Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Diane Francis

GET UPDATES FROM Diane Francis
 

How We're Letting Other Countries Take Control of Ours

Posted: 07/31/2012 3:45 pm

The proposed takeover of Nexen Inc. by China National Offshore Oil Company, or any other like it, cannot be allowed. If the acquisition of Canada's resource companies is not banned, then Calgary's skyline will be snapped up by the world's gigantic state-owned enterprises.

Resource companies are as important as banks or the stock exchange. The same ownership ring fence must be drawn around them, or a limit of 10 per cent foreign ownership. If that policy had not been adopted years ago in Ottawa, Toronto's skyline wouldn't exist.

The reality is that Canada is a small economy that must be protected, from potash to the TMX, from the foreign governments who bankroll enterprises and investment portfolios that have more money than Ottawa.
The new Game of Thrones is not about military conquest but about picking off trophy assets from countries, like Canada, that are Boy Scouts and naïve enough to let them do so. And growing and nurturing large successful entities is essential to any nation-state. Size matters.

The foreign buyout of resource, infrastructure, agricultural corporations simply has to stop. Foreigners can partner or do start-ups but nothing more.

This debate has nothing to do with economics or ideology. This is about street smarts. The United States -- that bastion of free enterprise -- did not allow the China national Offshore Oil Company buy Unocal in 2005. It did not allow a Dubai company to control port infrastructure assets.

Developing nations like Brazil or China would never allow a Nexen to be bought even though their publicly protected resource giants prowl the world for other peoples' assets. Even undeveloped nations like Nigeria require foreign oil or mining explorers to joint venture with government-controlled local corporations.
Canada should never have allowed Inco, Alcan, Petrokazakhstan, Addax, agri-business Viterra and dozens more resource companies to be picked off. That these deals have been rubber-stamped by Investment Canada does not establish a precedent. These represent disastrous mistakes and a dangerous trajectory.

Here are 14 concrete reasons why. Nexen's purchase will create a Takeover Hit List among Canada's 150 largest corporations, that includes Suncor Energy Inc., Enbridge Inc., Agrium Inc., Cenovus Energy Inc., Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., Teck Resources Ltd., TransCanada Corp., Canadian National Railways, Talisman Energy, Inc., Gibson Energy Inc., Canadian Oil Sands Ltd., Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., Penn West Petroleum Ltd., and Keyera Corp.

Further down the food chain will be Canadian Pacific Railway, Sherritt International Corp., Pembina NGL Corp., Crescent Point Energy Corp., Pembina Pipeline Corp. and ARC Resources Ltd.

Even others like Potash Corporation and Cameco Corp. or Canpotex, protected by Saskatchewan, could succumb eventually and then there are hundreds more private, or privatized, companies that foreigners are buying. A handful of years ago, two companies were snapped up for $9 billion within days by an arm of the Abu Dhabi government and only criticism by myself and others stopped the execution of a strategy to spend $20 billion buying into Canada's energy sector.

Nexen, however, will send a positive signal that Canada is open for business and for sale.

There are also two policies reasons to stop the global spree here:

1. Reciprocity. No entities from a foreign country should be allowed to do anything in Canada that Canadians cannot do in their country. In China's case, this means that only greenfields, or start-ups, can be invested in here and then with strict licensing from the government as is the case there when building a factory or anything. No Chinese can buy stock on the TMX or own shares of a Canadian company, as is the case there unless special government permission is granted. Same applies to real estate.

2. State-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds from all countries must be banned from owning any corporations, real estate or resources in Canada. This is because they are agents of foreign jurisdictions and enjoy sovereign immunity.

Sinopec, for instance, has refused to appear in a Canadian court concerning dozens of outstanding charges against the company involving construction site malpractice that led to the deaths of two workers and injuries to four more in 2007 in Alberta. And this winter a Sinopec official actually said the company wants the Supreme Court of Canada to exempt it from such health and safety actions.

Once Nexen is nixed, the Government of Canada should require full and timely disclosure of any foreign investment activities in future. Any ownership level beyond 5 per cent should be disclosed quarterly and published immediately.

The public, and government, do not understand the extent of the penetration of such investments and has a right to know. Transparency is essential in doing business and is essential in making policy decisions.
Then there are the politics. A recent poll showed that only 11 per cent of Canadians support foreign buyouts by state-owned enterprises.

And fears that disallowing foreign buyouts will lead to less investment in Canada can be laid to rest. After Saskatchewan's Premier successfully fended off the buyout of Potash Corporation, activity increased in the form of greenfields projects or start-ups. These are the only foreign investments that meet the "net benefit" test that Investment Canada is supposed to uphold.

Canada must state clearly that all of its resource-related and infrastructure assets and corporations must be Canadian-owned and controlled and that no single foreign entity can own more than 10 per cent, as is the case with Canadian banks.

Canadian should state that it remains open for ethical, sensible and "net benefit" business. If not, then Canada will simply be a colony waiting to be conquered again.

This article originally appeared in the Financial Post.

 

Follow Diane Francis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@dianefrancis1

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
The proposed takeover of Nexen Inc. by China National Offshore Oil Company, or any other like it, cannot be allowed. If the acquisition of Canada's resource companies is not banned, then Calgary's sky...
The proposed takeover of Nexen Inc. by China National Offshore Oil Company, or any other like it, cannot be allowed. If the acquisition of Canada's resource companies is not banned, then Calgary's sky...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Gnomish
ego doctus ignarus
11:23 AM on 08/05/2012
Our weakness is our leaders not our people,we know what their doing is wrong they refuse to listen.
Harper's reason for being seems to be selling us out!
04:01 PM on 08/02/2012
It seems like Canadians no long have a voice in this country. We’re becoming the minority faster than we realize. Sadly it was Canadians who voted in this dictator who is intent on selling off the rest of what we have built as a nation since the 1800's.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
05:23 PM on 08/01/2012
Let foreign ownership total no more than 49%.it keeps control in canada but encourages investment.Obviously there are some regulation and taxation loopholes that need to be tightened.We need foreign investment and we also need foreigners.I see a canada with 300 million people as a country that would no longer be so "boy scoutish",as a country that could hold its own against foreign hegemony.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reneehoude
05:04 PM on 08/01/2012
We should not sell at 100% but perhaps 20-30%. It must remain under our control.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karen Pottruff
read and surf internet
08:07 AM on 08/02/2012
I like your percentage, better than the previous one at 49%.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PAKALOLO
Hendrix deus est
03:49 PM on 08/01/2012
Once you have Multinationals in place, the rules change. You have less control as a country. International laws apply. How is that good for the average Canadian?
photo
Gnomish
ego doctus ignarus
11:24 AM on 08/05/2012
It's not nor is it in any way meant to be. We are now cattle led to the slaughter!
01:07 PM on 08/01/2012
The first thing NASA looks for when exploring other planets is water. Water is life. If we keep giving away our resources - water will be next on the list. If China owns our oil, when there is a crisis who gets the oil first. The Canadian people already pay more for gas and fuel than other rich oil countries - why can't we smarten up and instead of going down the slippery slope of free trade change it to smart trade. We shouldn't let rich mining companies come in and use our pristine lakes a dumps for iron ore scalings - we shouldnt let a communist country take over one of our major resources - we shouldn't let rich Arab countries tell us what to do.
If we are not careful we will not own anything and end up like Boliva where their resources were shipped out of the country to the death and detriment of the Bolivian people.
Fair trade not free trade.
11:55 AM on 08/01/2012
But first we urgently need a government in Ottawa NOT willing to sell-out to the highest bidders. Squatters in the own land - this is what Canadians are risking becoming.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
06:43 AM on 08/01/2012
Um, I know you're not interested in US takeovers the same way as you are Chinese, but "Canadian National Railways" is not called that now, it's now called CN, because its primarily American shareholders (85%....23% of CN shares are owned by Bill Gates, also) and management (Hunter Harrison) felt that the word "Canadian" on the side of rolling stock was not a good thing in US markets.....and Canadian Pacific Railways is already on the block, and Hunter Harrison now being enlisted, or lobbied at least, to take over its management.....CN may have a flagship HQ in Montreal, but it's run from Omaha...."One Big Railway" will be all that's left, with BNSF shoved into the shadows, and BC Rail, once the continent's third largest railway, now seeing its mainline fall into disuse and the communities which needed it to survive short-shrifted....

And I don't suppose you've given much coverage to the US takeover of BC's remaining hydro resources? Or how Anderson Consulting under its new name took over a huge chunk of BC Hydro? Or how a host of BC government services and crown assets have all been outsourced to US management companies?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
10:17 PM on 07/31/2012
Applause applause - excellent article Diane. If you ever run for the leadership of the Federal Liberals promoting the benefits of Socialism you will have my unwavering support. Bravo!! You have more eloquently made the argument currently made by the likes of the Wall Street Occupyers and the Montreal Student Union Protesters, and many other Canadians in between. Diane, with your experience and insight, you have painted the picture that I too see; the economic, political and independent state of our nation with increased de-regulation. Like the protesters in corporate centres across Canada - I too believe that Canadian resources are the property of all the Canadian Peoples (For The Good of the Common) - Government Treaties, Continental Agreements and Global Corporate Investments be damned! This staunch Diane Francis Federal Liberal Leadership supporter and die hard socialist has a question. "Under our current Confederation- how can Canada balance between the benefits of global investment and international agreements, and at the same time limit government out-sourcing, downsizing and de-regulating? "
10:10 PM on 07/31/2012
If we waited for absolute reciprocity, trade would be at much lower levels than it is presently.

Ms. Francis's protectionist views are well known, and add little to the debate. At points in time, in the past, Canada had much higher levels of foreign ownership, especially in the energy industry. They provided the capital to develop resources that presently benefit Canadians.
Surely Ms. Francis has read her economics 101 . Even if two economies reduce barriers to trade, from differing degrees, the benefits still accrue to both parties.
It's also likely that the proceeds from the sale of Nexen will largely be reinvested in the energy sector.
10:02 PM on 07/31/2012
well there you go ---the editor of the national post talking like an NDP er -----

but now that a right winger has said it ---national ownershiop and stewardship of our natural reources is suddenly a good thing.

you are a little late in the wake up -----but left wing canadians have been saying this for as long as i can remember
09:19 PM on 07/31/2012
An excellent article!!! Very nice work.
Here we are, in the middle of "peak oil", a nation smack dab in the middle of northern climate and we are giving our oil away as fast as we can get it out of the ground. In twenty years we will have to pay ten times the amount we sold our own resource for just to heat our homes.
08:43 PM on 07/31/2012
Maggie Turner Well, if this were a fantasy game, where I had a lot of money, lived somewhere other than North America and wanted to take over North America I would just buy up all the industry related to natural resources (like Dofasco for instance), ship the real jobs overseas to my own country and aim at dominating the local economies from my computer.

I would start with Canada, because the attitudes are provincial, reactionary and head in the sand, with the aim of creating a terrific base of operations right next door to my real target, the United States.

Well, this would be more a nightmare game than a fantasy game.

Mr. Harper has probably thought all of this through so we are safe... probably... right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigLittle
08:32 PM on 07/31/2012
You said it, Ma'am. All Canadians should read this!