Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David B. Harris

GET UPDATES FROM David B. Harris
 

Trudeau's Bad Company at the Islamic Convention

Posted: 12/21/2012 7:41 am

Nothing says bug-eyed clerical fanaticism more than inviting a hate-spewing Saudi cleric to address your religious revival meeting. But this is part of the under-reported history of the Reviving the Islamic Spirit (RIS) Convention, a conference that Justin Trudeau, a frontrunner in Canada's Liberal Party leadership race -- and son of former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau -- will address this weekend in Toronto. It's also why moderate Muslims and non-Muslims are aghast at the prospect of Trudeau's presence legitimizing the conference and some of its notables.

Although organizers pitch the gathering as "A Unique Youth Effort" "to help overcome new challenges of communication and integration" and "reviv[e] the Islamic tradition of education, tolerance and introspection," there is reason to be concerned. Aspects of the multi-year history and present-day manifestations of RIS invite questions about ideology and influences at play.

This year's conference was initially sponsored in part by IRFAN-Canada, an international Muslim relief entity that has seen its federal charitable tax status yanked by Ottawa, as a result of the Canada Revenue Agency's belief that millions in contributions went to "relieve" the Hamas terror organization.

Although exposure of this background forced IRFAN's eleventh-hour cosmetic removal as an RIS sponsor, it is not evident that all remaining sponsors are clear of radical taint. UBS Bank recently blocked the overseas account of British-based charity and RIS 2012 sponsor Islamic Relief, a situation which an Islamic Relief official reportedly attributes to the technicalities of counterterrorism regulations. Meanwhile, some have questions about the uneven ideological record of one or two prominent figures attached to sponsoring organization Zaytuna College, an Islamic institution in Berkeley, Calif.

And, yes, the inevitable Tariq Ramadan, the charming, soft-spoken and dupe-seducing scion of the extremist Muslim Brotherhood -- a man who famously called for a moratorium, rather than a ban, on the stoning of women, and avoids condemning Hamas -- will also speak at the event. Ramadan is an RIS veteran speaker whose apparent Muslim Brotherhood link offers little reassurance when taken in concert with a Brotherhood strategic plan for Canada and the United States which prescribes "a grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house."

Meanwhile, a journalist has exposed expected RIS 2012 speaker Yassir Fazaga as a fixture of Peace TV, an outlet with radical presenters, including Yusuf Islam -- the former Cat Stevens -- who called for author Salman Rushdie's death and spoke at the 2009 RIS.

But, years ago, those of us in intelligence who studied RIS conferences had concluded that RIS's problems exceeded even these present-day issues.

Indeed, the RIS's history of invited speakers includes some dignitaries who would give pause to people of conscience, especially when speakers might be considered models for youth and other convention attendees. For example, there was distinguished American neo-Nazi William W. Baker at the 2004 gathering. Known for establishing something dubbed Christians and Muslims for Peace (CAMP), Baker has rounded publicly on "belligerent American Jews." "[H]is apparent goal," wrote a reporter a year or two before his RIS invitation, is "the creation of a united Christian-Muslim front against Jews and other groups."

Middle East scholar Daniel Pipes complained that now-disgraced former RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli, then-Toronto Police Chief (and now federal Tory Minister) Julian Fantino and Mayor David Miller appeared at the Toronto conference, "thereby giving it -- and by implication, William W. Baker -- their blessing." Zaccardelli's pander-filled speech was memorable. Even the social-democratic NDP's Jack Layton could not resist addressing an RIS meet.

For "bridge-building" and interfaith work, there was RIS 2006 speaker Imam Siraj Wahhaj, US unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Another RIS invitee was Sheik Bilal Philips, a Canadian imam who is an unindicted co-conspirator in that bombing, favors death for homosexuals in Muslim lands, and fancies punitive amputations, lashings and public executions. From Kenya to Germany to Australia, he has been banned and deported on national security grounds.

The bug-eyed invitee mentioned above was reportedly Sheikh Abd Al-Rahman Al-Sudais, imam of Mecca's Grand Mosque. Well before his invitation to speak at the 2004 RIS, Al-Sudais said "Jews of yesterday are the evil forefathers of the even more evil Jews of today: infidels ... prophet murderers, the scum of the human race, accursed by Allah, who turned them into apes and pigs." "[A]n ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption," too. Christians?: idolators -- "worshippers of the cross" -- as were hideous "idol worshipping Hindus."

This was a bridge-building too far, and Canada's government barred entry to the Saudi imam.

As it did to RIS 2010 invitee (and previous speaker) Indian physician-preacher Zakir Naik, thought to have a crush on Osama bin Laden. "[E]very Muslim should be a terrorist," says Naik, and Jews are "our staunchest enemy." At the 2005 RIS, Naik pressed Islamic Sharia law upon America, complete with death penalties for homosexuals, heavy veiling for women. There was more than a dash of false equivalence in his comparing of the targeted civilian deaths of 9/11, and the accidental civilian casualties in Afghanistan combat. Naik's ambiguous position on suicide bombing included the view that it "should be done under proper guidance" -- surely a constructive thought for susceptible youth juggling contemporary responsibilities and trying to reach that life-balance between school and demolitions. Naik is progressive inasmuch as he believes wives should be beaten only "lightly."

Several years ago, Britain's Sheikh Riyadh ul-Haq spoke at an RIS convention in Toronto. Reports point to Indian-born ul-Haq's enthusiastic paraphrasing of the Quran in remarks made on another occasion: "the ones who are bitterest in their enmity towards Muslims, the most unrelenting, unforgiving, are the Jews and the mushrikeen, idolators in all their forms." Today's "chief idolators," he adds, are the Hindus.

U.S. authorities have taken an interest in RIS, and detained some American Muslims returning from the 2004 RIS conference in Toronto. Department of Homeland Security: "we had credible intelligence that conferences similar to the one from which these individuals were leaving were being used by terrorist organizations to fundraise and to hide the travel of terrorists themselves." The Saudi-funded, extremist-sympathetic Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) -- later an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terror funding U.S. prosecution, and the mother group of a Canadian chapter, CAIR-CAN, now attacking critics of this week's conference -- sued the American government, and lost.

Border authorities, asserted the supportive U.S. appeals court, "had reason to believe that terrorists, or those with terrorist ties, would be attending the RIS conference."

It was at this Reviving the Islamic Spirit conference -- presumably in the midst of some of its participants' condemnations of liberal coexistence -- that a jargon-laced greeting was read aloud from a letter from then-Prime Minister Paul Martin. "[T]his year's conference," he intoned on behalf of the Government of Canada, "adds to the fabric of our nation and strengthens our social foundations by making our communities more dynamic, culturally rich, and cohesive." U.S. border authorities might have taken another view.

Now comes the Reviving the Islamic Spirit 2012 conclave. You've heard about Tariq Ramadan and the rest, but what about other invitees who will be joining this month's Toronto conventioneers?

Jamal Badawi: Professor Emeritus, St Mary's University, Halifax, and held by the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report to be "a leader in many of the most important organizations of the Global and U.S. Muslim Brotherhood." Unindicted co-conspirator in the aforementioned terror funding trial, and an executive member of the Islamic Society of North America, an unindicted co-conspirator organization. Former board member of the Muslim Association of Canada, an organization boasting of its Muslim Brotherhood ideology. A pamphlet by Badawi that was available at an earlier RIS appeared to justify the practice of polygamy.

Imam Zaid Shakir: A U.S. cleric tending to trade in 9/11 conspiracy theories, aiming for Islamic rule of America, and believing that the U.S. government is at war with Islam -- a poor example for the Muslim youth at any conference.

At the 2005 RIS, Shakir seemed consumed with portraying the United States as a stain on humanity, a catalog of "slavery and genocide, oppression and military aggression." It is unsurprising that his ideology was condemned by moderate American Muslim leader and retired U.S. naval Lt. Cmdr Zuhdi Jasser, and by the American Anti-Defamation League. Shakir has spoken at RIS conventions on a number of occasions, and is a senior faculty member of RIS 2012 sponsor Zaytuna College.

Edina Lekovic: Policy director at the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). Exposed in 2007 by leading American counterterrorism expert Steven Emerson as having been managing editor of UCLA Muslim students' newspaper when its 1999 "Spirit of Jihad" issue counseled Muslims: "When we hear someone refer to the great Mujahid ... Osama bin Laden as a 'terrorist,' we should defend our brother and refer to him as a freedom fighter." Bin Laden had declared war on the United States in 1996.

Almost all of the foregoing information was on the public record before Trudeau accepted his speaking invitation. No wonder the moderate Muslim Canadian Congress and Muslims Facing Tomorrow organizations are joining so many other Canadians in raising questions about public officials who would become involved in this kind of enterprise.

Worse yet, there are now reports of enormous prospective increases in Canada's already-world-beating per capita immigration, some of it from countries associated with extremism and subversion. As suspicions deepen that much of this intake reflects a Harper government desire to "import" grateful voters for coming elections and profit from resultant demographic shifts, Canada is left to face policy outcomes that will continue to inflate its radical ranks, fill conferences of the RIS sort, and imperil Canadians' future. In the end, the Reviving the Islamic Spirit Convention stands as a warning of the need to press ambitious political figures of all stripes to resist the temptations and perverse political incentives endangering that future.

David B. Harris is a Canadian lawyer with three decades' experience in intelligence affairs, and serves as Director of the International Intelligence Program, INSIGNIS Strategic Research Inc. He is on the advisory board of the Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow (MFT), although opinions expressed here are his alone.

Loading Slideshow...




 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:21 AM on 01/05/2013
Reading this article (today January 5th, the conference was on Dec 22nd and 23rd, 2012) I am lead to believe that Justin Trudeau must be very brave... For he has acted against the expert opinion of counter-terrorism experts and chose to address and mingle with a bunch of "unindicted co-conspirator" (if you do not know what that means ask the expert David BH or search Fox News). I have attended some of the talks on Dec 22nd, including Justin Trudeau's, and I can assure all Canadians that all the worries that Mr Harris is trying to throw at us were unjustified. I believe that amassing all these negative statements, with no evidence from the actual event speeches which are available online and for purchase, amounts to intellectual dishonesty and cowardice. My suggestion to Mr Harris and his sympathizers is to be brave enough like Justin and plan to attend next year's RIS so you can make your own judgement.
09:58 PM on 12/27/2012
Shameless display of hate mongering Mr.Harris. I was at the conference this year and as usual found it thought provoking and insightful. There was absolutely no talk of violent ideology or thought. This conference is organized and led by progressive modern muslims and the audience is representative of muslims from all part of the religious spectrum, from conservatives to liberal. You justify your argument by using non contexual quotes from certain speakers. You fail to mention if you have even attended this conference yourself and fail to describe the actual content of the talks given at RIS, rather than obscure comments made by speakers at other times.
I invite you to attend the conference or atleast check out the online video posting at RIS talks
10:55 PM on 12/23/2012
I'm a liberal leftie and I wouldn't be suprised to learn that Mr. Harris is a conservative and bit of an Islamophobe however....this doesn't invalidate his basic message.

All one really has to do is research a few of his claims and you'll have the answer for yourself.

I looked into Yusuf Islam's statements - you can too. His position is extreme. He has said, among other things that Rusdie should die and that women adulterers should be stoned to death. He tried to back peddle on the Rusdie thing, but it looks like damage control.
08:29 PM on 12/23/2012
Mr. Harris what you have put together here is a cut-and-paste smear campaign, using convoluted paths to tie individuals to other more controversial people, like Cat Stevens when in fact they had nothing to do with them. You also use that 'only in America' legal travesty, called the 'non-indicted co-conspirator' charge that was liberally applied under the Bush government to smear innocent Muslim people and organizations while denying them a path to a just hearing. A legal manoeuver, roundly condemned by District Appellate Courts and Legal Scholars throughout the US. You also smear IRFAN based on a "new" investigation (an earlier CRA investigation under the Liberal Gov't, found no evidence of wrong doing by IRFAN.) .
The pulling of IRFAN's charity license and the falacious charges of "aiding terrorists" was under the Harper government. What was CRA's evidence? That IRFAN worked with the Hamas Government controlled (they were legally elected in 2006) Ministry of Health and Post Office, to try and send a Dialysis Machine to Gaza and continue support of an orphanage in that impoverished territory. I should maybe point out that the conservatives went after anyone who gave any aid or support to the Palestinian people, including the highly respected Christian Multi-denominational organization Kairos.
I remember you from the now defunct CCD. Your the guy that announced on US tv that there were at least a dozen terrorist groups operating in Canada, when every American wanted to blame us for 9/11.
05:12 PM on 12/23/2012
Oh Harris, Harris, Harris! you need to take a chill pill. Too much hatemongering ain't good.
04:31 PM on 12/23/2012
Mr Harris,
I find it very extremist of you to try to demonize all Muslims because some of them exercise their rights to free speech. This is exactly the kind of Us vs Them dogma, akin to Harper's "biggest threat to Canada is Islamicism" comment that only makes Canada a bigger target to extremists. You're already ridiculous argument takes it up a notch when you equate immigrants to terrorists use the term "bug eyed" to dehumanize them.

Any chance your lot will one day realize that invading and occupying islamic countries indefinitely, unequivocal support of Israel despite its' crimes against humanity, and extremist slander like your above rantings are some of the major reasons "we" are seen as an enemy by "them"?
02:22 PM on 12/23/2012
I was at the convention and not a single speaker spoke against liberal coexistence. Quite the contrary. You can draw all sorts of connections between the people present and other people or any such nonsense, but it's irrelevant. The only thing that is relevant is WHAT WAS ACTUALLY SAID BY THE SPEAKERS AT THE CONVENTION!! They'll be releasing videos of the lectures later. I encourage any critics to watch these lectures. I can think of almost nobody who could call the content divisive or objectionable or inciting to hatred. The biggest critics of the RIS are often Muslim fundamentalists because fundamentalism is constantly criticized by speakers and unity and moderation are often endorsed.
10:27 AM on 12/23/2012
A note designed to frighten from one of the many Commissar's in Canada's KGB.
This comment has been removed.
08:00 AM on 12/23/2012
Dear David,
You lost all credibility with your impassioned hate diatribe in the first paragraph.
And that, "INSIGNIS", thing? What the hell is that? A Kochian hate factory? An NRA sattelite community?
I note your association with SUNNEWS and widemouth Ezra Levant an palsy-walsy harperite connections But seriously, who and what the .... are you?
05:16 PM on 12/22/2012
Of course it is wrong for Trudeau to be in this bad company but it is hardly surprising, he like every other politician in this country will do anything to get the Muslim vote and when I say "every" politician I include Stephen Harper as well! That's right, Stephen Harper will go to any length to get this vote. I bet most people would be surprised to know that the Harper government gave $1.5 Million to the main sponsor of this hate-fest, the "Islamic Relief Org". This is a "charity" that condones Jihad. There is no telling how much money they raise for "charity" (including Harpers $1.5 Million gift) goes to support terrorists!

I am not making this stuff up! Here are my sources. Read for yourself!

Islamic Relief Canada receives $1.5 Million from CIDA despite its commitment to fund Jihad
http://pointdebasculecanada.ca/articles/10002791-maurais-live-islamic-relief-canada-re%C3%A7oit-1,5-million-$-de-l%E2%80%99acdi-en-d%C3%A9pit-de-son-engagement-%C3%A0-financer-le-jihad.html

From CIDA website:
http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/cidaweb%5Ccpo.nsf/projEn/M013730001

Islamic Relief
On its British and Canadian websites, Islamic Relief lists eight categories of beneficiaries for the zakat (charity) that it collects. Islamic Relief openly mentions funding Muslims involved in jihad (“Those struggling in the path of Allah”). Besides jihadists, the charity funds mostly groups of needy people as well as the zakat collectors themselves.
10:28 AM on 12/23/2012
OHHHHHHHHHHH!
So scared!
03:55 PM on 12/22/2012
Thanks for the article . Trudeau is after all a politician and would do anything for votes
08:02 AM on 12/23/2012
ya mean like...bribe a dying man for a vote in parliament?
Wait!!!!!!!!!!
Harper pulled that one, didn't he? That was a first in Canada.
12:01 AM on 12/22/2012
This an interesting article. Maybe some of the author's concerns have merit, though I suspect that many do not. Citing someone like Daniel Pipes is hardly reliable and many of the organizations and individuals who are now getting caught up in anti-terrorist funding laws are either innocent or on the wrong side of a political divide. And, unless I am mistaken, Tariq Ramadan really is a moderate and highly respected thinker. The problem here seem to be that Mr. Harris wants to punish and condemn everyone who does not think like him, while refusing to recognize that different historical and cultural experiences may produce people with very different perspectives than his own.

The problem with the kind of approach advocated by Mr. Harris, of course, is that it fails to account for these real political differences. What I would be really curious about is if Mr. Harris' complaints would extend to speakers/representatives of the religious and nationalist right from Israel, many of whom are deeply fanatical and clearly racist. Avigdor Leiberman, until recently Israel's foreign minister, would be a good example of this and many of the people likely to end up in the next ruling coalition are cut from this same cloth. Will Mr. Harris be consistent in his condemnation of bigotry then, or will he be unable to see it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teeleecee
I'm not who I think you think I am.
11:59 PM on 12/22/2012
Wow. Did we read the same article? You think that there's any merit whatsoever to being in the company of people who call for the death of others? Cat Stevens. That was the only name I needed to see. He wants someone dead for what that person wrote. Still. He has never apologized. And we want our politicians affiliated in any way with this list of criminals and hate-mongers? Then your issue becomes whether Harris would think the same way about Jews? I don't believe that was his focus and if he wanted to write on that topic, I'm sure he would. For now, he's dealing with this particular event and these particular players. It would be nice to just deal with the issue and not be sidelined by your own agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
09:24 PM on 12/21/2012
Yeh, ISlamophobia sells. Calling people bug-eyed is not better than the attributed quotes. How can this piece be taken seriously.
10:18 AM on 12/22/2012
Suggest you google Salim Mansur/Ottawa Citizen and read what he told the Canadian Senate during their immigration hearings- and note that this man is a practicing Muslim
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:27 PM on 12/22/2012
The neocons will have their darlings. The problem is extremism. To question which faith has the worst forms is simply a race to the bottom. It is all a scourge.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
07:22 PM on 12/21/2012
I'm not as concerned as Mr. Harris is about a diversity of speakers addressing the RIS conference; instead, I find it disturbing how he relies mostly on unsubstantiated suspicions to try to make a case for limiting free speech (certain speakers 'shouldn't have been invited') or for ostracism of the RIS by certain politicians. There are radicals with intent to cause harm amongst Muslims as well as amongst Christians and those that worship other deities or no deity at all. I admit I know little or nothing beyond what Harris presents about any of these organizations or individuals, but he doesn't convince me the alarm about Justine Trudeau addressing this conference is justified. Rather, I think the opportunity for the sharing of perspectives (whether we agree or not) and dialogue should be welcomed as opportunity for learning. It is, after all, ignorance that usually fuels fear that builds to mistrust and/or hatred..and, far too often, a lot of that entirely unjustified.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 PM on 12/23/2012
People here should pay carefull attention to what Ms Miller posts. She is a very reasoned, articulate and insiteful commentator who really ought to be posting here as a featured blogger as well. I can tell you from first hand experience she has helped to educate me in interactions we have had. I may not agree with everything she posts, but she is serious, and should be paid very careful attention when she comments

Madam, the fact you have commente as you have confirms my suspicions about this blog post are valid. I am getting very uncomfortable with all the anti Ilsmist diatribes being given attention and outlet. And certainly, as a retired Naval Officer of 20 years, I DIDN'T sail the briney blue in the defence of Canada so that mindless anit-Islamist commentary could be allowed without challenge.

Another great comment! Thanks for posting. And seriously, please think about blogging here. I think you have a voice we need to hear.

Cheers!
03:49 AM on 12/24/2012
Thank you, Art...frankly, I'm just an unemployed 'almost senior' still trying to figure out what I'm going to do into the future, and I don't know that blogging is in the cards.  I appreciate the encouragement though -- it's nice to know when something I've written has made some sense to someone.

I don't find enough time to follow and absorb all the news I'm interested in, but when I read something like this...well, I'm likely as not to rant a bit.  I'm disappointed and somewhat (even a lot) horrified over much that's unfolding in Canada and the world at present, and disturbed about the extent to which facts and truth are distorted to manipulate perceptions and influence public opinion.  I too feel that the mindless commentary that incites divisiveness must be challenged -- yet it seems pervasive in human culture in these times (so much so, a lot can slip under the radar, particularly in the absence of credible investigative journalism).

I understand that Justin Trudeau has himself responded to the criticism now, so off to see if I can find his response and lend it some thought.

Cheers to you as well, Art, and best wishes this holiday season and through the coming year.
          
This comment has been removed.