Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
David Frum

GET UPDATES FROM David Frum
 

Vimy Reminds Us of When We Were Warriors, Not Peacekeepers

Posted: 04/14/2012 12:00 am

You could learn a lot about Canada's national psyche from the country's enduring fascination with the battle of Vimy Ridge, fought 95 years ago this past week.

Canadians fought dozens of major battles during the First World War. Yes, Vimy was the most tactically spectacular: one of the best-planned, best-executed Allied operations of the whole war. Vimy fully deserves the honour it carries in the national memory.

But the exclusive attention to Vimy obscures other Canadian achievements even more deserving of honour.

Who remembers now the Battle of Amiens in August, 1918? Yet it was this battle that broke the spirit of the German army in the West. German troops broke and ran before a Canadian and Australian-led assault: the first German rout of the war. Between August and November, Canadians spearheaded a sequence of attacks that destroyed the German army's will to fight.

Those battles -- collectively known as the Hundred Days -- have been brilliantly summarized in a short book that, if it were up to me, would be assigned to every high school student in Canada: Shane Schreiber's Shock Army of the British Empire.

By Schreiber's tally, the 100,000 Canadians who fought in the Hundred Days met almost one quarter of the entire remaining German army on the West: 47 German divisions against four Canadians. The Canadian forces fought alongside an Australian/New Zealand contingent. The three Dominions together engaged some 40 per cent of the German army.

Over those three months, the Canadians suffered more than 45,000 casualties, killed and wounded -- or about as many as in the whole year from D-Day to VE Day in World War II.

Being a Canadian, of course, Schreiber underscores his point with a final statistical comparison to the U.S. forces in the Meuse-Argonne region on the southern portion of the Western front.

Troops engaged:

Americans: 650,000
Canadians: 105,000

Duration of Operations
:

Americans: 47 days
Canadians: 100 days

Maximum Distance Advanced:

Americans: 34 miles
Canadians: 86 miles

German Divisions Defeated:
(Out of a total of 200)

Americans: 46
Canadians: 47

Average Number of Casualties Suffered per German Division Defeated
:

Americans: 2,170
Canadians: 975

Total Casualties:

Americans: 100,000
Canadians: 45,830

"The ultimate conclusion that must be drawn," Schreiber sums up, "is that ... the Canadian Corps was able to make a highly significant contribution to the defeat of the German army on the battlefield at precisely half the cost in terms of life and limb as the American army."

Unlike Vimy, the Hundred Days was a strategic as well as tactical victory.

And while few would dissent from John Moore's verdict in yesterday's National Post that the First World War should never have been fought, it's also true that once fought, it was vital that the Western democracies win. A German victory would have locked an exploitative military dictatorship in control of the whole continent of Europe -- a point now agreed on by German historians fully as much as non-Germans. Canada's indispensable contribution to that victory ought to be a matter of national pride, to be celebrated gloriously in the now-impending centennial of the First World War.

But how? Not with more wreath-laying. The last veterans of the First World War are long gone, and will be longer gone in August 2014. What we owe them now is not only sympathy for their sacrifices, but remembrance of their military achievements: a national commitment to remembrance that should carry on through the whole period of the anniversary, and culminate -- not in April 2017 -- but on November 11, 2018, the centennial of the day that Canadian troops liberated the Belgian town of Mons, firing what is often described as the last shot of the First World War.

This anniversary offers an opportunity to rediscover Canada's heritage as a war-fighting and war-winning nation -- in wars that, because won, made possible the free, democratic and peaceful Europe of the 21st century.

This article is cross-posted at the National Post

 
 
 

Follow David Frum on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@davidfrum

 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:02 AM on 04/15/2012
Five relatives fought in WW1 and five returned. One was gassed, one was shot three times and the others came back without injuries. None of them spoke of the war. None of them liked war. none of the advocated war. one was fifteen when he enlisted (;ied about his age) and two used their veterans benefit for serving by going to university. Canada is not a country to promote or advocate war. War can be prevented for fewer dollars and no loss of life because war only benefits the arms manufacturers. In 1914 the world was in transition and empires were due to fall apart. The same is true to-day. The money the Harper government has allocated for the military is wasted on obsolete weapons which are relatively few in number . The money spent on them could do some serious problem solving which would make Canada friends and not enemies. Israel is a great example of how much money and how many men are required to keep the natives down and if the money had been spent on making their lives rich and bountiful, Israel would have a cheaper tax load and friendlier neighbours. War is never going to bring peace for long. The Versailles treaty showed how punishing the enemy only makes the enemy stronger. The Marshall Plan showed how helping the enemy actually helps the country giving the help.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
05:44 PM on 04/14/2012
Rachel Maddow's well written and best selling book "Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power" is a very readable account of America's drift into never-ending and invisible war to the average American citizen. Frum should read it as should Stephen Harper!
photo
Felix99
Born to be mild!!!!
08:54 PM on 04/14/2012
I am reading it right now, and it is about as scary as you want to get. We now have a mercenary army as large as the real one, and it is totally inaccountable to anyone. And it seems to be getting worse as I transition from Clinton to Bush.
photo
Felix99
Born to be mild!!!!
08:58 PM on 04/14/2012
Actually, I would rather that Stephen Harper not read it as it would give him nasty ideas, just as it did to the Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
05:42 PM on 04/14/2012
When I first read this article I couldn’t help think about the young man in his late twenty’s I briefly spoke to in a mall somewhere in South Carolina . Both his legs were gone and on eye covered with a patch. A wheelchair his mode of transportation, his entire life sacrificed by a bankrupt US foreign policy.

There are many thousands of damaged men and women walking or wheeling the streets of America at this moment because of wars contrived and promoted by Mr. Frum and the like.

Come you masters of war
You that build the big guns
You that build the death planes
You that build all the bombs
You that hide behind walls
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know
I can see through your masks.

Where do YOU fit Mr. Frum
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glass Cannon
Let every eye negotiate for itself.
04:21 PM on 04/14/2012
You are describing one of the most successful peace-keeping actions ever undertaken by Canadians. Contributions by our people, as you say, "made possible the free, democratic and peaceful Europe of the 21st century." There is much to be proud of, but that battle was for peace, not "war-fighting" (most ridiculous buzz word ever). The reason behind the call to arms makes all the difference. If you fight to oppress a people for their resources or territory you have nothing to be proud of. If you fight to protect people from said oppressors you are peacekeepers. You should be proud that Canada has sought keep the peace and protect people who can't protect themselves.

So shame on you Mr. Frum. You show no real respect for those that fought secure PEACE all those years ago.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
03:23 PM on 04/14/2012
I love it when guys like Frum and Black, one who virtually renounces and the other who explicitly renounces his citizenship, try to speak for Canada. It's interesting that the people who are the least likely to actually fight in a conflict are so often the ones who cheer on such conflicts.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
temenos
castigat ridendo mores
08:54 PM on 04/14/2012
F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
02:35 PM on 04/14/2012
Re-branding the Canadian military as "war fighters" are we? Well, we may have touted ourselves as peacekeepers and we have some heroes in that department--- they are reluctant to fight wars.
As should we all be as a people.
Harper can't goad us by saying our military "punches above its weight". That is nothing to be proud of these days. Since the Second War it has all been about manufacturing "the enemy",power, dominance and oil. Shameful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Speth
A Claymore for your thoughts
09:32 PM on 04/14/2012
Having been to South Korea many times I can assure they are quite thankful for the freedom many Canadians died to give them. Did we make the North Korean army up? How mch oil is in South Korea again? The Canadian military has always been war fighters. The only re-branding was done by the Liberals who created the peacekeeping myth so the wouldn't have to spend any money keeping the forces modern and prepared. The only shameful thing is ignorant patisan revisionist history that ignores the reality of the sacrafices of millions of Canadain who actually FOUGHT in three major wars in the last century.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harry Bradford
01:56 PM on 04/14/2012
Remember when Jesus said, "Blessed are the warriors"? Oh, wait. He said, "Blessed are the peacemakers".
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
01:55 PM on 04/14/2012
Two things Frum; 1) where do you get WE? You weren't there and I suspect even now you would do your utmost to avoid service, and 2) you've become a pseudo-American, even having been a speech writer for it's worst President, so quit trying to pretend that you're a Canadian patriot.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
10:24 AM on 04/14/2012
Frum overlooks the fact that Canada during both World wars I and II was tied to Britain's foreign policy and had to go to war when Britain did. He also overlooks that there was a draft which we call conscription in place. That said, I too value the sacrifice that those brave soldiers made.

As a cheerleader for the Iraq Invasion (which Canada did not participate in), a leader in the American Republican party and as a Canadian who has chosen (as is his right) to reside in the US, I take his construed accounting of Canada and "war" with a huge grain of salt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
12:31 PM on 04/14/2012
Vimy ridge is the battle that won independence for Canadian forces. Before then our troops were lead by British officers. We didnt HAVE to go to war because Britain did...in fact, if we chose to defy Britain at that time there is not a single thing it could have done to stop us. It just was not our way, and we saw a need to be involved in WW2. I can think of few wars that are morally just, but WW2 is definately one of them, and I am extremely proud of the role that Canada played in it.
This comment has been removed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
05:16 PM on 04/14/2012
WRONG.

First of all, although we were tied to British foreign policy in 1914, that was NOT so in 1939. By that time we were independent of British wishes.

Secondly, yes, there was conscription in both wars. In World War One, conscription was brought into effect until 1917, and due to massive resistance in Quebec, only about 25,000 draftees made it to the front just as the war was ending. No conscripts served at Vimy.

In World War Two, the problem repeated itself. There was conscription, and an uproar.....to the point that only 2463 conscripts ever reached the front lines in Europe. Out of 44,000 Canadian dead in WWII, 79 were conscripts.

Both wars were overwhelmingly fought by volunteers.

Ask anyone that served beside Canadian combat soldiers in any war, and they will tell you Canadians are some of the very best killers on earth, when it becomes necessary.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
10:05 AM on 04/14/2012
We still are warriors.

Ask anyone that served alongside Canadian troops in Afghanistan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:05 AM on 04/14/2012
Afghanistan is an occupation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
05:17 PM on 04/14/2012
Right.

And the Taliban are freedom fighters.

:)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
King Stevie Harper
10:04 AM on 04/14/2012
See the problem, David?

You conservatives lie like junkies. You literally cannot stop lying -- lying about Liberals, lying about your own, very well-documented history -- because at the end of ever righteous criticism which you level at the Gorgons that are destroying this country comes the same, damning question:

Where were you when it counted?

http://driftglass.blogspot.ca/2012/03/even-police-began-to-sit-up-and-take.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:53 AM on 04/14/2012
We need peacemakers, not warriors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
12:32 PM on 04/14/2012
When peacemaking fails we need warriors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Speth
A Claymore for your thoughts
09:35 PM on 04/14/2012
Your country thanks you for your brave service on the message boards of the internet. Good job. Your bravery has not gone unoticed.