Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Diane Francis

GET UPDATES FROM Diane Francis
 

Keystone Kops Will Ruin America's Economy

Posted: 11/16/11 09:10 AM ET

President Barack Obama has kicked the can down the road by postponing permission to build Canada's Keystone oil sands pipeline to Texas until 2013, after the next election.

This decision, in essence, strands the oil sands indefinitely and shuts it out of the U.S. market for years, if not forever.

It's being billed as a temporary setback, but it's a major and devastating development.

The excuse is that a new route is going to be sought to avoid putting pipelines across the aquifer that straddles mid-America.

The reality is that the environmental movement, not an aquifer, that straddles the United States and cannot be circumvented. The Keystone, and Canada's oil sands, has become the environmental movement's line in the sand in a battle to shut down fossil fuel usage even though there are no alternative fuels for 20 or 30 more years.

These 'Keystone Kops' have scored a victory that likely marks the beginning of a de facto pipeline moratorium south of the border. And this could cripple America's economy and energy industries.

Keystone has received approvals over a number of years from dozens of environmental and other government agencies, been scrutinized more than other projects and yet, in the end, has had its permit postponed on environmental grounds.

This postponement -- a rejection by any other name -- whets the appetite of a movement that not only opposes "dirty" oil from Canada, but also fiercely opposes the exploitation of shale gas, or deep natural gas, deposits. They are attacking shale gas even though it generates dramatically lower emissions equivalent to roughly one-quarter that generated by oil.

Already, a week ago the CEO of a major U.S. power utility issued a warning that the massive amounts of shale gas may remain shut in due to the difficulty of getting permission to build pipelines linking the deposits to power plants or consumers. Now, post-Keystone, his warning represents a more frightening specter because a gas pipeline is even more unacceptable to environmentalists than an oil one.

The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Foundation estimates companies will need to build 35,600 miles of big, high-pressure natural gas pipelines between 2011 and 2035 to meet market demands at a cost of $178 billion.

Good luck.

Of course, there are those who would argue that this is just a postponement and not a de facto moratorium on all pipelines. They argue that a Republican president will permit the pipeline.

That's questionable. The biggest obstacle at the end was the legal challenge mounted by the Republican Governor of Nebraska who vowed to fight the pipeline to prevent it from transgressing his state.

Others argue that once a route is found around the aquifer that's acceptable the pipeline will be built.

That's also questionable. There's not a governor anywhere that will want this high profile pipeline routed through his or her state or will want to take on the trans-national, non-state players that power the environmental movement.

Frankly, Canada and Alberta have badly handled the public relations when it comes to Keystone and remediation could help the situation because the White House has opted in favor of its environmental wing at the expense of organized labor one. Canada should guarantee that all the jobs that flow from the oil sands, inside and outside Canada, will be offered to Americans first if Canadians are unable to do the work. And last year, 150,000 visas were extended for that reason.

That, and only that, will up the political ante in Washington and should have been done from the outset. This is more important considering that Obama is likely to win another term due to the mediocre Republican field of candidates.

The other priority is to fast-track the proposed pipeline through British Columbia to the west coast to ship oil to Asian markets. The aboriginal claims must be settled financially and generously as quickly as possible before the trans-national non-state players in the environmental movement organize them and stop the pipeline.

That claims are still lingering represents another failure on the part of governments in Canada.

At the same time, the oil sands production must be refined in Canada in order to back out the importation of crude oil in Eastern Canada. This involves resurrection of the flow rates to Montreal and beyond in order to get bitumen or partially refined oil sands production across the country.

Clearly, shipping oil to the US from out west and importing in the east was an efficient, market-driven energy policy, but the greens and the President of the United States have made that unacceptable for Canada.

- Financial Post

 

Follow Diane Francis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@dianefrancis1

President Barack Obama has kicked the can down the road by postponing permission to build Canada's Keystone oil sands pipeline to Texas until 2013, after the next election. This decision, in essence,...
President Barack Obama has kicked the can down the road by postponing permission to build Canada's Keystone oil sands pipeline to Texas until 2013, after the next election. This decision, in essence,...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 78
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 11/18/2011
Oil is bought and sold on a global market. Same quality--same price, regardless or origin. What we need is a Manhattan Project to find alternatives to our addiction to fossil fuels.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
04:45 AM on 11/18/2011
undefined
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
06:55 PM on 11/17/2011
I'll try again for those who never listen. It is not a boon to anyone but big oil! Once it is out of the ground it can be sold anywhere in the world!! It has nothing to do with oil for America.. Others have said this more eloquently than I could ever do. Remember, once it is out of the ground, no matter what it is, IT CAN BE SOLD ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!
03:20 PM on 11/17/2011
Looking for Nineteenth Century solutions for Twenty First Century problems is at best pathetic and at worst counterproductive and ruinous. Our energy usage is disparagingly gluttonous and ignorant. We use about half of the World’s gasoline to move ourselves around one at a time in vehicles built like Sherman tanks. It’s been 38 years since the first Arab oil embargo and apparently most American have yet to learn anything. To allow the price and availability of one simple commodity to hold this Nation hostage is incredibly stupid. It would appear to an unbiased observer that we are incapable of functioning in a modern economy.

Growing opium poppies here won’t solve the problem of heroin addiction and refining more oil here won’t solve our energy problems. More to the point, given a finite resource, oil, using it inefficiently should be discouraged not enabled. What will our grandchildren say about not having a necessary resource because we were too selfish to change our gluttonous habits and too lazy to be inconvenienced by doing things differently?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
huevos07
The Anti-Beck, Conservative Hunter
08:16 AM on 11/17/2011
Would she support the pipeline running through her neighborhood?

Is she a shareholder?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
04:57 AM on 11/17/2011
A Editor-at-large does not equal Knowledge-at-large.

The issue here is not a pipeline here or a pipeline there or fracking here or fracking there.

The issue is about replacing The Carbon Economy with The Hydrogen Economy and saving the environment through this transitional period.

And this Editor should be training herself in and writing about The Hydrogen Economy.

Here is a prime example.

An 11.2 Megawatt Fuel Cell Park went into operation in Daegu City, South Korea, yesterday as noted here with pictures: http://fuelcellsworks.com/news/2011/11/15/fuelcell-energy-announces-worlds-largest-fuel-cell-park-operating-in-south-korea/ .

That park yields zero pollution.

The Fuel Cells are manufactured by FuelCell Energy, Inc in Danbury, Conn, which begs the question why this scale of clean electricity generation is not occurring in the U.S. or Canada?

The answer is that the Oil Cartel in North America will not permit these plants being built here which would collapse their highly profitable and polluting Carbon Economy.

If the OCCUPY movement incorporated The Hydrogen Economy into their program along with the destruction of Wall Street, a lot more of the population would get involved, that is, if this Editor and others would start promoting the Hydrogen Economy instead of the Carbon Economy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:59 AM on 11/18/2011
Thanks for making the effort to describe this piece of news about Hydrogen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
07:15 PM on 11/19/2011
Thank-you.

You can keep abreast of Fuel Cell and Hydrogen developments at a site that reports daily M-F: http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/ .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:09 AM on 11/18/2011
I appreciate that fuel cells are extremely clean at the point of use. The question arises: How do you get your hydrogen?
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
03:34 AM on 11/17/2011
"The aboriginal claims must be settled financially and generously as quickly as possible before the trans-national non-state players in the environmental movement organize them and stop the pipeline."

Oh come on!

Everybody knows there aren't any Native Americans in Canada.

Why do you think they call themselves Native AMERICANS? Duuh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:11 AM on 11/18/2011
I believe they prefer "First Nations."
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
03:23 AM on 11/17/2011
That's a really smart idea about letting Americans do the work the Canadians don't want to do.

We can be their Mexicans!

I'm telling Herman next time I see him. A great idea like that could totally revitalize his campaign.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
03:04 AM on 11/17/2011
"there are no alternative fuels for 20 or 30 more years"

I have a nice horse I can sell you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
09:38 PM on 11/16/2011
1. "Keystone has received approvals over a number of years from dozens of environmental and other government agencies, been scrutinized more than other projects and yet, in the end, has had its permit postponed on environmental grounds."

The State Department has admitted that the studies done to date were inadequate, and the Supervisor on the Environmental Studies had zero experience in environmental sciences.

2. "They are attacking shale gas even though it generates dramatically lower emissions equivalent to roughly one-quarter that generated by oil."

That is not only false, but getting it out of the ground expends more energy and pollutes more than the production of oil.

. 3. "Canada should guarantee that all the jobs that flow from the oil sands, inside and outside Canada, will be offered to Americans first if Canadians are unable to do the work. And last year, 150,000 visas were extended for that reason."

150,000 ????? BS. There will be approx. 5000 Temporary Jobs and possibly 120 Permanent Jobs created by the pipeline.

3.
09:17 PM on 11/16/2011
ya its as stupid as it gets - but when you need votes on the left it works - workers lose Obama gets votes....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theexperimentisfinished
09:12 PM on 11/16/2011
Keystone cancelled, oil back above 100 a barrell
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
12:39 PM on 11/17/2011
Sounds like extortion to me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:17 AM on 11/18/2011
If the exploitation of the Alberta tar sands is economically sound, the oil will get to some port somewhere. If not, why should we subsidize Canada's oil industry?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theexperimentisfinished
08:32 PM on 11/18/2011
we were not subsidizing Canada's oil industry. They were paying for the pipeline. You are right, the oil will now be sent to Vancouver and shipped to China. Pipelines are the safest form of transporting oil and natural gas.

There are 55000 miles of pipeline running throughout America, when is the last time you heard of an accident?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:25 PM on 11/16/2011
Who pays you? Oil sands have a near net zero energy gain. They are the worst of the worst of fossil fuels. The solvents necessary to make is fluid enough to flow in the pipelines are incredibly hazards to the aquifers they were to trespass.

We should be spending our time and money on green alternatives, not obsessing on the last few drops of oil.
09:18 PM on 11/16/2011
ya right. so the "oil" is somehow not useful here? DUH comes to mind
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:17 PM on 11/16/2011
What part of worst of the worst and near zero net energy gain, don't you understand?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
10:18 PM on 11/16/2011
None of the oil produced in the US has anything to do with the price of gas in the US. All oil goes on the international market where the Oil Companies can jack up the price through speculation on the commodities market. This drill baby drill crap is all propaganda by the International oil companies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:20 PM on 11/16/2011
The Keystone XL pipeline would create no long term jobs. It would enrich a few players. It would also expand the opening up of a wound in the North American landscape unlike anything seen anywhere on Earth. It would raise prices in the US, and it would send our future energy products overseas. Anything, apparently to deny the fact of our overuse and foolish use of the remaining fossil fuels.

www.offthegridmpls.blogspot.com
Realist2011
beware false profits....
08:12 PM on 11/16/2011
Diane, thanks for your article. But, as you can imagine, I have a few questions. First this statement.

"Already, a week ago the CEO of a major U.S. power utility issued a warning that the massive amounts of shale gas may remain shut in due to the difficulty of getting permission to build pipelines linking the deposits to power plants or consumers."

Please provide a link to that statement. I'd like to read the full document.

Now, here's one that is truly problematic for me. You see, I'm not a rabid environmentalist, but I did, and still do have serious questions about the benefits the US was supposed to derive from this pipeline.

"Canada should guarantee that all the jobs that flow from the oil sands, inside and outside Canada, will be offered to Americans first if Canadians are unable to do the work."

Now, see, there's a major problem. I've heard and seen job number from a few thousand to a quarter of a million, but no "hard" numbers. And I wanted to know how many permanent, well-paid positions would be there, long term, for Americans. The above statement tells me that we Americans will get whatever jobs you can't fill with Canadians, in both countries. How generous.The pipeline is a bad deal for the US. It should be cancelled. Build your pipeline in Canada through BC.
09:21 PM on 11/16/2011
questions? This is NOT government boondoggle like Solyndra... if real companies are wiolling to spend billions building the pipeline do ya think they do it with no plan?

we get OIL from the pipeline where we need it.....

Jobs. how many people do ya think it takes to build, and maintain this pipeline - wake up pal
Realist2011
beware false profits....
08:16 AM on 11/17/2011
My eyes are wide open. You're right, it's not like Solyndra. Solyndra represented a failure to pay attention to facts that were available. This pipeline's "facts" are anything but. How many jobs? Sure, there are some groups who will trade the rest of the country for a few temporary construction jobs. I'm not one of them. And yes, TransCanada is spending "billions" to build a pipeline. Is that "American" pipe in those pictures? Of course not. "Zero" effective benefit. Massive potential costs to America. Sorry, my position remains. Build your pipeline in Canada where it belongs.