Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Erika Lust

GET UPDATES FROM Erika Lust
 

Fifty Shades of Male Fantasy? No Thanks

Posted: 07/24/2012 11:33 am

As a fellow creator in the world of sex and erotica, I'm glad when other women in the industry garner great success for their work. Not only does it help to promote our work within the field as a whole, but it offers more female perspective on the topic of sex, which can only be a good thing! So with that in mind, I thought that Fifty Shades of Grey could be a massive help to women authors of erotica to gain some recognition within a widespread audience.


2012-07-24-50shadesresize.jpg


But inevitably, the success of the novels inspired lots of criticism, little of which led me to believe the books had any real merit beyond "being a hot read." What a shame that others in my field not only admitted that, as a cultural phenomenon, the books were considered required reading despite it's terrible quality, but also that they were capitalizing on a very unrealistic story of BDSM. That in turn only furthers the divide between what erotica is being popularized now versus what other women are writing, thereby hurting the cause for women authors rather than supporting it.

In my first piece for the Huffington Post, I wrote about the positive aspects of a BDSM sexual relationship. As I outlined, the most important components to safe and fun kink are open communication and enthusiastic consent, which obviously applies to every other kind of sexual relationships as well. Imagine how dismayed I was then after finding out that this wildly popular series not only represented a relationship devoid of those components, but also some of the most male-driven fantasies and sexual stereotypes!

First, there's the "virgin" thing: I mean how many women out there truly have a romantic notion of the first time after the fact? I recently heard an anecdote that went something like, "sex is a lot like making pancakes, the first one off the griddle is never the best" and for most I think that holds very true. So, this is definitely a male fantasy of initiation. In addition, although Christian, the dominant male protagonist, makes it clear that he wants a BDSM relationship by presenting Anastasia a contract, she never signs it, indicating both a lack of interest in the practice, and refusing to communicate what her needs and preferences were by even negotiating the terms.

Finally, there is the classic element of a woman dealing with abuse (which is essentially what it was, given a lot of his behavior and her refusal to sign the contract or otherwise indicate her consent) with the ultimate goal of saving the damaged man. And that's really the most stunning part of the story to me: suggesting that the only reason Christian practiced BDSM was because he had faced some sort of trauma, which doesn't paint this type of sex in a flattering light at all. How can it simultaneously entice readers by promising erotic scenes of spanking and bondage, whilst simultaneously transmitting the message that you'd have to be sick to enjoy it?

So I guess what I'm actually disappointed by isn't even the bad representation of BDSM, but the use of it as an angle and guise for what is really a story of traditional chauvinist values. The blend of the two very opposite things, and the resulting popularity branding it as mainstream is totally perplexing. It really reminded me of how conflicted I felt after Kathryn Bigelow was awarded Best Director at the Oscars -- so happy that a brilliant woman was finally recognized in an industry dominated by men, with which I can definitely sympathize, and yet disgruntled that it was in recognition of a war movie devoid of any female protagonists or perspective.

Doubtless her direction was brilliant, but I truly wonder whether the masculine subject matter made the decision to award her easier... as opposed to say, Sofia Coppola or Jane Campion, both of whom were nominated for, but failed to receive, the same award in 2003 and 1993 respectively, and whose movies represent more feminist themes and feminine perspectives.

If you're like me, and the whole idea of the popular trilogy just leaves a bad taste in your mouth, I suggest looking into other erotica -- and there is a huge, well-penned selection out there that represents a more fresh and modern take on sex, rather than just a Disney fairytale that's dressed up in leather. A great compilation of suggested titles by sex-educator and blogger Violet Blue are a favourite. And if you're more of a visual person interested in the true sex appeal of BDSM, check out my 2009 short, Handcuffs, filmed in Barcelona and based on true events.

 

Follow Erika Lust on Twitter: www.twitter.com/erikalust

FOLLOW CANADA LIVING
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:48 AM on 07/30/2012
In the book, it is strongly imposed to the reader that BDSM is a lifestyle that happens to be of people only who had suffered physical assault, sexual abuse or nervous breakdown in their childhood. Well, this is so not the case.
The author might have aimed to discredit BDSM -whilst treating many elements so detailed- for some certain reason. Something personal or social.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DocManhattan
01:49 PM on 07/29/2012
Well obviously, in real life, BDSM in the bedroom requires clear consent. But the fantasy does not - abhors it, in fact. And this book is fantasy (obviously). To include passages where the protagonists ask what's OK, establish boundaries and decide on a safe word would make it a very tedious read indeed.

Of course, it may very well be tedious anyway - I haven't read it and don't plan to. But the fact that it is written by a woman and is being bought and enjoyed by women in droves makes the idea from the headline that this is nothing but "male fantasy" an obvious falsehood. I thought that part of the appeal of fantasies like these is the fact that they break the rules of propriety and political correctness and allow the id free reign. Just because it doesn't turn you on doesn't make it wrong.

And as for its literary merit, well, that's an old complaint of any creator. In a world that offers haute cuisine, Shakespeare and Mozart, why do so many prefer McDonald's, Dan Brown and Rihanna? Griping won't change that.
10:42 AM on 07/26/2012
I got this book to see what the hype is about. And then I find out it's all hype.

Yes, it's poorly written but I'm not a literary expert so my thought on that is sort of moot.

As for the sex...I don't see what what women are drooling over. They must have boring sex lives. What a pity for them.
12:02 PM on 07/25/2012
The claiming of Sleeping Beauty, best trilogy ever, seriously, I cannot promote these books enough. They get into the true dynamic of being a top and bottom and what expressions are trying to be reached.
04:51 AM on 07/25/2012
Great review Erika! I also want to share this other piece in Good REads http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/340987215?auto_login_attempted=true it's just hilarious!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cwebster
predominantly exasperated
12:45 AM on 07/25/2012
I lost any interest I might have had in this book when I learned it was originally Twilight fanfic. Then I read some quotes from it. It's seems like extremely bad writing.

There is a lot of good erotica available...why read something just because it's being hyped?
07:23 PM on 07/24/2012
Male fantasies? No no, most readers of this book are women. Who have thoroughly enjoyed what is being portrayed in it. Not men. SO maybe what you classify as "male fantasies" are more shared fantasies. I'm afraid the only person being sexist here is the author of this article. It's kind of annoying how women can generalize all they want about men, make male desires and nature sound like a despicable thing yet they are never accused of being sexist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:20 AM on 07/25/2012
The author is a porn director, so Im pretty sure she's more on the up and up on this stuff than you are. No offense, but as a reader of erotica I can in fact tell when something is male or female perspective and I can enjoy both.
What she is saying is right, it is of the male perspective which is why its interesting that women are picking it up en masse.
Maybe its because THAT book is sold on the front counter of bookstores worldwide but other erotica are kept secretly in the back near the Romance, Mystery, and Fantasy sections?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toofarleft4thisworld
The Right Is So Wrong
01:31 PM on 07/24/2012
female porn can be found in the slew of home renovation shows on TV. my wife eats 'em up but it just makes me feel inadequate. all those guys have bigger tools than me and they know how to use them:)