Question: When do you know that a public figure really needs a P.R. boost?
Answer: When that person wraps himself in the rainbow flag.
Case in point: Toronto Maple Leafs GM/bully Brian Burke -- who endeavours (and sometimes succeeds) in getting commentators fired when he doesn't care for their opinions -- is part of an anti-homophobia public service announcement entitled, "You Can Play."
The debut of the spot comes on the heels of a very brutal few weeks for Burke, after he failed to make a significant deal at the trading deadline and then met his Waterloo in trying to get Don Cherry fired from Coach's Corner. (Sorry, Burkie -- you taking on hockey icon Cherry is akin to the Thornhill Selects taking on the Detroit Red Wings.)
So, what does Burke do to bolster his tarnished image? He rolls out an anti-homophobia campaign on the premise that his son, Brendan -- who tragically died in a car accident in 2010 -- was gay.
Surely, anyone being bullied for any reason is wrong -- whether that person is too fat, too nerdy, too freckle-faced -- you name it.
Yet, in the anti-bullying biz these days, it seems there's a subtext that the very worst sort of bullying is the kind that is perpetrated against homosexuals.
But why? Is it not equally repugnant to bully a gay kid as it is to bully a red-headed kid? Surely all forms of bullying are vile and should be eradicated.
However, when it comes to optics, a sure-fire way to get an image makeover is by latching on to a gay cause. And it seems to be working for Burke, who is being roundly applauded for his feel-good initiative -- even though I'm unaware of a scintilla of evidence that any professional or amateur hockey player has ever been discriminated against or targeted due to his sexual orientation.
So, what gives?
My guess is that Burke has learned a lesson from potty-mouth Sean Avery. This is the ex-New York Ranger who allegedly mocked ex-Leaf Jason Blake about having cancer. Avery also referred to his ex-girlfriend, actress Elisha Cuthbert, as "sloppy seconds" when Dion Phaneuf started dating her.
Avery needed a PR makeover too. So what did he do? He claimed that during a fight with Wayne Simmonds of the Philadelphia Flyers, Simmonds used a homophobic slur. (Oh, the horror! Apparently, in the NHL, players can use each other as punching bags until the ice turns crimson with blood, but for God's sake, nobody should utter a slur while releasing haymakers.)
Milking the gay angle for all it's worth, Avery went on to state how he was pro-gay marriage; what this has to do with the pursuit of pucks is beyond me.
But there was a very unhappy epilogue to the Avery story. Damien Goddard of Rogers Sportsnet had the temerity to tweet that he supported traditional marriage. A few days later, Goddard was terminated.
It's all so perversely ironic. For decades, the gay community has (rightfully) asked for more understanding and more tolerance. Yet it appears that tolerance is apparently a one-way street. If someone has problems with gay matrimony, that isn't a matter of having a differing viewpoint. Rather, it's apparently just cause for termination.
In fact, the whole gay issue seems to be less about equal rights and more about special rights these days. Case in point: at the Pride parade, numerous revellers go completely naked. Last time I checked, going au natural on city streets was against the law. Yet, is anyone ever charged with public indecency? Nope. But just try marching in the buff at the St. Patrick's Day parade and see what happens.
Sean Avery and Brian Burke are two peas in a pod in that they are both thoroughly unsavoury characters. But it's abundantly clear that the first step toward remaking one's image as Mr. Nice Guy is reinventing oneself as an advocate for gay causes.
I'll have to remember that next time I get into some hot water. I've even got a whiz-bang slogan: "If it's good, it's gay; and if it's gay, it's good."
It is the very worst sort. Judging by your ability to put words together I assume you went to high school. What would you rather spend a day as, a red head or an openly gay student?
" If someone has problems with gay matrimony, that isn't a matter of having a differing viewpoint."
Yes, they are differing viewpoints, but one of them is homophobic.
In the anti-gay "biz" these days, the Justify-My-Outdated-Bigotry sector is working overtime.
When kids with red hair are killing themselves in record numbers then we'll talk. Until then bullying homosexuals (not to mention the entire "gay community") sure is a front burner issue.
And, your comment that there is no evidence of any amateur or professional sports individual that has been affected by bullying as a result of their sexual orientation....well in Toronto...the gay hockey league has 120 players that would disagree with that. There are leagues in Montreal, Vancouver, NYC, Los Angeles, etc...that would also all disagree with that.
I don't know why I am bothering to respond as this is an obvious attempt on your part to develop your shock journalism and 'career'. However, your dislike for Brian Burke should not be a very thin veil for your clear homophobia.
Stephen Reid, TGHA Commissioner.
On top of that Burke has been open in his support of the gay community for a while now. He has stated publicly that he always supported Brendan and his choice, so this is nothing new.
You may think that he has done a poor job of running the team, and perhaps just don't like the man himself. Hell, I would even agree with you on those two points. But to call him out on this issue shows, at best, a miopic point of view, and at worst, a completely disrespectful attitude towards the gay community and anyone who supports eliminating homophobia from sports.
So with that said, when Burke is finally canned, if he immediatley disbands the You Can Play project, then I will issue you a full and public appology and eat crow for a week. However if the project continues I think you should issue an apology to the public at large, and Brian Burke in particular.
Yikes you have to get your facts correct before making this type of statement. His son Brendan died, not Patrick. Patrick is the other son who is spearheading this campaign. I'm not commenting on right or wrong, or giving my opinion in the matter, however if you're going to make this type of claim, it's best to have your facts correct.
"In fact, the whole gay issue... //... against the law."
Apart from his un-copy-edited (!? staff budget shortage at HPCan?!) misspellings of "revelers" and "au naturel"...
First off, "the whole gay issue"? Whaaa...? There is one "whole gay issue"? Since when? Has he canvassed all gays and lesbians to ascertain this? Further - "special rights"? Clearly, with such a sly injection of phrasing, your unenlightened columnist stopped paying attention to a variety of news and current affairs sources, and instead switched long ago - possibly the early 1990s? - to obtaining his mis-information solely from Faux Snooze.
Further, nudity in public is hardly a "gay issue" as any Canadian frat initiation/hazing survivor can tell you. Further still, partial public nudity is NOT illegal in this country. The last time this issue was tested in our courts, the wearing of shoes counted as clothing and those who elect to walk in the Pride Parade in Toronto are in fact shod in runners, sandals or the like, in full compliance with our Criminal Code provisions requiring persons to be partially clad in public.