Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Daphna Nachminovitch

GET UPDATES FROM Daphna Nachminovitch
 

PETA Wants You to Adopt a Rescued "Pet"

Posted: 02/25/2012 9:14 pm

A recent post was rife with inaccuracies about PETA's position on "pets." The facts are these: Not only does PETA actively encourage people to adopt "pets" from animal shelters, we also work to help people see that two are better than one (we suggest adopting an animal companion for your animal companion!).

Almost everyone at PETA shares their home with animals who were once discarded like old shoes by someone who didn't care enough to find that new "pet-friendly" apartment or to put time into training them or who couldn't afford or couldn't be bothered to pay for veterinary care when their animals became ill or injured. My beloved mutts -- Gilli, Dovi, and Agnes -- were all rescued by PETA and often come to work with me, where they are sure to steer clear of the office royalty: Marshall, with his three-and-a-half legs, and his buddies, Bubbles and Brandy, the three cats we rescued from the Gulf Coast following the BP oil disaster. PETA's office has always been home to rescued cats, most of whom were saved from the clutches of animal hoarders and other cruelty cases.

Then there are the ones who aren't as lucky: They will not go to a new home, and when you do the math, it's heartbreakingly easy to see why.

PETA is headquartered in the U.S., where an estimated 6 to 8 million unwanted animals end up in pounds and animal shelters every year. Canadian statistics are appalling too. Because people are still buying animals from breeders and pet shops instead of adopting from shelters, only about half of the animals who need a new home will find one. Shelters must euthanize the other half, some of whom are too ill or old to move into new digs. Others are broken souls who are fearful as a result of previous mistreatment or are large, loud, the wrong colour, or who knows what else that is not on the list of "desirable pet" attributes. Each animal, each "number," has a story, often a devastating one. We invite everyone to visit www.PETA.org and read about just some of them: Pokey, DJ, Trixie, Pepper, Sasha, Diamond, Tupac, Zoo, Asia, Sheba, Holly, Big Girl, Santana, Rikus, and so many more -- including some whose guardians never even bothered to name them but who suffered just the same.

Front groups for the meat, fur, and circus industries -- which kill hundreds of millions of animals every year, not out of compassion, but out of greed -- seize on the euthanasia of dogs and cats, something they, unlike PETA, do nothing to prevent, as a cudgel with which to beat up on animal shelters and animal rights groups. We should all be upset by animal homelessness, but for the right reasons -- not to take the spotlight off abuses in the meat, fur, and circus industries, but so that we can come together to end it.

PETA has spent millions attacking the overpopulation problem at its roots -- through spay-and-neuter surgeries, including via our three mobile clinics, which have sterilized nearly 80,000 animals at low cost to no cost in the last 10 years. We provide hands-on help to indigent communities in places where there are no veterinary services or only unaffordable ones.

We work with celebrities internationally to promote the adoption of homeless animals -- including kind stars like Justin Bieber, James Tupper, Tricia Helfer, and others. Our ads have reached millions of people with messages about animal adoption, respect, and the importance of sterilization.

We invite everyone to prevent more dogs and cats from being born only to end up chained and left to waste away in people's backyards, suffering on the mean streets of our cities, tortured at the hands of animal abusers, or euthanized for want of a loving home. To save lives, let's always have our animals spayed or neutered, adopt from shelters, and never buy animals from pet stores or breeders.

Daphna Nachminovitch is the vice president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals' Cruelty Investigations Department, 501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510; www.PETA.org.

 
FOLLOW CANADA
A recent post was rife with inaccuracies about PETA's position on "pets." The facts are these: Not only does PETA actively encourage people to adopt "pets" from animal shelters, we also work to help p...
A recent post was rife with inaccuracies about PETA's position on "pets." The facts are these: Not only does PETA actively encourage people to adopt "pets" from animal shelters, we also work to help p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 125
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
05:48 PM on 03/13/2012
People are so quick to blame PETA for cleaning up after society's negligence instead of looking at the big picture. PETA is not to blame. Breeders, pet stores, and irresponsible guardians who fail to sterilize companion animals are entirely at fault for this. Let's talk about solutions so that euthanasia is no longer a tragic necessity given the present crisis. The solution lies in prevention, which means being a responsible guardian and sterilizing your companion animal. PETA has sterilized 80,000 animals in the last 10 years, preventing the deaths of millions of unwanted animals. Let me ask everyone who has commented, what have YOU done to help homeless animals? What have YOU done to make this situation better? Anyone on this thread who eats meat is contributing to the torture and slaughter of BILLIONS of animals every year--not out of compassion (as PETA does), but out of greed and arrogance.
02:16 PM on 02/28/2012
As someone with three rescue cats at home, it breaks my heart that people who don't understand the big picture (or who don't care--and only want to make a buck) continue to breed animals while millions are literally dying for homes and leave open admission shelters and organizations like PETA to do their dirty work. Or that people don't spay and neuter, and bring more animals in the world so their kids can see, "the miracle of life."

What people should be talking about is what we can do to prevent euthanasia from being necessary, and the groundbreaking work that PETA is doing, like this, from just yesterday: http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2012/02/27/victory-cats-seized-from-caboodle-ranch.aspx
As a result of PETA's work, hundreds of cats rescued from this hell hole will finally have a soft spot to curl up, clean air to breathe, and desperately needed veterinary attention and hopefully many of them will find a loving home for the first time.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
05:18 PM on 02/28/2012
Please follow up on this. As long as PETA isn't involved in the actual rescue, this is a happy ending. (If those cats get into PETA's hands, they don't stand a chance. They certainly won't get all of those things you list at the end. Although I'm sure the euthanasia will be painless.)

When PETA restricts itself to the publicity business, as opposed to the death business, they can do good -- that's when all of those naked celebrities actually come in handy.
11:36 AM on 03/10/2012
It's fine to want to prevent "setting animals free" (PETA employees can't say "euthanize"), PETA has been charged with animal cruelty (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8255324/ns/health-pet_health/t/peta-employees-charged-animal-cruelty/#.T1t15LSo-So) and have said on multiple occasions they are an animal rights group, not an animal welfare group, big difference. Animal rights are no different than equal rights for all humans, that means no animal testing, no eating meat, and no more pets.
"For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding… as the surplus of cats and dogs declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out…We would no longer allow…pet shops” -Ingrid Newkirk, PETA President
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
04:44 AM on 03/21/2012
The right not to be killed is fundamental. It underlies all other rights.

It's the one right these hypocrites deny to animals.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
06:52 PM on 02/27/2012
I'm going to modify the thought experiment below, to bring it into line with an actual event involving PETA dishonestly euthanizing animals.

Let's imagine the following scenario. Justin Bieber is flown to Norfolk, to do some fab PR work for Ingrid. He brings his adopted husky, Baylor, for the photo op. But Baylor escapes.

Justin's pet is picked up by a concerned local, who takes it to an animal shelter. This shelter is relatively new to the area, or perhaps just naive, so they are unaware of PETA's All Kill policy. They have recently been inundated with rescues, and they hope that PETA can share the load: they ask them to take 31 animals. PETA offers to rehome them.

Not realizing that this group includes a celebrity pet, PETA's mobile euthanasia unit puts Baylor to sleep, along with the other 30 pets in the back of the van.

While attempting to deposit the corpses, illegally, into a dumpster, the PETA employees are arrested and charged with animal cruelty.

Do you think PETA would still have Justin Bieber as a celebrity spokesman?

(Yes, this actually occurred. It just didn't happen to involve Justin Bieber's dog: http://bit.ly/aQbw8Y Feel free to try out this same thought experiment, substituting other celebrity pets. You get the idea. These duped celebs have *no idea* what they're supporting.)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
08:42 PM on 02/27/2012
Oh, and to deal in advance with the inevitable fabrication -- that these 31 animals were all too sick to be adopted, hence required euthanizing -- we have testimony from the arrested PETA workers themselves: "In 2005, two PETA employees described as 'adorable' and 'perfect' some of the dogs and cats they killed in the back of a PETA-owned van. The two were arrested after police witnessed them tossing the animals’ dead bodies into a North Carolina dumpster."

http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/24/documents-peta-kills-more-than-95-percent-of-pets-in-its-care/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeiGal
09:47 PM on 02/27/2012
Tonight on Jane Valez-Mitchel, (who is a staunch vegan and PETA supporter ACK!), she had a commentary at the end, about "poor PETA has been accused by the Consumer Freedom people, stating they are putting many dogs and cats to sleep. Oh, boo hoo for them. So this must mean that people ARE being made more aware of both PETA and HSUS, and it's affecting them by losses of donations.............YIPEEEEEEEEE! Believe me, every chance I get (and I am on MANY showdog lists on yahoo), I get the word out about them. I've already changed many peoples' minds about donating. PETA is trying to do "damage control" on TV now. Too funny!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
01:16 AM on 02/28/2012
I promised my friend, a philosophy professor, that I would never demonstrate PETA's fraudulence without making a point of recommending humane alternatives. (She used to support PETA: she now donates her time to No Kill shelters.) So, again, here are three truly decent organizations. None of them perfect, but all worth your time and money:

http://www.bestfriends.org/index.htm
http://www.nokillnetwork.org/
http://www.scoobymedina.org/en/index.html

PETA criticizes the first two -- they hate the idea that not killing might be effective. The statistics, however, are encouraging: you cannot end euthanasia, but you can reduce it drastically. (Extremist No Kill types, who refuse to put down an animal even if it's incurably ill, are as bad as PETA, but they are much less common than PETA would like you to think.)

Scooby Medina is a personal favorite, because they are everything that PETA isn't. They're devoted to rescue, and shelter: dollars sent to them *prevent* dogs from being euthanized. Scooby started out by concentrating on the Spanish Greyhound (the Galgo), whose plight is nauseating: they're tortured and butchered by the thousands yearly. It's now the largest animal shelter in Spain, and is growing internationally.

(I happen to be devoted to greyhounds in particular, which is very un-PETA, of course. You'll find that much of the best rescue work is in fact done by single-breed fanatics. Which is not to say that I haven't also rescued Dalmatians, Mexican street dogs, etc.)
04:20 PM on 02/27/2012
PETA always gives great advice! Until we start adopting animals from shelters instead of buying them from pet stores and breeders, homeless animals will have to be euthanized. There just aren't enough homes for them all--and it's not kind to warehouse them in cages simply to appease our consciences. They need loving families, homes to call their own, and room to run and play. We all need to help end animal homelessness by spaying and neutering.
01:51 PM on 02/27/2012
Half of all the dogs andcats that enter shelters in the United States each year are euthanized. I am grateful for PETA for working to fix the root of the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
03:52 AM on 02/28/2012
What. By euthanizing 97%, instead of 50%?
10:39 AM on 03/10/2012
"Eventually companion animals would be phased out, and we would return to a more symbiotic relationship, enjoyment at a distance.”
Ingrid Newkirk – Founder, PETA

PETA believes the root of the problem is having animals at all, hence why they tried to sue SeaWorld.

"Deep down, I truly hope that oppression, torture and murder return to each uncaring human tenfold! I hope that fathers accidentally shoot their sons on hunting excursions, while carnivores suffer heart attacks that kill them slowly. Every woman ensconced in fur should endure a rape so vicious that it scars them forever. While every man entrenched in fur should suffer an anal raping so horrific that they become disemboweled. Every rodeo cowboy and matador should be gored to death, while circus abusers are trampled by elephants and mauled by tigers. And, lastly, may irony shine its esoteric head in the form of animal researchers catching debilitating diseases and painfully withering away because research dollars that could have been used to treat them was wasted on the barbaric, unscientific practice vivisection." Gary Yourofsky, PETA Humane Education Lecturer, interview on The Abolitionist – Online, 2005
12:23 PM on 02/27/2012
Thank you PETA, for taking in dogs that no-kill shelters turn away, and for setting the record straight. I couldn't believe that other article even got published.
10:41 AM on 03/10/2012
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8255324/ns/health-pet_health/t/peta-employees-charged-animal-cruelty/

Taking in with the sole purpose of killing, they were charged with animal cruelty because they were going around to vet clinics and shelters taking animals and promising to find them good homes, but even Newkirk admitted they goal was to take them just to euthanize them.
11:34 AM on 02/27/2012
People who are concerned with the numbers of animals PETA euthanizes must remember something: each of those numbers represents an animal who had to be taken in by PETA because he or she was abused, neglected, or victimized. PETA does not run an open-admission shelter, so they generally don't have "oops" litters of adoptable kittens being dropped off at their doorstep. The animals they take in are in far worse condition, and most of them are coming to PETA because they were victims of horrific cruelty that left them suffering, dying, feral, or traumatized. The adoptable animals PETA encounters are usually turned over to animal shelters with a lot of foot traffic. So, yes, PETA does the truly tough - but compassionate - work that no one else wants to do and releases dying or unadoptable animals from suffering. After the miserable life these animals have lived, that is the most compassionate thing anyone could do for them.
10:42 AM on 03/10/2012
Really their own president says otherwise:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8255324/ns/health-pet_health/t/peta-employees-charged-animal-cruelty/
10:05 AM on 02/27/2012
This is a great article. People don’t understand just how big of a problem overpopulation is. Really thing abou it, 6-8 million animals a year?!! You shouldn’t comment anything negative on this article if you aren’t doing anything about it. If you care about animals, you should be doing something about it. Even if you just encourage people to always adopt, and to spay and neuter their animal companions, everyone can do something.
10:45 AM on 03/10/2012
I lobby and only adopt animals, but I personally know people who have worked for PETA, they were told they would be fired if they ever said "euthanize" instead they had to say "we set them free." I have all my animals fixed (well not the female horses cause the procedure is very dangerous and unnecessary for mares, but we've never bred them.)
If PETA is so great why were they charged with animal cruelty:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8255324/ns/health-pet_health/t/peta-employees-charged-animal-cruelty/#.T1t15LSo-So
09:13 AM on 02/27/2012
PETA does amazing work for animals every day. Keep up the good work, PETA!
10:50 AM on 03/10/2012
You clearly have done no research, PETA's own president said they want to completely phase out companion animals.

Newkirk is crazy see what she said:
"I'm not only uninterested in having children. I am opposed to having children. Having a purebred human baby is like having a purebred dog; it is nothing but vanity, human vanity." Ingrid Newkirk, PETA founder & president, New Yorker magazine, April 23, 2003
09:07 AM on 02/27/2012
Thank you, PETA. for doing the right thing for animals even when it is surely the hardest thing for yourselves. I urge anyone who is upset about the number of animals who must be euthanized for lack of good homes at shelters across the country to do something constructive to change this: Spay and neuter your animals, and help your friends, family, and neighbors do the same. Save a life by adopting a dog or a cat from a shelter. Never buy animals from breeders or pet stores. Report cruelty and neglect. If everyone did these things, there would soon be no more need for euthanasia.
08:29 AM on 02/27/2012
I'd be more likely to listen to you if the Norfolk Virginia PETA HQ didn't euthanize more than 90% of the pets in the shelter. Since 1998 they have received 31185 animals for adoption, they have euthanized 27751. In 2001, they had 700 pets adopted, 2008, they had 7, yup Seven.

Their best year?2006, 3061 animals received, 58 transferred or adopted, leaving them to euthanize 2981 pets.

If you were to maybe actually present an logical reasonable argument instead of public relations stunts which simply make me think that your wack job nutcases I might be more inclined to listen, but based on the stupid PR stunts you usually do, I ignore you as I see you as more of a fringe group.

Nothing personal, I think the overall goal you have is admirable, your method of trying to implement is what drives me away from you.
01:24 PM on 02/27/2012
You choose not to read anything that conflicts with your pre-conceived notions about Peta.
The animals surrendered to Peta are from cruelty/abuse/neglect cases mostly and hence are not adoptable. A good number of animals are those who are in the throes of death (old pets, hit by cars, attacked, poisoned) and the owners, for whatever reason, can't get to an emergency vet. Maybe they dont have a car or cant afford it.
Peta ONLY responds to animals in DIRE SITUATIONS.
In 2001 when the domestic animal program was brand new, they probably responded to every single call about an animal. They then realized that the load was so great and to let the local shelters handle the adoptable animals and for Peta to handle the sick, injured and dying ones.
03:46 PM on 02/27/2012
A few years ago, I wrote to them several times trying to get detailed information on why they were killing so many animals. IF what you say is the truth, why wont they provide the information? I don't believe their statements. Why wont they print those statistics?

It is PETA's position that feral cats should be killed. Shame on PETA.
08:36 PM on 02/28/2012
Maybe I could believe you if it weren't for stories like this.

http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/1379/NC/US/

if what you say is true, why do the numbers from PETA say that the vast majority of animals turned over are by the owner, not rescues, not abuse because the owner wouldn't be turning it in, the police or an actual rescue.

http://www.virginia.gov/vdacs_ar/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2006

I don't see a single number that's says SEIZED. That looks an awful lot like a bunch of owners turned in their dogs and PETA euthanized them. Not that a bunch of abused animals were seized and put down for humane reasons. Yes I do see that that is a single year for one state. So you want to convince me wrong? So me the data link from a government site that disproves me.
10:52 AM on 03/10/2012
This is their overall goal:
"For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding… as the surplus of cats and dogs declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out…We would no longer allow…pet shops” -Ingrid Newkirk, PETA President
06:40 AM on 02/27/2012
I am so impressed and humbled by PETA's actions to make a real difference. The haters seem to have all the "answers" but I wonder if they have spent even one hour crawling in drainpipes to haul out soaking wet kittens, or taking apart car engines to try to save a crushed cat, or a barrel hiding a starved dog. As long as an apathetic public buys animals from breeders or pet stores, and allows them to have litter after litter, PETA will continue to do the heartbreaking dirty work while "analysts" can criticize from the comfort of their armchairs.
03:53 PM on 02/27/2012
I spend about 25 hours a week working at the shelter, mobile adoptions, networking, fundraising and trying to find ways to help and save more animals. PETA needs to provide long term care for these animals - not kill them. Why not start a PETA sanctuary - where animals could go to live out their lives if they aren't adoptable. Something along the lines of what Best Friends Animal Sanctuary has done in Utah. They have 33,000 acres and they don't kill anyone just because they don't have a home.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
01:08 AM on 02/27/2012
Just as a matter of interest, do these celebrities know PETA's kill rate? Do you tell Justin Bieber that his pet, if it were to find its way into PETA's clutches, would have a 3 percent chance of survival? Even though it's perfectly healthy?

My guess is that you wouldn't be so foolish as to deliberately euthanize a celebrity pet. But you rarely know whose animal you're killing, do you.

Let's imagine the following scenario. Justin is flown to Norfolk, to do some fab PR work for Ingrid. He brings his adopted husky, Baylor, for the photo op. But Baylor escapes.

Not realizing that this is a celebrity pet, PETA's mobile euthanasia unit picks up Baylor -- now a stray -- and puts him mercifully to sleep. Perhaps even in the back of the van.

Do you think you'd still have Justin Bieber as a celebrity spokesman?
06:43 AM on 02/27/2012
You just choose to ignore the facts, don't you? As I and Peta have said before, Peta only takes in surrenders from CRUELTY CASES, hence their high euthanasia rate. These are animals the local shelters would also euthanize. So if Justin Bieber came to town and his husky were to escape and Peta found the dog they would take the dog the the Norfolk SPCA or the VA Beach SPCA. Unless the dog had been hit by a car. The he would be euthanized.

I have no idea why you think Peta would go out of their way to kill perfectly adoptable animals. Maybe instead of this speculating, you could call VA Beach SPCA and ask if they ever accept animals from Peta.
08:35 AM on 02/27/2012
Really, they only kill animals from cruelty cases? Can you look at this link? http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf

Wouldn't an animal from a Cruelty case show as Seized? I would think there would be a lot more seized animals and a hell of a lot less owner surrendered. As a matter of fact, it shows 0 for seized animals.
09:50 AM on 02/27/2012
Randi, it's obvious that people are set with what they believe to be true and no set of facts will change their minds. I have had the same discussions with conservatives. As one liberal put it "They're so passionate about being wrong."

Ultimately, they really care about animals and support the exploitation of them on all counts. PETA is succeeding and they're afraid.

PETA will continue to save and help animals and the opposition will continue to lie about.
12:51 AM on 02/27/2012
Thank you for expressing so beautifully and eloquently the heartbreaking truth that until people stop supporting pet shops, puppy mills, and breeders, dogs and cats will continue to be euthanized for lack of good homes. It is simple arithmetic.
10:49 PM on 02/26/2012
Thank you PETA for being the best animal rights group! :-) Ingrid Newkirk said this: "I prefer the term "companion" to pet, as that is more respectful, don't you think? Semantics can be important in how we view others. It drives me wild to see Britney Spears and Paris Hilton acquiring dogs as arm candy, which is why I wrote a book called Let's Have a Dog Party! I wanted to draw attention to the fact that these dogs are individuals with needs and wants. They aren't fashion accessories; cigarette smoke, loud music, and being left alone to stare at the apartment walls bothers them—it isn't a real life. I ask that people stay clear of pet shops and breeders, who exacerbate the overpopulation crisis. But if a person has enough love, patience, understanding, time, and money for veterinary care, I would ask him or her to go to the animal shelter and get two dogs or cats—so that the animals can keep each other company when their guardians are at work or play."
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
02:43 AM on 02/27/2012
Yes, well some of us prefer the word "butchery" to "euthanasia." Which makes Ingrid a "butcher," rather than a person who cares for animals.

I have no time for Paris Hilton, but I would not put her in the same circle of hell as Ingrid Newkirk -- not unless she starts slaughtering those chihuahuas, as well as other people's healthy pets.

I assure you, PETA has enough "time and money for veterinary care." But you're right: these things have to be accompanied by "love, patience, and understanding." Which you'll find in abundance at some organizations -- Best Friends is good, as is Scooby Medina -- but it's pretty thin on the ground in Norfolk.
06:47 AM on 02/27/2012
This from a person who most likely eats 'butchered' and 'slaughtered' animals. Butchery? Really? Why don't you go harangue your local shelter then?

"I assure you, PETA has enough "time and money for veterinary care."" - Yeah. you know everything from absolutely no personal experience. Everyone thinks they know how Peta should spend their money. You are aware that this country kills millions of adoptable animals every year, right? You think we should displace adoptable ones with ones who need thousands of dollars in rehab who will most likely be euthanized anyway for space? Never worked in a shelter, have ya? I dont know why you think you are some authority on this topic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeiGal
03:20 AM on 02/27/2012
Here we go again, with that word "guardian"!! I am NOT the guardian of my animals, I OWN them! I purchased them, I pay for their vet bills, I buy them the best food I can buy, and I love them unconditionally. I am the "guardian" of someone else's animal I may take care of for them, for a temporary amount of time. Animal WELFARE is far different than animal RIGHTS! We want animals to be treated humanely, loved and cared for, but they do NOT have the right to vote, they do NOT have the right to tell me they cannot be spayed or neutered, and they do NOT have the right to choose if they want to take medicine that they may need, but may not taste good. If I do not "own" my animals, then that means if they require expensive treatment, I don't have to give it to them, as I do not "own" them. As for Paris Hilton and the rest, they do NOT deserve to own animals. They are "using" animals as accessories, of that I agree with you. But not every human being is like Paris or any of those who dangle dogs from their arms like jewelry.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
03:37 AM on 02/27/2012
I do sometimes wish that animals had our rights. It would be nice if they could euthanize the occasional human. If the dogs of this world had a say, Ingrid Newkirk would be mercifully put down in the back of a van.

(I doubt they would go so far as to aim for a zero birthrate for humans. Dogs are better than we are. Well, better than PETA, anyway.)