Canada's environmental laws are under attack by both the federal and Ontario governments. In Ottawa, the government introduced Bill C-38 to implement far-reaching measures announced in its budget. Ontario's government introduced a similar omnibus bill with profound implications for the environment.
The 420-page Bill C-38 will gut a raft of federal laws passed over the years to ensure that our air, water, and most vulnerable wildlife populations are protected. Casualties include the Canadia Environmental Assessment Act, Fisheries Act, Species at Risk Act, National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy Act, and the Kyoto Implementation Act.
In a surprisingly similar action, the government of Ontario recently introduced Bill 55. The 327-page bill seriously affects no less than six important resource and wildlife laws, with amendments that strike at the heart of Ontario's Endangered Species Act and other vital environmental legislation. These changes would reduce the level of protection and undermine public management of cherished forests, lakes, and rivers and the immeasurable benefits they provide.
When Ontario introduced its Endangered Species Act in 2007, legal experts and advocates lauded it as one of the strongest environmental laws in North America. Ontario's leadership was commendable, as it established a strong legal benchmark to protect wildlife at risk in the province, such as caribou, snapping turtles, and rare Carolinian forests, only a few years before the world came together to celebrate the 2010 United Nations International Year of Biodiversity.
Although biodiversity loss receives less attention than issues such as climate change, it threatens the very life-support systems of our planet: clear air, clean water, and productive soil. This is not a problem of some far off tropical rainforest nation or our overfished oceans. Scientists say Ontario is particularly vulnerable to biodiversity decline and has a global responsibility for stewardship.
A study in the renowned scientific journal The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences identified the boreal forest (which makes up more than 40 per cent of Ontario) as the biome on the planet most vulnerable to damage from industrial activities and the effects of human-caused global warming. The study's authors showed that in recent years these areas have lost more forest cover to resource development and natural disturbances exacerbated by human-caused climate change than any other biome on the planet -- including tropical rainforests such as the Amazon.
By weakening its Endangered Species Act -- eliminating legal timelines for the development of species recovery strategies, creating loopholes for resource industries like forestry and mining, and further limiting legal protection of endangered wildlife on private lands -- Ontario will be unprepared to cope with ongoing threats to its precious ecosystems and biodiversity, such as urban sprawl, the spread of invasive species, and climate change.
The federal government has justified its efforts to eviscerate environmental laws by cynically claiming that caring for nature is a barrier to economic prosperity. But this ideologically driven agenda will harm our nation and undermine the future for our children. We can't hope to have healthy economies and communities in Ontario or the rest of Canada without healthy ecosystems and species diversity.
Species and ecosystem losses affect production of valuable economic commodities like food, timber, and medicines, and compromise many ecological services that sustain the health and well-being of our communities. Nature helps regulate climate, disease outbreaks, and wastes; provides aesthetic, recreational, and spiritual value; and supports services such as nutrient cycling and water purification.
A recent study by the David Suzuki Foundation found that biodiversity in Ontario's Greenbelt alone helps to filter, store, and regulate drinking water for millions of people in the Greater Toronto Area -- a service worth over $1 billion a year that saves cash-strapped municipalities hundreds of millions in capital costs just to upgrade water infrastructure.
The health of our air, water, and most vulnerable wildlife populations are too important to be treated so callously. The government of Ontario must withdraw the proposed amendments to its Endangered Species Act and other environmental laws.
The environment can't simply be a fair-weather friend for politicians running for election. True leadership means committing to the long haul and ensuring that air, water, land, and wildlife are protected now and into the future in Ontario and across Canada.
Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Terrestrial Conservation and Science Program director Faisal Moola.
Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.
For more insights from David Suzuki, please read Everything Under the Sun (Greystone Books/David Suzuki Foundation), by David Suzuki and Ian Hanington, now available in bookstores and online.
http://www.ienearth.org/REDD/index.html gives an overall worldwide view.
http://saveela.org/
http://vueweekly.com/front/story/murky_waters/
Environmental Services manager Brenda Wallace was alerted to a glob of tar-like material on a sandbar last Thursday. The bitumen emulsion, an water-insoluble oil-based product, is used to seal cracks in roads and, according to Wallace, poses little threat to the local flora or fauna. Cleanup crews used booms to contain the spill and continued throughout the night. The amount of sealant released and the source were not yet determined. A similar spill occurred this spring, through not from the city of Saskatoon.
http://www.saskatoonhomepage.ca/spill-in-south-saskatchewan-river-not-oil-spill/itemid_21
http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/Crews+work+mitigate+damage+from+leaked+into+Saskatchewan+River/6789918/story.html
When we reported to Harper and the Environment Minister to report in our electrical capacity as a government certified professional. No response and while it may have seemed a good political move, now buildings are grossly exceeding building code. Here is the existing result of the government's spending on environment. Here is billions in buildings exceeding code and heating the atmosphere. http://www.thermoguy.com/blog/index.php?itemid=84
At this link, the 2nd set of images show a building Canada financed for retrofit, you can see the government sign. Put your mouse over the image and see the real energy loss from the building and it won't be addressed. http://www.thermoguy.com/globalwarming-heatloss.html
Capping this off is the wireless bombardment where we use the atmosphere for the wire. It is creating atmospheric heat changing climate.
90% of the species that ever lived on this planet are extinct. We can extend our time by evolving past hydrocarbons. First we have to get past the current ideologies that posit economics as a science.
MONDAY, JUNE 11, 2012
Environmental Deregulation in Ontario's Bill 55 Should be Condemned
Unfortunately, this latest blow to wildlife is happening at the
provincial level, where the Ontario Government has put forward changes
to the province's Endangered Species Act, and several other
environmental laws. These changes would hinder, not help efforts to
protect Ontario's most vulnerable species.
Bill 55, the Strong Action for Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2012,
removes the requirement that new resource or development projects result
in an overall benefit for species at risk, and does away with the
requirement to protect the habitat of endangered species on large areas
of private land. This, despite the fact that most of Ontario's
endangered species are found in southern Ontario where land is 90%
privately owned.
Bill 55 also removes the deadline for developing recovery plans for
species at risk listed before 2007. With no deadline, there's little
chance that action will be taken to save those species.
Nature Canada has joined with dozens of leading nature conservation
organizations, and with naturalists inside Ontario and throughout the
country in condemning these proposed changes. You can read this open
letter to Premier McGuinty for more information and to see which groups
signed it.
We need to ask why B.C. plans to dig an unprecedented amount of coal out of the ground at the very same time that we aim to slash our greenhouse gas emissions. Is our vision for Vancouver Island one of unsightly coal mines running along the island’s spine from Fanny Bay to Campbell River? Or should we invest in creating green jobs that have a low carbon footprint, are healthy for communities and won’t vanish in 20 years’ time?
http://www.sierraclub.bc.ca/take-action/mining-energy/say-no-to-the-raven-coal-mine
&
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/09/24/mining-industry-sees-gold_n_978884.html
"It said there are 20 major mines in the province, 30 industrial mineral producers and two smelters. There are nine mine projects in major development or near completion stages and 18 mines in the early stages for environmental assessment."
*JK Galbraith was the Paul M. Warburg Professor Emeritus of Economics at Harvard and a total party guy..
Sign the Ontario petition:
http://protectendangeredspecies.ca/
June 13, 2012 - 9:36 am
Makivik seeks Nunavik review of Baffinland?s Mary River iron mine project
Nunavik Inuit org calls for a "parallel process" due to the impact of
proposed shipping in the Hudson Strait
JANE GEORGE
MAP Makivik Corp. is worried about the impact of shipping through the
Hudson Strait, as shown here in a map from the final environmental
impact statement on Baffinland's Mary River iron mine project.
Baffinland Iron Mines Corp., a private company now under the control of
ArcelorMittal, the European steel-making giant, and a private investment
firm, Iron Ore Holdings LP, wants to see the Mary River mine churn out
about 18 million tonnes of iron ore a year, which will then be shipped
out year-round to markets in Europe and Asia for at least 20 years ? and
some predict up to 100 years.
The project, now under review by the NIRB, moves into final hearings
scheduled for July in Iqaluit, Igloolik and Pond Inlet.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Public Notice
Quebec Lithium Spodumene Mine Project
Public Comments Invited and Federal Funding Available
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) is conducting
a comprehensive study type of environmental assessment of the proposed
Quebec Lithium Spodumene Mine Project located in Quebec. The public is
invited to comment on the project and the conduct of the comprehensive
study.
The public is also invited to comment on the draft Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) Guidelines that identify potential environmental effects
to be addressed and information that needs to be included in the
proponent?s EIS. Public comments received will be reviewed and
considered before the guidelines are finalized and issued to the proponent.
The draft EIS Guidelines and more information on this project are
available on the Agency?s website at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca (registry
reference number 12-03-59158). To obtain a paper copy of the document,
contact the project manager listed in this notice.
Written comments in either official language must be sent by July 23,
2012 to:
Quebec Lithium Spodumene Mine Project
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Kambale Katahwa, Project Manager
901-1550, d'Estimauville avenue
Quebec QC G1J 0C1
Telephone: 418-649-6444
Fax: 418-649-6443
QuebecLithium@ceaa-acee.gc.ca