Calculating farming's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is difficult, but experts agree that feeding the world's people has tremendous climate and environmental impacts. Estimates of global emissions from farms range widely. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency puts them at 24 per cent, including deforestation, making agriculture the second-largest emitter after heat and electricity.
Agriculture contributes to global warming in a number of ways. Methane and nitrous oxide, which are more potent than CO2 but remain in the atmosphere for shorter times, make up about 65 per cent of agricultural emissions. Methane comes mainly from cattle and nitrous oxide from fertilizers and wastes. According to the World Resources Institute, "Smaller sources include manure management, rice cultivation, field burning of crop residues, and fuel use on farms."
Net emissions are also created when forests and wetlands are cleared for farming, as these "carbon sinks" usually absorb and store more carbon than the farms that replace them. Transporting and processing agricultural products also contribute to global warming.
We need to eat. So what's the answer? That obesity is epidemic in parts of the world while people starve elsewhere, and that an estimated one-third of food gets wasted, shows improving distribution and reducing waste are good places to start -- but won't be enough to significantly curtail agriculture's contribution to climate change.
Failing to recognize that everything in nature is interconnected has led to numerous unintended consequences.
Reducing meat and animal-product consumption and production -- especially beef -- would cut emissions, but wouldn't get us all the way.
Some suggest finding better ways to feed as many as nine billion people by 2050 means rethinking our agricultural systems. Industrial agriculture has made it possible to produce large amounts of food efficiently, but comes with problems, including pollution, reduced biodiversity, pesticide resistance and consequent increased chemical use, destruction of forests and wetlands, and human health issues such as antibiotic resistance. Soil loss and degradation, increased drought and flooding and changing growing patterns caused by climate change add to the complexity.
Some say the best fix is genetic modification -- to produce more nutritious plants that can withstand pests and a changing climate. Others note that when humans try to improve on or override nature, the outcome is often not what was expected. And a U.S. National Academies of Science report concludes, "GMO crops have not, to date, increased actual yields." Failing to recognize that everything in nature is interconnected has led to numerous unintended consequences, from DDT causing bird deaths and toxic buildup in the food chain to widespread antibiotic use facilitating the evolution of "superbugs."
The growing field of agroecology -- working with nature -- is one solution. Many researchers argue it's more efficient, less environmentally damaging and more equitable for farmers and local communities than industrial methods and GMOs.
The goal, writes University of California-Berkeley agroecology professor Miguel Altieri, "is to design an agroecosystem that mimics the structure and function of local natural ecosystems; that is, a system with high species diversity and a biologically active soil, one that promotes natural pest control, nutrient recycling and high soil cover to prevent resource losses."
A study by the Rodale Institute, a research organization devoted to organic farming, concluded global adoption of agroecological practices such as "cover crops, compost, crop rotation and reduced tillage" could "sequester more carbon than is currently emitted."
About 40 per cent of Earth's land surface is used for agriculture, entailing massive geophysical alteration, so working with nature as much as possible to maintain or restore balance to natural systems makes sense. Agroecology appears to be a better way to feed humanity than doubling down on industrial agricultural, from many angles: reducing pollution and chemical use, enhancing rather than degrading soils, increasing biodiversity, protecting water, growing healthier food and creating more equitable food systems.
In This Changes Everything, Naomi Klein quotes former UN Rapporteur on the Right to Food Olivier De Schutter: "Today's scientific evidence demonstrates that agroecological methods outperform the use of chemical fertilizers in boosting food production where the hungry live -- especially in unfavourable environments." He further notes, "agroecological projects have shown an average crop yield increase of 80 per cent in 57 developing countries, with an average increase of 116 per cent for all African projects."
We are part of nature, so harming it hurts us. The planet provides resources to feed us. We must learn to use them sustainably.
Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Senior Editor Ian Hanington.
Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
The 22-year-old from Lincolnshire is tudying for an MSc in Sustainable Cities at King's College London. "It felt right to shift from the humanities to geography after I realised climate change and being green had become my most passionate cause," she says. "I'm an active member of the KCL Environment Society and the Fossil Free group, campaigning for green innovation across King's and particularly for their divestment from fossil fuels." "In my spare time I'm leading a small garden project on campus, collaborating with Trees for Cities and Science Gallery London. The aim is to encourage students to interact more with their green spaces by planting fruit, herbs, vegetables and flowers that everyone can pick, smell and enjoy. So far I've got lots of mint growing, which the Student Union will use for mojitos. Once spring arrives I'll plant lots more."
The 26-year-old is studying a PhD at Reading University, focusing on ice shelf collapse. "Ice shelf collapse is important as it can lead to habitat loss for creatures such as penguins, changes in the ocean, and sea level rise through the speed up of glaciers that used to flow onto the ice shelf," she says. "I was motivated to do this through learning about climate change during my undergraduate. I think it’s important that scientists communicate their work to the public in order that the facts about topics such as climate change are known. I blog about what I do and try to simplify some polar/climate news stories here. "I also am co-president of the UK Polar Network, a group of early career scientists who, among other things, help to send young scientists into schools to talk about polar science and run climate change activities with students."
The 28-year-old studied atmospheric physics (climate science, basically) at Oxford and now makes videos to explain key climate issues. "Although I realised during my studies there's some amazing climate research going on, the biggest problem seemed to be the gap between scientific understanding and public perception of climate change. So I decided to do something about it! "I wanted to make videos that we're engaging, playful and accessible, and so I embraced the YouTuber style of storytelling. I was hoping the videos would be fun enough that people would enjoy them regardless of whether they cared about climate change or not - so I could trick them into learning!"
Aged 19, the Dutch inventor, entrepreneur and aerospace engineering student has a remarkable vision for cleaning oceans that have been decimated by human waste. Inspired by fishing trawlers, Slat devised a way to recover waste that has been sent out to sea with huge nets. "I don't really view my age as a disadvantage to get these things done. Simply I've thought about how to tackle the problem and I've worked for a number of years to bring it closer to reality," he says Slat, who is founder and president of the Ocean Cleanup Foundation. "The Internet really made this project possible... You can do an awful lot of things with a limited amount of resources." Read more about his project here
After graduating with a degree in Architecture, Arthur Kay took an unusual career turn and decided to start a biofuel business. Recycling used coffee grounds which would otherwise go straight to a landfill, biobean turns them into biomass pellets that can be used to heat houses. "At the heart of my work is a desire to combine the practical with the aesthetic, the functional with the idealistic, and to meet the challenges of a modern world in an innovative way," he says. Read more about his project here
The three architecture students have come up with a design for a tidal barrage which could power up to 200,000 homes in Liverpool with green electricity. "We wanted to design something that supported the natural progression of Liverpool and the surrounding area," Thomas explains. "We all have an invested interest in Liverpool. "The ultimate aim was to provide a barrage which would act as a unifying destination promoting a healthy, holistic strategy to support the sustainable progression of Liverpool and the Wirral." Read more about their project here.
Follow David Suzuki on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DavidSuzukiFDN