A recent post was rife with inaccuracies about PETA's position on "pets." The facts are these: Not only does PETA actively encourage people to adopt "pets" from animal shelters, we also work to help people see that two are better than one (we suggest adopting an animal companion for your animal companion!).
Almost everyone at PETA shares their home with animals who were once discarded like old shoes by someone who didn't care enough to find that new "pet-friendly" apartment or to put time into training them or who couldn't afford or couldn't be bothered to pay for veterinary care when their animals became ill or injured. My beloved mutts -- Gilli, Dovi, and Agnes -- were all rescued by PETA and often come to work with me, where they are sure to steer clear of the office royalty: Marshall, with his three-and-a-half legs, and his buddies, Bubbles and Brandy, the three cats we rescued from the Gulf Coast following the BP oil disaster. PETA's office has always been home to rescued cats, most of whom were saved from the clutches of animal hoarders and other cruelty cases.
Then there are the ones who aren't as lucky: They will not go to a new home, and when you do the math, it's heartbreakingly easy to see why.
PETA is headquartered in the U.S., where an estimated 6 to 8 million unwanted animals end up in pounds and animal shelters every year. Canadian statistics are appalling too. Because people are still buying animals from breeders and pet shops instead of adopting from shelters, only about half of the animals who need a new home will find one. Shelters must euthanize the other half, some of whom are too ill or old to move into new digs. Others are broken souls who are fearful as a result of previous mistreatment or are large, loud, the wrong colour, or who knows what else that is not on the list of "desirable pet" attributes. Each animal, each "number," has a story, often a devastating one. We invite everyone to visit www.PETA.org and read about just some of them: Pokey, DJ, Trixie, Pepper, Sasha, Diamond, Tupac, Zoo, Asia, Sheba, Holly, Big Girl, Santana, Rikus, and so many more -- including some whose guardians never even bothered to name them but who suffered just the same.
Front groups for the meat, fur, and circus industries -- which kill hundreds of millions of animals every year, not out of compassion, but out of greed -- seize on the euthanasia of dogs and cats, something they, unlike PETA, do nothing to prevent, as a cudgel with which to beat up on animal shelters and animal rights groups. We should all be upset by animal homelessness, but for the right reasons -- not to take the spotlight off abuses in the meat, fur, and circus industries, but so that we can come together to end it.
PETA has spent millions attacking the overpopulation problem at its roots -- through spay-and-neuter surgeries, including via our three mobile clinics, which have sterilized nearly 80,000 animals at low cost to no cost in the last 10 years. We provide hands-on help to indigent communities in places where there are no veterinary services or only unaffordable ones.
We work with celebrities internationally to promote the adoption of homeless animals -- including kind stars like Justin Bieber, James Tupper, Tricia Helfer, and others. Our ads have reached millions of people with messages about animal adoption, respect, and the importance of sterilization.
We invite everyone to prevent more dogs and cats from being born only to end up chained and left to waste away in people's backyards, suffering on the mean streets of our cities, tortured at the hands of animal abusers, or euthanized for want of a loving home. To save lives, let's always have our animals spayed or neutered, adopt from shelters, and never buy animals from pet stores or breeders.
Daphna Nachminovitch is the vice president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals' Cruelty Investigations Department, 501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510; www.PETA.org.
Betsy Saul: Adopt-A-Less-Adoptable-Pet Day
Cathleen Falsani: Belieber!: Fame, Faith and The Heart of Justin Bieber (EXCERPT)
Dori Hartley: Not All Children Are Human
Wayne Pacelle: Special Attention for Special Shelter Pets: Adopt-A-Less-Adoptable Pet Week
Justin Bieber Promotes Adopting Animals From Shelters | PETA.org
Justin Bieber Joins PETA Campaign for Animal Adoption | PopEater ...
What people should be talking about is what we can do to prevent euthanasia from being necessary, and the groundbreaking work that PETA is doing, like this, from just yesterday: http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2012/02/27/victory-cats-seized-from-caboodle-ranch.aspx
As a result of PETA's work, hundreds of cats rescued from this hell hole will finally have a soft spot to curl up, clean air to breathe, and desperately needed veterinary attention and hopefully many of them will find a loving home for the first time.
When PETA restricts itself to the publicity business, as opposed to the death business, they can do good -- that's when all of those naked celebrities actually come in handy.
"For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding… as the surplus of cats and dogs declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out…We would no longer allow…pet shops” -Ingrid Newkirk, PETA President
It's the one right these hypocrites deny to animals.
Let's imagine the following scenario. Justin Bieber is flown to Norfolk, to do some fab PR work for Ingrid. He brings his adopted husky, Baylor, for the photo op. But Baylor escapes.
Justin's pet is picked up by a concerned local, who takes it to an animal shelter. This shelter is relatively new to the area, or perhaps just naive, so they are unaware of PETA's All Kill policy. They have recently been inundated with rescues, and they hope that PETA can share the load: they ask them to take 31 animals. PETA offers to rehome them.
Not realizing that this group includes a celebrity pet, PETA's mobile euthanasia unit puts Baylor to sleep, along with the other 30 pets in the back of the van.
While attempting to deposit the corpses, illegally, into a dumpster, the PETA employees are arrested and charged with animal cruelty.
Do you think PETA would still have Justin Bieber as a celebrity spokesman?
(Yes, this actually occurred. It just didn't happen to involve Justin Bieber's dog: http://bit.ly/aQbw8Y Feel free to try out this same thought experiment, substituting other celebrity pets. You get the idea. These duped celebs have *no idea* what they're supporting.)
http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/24/documents-peta-kills-more-than-95-percent-of-pets-in-its-care/
http://www.bestfriends.org/index.htm
http://www.nokillnetwork.org/
http://www.scoobymedina.org/en/index.html
PETA criticizes the first two -- they hate the idea that not killing might be effective. The statistics, however, are encouraging: you cannot end euthanasia, but you can reduce it drastically. (Extremist No Kill types, who refuse to put down an animal even if it's incurably ill, are as bad as PETA, but they are much less common than PETA would like you to think.)
Scooby Medina is a personal favorite, because they are everything that PETA isn't. They're devoted to rescue, and shelter: dollars sent to them *prevent* dogs from being euthanized. Scooby started out by concentrating on the Spanish Greyhound (the Galgo), whose plight is nauseating: they're tortured and butchered by the thousands yearly. It's now the largest animal shelter in Spain, and is growing internationally.
(I happen to be devoted to greyhounds in particular, which is very un-PETA, of course. You'll find that much of the best rescue work is in fact done by single-breed fanatics. Which is not to say that I haven't also rescued Dalmatians, Mexican street dogs, etc.)
Ingrid Newkirk – Founder, PETA
PETA believes the root of the problem is having animals at all, hence why they tried to sue SeaWorld.
"Deep down, I truly hope that oppression, torture and murder return to each uncaring human tenfold! I hope that fathers accidentally shoot their sons on hunting excursions, while carnivores suffer heart attacks that kill them slowly. Every woman ensconced in fur should endure a rape so vicious that it scars them forever. While every man entrenched in fur should suffer an anal raping so horrific that they become disemboweled. Every rodeo cowboy and matador should be gored to death, while circus abusers are trampled by elephants and mauled by tigers. And, lastly, may irony shine its esoteric head in the form of animal researchers catching debilitating diseases and painfully withering away because research dollars that could have been used to treat them was wasted on the barbaric, unscientific practice vivisection." Gary Yourofsky, PETA Humane Education Lecturer, interview on The Abolitionist – Online, 2005
Taking in with the sole purpose of killing, they were charged with animal cruelty because they were going around to vet clinics and shelters taking animals and promising to find them good homes, but even Newkirk admitted they goal was to take them just to euthanize them.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8255324/ns/health-pet_health/t/peta-employees-charged-animal-cruelty/
If PETA is so great why were they charged with animal cruelty:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8255324/ns/health-pet_health/t/peta-employees-charged-animal-cruelty/#.T1t15LSo-So
Newkirk is crazy see what she said:
"I'm not only uninterested in having children. I am opposed to having children. Having a purebred human baby is like having a purebred dog; it is nothing but vanity, human vanity." Ingrid Newkirk, PETA founder & president, New Yorker magazine, April 23, 2003
Their best year?2006, 3061 animals received, 58 transferred or adopted, leaving them to euthanize 2981 pets.
If you were to maybe actually present an logical reasonable argument instead of public relations stunts which simply make me think that your wack job nutcases I might be more inclined to listen, but based on the stupid PR stunts you usually do, I ignore you as I see you as more of a fringe group.
Nothing personal, I think the overall goal you have is admirable, your method of trying to implement is what drives me away from you.
The animals surrendered to Peta are from cruelty/abuse/neglect cases mostly and hence are not adoptable. A good number of animals are those who are in the throes of death (old pets, hit by cars, attacked, poisoned) and the owners, for whatever reason, can't get to an emergency vet. Maybe they dont have a car or cant afford it.
Peta ONLY responds to animals in DIRE SITUATIONS.
In 2001 when the domestic animal program was brand new, they probably responded to every single call about an animal. They then realized that the load was so great and to let the local shelters handle the adoptable animals and for Peta to handle the sick, injured and dying ones.
It is PETA's position that feral cats should be killed. Shame on PETA.
http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/1379/NC/US/
if what you say is true, why do the numbers from PETA say that the vast majority of animals turned over are by the owner, not rescues, not abuse because the owner wouldn't be turning it in, the police or an actual rescue.
http://www.virginia.gov/vdacs_ar/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2006
I don't see a single number that's says SEIZED. That looks an awful lot like a bunch of owners turned in their dogs and PETA euthanized them. Not that a bunch of abused animals were seized and put down for humane reasons. Yes I do see that that is a single year for one state. So you want to convince me wrong? So me the data link from a government site that disproves me.
"For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding… as the surplus of cats and dogs declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out…We would no longer allow…pet shops” -Ingrid Newkirk, PETA President
My guess is that you wouldn't be so foolish as to deliberately euthanize a celebrity pet. But you rarely know whose animal you're killing, do you.
Let's imagine the following scenario. Justin is flown to Norfolk, to do some fab PR work for Ingrid. He brings his adopted husky, Baylor, for the photo op. But Baylor escapes.
Not realizing that this is a celebrity pet, PETA's mobile euthanasia unit picks up Baylor -- now a stray -- and puts him mercifully to sleep. Perhaps even in the back of the van.
Do you think you'd still have Justin Bieber as a celebrity spokesman?
I have no idea why you think Peta would go out of their way to kill perfectly adoptable animals. Maybe instead of this speculating, you could call VA Beach SPCA and ask if they ever accept animals from Peta.
Wouldn't an animal from a Cruelty case show as Seized? I would think there would be a lot more seized animals and a hell of a lot less owner surrendered. As a matter of fact, it shows 0 for seized animals.
Ultimately, they really care about animals and support the exploitation of them on all counts. PETA is succeeding and they're afraid.
PETA will continue to save and help animals and the opposition will continue to lie about.
I have no time for Paris Hilton, but I would not put her in the same circle of hell as Ingrid Newkirk -- not unless she starts slaughtering those chihuahuas, as well as other people's healthy pets.
I assure you, PETA has enough "time and money for veterinary care." But you're right: these things have to be accompanied by "love, patience, and understanding." Which you'll find in abundance at some organizations -- Best Friends is good, as is Scooby Medina -- but it's pretty thin on the ground in Norfolk.
"I assure you, PETA has enough "time and money for veterinary care."" - Yeah. you know everything from absolutely no personal experience. Everyone thinks they know how Peta should spend their money. You are aware that this country kills millions of adoptable animals every year, right? You think we should displace adoptable ones with ones who need thousands of dollars in rehab who will most likely be euthanized anyway for space? Never worked in a shelter, have ya? I dont know why you think you are some authority on this topic.
(I doubt they would go so far as to aim for a zero birthrate for humans. Dogs are better than we are. Well, better than PETA, anyway.)