Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel Alexandre Portoraro

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel Alexandre Portoraro
 

Occupy Toronto: Who Are These People?

Posted: 10/17/11 07:14 PM ET

"It is a speaking out, coming out, dancing out." says playwright Eve Ensler. "It" being Occupy Wall Street, of course.

In Toronto, to where the protests have spread since Saturday, the movement is certainly "speaking out," although it's rather difficult at times to hear what they're saying. "Dancing out"? Well, if this is a dance, as Ensler calls it, then the performers are tripping all over each other.

St. James Park -- Toronto's Zuccotti -- is playing host to the Occupy Toronto protesters. Porta-potties have been installed, tents are being erected, and people from all walks of life are coming to see what exactly it's like to protest in the 21st century. I imagine this was much to the chagrin to the young couple who were being married that day in St. James Cathedral (a favourite spot of the Queen when visiting the city), which would explain the bridesmaids' black dresses.

When I first get there, I count more cameras than signs, and suddenly remember the G20 when every Ryerson student and his blogosphere kin thought if he just got that one picture, he'd be the next Marinovich. But as the day wore on, more and more painted signs crowned the crowds, the majority of them announcing the end of capitalism, that "revolution is the only solution," and that "if you can't beat 'em, eat 'em." Pictures of Marx and Mao were common features, as well as the crossed out images of former president Reagan.

The crowd is a hodgepodge of the things headlines are made of, and stereotypes wrought. Between these two extremes are more everyday folk, from parents with young children, to the veterans of protests gone by, happy to see the return of emotion on the street. A great deal of the protesters wear Guy Fawkes masks of (sadly) V For Vendetta fame. These masks, whose rights are owned by Time Warner, are meant to express the anonymity of various protesters, members of Anonymous amongst them. Robin Hood costumes are abundant, as well as the type of clothes one would expect to find at a rave (I imagine these to be the stragglers from the World Electronic Music Festival unable to let go of their glow-sticks).

(Blog continues after slideshow)


However, while the latter are the types of people that would make good fodder for the media, it would be a mistake to characterize them all as such. Upon the muddy, squishy ground are protesters with meaningful messages to convey, although I find these voices of reason are smothered by the sensationalist songs of "craving harmony" and megaphone-wielding anarchists.

Mark, a man from Toronto, and owner of a factory in Vaughan, is one of the more articulate voices.

"I'm discontented with what we call democracy," he tells me. "Representative democracy has clearly failed us; direct democracy is better. For example, if you took the situation in Libya, and asked Canadian citizens if they were in favour of our involvement, they would have said no. I believe foreign and corporate interests have influenced our politicians," he continues, "while in fact they should be acting on our behalf. And especially today, with all of our technological advancements, there is no reason why the people shouldn't be more directly involved with Canadian policy, both domestic and abroad. We need a system in which democracy can exercise as it should, that is, that will allow people to vote on issues more directly. We shouldn't be giving the power to someone who will bankrupt us."

Mark's voice is but one the hundreds here at St. James Park, and his reasons for being here are not akin to everyone else.

"I'm protesting the monetary system," a young man named Nick tells me. Working in retail at a downtown clothing store, he is dressed, ironically, in shirt and tie, brandishing a sign that reads: "There is no economy."

"'Economy,'" he explains, "is defined as the conservative use of resources. But now, the economy doesn't do this, and works more for the corporations and the rich. It should be working for the human race, with a focus on individuals. I'm against fractional reserve banking and the debt-based economic model. It's not nice. The monetary system should be abolished."

But Nick doesn't believe the Bank of Canada is one of the big guys;  rather, the Big Five (RBC, BMO, CIBC, TD, and Scotiabank) are, as they are "private and foreign-owned banks." He claims that while these institutions are partly to blame for our nation's woes, it's society at large, and the current monetary system, who are at the heart of the problem.

"Do you know Jacque Fresco?" he asks me. "He's the founder of the Venus Project, and talks about how we should move to a resource-based economy. Now, we create a false sense of scarcity, but we have an abundance of resources, such as technological, and we should share these with the rest of the world. Fresco says we should focus on the human race, and I believe this is the solution." And his opinion of Canada's comparative economic strength? Nick says, "It only looks good because of the housing bubble; Canada is a mess behind the scenes."

Like at OWS, Occupy Toronto has its own 'tent town,' and its own library. Fitzgerald's The Love of the Last Tycoon is nowhere to be found, nor any other gilded work of fiction, though I do find a great deal of leftist papers and self-help books for humanity at large. The man in charge is kind and helpful, like so many who have taken on an "official" capacity at Occupy Toronto, and explains to me the library works just like any other lending library, and is stocked solely via donations.

Walking through the park, one is always suspect, or victim, to an outspoken individual using the protests as a soapbox. Pamphlets are given away willy-nilly. These vary from the coloured papers of "2B1," a group that believes as a race, we must act as one and "declare our interdependence," which, while banal, is comparatively ingenious to the other extreme in which one finds leaflets quoting the Bible and the Rothschilds ad infinitum to propel some conspiracy theory about a "One World Power."

I spoke to a man with such a pamphlet, Gordon Chamberlain, who claimed to founded the organization to put an end to 'ecocide' a month ago. This was his reason for occupying Toronto.

"Ecocide," he tells me, "is the large-scale destruction of the environment; it's a war action. It must be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court. There's a group of like-minded bodies that are in favor of the destruction of the environment."

He lists the "crimes" of corporations in Alberta's tar sands, the 50 years of petroleum dumping into the Niger Delta, and the "negligent conduct of the CEOs and Board of Directors of GM who fooled consumers that Hummers were a responsible response to deaths from smog and the environmental and economic impact of global climate destabilization." The word "Destabilization" is spelt as "Destabilisation" the pamphlet he handed me.

"I've written to Harper over a year and a half ago about this issue to get him to help mandate the International Criminal Court to get them going on prosecution for these crimes. But he hasn't responded. I'm trying to get the University of Toronto and York University to make fighting ecocide a part of their curriculum."

It's getting colder out, and there have been calls for blankets. A lot of blankets. What will happen when the snow comes down? I wonder. I walk through tent town, and there's a look of resolve on everyone's faces, as if winter will never come. But 9 a.m. Monday will: "I'm staying here, but I have job," I hear the librarian say, "so I'll have to leave for work on weekdays, 9 to 5."

I find two of the Guy Fawkes that are sprinkled about the protests. They agree to speak with me, but only if their names are fake, and they can keep the masks on. One of them is holding a sign reading, "Rich Y U No Share?"

"I'm fighting against capitalism, corporatocracy, and injustices against the masses," the young man tells me. He a student (in debt, he stresses), and lives in Toronto. "When money comes before people, that's when you have a problem; you can't have peace."

I ask him what he thinks the Canadian banks have done to justify what is currently happening at St. James. He says, "Basically, the bailout. But that's for the American system. I can't speak too much about the Canadian banks. Except that we should nationalize them. But I believe that we should tax the elite more, and limit CEO salaries." He goes on, "It doesn't make a difference to them if they make $2 million a year, or 10. I mean, if we taxed the CEOs one per cent more, imagine how many jobs would be generated?"

These muddled messages seem to be du jour at Occupy Toronto. Later in the day, I come across a group of students brandishing a cloth banner with the headline "How to Go Further."  Scribbled onto it are originalities such as "Make Love, Not War," specificities like "No More A-Holes," "They got the guns but we got the numbers," and so on and so forth. I speak to a young woman named Sam who appears to be their ringleader and ask her what her reasons are for being here are.

"I'm protesting greed," she says. "The greed of credit card companies, banks, and Big Pharma."  Sam says she works in Toronto at a marijuana cafe. She's got "a really big problem with Big Pharma because, you know, marijuana is such a healing thing. But Big Pharma is making it impossible for the government to legalize it. It's medicinal, that's why it's illegal." She claims that OWS and OBS are part of the solution to our current crisis: "Once we delve away from reality, it's dangerous." And how does one return to reality? "Through a lot of discussion," she says, smiling.

In terms of Canada, Sam claims that "Harper hasn't done enough for the country. The money he got from the bailout went into convincing people the bailout worked." A man comes by with a headband of hers, and we end our conversation before I have the time to tell her it was in the United States, not Canada that the banks got a bailout.

What is there to say about Occupy Toronto? Well, that it still has yet to take any true form. The so-called "day of action" has been more noise than action. Walking through St. James, you get the impression that a good chunk of the crowd are here more for the sake of it than anything else; this is evidenced through faulty logic or reasoning. Everyone I spoke to seemed to have a different reason for being here. And when reasons were similar, it was only because of the use of broad-stroke language. There is no unity, regardless of what their supporters and organizers say.

If there is a common bond between these protesters, it's disenchantment, anger. But at what exactly? Too many things to count, as I found out.  We are left with nothing but a mere emotion to link these protesters. And mere emotion is not enough to propel a movement to successful heights. Should the Occupy Movement sit down and draw out a specific map of what must be done, things might go differently.

"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold," says W.B. Yeats when speaking of the Second Coming. But here in the park named after James, son of Zebedee, there is no centre. The protesters say, "Surely some revelation is at hand," but they refuse to start at the beginning, to have a centre. Without a centre, things cannot fall apart, and when things cannot fall apart, they cannot be rebuilt and be the Second Coming. What I've seen at St. James is nothing more than a group of people at a standstill. They can camp out all they want, they can march in the streets all they want, but without specificity, they will not move forward.

 

Follow Daniel Alexandre Portoraro on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dportoraro

"It is a speaking out, coming out, dancing out." says playwright Eve Ensler. "It" being Occupy Wall Street, of course. In Toronto, to where the protests have spread since Saturday, the movement is ce...
"It is a speaking out, coming out, dancing out." says playwright Eve Ensler. "It" being Occupy Wall Street, of course. In Toronto, to where the protests have spread since Saturday, the movement is ce...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:23 PM on 11/16/2011
Down with everything and no alternatives.LAME!
12:08 PM on 10/18/2011
Portaroro opines "Without a centre, things cannot fall apart, and when things cannot fall apart, they cannot be rebuilt and be the Second Coming."

I believe that's the point of the protests. Things have already fallen apart except for the filthy few in this world. People believed they had a center through the political process. That clearly is not the case. It's time to take a critical look at the way our government leaders are behaving and come up with a rebuilding process. The reason that there are so many differing opinions on the purpose of the protest is due to the fact that we humans have mucked things up so completely its difficult to know where to begin in order to save civilization (if we can call it civil in this day and age).

It's easy to mock them. But any critical thinking person can plainly see that things are not going well economically, environmentally, or politically. Protestors come from all areas on the political spectrum whether the Tea Party or OWS. That should give Portoraro a clue but a rigid mind is unable to see the forest for the trees.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
arcsong
David Archer Toronto based Composer, Guitarist
11:45 AM on 10/18/2011
Okay then, Huffpost won't allow my comment - somewhat sarcastic but in no way off the radar compared to my past published remarks, other comments found here or Mr. Portoraro's own words - so perhaps they will allow a similar, more succinct appraisal in the words of Glenn Greenwald:

"Anyone who expressed difficulty seeing or understanding what motivates these protests revealed many things about themselves. None is flattering. "
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinnerator
12:15 PM on 10/18/2011
What motivates them is not the issue. You'd have to have lived under a rock for decades not to know the issues. It's their answers that are disturbing and I dare say unpalatable for a large number of the 99%
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
arcsong
David Archer Toronto based Composer, Guitarist
03:35 PM on 10/18/2011
You find these views "disturbing" and "unpalatable" ?

There are disturbing and unpalatable things going on out there but I would never agree that the views of these few activists qualify for such dramatic language.

Save that for those who game the entire system and for those who work so hard from positions of influence to dissemble and distract from the larger issues.
Jack Canuckski
Canadian Observer of the passing scene
01:12 AM on 10/18/2011
Again Daniel Alexandre Portoraro's observations underwhelm me.

He spoke with "Gordon Chamberlain, who claimed to founded the organization to put an end to 'ecocide' a month ago. This was his reason for occupying Toronto."

Received a pamphlet from Gordon Chamberlain on the subject of ecocide, and his take-away was that
"The word "Destabilization" is spelt as "Destabilisation" the pamphlet he handed me. "
The quotation above is cut and pasted, not one of my frequent typos.

Mr. Portorano's powers of observation remind me of a poem I once learned by Ogden Nash.

“I give you now Professor Twist
The conscientious scientist.
Trustees exclaimed, “He never bungles”
And sent him off to distant jungles.
Camped on a tropic riverside
One day he missed his lovely bride.
The guide informed him later
She had been eaten by an alligator.
Professor Twist could not but smile.
You mean,” he said “a crocodile.!”
― Ogden Nash
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter sfikas
Yia sou
09:52 PM on 10/17/2011
What you accomplished with your blog, is give the profession "reporter", a bad name. A good reporter presents the facts only, and does not editorialize. You present the protesters in the worst possible way,
but the readers can see through the arrogant stance. We, the people, don't expect any compassion from the elite. The elites' greed has consumed all their noble, human qualities. We can read and hear what the elite are reporting, and saying, to the protesters. Let them eat cake; but, we know what happened after that. This reporting is rated, ZERO. Check that; less than, ZERO. Have a nice day.
Dharma kate
Monty Python wrote my bio.
10:47 PM on 10/17/2011
I like to read people's reactions and emotional responses to these things ... the beyond the "200 people assembled at such and such a time..." I think that people can make a distinction between the reporting of object facts and opinion and both have their place. I didn't think he was particularly arrogant but then, I ask some of the same sorts of questions. I don't like to write people off and dismiss their opinions as "elite" or any of the other labels people like to chuck around. I think we learn a lot when we listen with our hearts. I believe that this revolution is going to be slow one, that it started many many yeras ago but it's time for its fruition as well-intentioned and good heearted people come together to listen, to share, and realize that we are all one people.

But then again, I've always been an incurable optimist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter sfikas
Yia sou
03:42 AM on 10/20/2011
I feel your good intentions! I am an optimist too. The difference is, I am an active optimist. You seem to be a passive one. I don't "chuck around" as you say, any labels. I just call a spade, a spade. It is the elite, the super rich, and spacial interests that dictate policy. And the policy as any blind man can see, favors the 1%. This has to change. It requires strong, honest opinion, and strong action. You can chose to stare at the wall. I will joint the protesters, the 99%, and demand change. The same change President Obama promised us, but abandoned once he was elected. Why? possibly because all he's got is, eloquent oratory, but no backbone. Or, he's scared sh...less of the special interests. Have a nice day !
Dharma kate
Monty Python wrote my bio.
05:27 PM on 10/20/2011
OK Peter.. my 2nd shot at replying to you .. apparently my computer ate my answer. Yes, I think we share a desire for common goals. The 'debate" comes down to what is the *best*.. yeah, I know, totally loaded word there -- way to accomplish it. I believe that protest and demonstration has its place for the simple reason that people of all walks of life don't feel they are being heard and rightly so. Commerical media interests in the "Us vs Them" script is for the benefit of media profit margins. I don't think commerical media has any interest in encouraging reasonable and intelligent dialogue. If it accomplishes nothing else, OWS has been a smashing success in that it has allowed many voices to be heard. And no, they don't all agree on topic or priority or solutions but there is value in voices being heard.
I guess that was my original point -- I like to hear from people with different political philosophies -- about their perspective on things. Speaking only for myself, I have learned that when *I* starting chucking labels around, it's because *I* stopped listening and I've closed my heart down.Experience taught me that when I do that, I make bad decsions. I do not react skilfully to things. Decisions that arise from my ego usually suck. Again, that's only my experience..

Incidently, I'm interested on your take on the comments made today by the CEO of the TDBank. I found them encouraging.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:00 PM on 10/18/2011
Portoraro is not a reporter, he's a blogger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctor Nick
Hi, everybody!
09:18 PM on 10/17/2011
We are the 99% seems like a pretty clear message. That is, the vast majority of people feel like a small part of the population is benefiting from the current system at their expense. How are they benefiting? Among the various quotes in the article, I see the monetary system (the bias of politics and monetary policy towards the interests of the creditors rather than the debtors), destruction of the environment, the role of money, lobbyists and special interests in the political system, the corruption of the pharmaceutical industry, and the lack of a more progressive tax code. There is an obvious common thread here if you choose to look for it.

I think the area on which there is more disagreement among protesters is what to do about it, and the answer to that question is much more important for the movement than agreeing on a few specific goals.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:21 PM on 10/17/2011
"I spoke to a man with such a pamphlet, Gordon Chamberlain, who claimed to founded the organization to put an end to 'ecocide' a month ago. This was his reason for occupying Toronto."

since you're judging the protestors for grammar and spelling errors, i figured i'd return the favor. fortunately expectations are pretty low for "blogosphere kin" like yourself.
07:56 PM on 10/17/2011
Everyone at this protest - and others like it around the world - really have a single demand (despite the fact that it dresses differently for everyone). There is a strong sense that something just isn't right in the world; we can call it economy, environment, greed, whatever. What we sense is that there is something fundamentally wrong in the relations between people...we simply don't care about each other. If there was a sense of mutual concern and mutual responsibility among people, would such problems even exist? Absolutely not. We would not pollute if we knew that it directly damages the lungs of someone we love. We would not steal money from the financial system if we knew that it was coming straight out of the pocket of a family member. These problems - and more to come - will show us the extent of our connection. Once we see how tightly connected we are and the need for a true care and concern for other members of society (as in a family), we will see how everything will begin to fall into place. Let's hope reaching this point does not take too long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles the Great
Canadian/Israeli Goy in Alert,Nunavut
09:11 PM on 10/17/2011
Oh wait! the 99% does not even support them