By Livia Bizikova and Peter Denton
How much can emerging technologies help change our environment, and will they alone help address some of the environmental challenges we are faced with?
This question was the focus of a Global Environmental Outlook launched by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) in May, alongside six Regional Assessments.
The North American Assessment summarizes current trends in key environmental issues (such as water and land biodiversity), along with policies aimed at managing them. It concludes with an Outlook section that provides a snapshot of how emerging technologies could significantly change our environment.
So what does the assessment tell us?
On current trends, the report identifies continued improvements in air quality, access to safe drinking water, and land resources. Future challenges are related to climate change and other pressures such as urbanization, pollution and invasive species. These pressures will lead to water scarcity and increasing drought; a degrading coastal and marine environment; considerable groundwater depletion; chemical pollution; and increasing waste generation. Many of these challenges are magnified in a warming Arctic.
The report emphasizes past successes of policy-making in both countries, with long traditions of legislation in areas such as air pollution; biodiversity protection; and ensuring quality of drinking water. Yet the relevance of previous policies to future problems remains uncertain, as the challenges ahead are increasingly complex and involve many unknowns.
Do we have the right tools, the right technologies, to make a difference?
The Outlook section of the report outlines how emerging technology and new policies an address these challenges -- promoting cleaner, less resource-intensive production systems in areas such as agriculture; reducing packaging waste; green construction; new modes of transportation; and sustainability certification schemes. Specific trends include considerable growth in organic production systems; green construction and building operations especially to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water use; car-sharing and public transportation systems; renewable energy systems and increasing consumer awareness about the environmental impacts of products combined with interest in greener, more sustainable goods.
All of these trends are promising and encouraging, but we don't know whether these efforts will be enough to shift North American lifestyles in a sustainable direction -- and in time to mitigate or manage the effects of a changing climate.
Do we have the right tools, the right technologies, to make a difference? And are we using them in the right ways? This is where technology shows its limits.
First of all, studies that project the impacts of future technologies are often isolated from current trends and very narrowly focused on only a specific sector or issue. Most of the work has involved detailed projections of different technological solutions toward greenhouse gas reduction. Nor is it easy to foresee the uptake and large-scale spread of new innovations, however promising they might seem in theory.
Secondly, even in this era of high technology, we have limited data on complex environmental problems and their multiple causes, such as those affecting coastal areas, groundwater resources and the implications of extreme climate change. This effectively means we don't know how bad things really are, nor whether we are actually improving the situation with the tools we are using.
Thirdly, we must better connect accounting for the environment with assessments of production and economic growth. Are changes in technology and production efficiency in fact reducing natural resource depletion and pollution or not? How do we understand sustainable production and consumption in ways that emphasize personal and social well-being?
Comprehensive (or inclusive) wealth is an emerging measure with great promise as a basis for evaluating sustainability. IISD is currently preparing a report on comprehensive wealth in Canada that will be one of the first anywhere to showcase the connection between well-being and produced, natural, human and social capital. Such a measure will provide clear indications as to whether current patterns of economic growth are sustainable in the long run or if, instead, we are merely depleting our capital base -- in particular, our natural capital -- for short-term gain.
The regional assessment ends by exploring the use of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) to provide reference points as to what we need to do and how we should do it. Thus far, however, there is very limited interest in Canada and in the United States to consider the SDGs as a serious guide to prioritizing either policy or practice.
We need to do more than just hope for a sustainable future, or the world we want will simply become a further depleted version of the world we already have.
To ensure that technological progress will contribute to truly sustainable development, we must make wise choices, choices that will create and preserve ecological and social wealth for generations to come.
Livia Bizikova is Director, Knowledge for Integrated Decisions, at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD); Peter Denton is an independent consultant based in Winnipeg. Livia Bizikova and Peter Denton authored various parts of the North American GEO 6 Regional Assessment, most significantly the last section on Outlooks: Megatrends, Emerging Issues, Technologies, and Sustainable Development.
The views expressed in this blog are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the positions of CCIC or its members.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
Solar flowers at Clarkson Wastewater Treatment Plant in the Region of Peel in Mississauga, Ontario. This flamboyant solar system is installed right next door to a former hybrid bus plant that also has a 427 kW solar system on it's roof. More than 23,000 renewable energy projects have been built in Ontario since the launch of the Green Energy Act in 2009. Photo David Dodge, Green EnergyFutures.ca
Siemens set up a wind turbine blade manufacturing plant in Tillsonburg shortly after the recession hit and today employs 400 people in the region. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Tyler Hamilton, editor of Corporate Knights magazine says Ontario's has been successful in getting more than 20,000 renewable energy projects developed in Ontario–where it stumbled was in execution which created uncertainty for business and resistance in some communities. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Jason Rioux worked at Ontario Power Generation in its coal-fired heyda. He also worked there during the transition away from coal to natural gas and renewables. He now works for NRStor, an energy storage company in Ontario. He says Ontario is well on the way to achieving its goal of 10,000 megawatts of solar, wind and biomass. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Canadian Solar was one of many companies that have started in Ontario since the launch of the Green Energy Act. Ontario's local content rule was shot down by the WTO, but meanwhile dozens of clean energy companies emerged and are operating in Ontario. Photo David Dodge, Green Energy Futures
This wind turbine set up Exhibition Place now serves as a central feature of renewable energy education programs operated by TREC in Toronto. Photo David Dodge, Green Energy Futures
What once was a novelty is now just another feature in Exhibition Place in the heart of Toronto's waterfront. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
The Canadian Solar plant in Mississauga, Ontario has two assembly lines for solar modules. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
As you drive through the countryside in Ontario it's quite common to see solar systems like this installed on farms. This one is north of Toronto, Ontario Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Ontario has installed 3,498 megawatts of wind and another 2,228 megawatts are under development making Ontario the leader in wind energy in Canada. Photo Tim Weis, CanWEA
A solar installation on a boat shed at Bobcygeon, Ontario. More than 20,000 solar projects have been built or are under construction in Ontario due to the Green Energy Act. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
There are more than 23,329 microFIT small rooftop solar projects installed in Ontario. This adds up to 2,356 megawatts of solar PV. For comparison Alberta has seven megawatts. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Shows projected absolute change in provincial GHGs under current policy. Canada's 2020 target is 125 Mt below the 2005 level. Excludes land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) emissions. Data from Environment Canada. Figure via Pembina Institute: www.pembina.org/blog/758
Follow Development Unplugged on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CCCICCIC