Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel D. Veniez

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel D. Veniez
 

Why the Liberals Should Not Merge With the NDP

Posted: 06/12/2012 12:44 pm

A recent poll was published that said a majority of Liberal and NDP supporters are in favour of merging. I'm not one of them. This isn't a matter of political expediency. From where I sit, there are simply far too many very basic and irreconcilable differences.

I'm mystified at why so many Liberals appear so ready to fold the tent and call it a day on one of the most impactful institutions in Canadian history. Taken in context, the decade in the political wilderness is a blink of an eye. Centrism is alive and well in the Canadian experience. And the notion that the Harper Conservatives or Mulcair's NDP are moving to the centre is a cruel and cynical ruse.

Still, there's a growing chorus -- including among prominent Liberals -- that declares that the "centre-left" parties should merge. Perhaps they should, but we aren't a centre-left party; Liberals are situated squarely in the middle. The sensible centre has not gone anywhere. Centrists must jolt the Liberal Party of Canada toward change and renewal. And we must help it rediscover its lost voice. After all, it is really our lost voice.

So, what does this Liberal think we stand for? I want us to believe in a strong national government that leads in areas where the national interest demands it. We believe that a strong and vibrant market economy is indispensible to funding a caring society. Liberals want to strengthen international institutions and be a constructive force in the world.

Liberals do not believe in the omnipotence of government and the socialist creed of social and economic engineering of the NDP. Nor do we believe in Adam Smith's infallible "invisible hand" of the market that many Conservatives do. Canada was built on a careful and pragmatic balance between the two.

Liberals reject rigid ideology of the left or the right. We believe in the power of incentives to drive a vibrant, innovative, knowledge-based market economy. We favour a robust and efficient regulatory regime that serves as a magnet for investment while safeguarding against market abuses. We believe in the power of fair and rigorous competition as the catalyst for prosperity, free and fair trade, smart regulation -- not over-regulation -- and in an equitable and less burdensome tax regime.

To pay for a progressive society, private enterprise must be the engine of wealth creation. A healthy market economy and prudent fiscal management are prerequisites for expansive government initiatives. We cannot modernize health care, make major investments in post-secondary education, pension improvement, security for seniors, critical infrastructure, arts and culture, or our police and military without a strong and competitive business sector.

Deficit, debt reduction or even balanced budgets are not ends in themselves -- they are means to achieving larger goals of economic growth, security, and shared prosperity. We must find the right balance between fiscal discipline and sustained investments in what drives a healthy and clean economy. We must not seek a planned economy, as the NDP does. That is a goal more properly defined with socialism. That's not us.

Liberal policies must be predicated on realizing our long-term economic potential, drive greater investment in human and physical capital, motivate innovation through a smarter tax system, and improve our market structures to place a premium on creativity and innovation.

Core Liberal values are unshakable. Last year, a student asked Michael Ignatieff to define his political values. He replied: "I'm passionate about freedom." In that brief but profound response, Ignatieff powerfully articulated what it means to be a Liberal, at least for me.

Liberals stand for independence. For us, dependency cripples. We believe that human beings must be free to develop and act upon their full capabilities. But that doesn't mean very much if the playing field isn't level. Liberals believe that if independence is good for the few, it ought to be good for the many.

To paraphrase political scientist Alan Wolfe, Liberals seek to include rather than exclude, to accept rather than to censor, to respect rather than to stigmatize, to welcome rather than reject, to be generous and appreciative rather than to be stingy and mean. Liberals are impatient with arguments rooted in fear and self-protection.

At the root of a renewed Liberal Party will be the impulse to reform, to tackle the big problems, to seize the big opportunities, and to fix what is broken. Canada's most intractable problems are deep and structural, so that is where our focus as Liberals must be -- reform. Liberal policies should make our country freer, more equal, fairer, more inclusive, more democratic, more tolerant, more welcoming, and more generous.

In the key spheres of public policy -- including national unity, economic prosperity, social justice, environmental sustainability, democratic renewal and constructive international engagement -- fundamental reform is long overdue. Liberals agree that Canada needs many more immigrants, not less. We need their work ethic, their skills, and their entrepreneurial drive.

Federalism itself must undergo a serious renewal. We must modernize the core instruments of governance if we are to deal effectively with the challenges we face. Quebec's exclusion from signing the Constitutional Act of 1982 remains an important piece of unfinished business.

If we are to renew, I believe Liberals must rediscover our roots as the original party of reform. We must dare to be bold again in policy innovation that is firmly anchored around a reform agenda for the 21st century.

Education, economic growth, and productivity must necessarily be the centerpiece of our action. For without them, everything else we want to achieve to create an environmentally sustainable, more united, tolerant, caring and just society will be just a cruel pipedream.

For me, a Liberal Canada is where our unity is revived. Where our economic and social union is fortified. Where our cultural soul is nourished. It is where equality, social justice, and economic opportunity meet.

There is an underserved public out there in the vital center that is just craving for substance and intellectual honesty from us. Liberals have never been more ready to deliver on that need. Let us at least try to fill that massive void in Canada's polarized body politic before throwing in the towel out of understandable -- but profoundly misplaced -- frustration and despair.

 

Follow Daniel D. Veniez on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@danveniez

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Gnomish
ego doctus ignarus
05:18 AM on 06/15/2012
A good barometer of CPC fear is how many times and in how many forms they bring a topic up.

This would be a classic example. All we need is a pact of cooperation.
All we need is a few Canadians.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
05:45 PM on 06/13/2012
Well, the center-right is already going to the Conservative Party and the center-left is already gravitating to the NDP.

There just aren't that many people anymore who are neither center-right nor center-left. Center-left Liberals might want to try and cut their deal with the NDP for merger now in the same way center-right former "Progressive" Conservatives eventually cut their deal with what emerged as the Reform Party.
01:36 PM on 06/13/2012
"Quebec's exclusion from signing the Constitutional Act of 1982 remains an important piece of unfinished business." And you wonder why we think the liberals are out of touch. No one cares except those in Ottawa it seems, the fact that it was thirthy years ago and you can still no tlet that one go is proof enough.

But the real reason we feel th aliberals are now dead weight in our political arena is no one sees a dfifference between the liberals or PC's. You can write as eloquently as you like, but the fact is most Canadians feel there is no difference. And you and your party are to blame.

If you truly cared about Canada you would be considering this move as one to help restore Canadian values which are being twisted by our current govt. Maybe it's time for the liberals to put the cuntry first and not their own partisan interests.

I think the real reason most liberals are unwilling to merge their party is the guys at the top of the liberal party don't want to share power with the NDP. They have been incharge for too long to let these new upstarts tell them what to do. And as the NDP have the numbers right now, they would be the ones calling most of the shots. Not something the old boys club would ever let happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mr Lyons
views of an meat-eating socialist
11:21 AM on 06/13/2012
if Tommy D. wouldn't have pushed Lester Pearson, we wouldn't have had health care, and i'd hope that we'd all agree that, as broken as it is, is a damn site better than nothing.I'm an NDP supporter(always have been) but my parents were staunch liberals for the longest time, but after years of failed promises(getting rid of the gst) and scandals, they also vote NDP.
08:41 AM on 06/13/2012
The Liberals have already burned too many bridges, first out West under P.E.T., then in Quebec under Chrétien. The sponsorship scandal is not something that will be forgotten easily. Why should we trust the Liberals, what has changed? Let's face it, its Quebec wing is a magnet for corrupt, opportunistic people. They made me ashamed of being a Quebecker. I can never forgive them for that.
07:06 AM on 06/13/2012
wrong .. you can consider yourself an independent .. i am tired of the right being in power in this country .. radical change is needed .. the right united and it worked LOOK..now its time for the centre/left to unite ...NDP/LIBERAL PARTY NEEDED NOW.
TheRenaissanceMan
A starry-eyed idealist with too much time
01:12 AM on 06/13/2012
You'd be right about centrism, though the NDP are more centrist, and the Liberals are right wing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
09:36 PM on 06/12/2012
I don't like politicians or politican parties very much - but as long as I can remember - and I'm 65 - the federal libs never seemed to stand for anything other than claiming not to be conservative. Ya want to rebuild your party - stand for something more than a desire to return to power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
07:28 PM on 06/12/2012
Sounds like your centrism is my Social Democracy.

But you see there are neo-Liberals in the Liberal party who won't commit to what you describe, in my opinion.
06:57 PM on 06/12/2012
My friend is a big Liberal. She is heavily involved in the riding association and such.

She has told me flat out that if there is a merger, she would go conservative rather than NDP...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russg
08:39 PM on 06/12/2012
There are many who would. The only result would be a close to 50/50 split between two big political parties. It would closely resemble another ineffective democratic system somewhere south of here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:13 PM on 06/12/2012
So what's your point? I know many blue blooded card carrying Conservatives who vote Green. What does that mean? Not much ...

Your friend is not unusual given that many Liberal supporters voted Conservative last election rather than NDP, some pundits credit these voters for giving the Conservatives their majority. Just another reason to dislike Liberals...
05:13 PM on 06/12/2012
"I'm passionate about freedom." So is the right-wing -- or so they like to claim. Freedom must be balanced by responsibility to not turn into right-wing abuse of 'freedom'. I agree with a lot in this article, but I think many liberals (or progressives in general) are missing a fundamental point: this is not the 20th century, and as the Harperites have exposed, 21st century politics is becoming very different from the relatively civilized philosophical battles of the 20th century (in North America) between liberals and conservatives and democratic socialists. The far right have hi-jacked the 'conservative' label in both Canada and the US and have no interest in civilized or reasoned discourse or politics. The battle lines are now between progressives and regressives. It is an entirely different war now, and new strategies will have to be devised to protect basic progressive values -- including democracy itself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russg
08:40 PM on 06/12/2012
The left-right paradigm has gotten so old that it isn't useful. One cannot argue that modern neo-cons are further "right". What they are is big-spending statists, both of which are about as far from conservatism as you can get.
11:30 PM on 06/12/2012
I think that is a fair and valid observation, but I would add that (in my opinion) both the Harper Government and the US Republican Party have become a very odd blend of neo-cons, Straussians and New Right religious 'conservatives', with a few libertarians and neo-liberals thrown in. The net result is a political movement with little regard for the fundamentals of reason and ethics that most progressives and even most traditional 'conservatives' took for granted in the 20th century.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
05:06 PM on 06/12/2012
LOL source?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctor Nick
Hi, everybody!
04:37 PM on 06/12/2012
"Liberals do not believe in the omnipotence of government and the socialist creed of social and economic engineering of the NDP... We must not seek a planned economy, as the NDP does. That is a goal more properly defined with socialism. That's not us."

I understand that the Liberal party has lately had a problem defining its raison-d'etre, what with the NDP and the Conservatives moving to the center on some issues, but I don't think you serve the cause by completely fabricating the positions of the other parties and debating a straw man.

Meanwhile, those of us who care about issues and not just party labels and "rooting for your team" look forward to substantive policy proposals from the Liberals that would distinguish them from a reality-based characterization of the other two parties. You know, instead of lofty, abstract claims about the Liberal party being "where our cultural soul is nourished."

This article is exhibit A that the Liberal claim to power these days is some mixture of lofty rhetoric, distortion of other parties positions, dubious claims of competence based on the party's history, centrist-fetishism (also known as Broderism in the US), esoteric complaints about procedure and decorum in parliament, and worst of all the entitlement complex as Canada's "natural governing party" and the party of "national unity."
03:40 PM on 06/12/2012
16,500 votes is not that big a majority, we need 20,000 Canadians to stand up and say Harper doesn't represent us. The rest of the media (alternative or mainstream) need to get on board with what is Right/Wrong, not Left/Right...
03:27 PM on 06/12/2012
Why would the NDP want to align itself with a dying, aimless brand like the Liberals?