born children in the world with iPods before they become accustomed to the taste of pablum, does recognize is that much of what has to be done is fairly obvious. Domestic and off-shore oil drilling and crossover where practical to natural gas, and preferably a significant increase in taxes on discretionary gasoline, (and luxury goods) purchases, and on so-called 'Cadillacs' (when Cadillac was a well-built luxury car), health care plans, and on discretionary financial transactions; New Deal or Interstate Highway-like infrastructure spending to absorb the able-bodied unemployed; serious spending cuts, starting with eliminating the 500,000 federal government jobs created during the life of the mad stimulus plan; legislated lower drug prices, and lower personal and corporate income tax rates; all of this should happen.

So should draconian measures in public education, starting with decertifying the teachers' unions, and the need to curb lawless American prosecutors, reform the plea bargain, resurrect the grand jury as an assurance against capricious prosecution, and restore the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment guarantees against uncompensated property seizure, absence of due process, a stacked jury, prevention of access to counsel, overlong prosecutions, and unreasonable bail; and amend the book of practice to end the clogging of the civil courts with frivolous and vexatious litigation; all this must be done also. But this isn't a Grand Bargain; it's a new New Deal or Great Society, but it will have to be more than just the catastrophe avoidance of the first or the stark, staring mad assault on the family of the second.

Higher consumption taxes would shrink the deficit, lower income taxes would generate economic recovery, and workfare would reduce unemployment and start to fix up the crumbling core of the country. Attacking drug prices while promoting health care competition and making it, in effect, a two-payer system where individuals can afford it, will start to reduce the country's $7,000 per person medical costs, opposite about $3,000 for other advanced countries.

The Tea Party has livened things up and many of its standard bearers are not such kooks as the leftish media claims. But when Michele Bachmann can't go further than say that reducing entitlements may have to be considered, while grousing about obligatory sex protection for girls in public schools and still raving about TARP, a program that began clumsily but wasn't misguided and will make the taxpayers money, it is time for the Republicans to get a serious leader. Of the ones that are visible now, I suspect Huntsman's the best. Of those being courted or tempted, I like Jeb Bush better than Christie, since no American prosecutor can be trusted to do anything, at least until their party chairmen have verified that they don't have SS Gauleiters' uniforms in their cupboards. Ryan and Rubio are more interesting, but they are very young for the presidency, but could be fine vice presidents.

The last time the Democrats inflicted an utterly hopeless regime on the country, Ronald Reagan could be seen approaching and was able to move the Republicans to the right without losing his compass and falling off the edge of the flat Earth. There is no presumptive leader now and listening to these Republican candidates' debates is a nerve-wracking experience. The United States has never in its history endured a decline like that of the last 20 years, though it had some sharper but shorter declines, as between Polk and Lincoln and Coolidge and Roosevelt, or from Watergate to Reagan. This time the office has to seek someone serious, and whoever that person is, has to come out of the closet soon. It's a good time for a power dive, given the shambles in Europe and Japan, but it's time to pull up.

 
 
 
This imperishable talk about a Grand Bargain between Democrats and Republicans is vintage, shovel-ready, Tom Friedman bunk. No possible such arrangement will even remotely address the full proportions...
This imperishable talk about a Grand Bargain between Democrats and Republicans is vintage, shovel-ready, Tom Friedman bunk. No possible such arrangement will even remotely address the full proportions...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 272
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
11:12 PM on 10/02/2011
Unfortunately what both parties have lost is Optimism.

Neither party or any candidate paints a forward thinking picture of America...one which might entail struggle, but then gain.

Each party uses scare tactics or a nostalgic longing for something from decades ago.

Neither party is embracing or understanding the 21th century.
11:02 PM on 10/02/2011
All the economy needs to instantly recover is allowing oil drilling in the ANWR, restoring prayer to the public schools and banning gay marriage. Or so say the Republicans.
photo
Minolta321
Photographer
10:40 PM on 10/02/2011
I'd say the governors and former goveners are far more credible candidates than running, say, a socialist community organizer who made bad grades in school and has no experience running anything except working for that criminal Acorn agency.

I mean come on.....talk about a non serious candidate.....and his first four years prove it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sparkle125
Left-handed Independent
11:12 PM on 10/02/2011
Go away. You have nothing interesting, novel or clever to write. We don't want you to take up our precious time. Buh-Bye.

PS I have never known a John Birch Society photographer. Are you hiding behind rocks, shooting and taking names? Study up on the John Birch Society. Bunch of paranoid crazies. I know. I was mistakenly "awarded" a couple of weeks at one of their orientation summer camps for kids; a local banker selected me, but he didn't really know who was sponsoring the camp. So, who pays you?
09:27 PM on 10/02/2011
Black assumption is that there exists a serious Republican left in this country.
09:15 PM on 10/02/2011
In order for anyone to find a serious Republican candidate, one most first look for a serious Republican party..... Any one seen it?
photo
ranchero42
Cherished Memories? NRA'll Rifle Thru 'Em
09:13 PM on 10/02/2011
For a short while I was convinced I wanted to post on this forum--not so much anymore. AOL brings a brand-new 'sensibility' to posting--'The Enemy Of My Enemy Is My Friend' has a whole new dimension when trite phrases become ironclad policy. Funny way to generate interest in an article--free speech a dim memory in Canada? So sad.
09:08 PM on 10/02/2011
Would a serious commentator please step in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TraceyES
08:20 PM on 10/02/2011
Conservative writers are old, tired, clueless Marie Antoinettes whichever country they hail from, apparently. At least this one can string coherent sentences together, even if there is no sense behind the words. It's better than most Republicans nowadays, whose writing skills make those of the average fourth grader seem impressive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pembrokelib
08:15 PM on 10/02/2011
The author, Conrad Black, was tried and convicted of embezzling millions from his media company in 2007. He served 2 years of a 6 year sentence. He is a far right fake who has the colossal nerve to criticize others. Would you take advice from a convicted crook? HP should have warned readers about this. I had to google his background to check the facts.
07:34 PM on 10/02/2011
Black's policy ideas are basically the same as what Cameron is doing in the UK. (The only difference is that they are using different tactics to weaken universal health coverage laws.) And Cameron's policies have been a complete disaster. His austerity measures have halted recovery in the UK and started a double-dip recession. But the right never learns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fightthapower
Brevity is the soul of wit....
07:28 PM on 10/02/2011
Classic and spot-on a much needed shot in the arm
07:26 PM on 10/02/2011
Aren't the Democrats waiting for the same thing?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon F
07:23 PM on 10/02/2011
"...so-called millionaires and billionaires who make $250,000 per year (and, if they have three children in private schools, don't have $5,000 at the end of the year)."

Conrad, does it really cost a family of five $245,000 a year to live? Please don't let all those families in the US making $49,445 (US median income 2010) know that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:20 PM on 10/02/2011
This is pathetic, if you are really concerned about national debt levels than tax hikes would inevitably be on the table. Yet, again, here we go, one of the "solutions" listed is to lower personal and corporate income tax rates!!!! Amazing, these Republicans never ever give up, they keep pushing their agenda rain or shine, to "solve" any problem under the sun. Here, here is a great way to resolve our debt problems - it is "simple", easy, practical, and conservative - yes conservative by not rocking the boat or radically altering anything or changing the American way of life or whatever new little fear that the Republicans use to "solve" problems. Here it is - end ALL of the Bush tax cuts and return to Clinton era levels, Oh, and return to Clinton era defense spending levels while we mothball most of our overseas bases and tell our allies that if our stationing troops on their soil is "necessary" for their defense than they will have to pay the entire cost of their defense. I do not think that you can find a single American who believes that we need to have troops stationed in Germany, Japan or South Korea to defend them from any conceivably realistic threat. Simply ask our allies - if you need us, pay up and if Germany, Japan, or South Korea cannot pay for our defending them than something is seriously wrong with our level of defense spending on those countries.
07:08 PM on 10/02/2011
What we need is a fiscal conservative. Enough with social conservatisim - we have much bigger problems.

We need a massive cut in federal spending and we need to government to get out of the way of the private sector so that the economy can heal itself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon F
07:34 PM on 10/02/2011
Massive cuts in Federal spending means cutting many, many government jobs, so that means even greater unemployment and even more competition among the unemployed. The private sctor has been deregulated in so many ways and enjoyed so many tax breaks over the past 30 years that it should be flourishing., but it isn't. So your arguments do not make any logical sense. The problem is not the government. The problem is an almost completely unregulated marketplace and the vast redistribution of wealth upward from the middle class.