This is the concluding installment in a four-part series that details the pressing need to rebuild confidence in our nation's leadership by developing long-term goals for which our federal government is directly accountable.
The first installment outlined the need for government representatives to look beyond political self-interest. The second installment focused on the lack of foresight in building and maintaining Canada's infrastructure. The third installment discussed the inadequacy of Canada's national energy strategy and suggested a sustainable and forward-thinking approach to green energy. Part four will propose an infrastructure for Aboriginal communities that will allow them to facilitate solutions for critical concerns regarding public services and finances.
The fact that the plight of Aboriginal Canadians still has to be singled out for special attention in the early 21st century conclusively demonstrates the urgent need for outside-the-box thinking and new institutional structures to support good governance. We have to move beyond the occasional bursts of outrage over news reports citing that extensive federal expenditures on Aboriginal education appear to have produced no discernible improvement, that Aboriginal health care is sub-standard and housing conditions have worsened, that incarceration and suicide rates among aboriginal Canadians are shockingly high, and that nearly 40 per cent of water systems on native reserves pose high levels of risk.
Chief of the Assembly of First Nations Shawn Atleo's proposal to do away with the Department of Aboriginal Affairs and the dysfunctional legislative framework of the 1876 Indian Act is encouraging. This would mean that band councils would be primarily responsible to their citizens, rather than to the minister of aboriginal affairs. Aboriginal communities would establish new governance entities and assume responsibility for the long-term management of their local economies and the efficient and effective delivery of services to aboriginal Canadians.
But while repealing the Indian Act is a good step, a comprehensive framework providing consistency in the structures and operations of Aboriginal governance entities is also required. Too much internal fragmentation will undermine the collective effectiveness of Aboriginal governments in justifying the extensive fiscal transfers and other investments required to bring public services and the standard of living of Aboriginal Canadians to acceptable levels.
New fiscal-transfer arrangements should be collectively negotiated with the federal government, while maintaining the shift of responsibility to Aboriginal governments. It is important that we reduce the amount of back-and-forth red tape that currently exists between bands and federal bureaucrats, as it obscures accountability. These fiscal-transfer arrangements would be managed openly and in a way that makes each party accountable through the proposed arm's-length national commission, which would also be responsible for other intergovernmental transfers such as health, education, social services, and equalization.
Furthermore, the proposed Canadian infrastructure financing authority would be responsible for leveraging the investment needed to advance high-quality infrastructure for Aboriginal communities, just as it would do for the rest of Canada. Our federal leaders would be held accountable for our clear national commitment to provide equal opportunities and an acceptable standard of living for all Aboriginal Canadians, and would have to be vigilant in ensuring that Aboriginal governments' expenditures were effectively devoted to this end.
To conclude this series on the urgent need to address the serious crisis of confidence in national governance, it is crucial to note that we are neither as difficult a country to govern, nor as complicated a people, as our politicians would have us believe. Despite the fact that Canada has 13 provinces and territories, six time zones, three oceans, and many languages, religions, and ethnic and national origins, Canadians have much in common. We are Canadians without borders -- citizens from everywhere, with links to many countries and global networks that are enormously valuable economically, socially, and politically. And we are all contributing to a vibrant and youthful diversity that will sustain us for generations to come. The world is still a collage -- plural, fragmented, a random collection of cultures, origins, and perspectives. Canada is where the collage becomes a coherent dynamic whole with a collective commitment to the best of universal values: equality, justice, the rule of law, fundamental rights and freedoms, and non-discrimination.
We are building a unique multi-ethnic liberal democracy that can be an inspiration to a world troubled by religious and sectarian friction. But we will fail to realize our potential as a great nation if our federal leaders continue to cast national politics as a boring, outdated struggle between supporters of smaller government and less spending, on the one hand, and bigger government and more spending, on the other -- between supporters of private-sector initiatives and public initiatives; conservative values and liberal or socialist values. Such arguments are seriously out-of-sync with the rhythm of our times.
Good national government in the 21st century is much less about sterile debates over the size of government and levels of expenditure, and much more about providing ethical leadership, both nationally and internationally, and establishing firm national priorities across the full spectrum of issues that demand national attention. Going forward, we need creative and innovative ideas for governance and the management of public finances, and for new institutional structures designed to ensure a long-term focus - one that goes beyond the next election. We require new public spaces for citizen participation to facilitate solutions, compromise, and common ground on critically important issues and concerns.
Above all, we need to remind our national leaders that their job is to increase, not diminish, our internal strength and global potential, and that we are stronger when we act together. Together, we can restore coherent national leadership at home, and a clear Canadian voice on the world stage.
Originally published by The Mark News
Follow Deborah Coyne on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cdnwithoutbrdrs
Hon. Carolyn Bennett: Arctic Canada: True North Strong and Free -- and Just
Aboriginal leaders query $80m income management bill
Troubled First Nations community risks 'losing a generation': Report
also in relation to Canada’s G2o last summer...
Graduate students have been provided specific instructions on access to their labs and a University spokesperson confirmed that the G8 Research Group at the Munk School of Global Affairs will remain open throughout the summits. These discrepancies have led many in the campus community to question what is really happening at U of T and to its purpose. And it has led to further speculation on whether students are being shut out to accommodate additional security forces for the G20 at University of Toronto. When asked, University administration representatives would not confirm or deny whether additional security was being housed in the residences.
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/campus-notes/2010/06/academic-freedom-and-u-t-campus-closure
BUT!!!!
This study was built on an earlier 1981 study published by the Task Force on the Needs of Native People in an Urban Setting, a partnership between the Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres, the Ontario native Women’s Association, the Ontario Métis Aboriginal Association and government. It employed community-based research methods to examine several areas, including demographics, identity and culture, economics and employment, education and youth, homelessness, health services, women, and justice.
The five cities included in the study were Thunder Bay, Ottawa, Barrie-Midland, Sudbury and Kenora.
On Urban Aboriginal Migration – Executive Summary of the Final Report:
A key finding in terms of the demographic trends in the five cities under study is that the urban Aboriginal population is young (approximately 45% are under the age of 25) and its numbers are increasing.
The fact that urban migration is a long-term trend is reflected in the fact that a significant number of Aboriginal people (16%) have lived in the city for 20 years or more, with 63% indicating that they have lived in their respective cities for five years or more. Having said this, we also found that many Aboriginal people maintain important links to their communities of origin primarily to visit family and friends and for holidays.”
http://74.213.160.105/ofifchome/page/uatf/UATFOntarioFinalReport.pdf
"On July 4, American Independence Day, the Queen of Canada, as Prime Minister Stephen Harper called her throughout her recent visit, attended a Sunday morning service at St. James Cathedral in downtown Toronto. Four days after Canada Day, the choice of a service at St. James, one of the most visible manifestations of Toronto’s increasingly atavistic ‘English connection’, was a reminder of the living presence of history. This was poignantly apparent in Queen Elizabeth’s personal decision (according to Kevin S. MacLeod, Canadian Secretary to the Queen) to present two peals of hand bells to the Chapels Royal of the Mohawks.
In so doing, as the Archbishop of Toronto Colin Johnson and the day’s homilist Cathedral Rector Douglas Stoute reminded the 700 sweltering bodies inside the Cathedral and the thousands lining King and Church Streets outdoors, the Queen honoured a relationship that pre-dates the existence of Canada by more than 150 years."
Read more:
http://activehistory.ca/2010/07/the-queen-among-the-mohawks/
CANADIANS : commit this to memory..
Do First Nations people receive more government spending than other Canadians?
No. In fact, the average Canadian gets services from the federal, provincial and municipal governments at an amount that is almost two-and-a-half times greater than that received by First Nations citizens.
Does the federal government spend $8 billion (or more) on First Nations people every year? This figure is often used in media and public statements. In fact, the $8 billion figure is an estimate of what was spent in fiscal year 2003-2004 on Aboriginal peoples. A projection for this fiscal year would suggest that the number will rise to $8.5 billion in 2004-2005.
Included in the numbers is funding for Inuit, Métis, "non-status" Indians, administration and bureaucracy at the federal level, and money paid to Provinces, Territories and private organizations to carry out programs on behalf of the Federal Government.
Of that funding, just over five billion dollars was allocated to the Indian and Inuit Affairs Program of Indian and Northern Affairs Canadain 2004. ( DIAND offices across Canada)
A good chunk of the DIAND $ is spent in house or on third party accounting firms or on litigation AGAINST Indian bands or individuals.
Canada is rarely sitting on our side of the bench- generally with the Dept. of Justice & provinces in landclaim or land use cases.
Kinda hard to encourage 'self-governance" is the funding goes to government depts. & agencies eh?
The Circle Game: Shadows and Substance in the Indian Residential School Experience in Canada
By Roland Chrisjohn and Sherri Young
Genre: Native Studies
ISBN 978-1-894778-05-3
http://www.theytus.com/
http://readingcanlit.com/
speech delivered in Edmonton, Alberta by Dr. Roland Chrisjohn
Member of Iroquois Confederacy (Oneida), healer ("psychologist"), author of The Circle Game
Date of speech unknown
http://sisis.nativeweb.org/resschool/chrisjohn.html
*******************************************************************
http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ap/rrc-eng.asp
Part Two: False Assumptions and a Failed Relationship
•8 - Introduction
•9 - The Indian Act
•10 - Residential Schools
•11 - Relocation of Aboriginal Communities
•12 - Veterans
•13 - Conclusions
Recycled survey polished into an Environics Institute cashcow
Environics Institute recycled/updated an older survey undertaken in 1981... published by the Task Force on the Needs of Native People in an Urban Setting, a partnership between the Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres, the Ontario native Women's Association, the Ontario Métis Aboriginal Association and government.
http://74.213.160.105/ofifchome/page/uatf/UATFOntarioFinalReport.pdf
"Looking to the future, the Institute also aspires to help advance national thought and dialogue regarding Canada’s First Nations: their standard of living, quality of life, and future in this country. The Institute’s Aboriginal initiative is in its early stages; discussions with progressive Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal leaders, as well as a literature review, are underway. The Institute’s planned approach is to focus on the growing number of aboriginals who are choosing to live in Canada’s large urban centres.
The Institute will consult widely with appropriate experts on topics for possible exploration. To help shape the Institute's body of work, an advisory panel will be assembled incrementally over time. Projects that meet the guidelines for charitable contributions will be funded through the Tides Foundation.
Michael Adams — Writer; Founder of the Environics Institute. ... and Senior Fellow, Munk School of Global Affairs, U of T
Hhhhhmmmm, strange eh?
Always , always do the background research to see who is 'BEHIND THE CURTAIN' so to speak..
Now some mini research projects underway ..all that data mining...
The Munk Centre for International Studies was opened in 2000. The Centre is named after Canadian business man and philanthropist Peter Munk, who made a $6.4 million donation to finance the construction.
It was renamed the Munk School for Global Affairs on April 13, 2010 when Peter Munk and his wife made a $35 million donation. According to the University of Toronto..
http://www.miningwatch.ca/en/search/node/Barrick+Gold+Corp.+%2B+Canada
http://www.mediacoop.ca/story/2396
http://thevarsity.ca/articles/38377
http://www.gsu.utoronto.ca/newsevents.html
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/campus-notes/2010/06/academic-freedom-and-u-t-campus-closure
http://www.alternet.org/story/73504
http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/editorial_0498.shtm
To place the federal spending in perspective, consider the federal government’s commitment to new immigrants to Canada. In the same year that the government transferred $13.4 million to Native Friendship Centres, it spent over $256 million on immigrant settlement and integration.
The discrepancy between these amounts becomes most apparent when seen on a per capita basis.
Federal immigrant settlement and transition spending in 1996-97 was $247 per person who immigrated in the previous five years, while the government’s contribution to Native Friendship Centres was $34 per urban Aboriginal person.
Perhaps this helps to explain the difficulties many Aboriginal people are experiencing in adjusting to life in western Canadian cities...eh?
Income levels are tied to types of employment and levels of participation in the labour force. Aboriginal people who are employed tend to be concentrated in low-paying occupations: primary resource industries, sales and service, and trades. Aboriginal people are under-represented in management positions and professional occupations. Unemployment rates tend to be high, with 24% of Aboriginal labour force participants unemployed in 1996, compared to a non-Aboriginal unemployment rate of 10% that year. As with the overall population, unemployment rates are highest among young adults, with 32% of all Aboriginal labour force participants and 35% of Aboriginal males aged 15-24 unemployed in 1996. Unemployment is higher in the on-reserve population, at 29%, and lower among Metis (20%) and Inuit (22%). (Statistics Canada, June 2001)
Where breakdowns according to Aboriginal sub-groups have been done educational attainment of Metis and registered Indians off-reserve are somewhat higher than that of reserve residents and the attainment of "other Aboriginal" in urban centres is closer to the levels attained by the non-Aboriginal population. (Norris et al., 2000b)
Income:
The average annual income of Aboriginal people is substantially lower than that of non-Aboriginal Canadians. In 1995, Aboriginal people had an average income from all sources of $15,700, just 62% of the figure of $25,400 for the non-Aboriginal population. Within the Aboriginal population the Metis have the highest average incomes at $17,500 , compared with $17,600 among the Inuit and $14,900 among the North American Indian population, a census category that includes self-identified Indians on- and off-reserve. (Statistics Canada, June 2001) About one-quarter of all income of Aboriginal people comes from government transfer payments, compared with 14% of the income of non-Aboriginal people. 48% of North American Indians, 46% of Inuit and 41% of Metis had incomes below $10,000.The income of rural off-reserve residents and smaller cities was highest, averaging more than 70% of non-Aboriginal residents of those locations, while Aboriginal incomes in large cities was at the overall level of 62% of non-Aboriginal incomes. The solution to low-income recommended by some observers, that of moving off-reserve, is evidently not sufficient to effect change.
Almost two-thirds of Indian youth continue to leave high school without a diploma, compared to one-third of the general population (Auditor General, 2000:4.44). Many return later to complete academic and vocational credentials, as indicated by the fact that 42% of registered Indian post-secondary students are over 30 years of age. INAC reports annual enrolment of 22,000 registered Indian students in post-secondary studies. Of enrolled students in 1998-99, 54% were in non-university programs, 37% were in undergraduate degree programs, and 5% were in graduate university programs. Of those starting post-secondary programs, 72% of registered Indians completed non-university programs compared to 80% of all Canadians. In contrast, 36% of registered Indians enrolled in university and 41% of Aboriginal identity students completed a degree, compared to 64% of enrolled non-Aboriginal students reaching graduation. High attrition among students who start a university program accounts for the fact that the gap between registered Indians and non-Aboriginal persons holding a degree widened in the period 1991-96.
Education:
Aboriginal people have made gains in educational attainment in recent years. INAC figures comparing social conditions between 1991 and 1996 indicate that the proportion of registered Indians having less than grade 9 education fell from 28% in 1991 to 22% in 1996. This compares to 12% of the total Canadian population having less than grade 9. Among the registered Indian population 15 years and older and not attending school in 1996, 44% had completed secondary school or continued to post-secondary studies, compared to 51% of the Aboriginal identity population and 67% of non-Aboriginal population. The proportion of registered Indians having trades or other non-university certificates was 25.9% in 1996, close to the Canadian proportion of 27.9%. In contrast, registered Indians holding a university degree rose from 2% to 3% of the population in this 5-year period, still falling far behind the Canadian levels of 13.3%, an increase of 2.9% from 1991 to 1996. (INAC,2000; Hull,2000)
Aboriginal youth aged 15-19 were less likely than non-Aboriginal peers to be attending school, 68% compared with 83% of the general population in school. Similarly, 31% of Aboriginal people aged 20-24 were in school versus 49% of non-Aboriginal people in the same age group.(Statistics Canada, June 2001)
There are a number of patterns evident in educational attainment. Aboriginal people with less than grade 9 are fewer and clustered in older generations.
Reinstating the authority of Aboriginal nations to mandate holistic, culturally appropriate public services is a practical goal of self-government. Negotiating recognition of the historic and ongoing place of Aboriginal peoples in this land is the larger goal which has gained ground in the past thirty years, advanced by Supreme Court decisions, the Constitution Act of 1982, and United Nations forums.
The next stage in the renewal of Aboriginal peoples is assuming a place of dignity and responsibility as member nations in the Canadian federation. The actualization of that vision of relationship will depend not only on the energy being mobilized within the Aboriginal community. It will depend also on the readiness of other peoples in Canada to make space for a vibrant Aboriginal presence.
It is my hope that the stories related in this paper will contribute in some small way to generating the dialogue that will make that future possible.
Nia:wen. Thank you for your attention. Marlene Brant Castellano Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory
(Mandamin in RCAP, 1997).