Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brenda Kenny

GET UPDATES FROM Brenda Kenny
 

The Dangerous Game Of Fear

Posted: 03/19/2013 10:29 am

There is no doubt that public persuasion and influence are powerful tools. But with that knowledge comes responsibility. Fact-based evidence and scientific studies are the way in which our association chooses to engage Canadians about pipeline matters.

However, there are others that prefer to create myths about our industry's safety performance. It seems the intent, or the tactic, is to instill fear in the public and paint our industry as irresponsible operators of critical energy infrastructure.

For the past two years, there has been a manufactured myth circulating that diluted bitumen is corrosive in pipelines. It began with a report created by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). This report tried to "prove" diluted bitumen is more corrosive than conventional crude. We know that this is not true, but it is easy for the public to believe this myth when the report appears to be genuine and scientific. The reality is, many of the allegations in the NRDC report are completely false, including the one about diluted bitumen.

For over 60 years, pipelines have been safely transporting oil and gas products underground with very few incidents. Most of the time, people don't even realize that they are operating beneath our feet. But, manufacturing a myth in the hopes of preventing pipeline projects from accessing new markets and ultimately contributing to our Canadian economy, seems to be a good way for these organizations to put fear and worry into action. And, given the advent of social media, in which the speed of information is measured in nanoseconds, that myth quickly becomes the assumed truth. It's no different than the telephone game you played as a child. The problem is, we are not children and this is not a game.

But, real scientists do not make up myths and they do not take things for granted. They are meticulous. They are thorough. And, they seek answers to tough questions with an unbiased point of view. Organizations, such as NACE International, formerly known as the National Academy of Corrosion Engineers, is a good example of real scientists searching for the truth.

Last fall, NACE International cited 16 studies dating back over 20 years, that compared corrosion rates between conventional crude and diluted bitumen. None of these studies found evidence to determine that diluted bitumen was more corrosive than conventional crude. NACE International is the most recognized, global organization dealing with corrosion matters.

In addition, an independent study completed by Alberta Innovates Technology Future, which engages scientists and other experts, many of whom are world-renown in their areas of study, concluded that there is no increased risk to transporting diluted bitumen versus conventional crude. And finally, if that isn't good enough, our association, the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, commissioned its own report, which looked back over the past 42 years and examined over 40 studies. The findings conducted by the UK-based, internationally renowned Penspen Integrity Group was that diluted bitumen is not more corrosive than conventional crude.

With all this evidence, one would hope that this manufactured myth would finally be laid to rest. But, even if our opponents were finally convinced that diluted bitumen is no more corrosive than conventional crude, other myths could be created in an effort to erode, yet once again, public confidence in our industry.

But, who is accountable for spreading the allegations and myths? If a company knowingly lies to advance its interest, it risks losing its license to operate. Companies are held accountable by laws, regulations, audits, and shareholders. In the public sector, governments are held accountable through elections, as well as checks and balances for transparency and fairness like the Auditor General and the court systems. But, it seems there are very few organizations, such as the NRDC, being held accountable.

From my point of view, these types of tactics are fundamentally counter-productive to creating a rational debate which would help find the right balance between developing our natural resources, protecting the environment and supporting Canadians' quality of life. In this regard, pipelines remain a fundamental mode of transportation to a modern and well-functioning society. When you think about it, if you took a plane, a train, a bus, a car, a bicycle or even walked to work wearing shoes this morning, a pipeline and the products it carries were responsible for making that happen.

Pipeline operators that our association represents take their role very seriously in making sure they deliver oil and gas products as safely and reliably as possible. In 2011, our member companies transported approximately 5.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 1.2 billion barrels of crude oil and refined products. And, 99.999 per cent of that product made it safely to its destination.

The bottom line is this -- the public deserves a healthy debate. At CEPA, we welcome anyone to challenge us. And, to be fair, Canadians should be challenging our opponents, as well.
For more information on pipelines, please visit: www.aboutpipelines.com

Dr. Brenda Kenny
President and CEO,
Canadian Energy Pipeline Association

Loading Slideshow...
  • Total Jobs

    If unhindered, it's estimated that expected investment in the oilsands will result in 100,000 new jobs a year for the next 13 years, either directly or in companies supplying goods and services.

  • Alberta Reaps

    As much as 54% of the benefits accrued from ongoing investments in the Alberta oilsands will stay in Alberta.

  • Ontario Gets Its Share

    Within Canada, the biggest winner outside Alberta is Ontario, which is expected to benefit from 10,000 new jobs per year.

  • B.C. Gets A Little Smaller Share

    British Columbia comes next with approximately 5,400 new jobs per year. Alberta and B.C. are currently locked in a fight surrounding the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, which would carry bitumen from the Alberta oilsands to the B.C. coast for shipping to Asian markets.

  • The Prairies

    The prairies would gain 2,700 new jobs per year.

  • Quebec

    Quebec would benefit from approximately 2,500 new jobs a year.

  • Atlantic Canada

    Atlantic Canada can expect to see approximately 530 jobs a year, says the study.

  • The Rest Of The World

    Other countries will reap approximately 27 per cent of the benefits from continued, expected investment in the oilsands. In the U.S., 8,300 jobs a year

  • The U.S.

    The biggest benefactor of continued investment in the oilsands outside Alberta would be the U.S., with 8,300 new jobs being created each year.But the benefits for the U.S. extend beyond mere jobs alone.

 
FOLLOW CANADA BUSINESS
There is no doubt that public persuasion and influence are powerful tools. But with that knowledge comes responsibility. Fact-based evidence and scientific studies are the way in which our association...
There is no doubt that public persuasion and influence are powerful tools. But with that knowledge comes responsibility. Fact-based evidence and scientific studies are the way in which our association...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:55 PM on 03/25/2013
If the tar pits sludge isn't more corrosive in the pipes then why don't they come out and show us what chemicals they're using in the pipes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert C Lawson
justice & human rights for all
12:15 PM on 03/23/2013
More corrosive? less corrosive?, is miles from the point, fact is this product is! corrosive to the best steel we have, it can and does eat the walls away and where and when can not be predicted at all![this is why your! industry spends millions on
"PIG" surveys every year,and good thing too we say],..It is the product in toto! that is the question, not one part or one product,, all of it!,.please spare us your paid for bafflegab and so obvious deflection moves and try and stay on topic shall we?,..fact is, previous real world experience shows that people like you and those you work for, can not! be trusted as the bottom line is your only concern,when you agree that we can dump heavy oil in your backyard and "sort of" maybe? try and clean it up[and dont], then you may? be entitled to an opnion, otherwise you are just one more! paid hack from an industry that is destroying Alberta as we speak amd wants to move your dirty deals to our homes,,and I will say, not likely that is going to happen given the "usual tactics" and failure to adapt we see from your! employers,,Do it right! Keep it clean! and be![especially this!]responsible!, period!,, cant or wont?. go away and quit wasting our time and money,,we have kids going hungry while you me me,s suck up millions,,get a grip!!
02:10 PM on 03/21/2013
Based on the information you linked(http://www.cepa.com/library/cepa-member-pipeline-integrity-performance) to about the few incidents that have happened in the past:

In 2011, for every 5714km of pipelines there was a leak that year in Canada. There was 108 700km of pipeline back then, a little math would mean 19 spills happened in Canada in 2011. This caused 4,923 square meters to be released into the environment, a barrel is 8 square meters so that makes 615 barrels spilled out of pipelines in Canada for the year 2011.

Are you suggesting this is safe and we should build more pipelines? Will you be accountable if ever it is proven that diluted bitumen does affect the durability of a pipeline when compared to regular crude?
01:34 PM on 03/21/2013
Millions and millions and millions and millions gallons of poisoned water every day and probably billion and billions already poisoned this is the result bitumen cleaning an irrefutable fact this is madness.We should not be even thinking about doing it.Germany has gone alternative and provide better jobs
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
11:50 AM on 03/21/2013
This oil is bad.
It 'promotes' friction.
And it is 'corrosive' to steel.
And its considered 'undervalued' at $60.oo US per barrel.
Anybody "picked up on the sarcasm yet"
Ha!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cityprole
old,sly, crafty,arty, leftie
11:41 AM on 03/21/2013
No one cares what sort of rationalizations you try to perpetuate - no means no, and that is what the people of BC are telling you, and will continue to tell you..
No one cares whether or not one form or dirty oil over another is worse or better...it's all bad during a spill, either on land or in the ocean, and since your company has a terrible reputation for not containing the spills that have already happened on projects you are profiting from, it's hardly surprising that no one believes a word you say, print or advertise...
I'll repeat it again, since you obviously have not received the message...here it is loud and clear NO MEANS NO!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:12 AM on 03/21/2013
Dear Mrs. Kenny, you seem to be labouring under the false impression that the public considers pipeline corrosion rates to be their main concern with running pipelines all over the place, including over fault lines and pristine nature and rocky mountains, then shipping it through dangerous waters. As a side note, pictures of Obama standing in front of corroded Keystone pipeline sections that haven't even been laid yet don't help your argument. No ma'am, people are concerned with your track record.
08:02 AM on 03/21/2013
The bitumen pipelines don't have to be any worse than heavy crude pipelines to be awful. There are regular spills involving heavy crude pipelines that do irrevocable damage to the surrounding environment. The Gulf Coast spill involved heavy crude. Not bitumen. Your argument is facetious at best. Misleading at worst.
photo
NTodd
Aude Sapere
07:55 AM on 03/21/2013
"But, real scientists do not make up myths and they do not take things for granted. They are meticulous. They are thorough. And, they seek answers to tough questions with an unbiased point of view."

We know, but your climate-change-denier friends seem to disagree.
02:08 PM on 03/21/2013
Provide me with the scientific papers (for review) that show a direct correlation to the utilization of hydrocarbons and climate change please.
03:27 PM on 03/21/2013
bit too late, everybody knows it does. Try to keep up.
photo
NTodd
Aude Sapere
04:22 PM on 03/21/2013
Is this the part where I pretend to think you're open-minded enough to bother, and you pretend to know enough about climate science to pooh-pooh what I've posted? Or I show the scientific evidence that backs the correlation and you define away the concept of "correlation"? Been there. Done that. I'm not playing this time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angus12
06:46 AM on 03/21/2013
I expect all the hater below will give up their cars, and remove their furnaces from their homes, get rid of all their clothes and anything else they have that is manufactured by the use of petroleum products, whcih is about everthing on this planet. Start up your wind mills, see were that get you... oh yah the wind mills are made of plastic and metal, which are created by the use of petroleum products. Well good luck trying to live without the evil oil industry.
07:44 AM on 03/21/2013
I think most thinking people would be ready to reduce substantially the petroleum products they use, but it takes the government to organize the massive shift that it involves, since our lifestyles and the organization of society itself is a function of the availability of oil. Stores and work will have to be closer to the average person to eliminate long commutes and reliance on cars. there are companies making a killing selling glass and wood replacement products for plastic. One person scrapping their car when they need it for work, though, will not do anything. If they do change their lifestyle, hypocrites who were previously daring them to do so will just change tactics and call them a weirdo and go on slurping the petrol.
02:11 PM on 03/21/2013
Government oh please!!

It is you using hydrocarbons. Stop using the stuff and there will be no market. Fairly simple don't you think. You pull the masses together and have a non-hydrocarbon week or something like that.

Take responsibility for your actions. Lead by example and stop using the stuff
07:57 AM on 03/21/2013
So in your mind we should just give in and use up all the resources available to us with no consideration to making them last as long as possible because windmills are made of plastic.....hmmmm sound logic.LOL
03:47 AM on 03/21/2013
Are you and your oil hungry kind that depraved to think your green washing of the oil sands and the pipelines will work?
Maybe to the ignorant and bought and paid for Conservatives.
The Canadian public and their children need clean water and air to live.
Not a few that will prosper from the destruction of our lands and water..

The scientific evidence is in, if pipelines are made it is GAME OVER for our planet.

I pray to the Creator every night that people like you wake up.
I also pray that every Aboriginal in Canada and every human being stands up and stops the madness you sell.

How much did they pay for your soul?
03:18 AM on 03/21/2013
Fine. Let's see the report and the CVs of the scientists who wrote it. I want to know for whom they have been/are working. I want to know whether this report was peer reviewed for accuracy. Then we'll talk.
photo
Wild Thing
Say What?!
02:53 AM on 03/21/2013
SOOOO...Enbridge is not a member of CEPA? The "very few incidents" link leads to stats on CEPA's website. Notice in 2010, only 250.6 cubic metres of liquids were reported leaked.

Well, Ms. Kenny, what about Enbridge's incident in July of 2010 where 3300+ cubic metres of diluted bitumen spilled into Talmadge Creek in Michigan, then flowed downstream into the Kalamazoo River? The US EPA later estimated that more than 3800 cubic metres were spilled. That's more than 1 million US gallons.

Your statistic of 4923 cubic metres spilled in 2011 is just large enough to include the huge spill from Plains Midstream Canada’s Rainbow Pipeline, but why stop at 2011? Plains Midstream spilled 475 cubic metres of light sour crude into the Red Deer River in June 2012. Then, later that same month, Enbridge leaked 230 cubic metres near Elk Point, Alberta. And then the next month there was yet another Enbridge spill in Wisconsin. Was 2012 too embarrassing for you to include in your stats?

So, I kept digging, and it looks like the “very few incidents” statement is a flat out lie. In fact, Enbridge alone has apparently had over 800 spills between 1999 and 2010, for a total of 25,000+ cubic metres spilled.

I think this article, and the statistics on your website are a deliberate attempt to mislead. I suggest everyone begin with "The History of Oil Pipeline Spills in Alberta, 2006-2012"
08:01 AM on 03/21/2013
Hey now....Stop trying to use facts. Facts can be used to prove anything. Stick to the Conservative Spin-Doctor story please. Rational thinking is too hard. [/sarcasm]
photo
Wild Thing
Say What?!
10:28 AM on 03/21/2013
I'm a "re-education" refusenik : )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cityprole
old,sly, crafty,arty, leftie
11:43 AM on 03/21/2013
I'd fan you, but that would be redundant..thanks for the research to prove the points...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
02:06 AM on 03/21/2013
We don't care, just keep your crud in Alberta. The west coast of BC will be protected at all cost. That's what you should really be doing a study on.
01:48 AM on 03/21/2013
Of all the reasons to not build Keystone and Gateway, the corrosive quality of dilbit ranks pretty low. Maybe this fear has been overstated. So what? There's still climate change, environmental destruction resulting from mining practices in Alberta, risks of leaks due to other factors, risk of marine spills on BC's coast, the toxicity of dilbit when it is leaked or spilled, and the fact that dilbit sinks, making marine cleanup a nightmare.

There are still lots of really great reasons to oppose Keystone and Gateway.